Guest essay by Eric Worrall
h/t JoNova; Britain has 200 trillion cubic feet of frackable gas in Lancashire. But the climate obsessed British Government would rather pay sky high prices to Russia, than develop available domestic resources.
How Britain’s fracking industry was regulated into irrelevance
13 February 2022, 5:00pm
Andrew MontfordThis week the fracking company Cuadrilla announced that it was permanently closing its two shale mines in Lancashire, after the Oil and Gas Authority (OGA) declared that shale gas companies must seal up the wells they had drilled and return the land to nature.
It is, on the face of it, a very strange step to take at this time. The wells have not been producing any gas for some years, of course, ever since environmentalists launched their scare campaign against the industry. It was a campaign that was astonishing in its brazenness. Tiny earth tremors recorded near the wells, of a scale that is entirely normal in, say, the mining industry or in geothermal energy developments were rebranded by activists ‘earthquakes’. The chemicals used – all licensed as entirely safe by the Environment Agency – were declared to be dangerous poisons. In one particularly egregious case, householders were given leaflets which claimed that the gas companies were going to use industrial quantities of a known carcinogen called ‘silicon dioxide’. That’s sand, in common parlance.
…
This being the case, how can we explain the decision to seal the wells up? In fact, it makes sense if you take a look at the OGA’s remit. In this extraordinary document, you will find no mention of any duty to ensure that operators aren’t cutting corners. There is nothing about making sure that they deliver for consumers, nor even anything about national energy security (another issue of pressing urgency, given Mr Putin’s machinations). Instead, the role that government has given it revolves entirely around delivering Net Zero. Put bluntly, the OGA is more about closing the industry down than regulating it.
When the price cap on domestic energy bills is lifted in a few weeks’ time, there is likely to be a great deal of anger. If people learn that the government’s political cowardice has been making things worse, a major political backlash is on the cards.
…
Read more: https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how-britain-s-fracking-industry-was-regulated-into-irrelevance
Fracking likely does cause small 1.5 Richter Earth tremors – too small to notice. I defy anyone genuinely notice an Earthquake below 2-3 on the Richter scale without sensitive instruments. The only Earthquake I ever personally noticed was a 5.4. At the time I didn’t even realise it was an Earthquake – for a few seconds it was like the wind suddenly picked up, all the trees started rustling. Then it stopped. I’ve been in other Earthquakes, but that was my only experience of noticing something unusual when the event occurred.
The Richter scale is logarithmic. Each whole number on the scale is 31.7x stronger than the previous whole number. The 5.4 I barely noticed was 700,000 times stronger than the 1.5 Earthquakes environmentalists claim are a problem.
A lot of Britons think embracing Net Zero is the right course. But even if you think gas is a short term stopgap, surely it makes more sense to allow British domestic resources to be exploited until they are no longer needed, rather than feeding money into President Putin’s Ukrainian peacekeeping budget.
Needless to say, British ‘journalists’ covering the net zero story have never said what Britain’s CO2 contribution is. One would have thought that was a starting point – “We need to move to net zero because we currently emit X amount of CO2”.
But, even today, there is no mention to be found of this salient fact in the media. And this why: Britain’s CO2 contribution to the global atmosphere is…..0.000012%.
You can imagine the hard sell net zero would be for Boris Johnson if this ever got out. But the press are keeping shtum – even the science correspondents won’t go near this story.
https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/news/local-news/huge-solar-farm-planned-fields-6616074
The right way to look at is, Britain is doing about 450 million tons a year out of a global total of about 37 billion tons. So a bit over 1%.
Sometimes people point out that Britain also imports, and the CO2 burden of imports is about another 200 million tons. However, to be consistent, you’d also have to deduct the CO2 of its exports to get to the net.
To make this clear, consider Britain and the world with rounded figures
500 million – British emissions in Britain
200 million – British emissions on imports, emitted in ROW
37 billion – Total Global Emissions in-country
If you don’t take account of imports, ROW emissions will be 36.5 bilion.
If you raise UK emissions to allow for imports, ROW emissions must fall to 36.3 billion.
Suppose now that British exports carry a CO2 burden of 300 million. Then to avoid double counting ROW emissions must rise by this amount. They will be not 36.3 billion but 36.6 billion.
To make this all balance, net UK emissions must fall to 500-300+200=400.
People often argue, eg in the Guardian, that Britain is doing more than its local emissions because imports. But they never go on and allow for exports. And they also never draw the logical conclusion of proposing banning imports, particularly from China. I guess they like their iPhones too much…
Some people simply do no homework, like Greta, or went to a UK Skool.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/02/02/uk-pm-boris-johnson-duped-by-uk-activists-climate-slides-climate-depots-point-by-point-rebuttal-to-help-deprogram-the-propaganda-johnson-absorbed/#comment-3447189
Follow the UK money trail to see why….
Just in case someone hasn’t said it yet – or to emphasize it even more if they have said this:
“Gooder and harder.” Twits.
Fracking Britain was rejected by local opposition because they did not want their ground water polluted and all their fresh water being diverted to fracking. It was NOT because govt “net zero” policies, which only came about a lot more recently when Bojo got a new leg-over who converted him from getting rid of Green Crap to promoting insane “net zero” crap.
Clearly Jo Nova knows sod all about Britain, british politics, or british gas.
Leaving this gas in place is a great gift to the great-grandkids. They can sell it to the Russians.
Just plonk all these fond Green machinations under the heading of ‘Curtailment’-
What is renewable energy curtailment and how does it affect rooftop solar? – ABC News
Curtailment is nobody’s fault according to perfessor Adams-
I think people in general were quite dismayed to find that they were doing [curtailment],
They couldn’t have been warned that this was happening, because it’s such an emerging issue. Ten years ago, no-one could have imagined we’d be seeing this.
They’d chosen to put a solar system on the roof and most seemed to feel like they’d done that for a few reasons, including financial, but also thinking they were doing the right thing environmentally.
It was a bit of disappointment they didn’t know this was an issue. No-one had told them. It felt a bit like punishment.
Seems the good perfessor needs a lesson in the fallacy of composition and its predictability not to mention a fundamental axiom of engineering that you can’t make a reliable system from unreliable componentry.
So the Beatles may soon get their “Four thousand holes in Blackburn, Lancashire“?