Luckily, someone smarter than me preserved an Internet Archive version of the original AP story, with the two Oreskes paragraphs intact.
Tag: Naomi Oreskes
Naomi Oreskes’ Tale of Meeting Dr S Fred Singer, Part 1
As I’ve detailed at my “Summary for Policymakers” about Oreskes, she – at minimum – appears to have a credibility problem; the assortment of narratives she offers about her own role…
Guardian: “Climate Deniers” make up Nearly a Quarter of US Congress
Climate believers claim climate skepticism is in decline, that a growing number of people are concerned about climate change. But if this is the case, why are there so many…
Climate Change Killed Your Pets
if people’s dogs started dying, maybe then they would sit up and take notice.
Another Cut and Paste Lawsuit: Pennsylvania Bucks County v. BP PLC, et al.
it is a near-total copy of their Feb 20 “Chicago v BP” lawsuit – see my dissection of that one here. It shares text straight out of others. No joke,…
City of Chicago v. BP PLC
If the case can be made that each – in domino fashion – should be dismissed due to a total lack of evidence for the claims about ‘industry-paid shill climate…
“97% Consensus” — What Consensus?
It appears that Cook and his co-authors manipulated the data to present an altogether untrue narrative of overwhelming support for catastrophic human-caused warming.
Climate Hypocrisy Wednesday Part Two: It’s Not Hypocrisy if Your Heart is Pure
I believe I can sum up the following bafflegab in three short bullet points.
What I Learned about What Exxon Knew
This essay is the nuclear fallout emergent from that small spark.
Claim: Anti-ESG Investment State Leaders Have Conflicts of Interest
According to Naomi Oreskes, personal fossil fuel investments by politicians leading ESG divestment constitute a conflict of interest.
Being Disagreeable – At Christmas
It is increasingly difficult to articulate a sceptical perspective on catastrophic human-caused climate change and other such issues.
The Big Naomi Oreskes Hole in PBS Frontline’s Part 3 “The Power of Big Oil” Train Wreck
If the Frontline program was an actual investigative news outlet instead of an apparent propaganda pusher for narratives from enviro-activists which were never questioned, they could turn their focus 180°…
“CBS Sunday Morning” Puts all its Eggs in Chicken Little’s ‘Reposition Global Warming as Theory (Not Fact)’ Basket
Attorney General Tong’s assertion of Exxon knowing in 1982 that “as the levels of carbon dioxide rise, the temperature of our atmosphere will rise” is contradicted by Exxon’s own 1982…
Study: 3% Contrarians Derailing the 97% Climate Consensus
According to a new study, the credibility of the alleged 97% climate consensus is so fragile, the 3% who dissent are completely disrupting climate action. And Naomi Oreskes is really…
Claim: More Work Required to Study “Settled” Climate Science
Last Halloween, Naomi Oreskes unsettled the climate community by suggesting the work of WG1 scientists is done, and that they should move on to other fields. Climate scientist have now…
Naomi Oreskes Slams Big Oil Climate Change Ads
Naomi Oreskes, who believes that Climate Change is a problem, has written a dramatic expose of old Big Oil ads which actually told the truth about global warming.
Halloween Horror: Naomi Oreskes Just Called for WG1 Climate Science to be Shut Down
Naomi Oreskes: – “if human-made warming is as unequivocal as these scientists insist, then why do we need more reports to tell us the same thing?”.
Music to Soothe the Climate Denial Away?
Climate activist Naomi Oreskes now has her own theme song, after the University of Utah commissioned a musician to compose a song about climate denial, to convince people to read…
Why Would Naomi Oreskes Be On Retainer With Any Law Firm?
Just askin’. When the defendant energy companies’ law firms start that kind of probing, they may see how Oreskes’ errant and inconsistent narratives are a gift on a silver platter…
Academics Blame Lower Trust In Scientists On Everything But Bad Scientists
The mistake the paper makes is assuming scientists’ expertise is always better than people’s. Sometimes yes, sometimes no. But never always.