Corals, John Brewer Reef, GBR by Jennifer Marohasy

Coral Reefs are as Good as Dead, so We Don’t have to Try Anymore?

Essay by Eric Worrall

But, but, there is still hope if we restrict fishing, reduce runoff pollution, and immediately commit to reducing CO2 emissions.

The end of coral reefs as we know them

Years ago, scientists made a devastating prediction about the ocean. Now it’s unfolding. 

By Benji Jones@BenjiSJones  Apr 26, 2024, 7:15am EDT

More than five years ago, the world’s top climate scientists made a frightening prediction: If the planet warms by 1.5 degrees Celsius, relative to preindustrial times, 70 to 90 percent of coral reefs globally would die off. At 2°C, that number jumps to more than 99 percent. 

In not so great news, the planet is now approaching that 1.5°C mark. In 2023, the hottest year ever measured, the average global temperature was 1.52°C above the preindustrial average, as my colleague Umair Irfan reported. That doesn’t mean Earth has officially blown past this important threshold — typically, scientists measure these sorts of averages over decades, not years — but it’s a sign that we’re getting close.

What’s become increasingly clear is that climate change doesn’t just deal a temporary blow to these animals — it will bring about the end of reefs as we know them. 

Will there be coral reefs 100 years from now?

In the next few decades, a lot of coral will die — that’s pretty much a given. And to be clear, this reality is absolutely devastating. Regardless of whether snorkeling is your thing, reefs are essential to human well-being: Coral reefs dampen waves that hit the shore, support commercial fisheries, and drive coastal tourism around the world. They’re also home to an incredible diversity of life that inspires wonder.

Ultimately, the only real solution is reducing carbon emissions. Period. … “We really have no choice but to stop climate change.”

Scientists also see an urgent need to curb other, non-climate related threats, like water pollution and intensive fishing. “To give corals the best possible chance, we need to reduce every other stressor impacting reefs that we can control,” Manzello told Vox. 

These efforts alone will not save reefs, but they’ll buy time, experts say, helping corals hold on until emissions fall. If those interventions work — and if countries step up their climate commitments — future generations will still get to experience at least some version of these majestic, life-sustaining ecosystems.

Read more: https://www.vox.com/climate/24137250/coral-reefs-bleaching-climate-change

The 70-90% death rate prediction, let alone the 99% death rate prediction, doesn’t pass the smell test.

If the ocean warms a few degrees, beyond current reef survivability, coral organisms will just migrate slightly further away from the equator.

Reef coral is highly mobile.

The adult form of coral is immobile, but every year, when conditions are right, coral produces uncounted billions of highly mobile microscopic larvae which seek out new locations to colonise. Coral is continuously probing the boundaries of its range, and establishing new colonies when conditions permit.

And that range of acceptable conditions is enormous. I live on the southern edge of the Coral Sea on the East Coast of Australia. There are plenty of suitable sites to the south of me, stretching well over a thousand miles South, which could be colonised overnight by coral if the water was a little warmer. That water near my home is too cold for swimming much of the year – but coral does just fine in the waters off my section of the coast. The Great Barrier Reef which starts near where I live stretches thousands of miles North into the sun drenched bathtub warm waters of the tropics.

Further evidence of reef adaptability is that reefs like the Great Barrier Reef have only been in their current location for a few thousand years. During the great melt which marked the end of the last ice age, when in just a few thousand years sea level rose over 300ft, the reef had no problem keeping up with the rising sea level, and immediately colonised former coastland which were inundated by the rising seas. In fact, during the Holocene Optimum, around 6000 years ago, when sea level was around 6ft higher than today, the Great Barrier Reef occupied parts of coastal Australia which are now dry land.

If you want to see the limits of modern coral adaptability, there are corals growing in the Persian Gulf which tolerate sea water temperatures > 36C / 97F.

