Fernanda Leite, Associate Professor, Sustainable Systems Construction Engineering and Project Management Program Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering The University of Texas at Austin

University of Texas Professor Demands More Renewables

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

According to University of Texas Associate Professor Fernanda Leite, last winter’s Texas ice storm which knocked out the state’s wind turbines and caused widespread power outages proves more renewables are required.

Nov 23, 2021

We All Must Rise to the Challenge of Climate Change

By: Fernanda Leite 

Columns appearing on the service and this webpage represent the views of the authors, not of The University of Texas at Austin.

We’re feeling the impacts of climate change all around us. Rising temperatures are changing our landscapes and livelihoods. The Great Barrier Reef is suffering from thermal stress that contributes to coral bleaching — more than half of the reef’s coral cover was lost between 1995 and 2017. In July, several European countries were severely affected by floods. Globally, eight of the world’s 10 largest cities are near a coast. And in the United States, almost 40% of the population lives in coastal areas, where sea level plays a role in flooding and land erosion. 

Nowhere are climate stressors more obvious than in Texas. Our population is expected to nearly double by 2050, and most of the state has warmed between 0.5 and 1.0 degree Fahrenheit during the past century. We are seeing new diseases spread from tropical areas, and we’re experiencing more extreme weather events such as the winter storm that left two-thirds of Texans without power and almost half without water for an average of more than two days in February.

We need to urgently decrease emissions. And Texas needs a statewide climate adaptation plan. 

Rising temperatures are caused primarily by an increase of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases. CO2 levels have been rising steadily for more than 100 years due mainly to the burning of fossil fuels, trapping more heat in our atmosphere and contributing to climate change. 

A special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which includes climate scientists from around the world, has said that human activities are estimated to have caused approximately 1.0 degree Celsius (1.8 degrees Fahrenheit) of global warming above preindustrial levels. And global warming is likely to reach 1.5 degrees C (2.7 degrees F) between 2030 and 2052 if it continues to increase at the current rate. 

This is precisely one of the goals of the United Nations Climate Change conference, or COP26, which has brought world leaders together to tackle climate change. Countries are being asked to set ambitious 2030 emission reduction targets that align with reaching net zero by the middle of the century. 

We all need to do our part like a true phase-out of coal, accelerating the switch to electric vehicles and investing in renewable energy. There are positive examples around the world of countries that are heading toward a low-carbon future by embracing solar, wind, geothermal and other renewable energy sources. Texas produces the most wind energy of any state in the United States. The U.S. as a whole has the second highest installed wind energy capacity in the world after China. A clean energy revolution must continue to happen across America, underscored by the steady expansion of the U.S. renewable energy sector. 

Not only will setting ambitious emission reduction targets help with climate change, it will also lead to cleaner and more resilient cities and infrastructure systems. Energy systems with high percentages of renewables — or even decarbonized power grids — are better able to resist shocks than those heavily dependent on fossil fuels such as natural gas and coal. 

Extreme weather events such as this year’s winter storm, which happened only nine months ago, are expected, and we need to adapt our infrastructure to withstand such stressors. And we especially need to take into consideration vulnerable communities, those that already suffer from chronic stressors related to toxic pollution, poverty, food insecurity, mixed immigration status and gentrification. States and communities around the country have begun to prepare for climate change by developing their own climate adaptation plans, so we have many examples to follow just within our own country.

Our world leaders need to leave COP26 with actionable goals with deadlines that are concrete, realistic and meaningful. And policymakers and leaders in Texas must do their part and adopt and accelerate measures that combat climate change, addressing energy infrastructure and equitable resilience. Only then will we rise to the challenge of climate change.

Fernanda Leite is an associate professor and the John A. Focht Centennial Teaching Fellow in Civil Engineering in the Cockrell School of Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin. She serves on the leadership of a university wide grand challenges initiative called Planet Texas 2050.

A version of this op-ed appeared in the San Antonio Express NewsAbilene Reporter NewsMSN and Lubbock Avalanche-Journal.  

