Many Happy Returns. The Stern Review Turns 20 and Weather Losses Come in $2.8 Trillion Under Its Forecast

The Guardian says Stern underestimated the economic consequences of climate change. Weather losses came in at 0.18% of world GDP in 2025 against his projected 0.41%, $2.8 trillion short over…

Stormy Weather?

But it’s revealing of how isolated the chattering classes are from the real world.

Storm Boelo

This is what happens when you give storms silly names; it was precisely why the Met Office started it in 2015.

On The Criteria For Falsifying A Scientific Hypothesis

If the ACE data reflected in this chart are the criteria on which the “more and more severe storms” theory can be falsified, then I can’t see how that hypothesis…

Wrong, TIME, One Nor’easter Isn’t Proof of Climate Change

TIME starts with a storm, asks how climate change made it worse, and then assembles quotations supporting that premise while relegating contradictory evidence to a few sentences. That’s not how…

“More And More Severe Storms”: When Can We Declare This Hypothesis To Be Definitively Falsified?

The fact is that the claim (hypothesis) that warmer temperatures lead to more frequent and more severe hurricanes has already been falsified, whether they will admit it or not. By…

Was Storm Eowyn Worse than the Great Storm of 1987?

This dishonesty goes well beyond mere gaslighting. To suggest Eowyn was worse is an outright lie.

PBS News Is Wrong, Climate Change Is Not Causing Georgia’s Drought

The PBS “journalists” should be ashamed of the slant of this coverage. They offered no pushback whatsoever on the suggestion that Georgia’s drought was unprecedented or part of a pattern…

London Heat Adaption Event Cancelled by a Heatwave

Apparently the adaption event venue needed more adaption.

Claim: Climate Change Could Make Hailstorms Worse

So what is the point of solar panels?

At The Heartland Climate Conference: “What Is The Proof?”, Extreme Weather Events Edition

You will not be surprised to learn that for most every claim of the climate cabal, the proof is lacking.

March Madness: When ‘Record Heat’ Caused by ‘Climate Change’ is Just a Stuck Weather Pattern

In case you haven’t noticed, the media is stupid when it comes to weather.

WRONG, Chicago Tribune, Climate Change Isn’t Making Hailstorms Worse

The Chicago Tribune failed in its journalistic duty of producing a story grounded in facts. Instead of merely reporting on the danger and human interest aspects of the recent severe storms, they…

When the Weather Turns, Permitting Failure Gets Expensive

We need a permitting framework that is rigorous but workable, environmentally responsible, and decisive. One that allows critical infrastructure to be evaluated thoroughly and then, once approved, actually built and…

Good News, Everyone! Extreme Weather Isn’t Getting Deadlier – Despite What the Media Says

The real story of extreme weather is not one of failure, but of resilience. Adaptation has outpaced hazard—not the other way around.

Deconstructing the Myth: “More Energy in the System Means More Extreme Weather”

The climate system is not an oscillator. It has oscillatory components, but the whole system is a gradient-driven heat engine. It moves energy from where there is a lot of…

What Climate Science Actually Says About Extreme Weather

2025 Climate Speaker – Roger Pielke, Jr. (The Honest Broker)

Tell the Truth, The Guardian and NBC, High Weather Disaster Costs Aren’t Due to Climate Change

As should be obvious to any honest observer exercising the least bit of common sense, the reason for rising disaster costs is clear, the expanding bullseye effect.

Climate Change Is Not to Blame for the Rising Costs of Natural Disasters, NBC

However, there is no real-world data showing such disasters are becoming more common or deadly, or any indication whatsoever that human greenhouse gas emissions cause or contribute to them. Nor…

Hail No! NBC, Climate Change Isn’t Making Hail More Damaging

NBC’s hailstorm climate segment is a masterclass in misleading science communication and seems to be more about funding than science.