Even the dinosaur killer asteroid failed to kill off coral. Coral survived mile high tsunamis, earthquakes and volcanic upheavals which blackened the skies and poisoned the waters of the Earth, and also survived the billions of tons of mud and organic detritus which must have gushed into the oceans when those mile high Tsunamis receded. Much of the organic detritus washed from the land by giant tsunamis would have been caught in coastal areas, and would have rapidly rotted and turned stagnant, releasing nitrates and toxic chemicals into the shattered remains of the world’s coral reefs.

Yet coral survived all this and recovered.

Then there was the Palaeocene – Eocene Thermal Maximum. That temperature excursion was so extreme, one recent theory which tries to explain the PETM temperature excursion is a close encounter with another star perturbed Earth’s orbit, causing radical changes to the global climate.

At least 5-8C hotter than today. Yet coral survived the PETM – the lack of abundance was because of geography, not because of survivability.

Paleobiological Traits That Determined Scleractinian Coral Survival and Proliferation During the Late Paleocene and Early Eocene Hyperthermals

Anna M. WeissRowan C. Martindale
First published: 21 January 2019

This article was corrected on 18 MAR 2019. See the end of the full text for details.

Abstract

Coral reefs are particularly sensitive to environmental disturbances, such as rapid shifts in temperature or carbonate saturation. Work on modern reefs has suggested that some corals will fare better than others in times of stress and that their life history traits might correlate with species survival. These same traits can be applied to fossil taxa to assess whether life history traits correspond with coral survival through past intervals of stress similar to future climate predictions. This study aims to identify whether ecological selection (based on physiology, behavior, habitat, etc.) plays a role in the long-term survival of corals during the late Paleocene and early Eocene. The late Paleocene-early Eocene interval is associated with multiple hyperthermal events that correspond to rises in atmospheric pCO2 and sea surface temperature, ocean acidification, and increases in weathering and turbidity. Coral reefs are rare during the late Paleocene and early Eocene, but despite the lack of reef habitat, corals do not experience an extinction at the generic level and there is little extinction at the species level. In fact, generic and species richness increases throughout the late Paleocene and early Eocene. We show that corals with certain traits (coloniality, carnivorous, or suspension feeding diet, hermaphroditic brooding reproduction, living in clastic settings) are more likely to survive climate change in the early Eocene. These findings have important implications for modern coral ecology and allow us to make more nuanced predictions about which taxa will have higher extinction risk in present-day climate change.

Key Points

  • There is no extinction of coral genera in the late Paleocene; however, there are extinctions at the species level
  • Differences in habitat, reproductive strategy, diet, coloniality, and photosymbiotic ability make some corals more susceptible to extinction than others
  • The early Paleogene is an important case study in how coral communities survive extreme environmental perturbations
Read more: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2018pa003398

Given the evidence of coral survival during the PETM, 5-8C hotter than today, and the modern day extremophile descendants of that warm epoch which thrive in the Persian Gulf, how can anyone seriously claim a 2C global temperature rise will kill 99% of all Coral?

Nothing we are doing to the planet is any kind of threat to the survival of Coral and Coral reefs. At worst, a few species might be outcompeted by other corals, a dance of survival which has occurred unchecked since modern corals first appeared over 200 million years ago.

5 34 votes
Article Rating
47 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Halla
April 29, 2024 10:27 am

But of course it is different this time. Beasties that survived much warmer temperatures did so because the warming was Natural, not man made. Only man made events count.
And if you believe that, do you want to invest in my voodoo acupuncture venture?

Scarecrow Repair
Reply to  Tom Halla
April 29, 2024 10:32 am

Does it come with a bridge?!? Cuz I could really use a bridge right now! C’mon, man, throw in a bridge!

Tom Halla
Reply to  Scarecrow Repair
April 29, 2024 10:37 am

Fresh out of Brooklyn Bridge Company stock, but I do have magic beans.

steveastrouk2017
Reply to  Tom Halla
April 29, 2024 1:34 pm

Ah you must be a stalker

bo
Reply to  Scarecrow Repair
April 29, 2024 7:36 pm

Do you live in Baltimore?