MEDIA CONTACT

University Communications
Email: UTMedia@utexas.edu
Phone: (512) 471-3151VIEW ALL TEXAS PERSPECTIVES

Texas Perspectives is a wire-style service produced by The University of Texas at Austin that is intended to provide media outlets with meaningful and thoughtful opinion columns (op-eds) on a variety of topics and current events. Authors are faculty members and staffers at UT Austin who work with University Communications to craft columns that adhere to journalistic best practices and Associated Press style guidelines. The University of Texas at Austin offers these opinion articles for publication at no charge. Columns appearing on the service and this webpage represent the views of the authors, not of The University of Texas at Austin.

Source: https://news.utexas.edu/2021/11/23/we-all-must-rise-to-the-challenge-of-climate-change/

The claim that more renewables could have saved the day is easily refuted.

Texas Ice Storm Generation
Change in Power Output in Texas, Jan 18 – Feb 17th, 2021, 12 AM US EIA (Source Forbes)

To be fair, 7% of wind capacity apparently kept producing, at least some of the time, so wind surprisingly wasn’t completely useless. I’m guessing solar wasn’t much use during the ice storm.

But how much wind would have been required to keep the lights on, if Texas went 100% renewable?

100% ÷ 0.07 = 1428% – the original 100% = 1328% above 100%, or 1328% overcapacity.

It is hypothetically possible wind could have carried the load, though this is a very rough calculation which takes no account of availability of turbine sites, or variation in output around the 7% average, but the 1328% standby wind overcapacity Texas would have required to match the performance of gas during last winter’s ice storm would be impossibly expensive to build and maintain.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
4.9 18 votes
Article Rating
185 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
WXcycles
November 26, 2021 2:45 pm

Nothing spreads fundamentalist mass-delusion like a university.

They’ve come a long way. Used to be the bread ‘n butter the Catholic Church.

Power hates a vacuum …

November 26, 2021 5:00 pm

So, her message is, “If you try something and it fails, try it again and fail, fail, fail again.”
That’s real progressive!
Sort of like, “Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”Hmm … that sounds like “chaos theory”. Is that the goal “The Cause” she doesn’t know she’s working toward? Chaos?
Reminds me of what Tony Curtis’s character said in “Operation Petticoat”.
“In confusion there is profit.”
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053143/quotes/qt3805197

November 27, 2021 7:29 am

Although severe winter weather events in Texas have actually been having a decreasing trend since the late 1800s and therefore are not being worsened by climate change (even though global warming is real and mostly manmade), cherrypicked data of power production from a particular 30 day period other than a calendar month apparently chosen to cherrypick for the days of least wind is as bad as what climate activists do.

Robert Leslie Stevenson
November 27, 2021 7:32 am

There has been a lack or shortage of wind this Autumn for the the North Sea wind farms; my theory is that it all got used first time around

Robert Leslie Stevenson
Reply to  Robert Leslie Stevenson
November 27, 2021 8:01 am

correction —used up first time around. —much more techniclly sond now.

Robert Leslie Stevenson
Reply to  Robert Leslie Stevenson
November 27, 2021 11:05 am

correction——- sound—–

cgh
November 29, 2021 7:44 am

Big effing deal. Some po-faced professor opens her yap to rant about power systems and suddenly everyone cares about some academic no one ever heard of?

Who cares about her display of idiocy?

Cosmic
November 29, 2021 3:31 pm

Idiot. These people disgust me. A professor? Tells me everything.

Albert Paquette
December 4, 2021 4:42 am

It’s too bad that the discussion on renewables always ends up at the extreme ends. Renewables have a place in the mix but they certainly aren’t the answer to the problem on their own. It’s the same thing with electric cars. They are more efficient at converting energy into motion than ICE cars, but why use the limited supply of batteries on a 300 mile range Tesla when the average car drives 30 miles per day? I have a 2021 Ford Escape PHEV with an electric range of 37 miles and a backup gasoline engine that can do over 400 miles on a fill. In 3 months of driving, 94% was electric. What’s not to like about that? No range anxiety. It takes advantage of the strengths of both methods of propulsion while minimizing the amount of CO2 produced, saving me money and keeping the green folks happy in the process.

Reply to  Albert Paquette
December 4, 2021 5:32 am

Are you *sure* that EV’s are more efficient at converting energy than ICE cars? At least when considering the entire energy chain from ground/wind/sun to the tire patch on the road?