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Scarecrow Repair
April 30, 2024 9:42 am

A bridge in a swamp.

Dave Fair
Reply to  Tom Halla
April 29, 2024 10:51 am

As part of my non-drug pain management regimen at the U.S. VA they offered me a 12-session acupuncture routine. At the end of it, they offered me something they called “battlefield acupuncture.” They really hated it when I kept referring to it as “bayonet acupuncture.”

gezza1298
Reply to  Tom Halla
May 1, 2024 8:08 am

Amazing how nature can tell which air molecule has heated because of us and which is natural and react accordingly. It is a bit like how each renewable electron knows which house is on a green energy tariff and goes there.

Rud Istvan
April 29, 2024 10:35 am

It is amazing how many times alarmists have recycled the coral reef canard—as if it hadn’t been fully refuted every time before,
Well written riposte, EW.

Reply to  Rud Istvan
April 29, 2024 10:49 am

Almost as often as the Arctic being ice-free by 2000, 2004, 2008, 2011, 2013, 2018, 2020, er..soon, I tell ya

Reply to  Redge
April 30, 2024 9:26 am
AGW is Not Science
April 29, 2024 10:36 am

We couldn’t kill coral reefs at the Bikini Atoll with hydrogen bombs, but now a 1.5 degree change in AVERAGE temperature (read:mostly overnight LOW temperatures not getting as COLD, not by “hotter” weather) is going to permanently destroy 99% of coral reefs?! I mean, who is stupid enough to believe this bullshit?!

I’m so sick of this nonsense.

Reply to  AGW is Not Science
April 29, 2024 12:33 pm

I mean, who is stupid enough to believe this bullshit?!

“There are some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual could believe them.” ― George Orwell

Reply to  Mumbles McGuirck
April 30, 2024 4:19 am

Great quote.

Mr.
Reply to  AGW is Not Science
April 29, 2024 1:40 pm

And according to some studies, the planet has already warmed up by more than 1.5C since the end of the Little Ice Age.

So we better make the “catastrophic warming” point a bit higher, say 2 degrees C?

(Aw stuff it, let’s stop rooting around and make it 15C just to be sure 🙂 )

M14NM
Reply to  AGW is Not Science
April 30, 2024 7:29 pm

“I’m so sick of this nonsense.”

+1

Ron Long
April 29, 2024 10:37 am

Die, reef, die! The Devonian Bootstrap fm. is dead reef debris, and the Carlin type gold deposits, in Nevada, love it. By the way, limestone is the product of debris shed from reefs, and sometimes the reef itself. Show me a limestone debris flow horizon in the Devonian Popovich fm, an Eocene intrusion, and start digging the gold. Sorry.

John Hultquist
April 29, 2024 10:38 am

These scare stories seem to be getting more shrill and desperate as the time to save the world approaches. Is it 2030 or 2050?
CO2 concentration long ago passed the 350 that was decided in 2008 [How was that determined?]. Arctic Ocean ice is still there. Polar Bears thrive. Antarctica ice has not collapsed. Carbon-based fuels still rule. And temperature is at or beyond the 1.5 C. degree rise sure to destroy the planet. That’s another number with no provenance. And so on.
I sense the “green” race to save Earth from CO2 is a rapidly inflating bubble. When 2030 appears, there will be thousands of folks needing mental health counseling.

Reply to  John Hultquist
April 29, 2024 11:32 am

Change a few words and it’s Pure Chicken Little Speak:

     “Science has made a devastating prediction. Now it’s unfolding
     and will bring about the end of the planet as we know it. That
     we will all die is pretty much a given. This reality is absolutely
     devastating. Ultimately, the only solution is reducing carbon
     emissions Period. “We really have no choice but to stop climate
     change.” These efforts alone will not save us  but will buy time,
     experts say.”



Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  John Hultquist
April 30, 2024 10:20 am

Can’t wait to see how they respond with the upcoming global cooling trend. It is coming. Will it be glaciation? Unknown, but the solar grand minimum is coming, the magnetic fields are shifting and volcanic activity, although minor in degree, is on an uptick. These have coincidental alignments in past cooling phases. Coincidental because correlation and/or causation have not been definitively proven.

Duane
April 29, 2024 11:20 am

If last year was truly the “hottest year ever”, and 70-90% of corals will die due to a temperature change relative to 200 years ago (and the significance of 200 years ago is?) that is identical to what we experienced last year, then ipso facto, 70-90% of all coral reefs in the world have already died, right?

So has this been documented yet? Where are all the dead coral reefs?

ferdberple
April 29, 2024 11:42 am

Coral is mostly CaCO3. This is (CaO)+(CO2).

By weight, coral is almost 1/2 carbon dioxide. Like greening forests, the more carbon dioxide you add to the ocean the more limestine will precipitate out.

Acidification only exists if you are a chemistry ignoramous, and failed to account for buffering due to salt in the oceans.

Reply to  ferdberple
April 30, 2024 12:34 am

Eco alarmists are ignoramuses by definition.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  ferdberple
April 30, 2024 10:22 am

Reducing the pH from 8.4 to 8.3 is not, technically, acidification. But acid people know and know to be scary. Reducing the pH or alkalinity is not alarming at all.

ferdberple
April 29, 2024 11:45 am

If warming is bad for coral how come only the warmest places in Australia have the Great Barrier Reef.

Mr.
Reply to  ferdberple
April 29, 2024 1:47 pm

The opposite (North-Western) side of the Australian continent also has numerous coral reefs just offshore.

Many divers regard these reefs as more luxuriant than the GBR.

(I’ve only sampled diving on the GBR, so can’t offer a personal opinion of the WA reefs)

Duane
April 29, 2024 11:45 am

Aside from coral moving around, they also adapt. Which is why there are coral reefs in a rather wide range of climate and temperature, from 30 deg N to 30 deg S across the entire planet … and of course, all that range is what constitutes the tropics and subtropics, centered on the equator which has the warmest waters of all.

The notion that warmer water would be a problem for corals flies in the face of all data and (un)common sense. It’s like saying that warm water fish species (both salt and fresh) would be threatened by warmer waters, rather than, say, cold water fish species.

Much as the warmunists claim that rising sea levels will harm corals, “drowning” them, so to speak. When it is well known that virtually all corals are shallow water species, not deep water species. So if and as sea level rises, corals just follow right along with whereever the shallower waters are located.

Which is why the Florida peninsula, for example, which is very flat and for the most part not far above mean sea level, is comprised almost entirely of flat beds of limestone, even in the center of the state. Florida of course is regularly, on a geologic timescale, either inundated completely during interglacials … or the peninsula expands to hundreds of miles wide during glaciations, as has been the case throughout the Pleistocene and now Holocene.

Per National Science Foundation:

During the ice ages of the Pleistocene, the Florida Peninsula regularly grew to twice its current size as glaciers expanded near the planet’s poles, only to be reduced to a series of islands as melting ice returned to the sea during warm periods.

They just make up this crap.

Ed Zuiderwijk
April 29, 2024 11:45 am

Someone ought to provide Mr Benji S Jones with a few brochures advertising scuba diving at the GBR.

Rud Istvan
April 29, 2024 1:00 pm

I got to thinking about coral diversity, so did some quick research.

There are 20 coral genera comprising in total about 6000 species.
All near surface reef corals also have endosymbiont zooxanthellae providing coral polyps with food via photosynthesis. They comprise 7 genera. By far the most important for coral reefs is Symbodinium, which has just 25 species—but a huge number of distinct phylotype subspecies (thousands) determined by epigenetics. No different than the many epigenetic types of Americas dry beans (white, black, red, navy, pinto, kidney….) are all genetically the same plant P. Vulgaris.

The chance that global warming would ‘kill 50% at 1.5C or 99% at 2C of all corals’ is zero. Anyone stating otherwise obviously does not know what they are talking about. But that is typical of climate alarmists

April 29, 2024 1:24 pm

I said this on the previous coral bleaching post. Air has a miniscule heat content compared to water so how can air have any measurable impact on ocean temperatures?

Duane
Reply to  MIke McHenry
April 29, 2024 2:20 pm

Correct – the atmosphere does not heat the oceans – the sun heats the oceans then the oceans heat (or cools) the atmosphere.

Rud Istvan
Reply to  Duane
April 29, 2024 3:08 pm

But the atmosphere (via clouds) does control how much the Sun heats the ocean. It’s complicated.

Reply to  Rud Istvan
April 29, 2024 6:49 pm

They don’t includethe Sun or the clouds in the IPCC models.

Mr.
April 29, 2024 1:33 pm

The natural history ignorance (or denialism) is always on full display with the Climate Catastrophe Cult.

And also Eric, in addition to –
“around 6000 years ago, when sea level was around 6ft higher than today, the Great Barrier Reef occupied parts of coastal Australia which are now dry land”

In earlier cycles of sea-level rise and fall, the GBR proper was out at the continental shelf, and all the coastal plains were dry land.

The tops of the hills on the coastal plains now present as the Whitsunday Islands Group.

John Aqua
April 29, 2024 1:50 pm

To think that planetary air temperature increasing by 1.5 C, will uniformly change the temperature of the oceans over the entire globe, and kill coral, is preposterous! What kind of person would think this and actually put this drivel in writing which is easily refuted? “Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.” Abraham Lincoln.

April 29, 2024 2:59 pm

If the ocean warms a few degrees, beyond current reef survivability, coral organisms will just migrate slightly further away from the equator.

It can’t. The Barrier Reef already reaches the 30C limit. Earliest measurements from 1870 show that it reached 30C then and still usually reaches the 30C.

Moreton Bay off Brisbane at 27S had abundant coral when it was warmer than present time. Coral thrives in warm waters not cold.

The current Barrier reef would have been mostly dry land 20,000 years ago so what exists now above 120m depth has developed over the past 20k years.

Streetcred
Reply to  RickWill
April 29, 2024 4:26 pm

Moreton Bay still has substantial coral.

Mr.
Reply to  Streetcred
April 29, 2024 4:38 pm

The reefs just south west of Peel Island used to be great fishing.
Did a Capt Cook there one day and ran aground on the coral reef.
But that’s why high tides were invented – to get numpties like me out of embarrassing situations.

aussiecol
April 29, 2024 4:14 pm

I thought most of the warming was happening in poles and not the tropics?
And how does coral survive in the Red Sea which has much warmer waters than other coral habitats?

April 29, 2024 4:16 pm

As I write this, none of the CAGW enthusiasts have made a comment. If even they won’t back it up, maybe the alarmist press should stop flogging this particular dead horse.

ntesdorf
April 29, 2024 4:32 pm

“If the ocean warms a few degrees, beyond current reef survivability, coral organisms will just extend slightly further away from the equator.”

KlimaSkeptic
April 29, 2024 7:07 pm

The Earth’s temperature was for large part of the last 600 millions of years
10° C warmer than today, and CO2 concentrations were at times 1000’s of ppm, so how did the corals survive? The 1.5° C “limit” these warmist alarmists are threatening us with, has no scientific bases! It is just a number someone pulled out of their derier.

Ed Zuiderwijk
Reply to  KlimaSkeptic
April 30, 2024 1:40 am

Such logic! But logic has nothing todo with it. The green mind misses the concept or is hostile to it.

Personally I wonder how corals survive in the Red Sea, which is some 5 degrees warmer than the equatorial oceans.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Ed Zuiderwijk
April 30, 2024 10:25 am

It’s a Red state (aka Republican) so survival is better than in a Blue state. Green is technically not a shade of blue, but I am going to say so anyway.

Ireneusz
April 30, 2024 10:48 am

comment image
comment image

Ireneusz
April 30, 2024 10:56 am

comment image

Verified by MonsterInsights