Climate change not the only blame for bushfire crisis

Essay by Eric Worrall

There is also colonisation.

Climate change not the only blame for bushfire crisis

By Allanah Sciberras
Updated October 8 2026 – 5:03am, first published 5:00am

Restoring Indigenous cultural burning could help break a “catastrophic fire loop”, plaguing Australia’s southeast forests, a new study has found.

Researchers reconstructed the past millennium of vegetation, fire and erosion in Victoria’s Croajingolong National Park in East Gippsland, one of the most fire-prone forests.

The study published on Thursday by the University of Melbourne, found long-term environmental shifts should not be blamed on climate change alone, with the crisis linked to colonial land use.

“Climate records show that seasons of comparably dangerous fire weather, such as those seen during Ash Wednesday and Black Saturday, occurred in the region repeatedly before colonisation, yet the open landscape maintained by cultural burning protected the land from catastrophic fire,” lead author Michael-Shawn Fletcher said.

“When colonisation ended that care, the forest expanded and thickened across the region, loading the landscape with fuel. It is that transformation that has handed control of fire to climate.”

…

Read more: https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/9364649/climate-change-not-the-only-blame-for-bushfire-crisis/

The abstract of the study;

  • Article
  • Published: 07 October 2026

Australia’s current wildfire crisis linked to colonial land-use change

Nature (2026) Cite this article

Abstract

The global wildfire crisis1 is often attributed to climate change, a framing that overlooks crucial historical drivers. Biomes at the forefront of this crisis, such as the temperate eucalypt forests of Australia, have seen alarming increases in large, intense wildfires in recent decades. Yet evidence of how colonial land-use change and the disruption of Indigenous fire use altered vegetation structure and fuel dynamics remains scarce. Here we reconstruct 1,000 years of vegetation and fire change in a temperate eucalypt forest in southeastern Australia. Before the British invasion (from 1788 CE), fire use by the Indigenous Gunaikurnai people maintained stable, open woodlands through frequent, fine-grained, low-temperature cultural burning. Colonial disruption drove cascading changes: increased fire temperature, a fourfold rise in eucalypt cover, a shift from open woodland to forest and increased soil erosion. These transformations preceded anthropogenic warming, indicating that the vulnerability of these forests to wildfire is shaped by colonial land-use legacies. By creating more flammable landscapes, colonial land use amplified the influence of climate change, suggesting a reinforcing feedback (the ‘catastrophic wildfire loop’) in which high-intensity wildfires raise fuel loads and further increase the likelihood of climate-driven fire. Integrating Indigenous knowledge into fire management is therefore essential to restoring resilience and mitigating future wildfire risk.

Read more: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-11097-z

I doubt the 18th century Aboriginals thought of setting fires as taking care of the land. More likely they thought of setting fires as ideal conditions for a free BBQ where you didn’t have to chase the animals first.

But underneath all the leftist identity politics the recommendation if the study is sensible – enlist green support for fuel load burns before you end up with a LA scale wildfire.

Sadly progress has been slow convincing greens to support sensible forestry policies, even when the advice is loaded with language designed to appeal to green sensibilities.

The absurdity of mostly white “colonists” dictating to aborigines how to manage forests is lost on the anti controlled burn protestors. Chaining themselves to trees to save koalas from a low intensity burn, koalas which get fried to a crisp a few months later in a high intensity fire, seems more their thing.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Sparta Nova 4
October 8, 2026 10:14 am

We are told to use indigenous knowledge in this, that, and the other.
Then we are told to no use indigenous knowledge in these others.

Hmmmm….

October 8, 2026 10:43 am

The 1939 Australian wildfires were just as devastating:
https://www.ffm.vic.gov.au/history-and-incidents/black-friday-1939

Black Friday was the culmination of a dry summer following a drought period that lasted several years. As a result, many creeks and rivers had dried up, and people living in Melbourne were under water restrictions. In addition, dry heat and hot winds sapped moisture from the ground, leaving forest floors and the open plains tinder dry.

The fires on Black Friday was also resulted to a combination of human causes. Landowners, graziers, miners, forest workers, and campers either deliberately or carelessly contributed to the 1939 fires by lighting fires before 13 January. The causes included burning off for land clearing and grass growth, lighting campfires, inappropriate sawmill operations, and domestic fires.

Fires initially started as early as December 1938, and the majority had begun in the first week of January 1939. Some fires could not be extinguished, while others were left unattended. High temperatures and strong northerly winds fanned these separate fires. The fires eventually combined and created a massive fire front that swept mainly over the mountain country in the northeast of Victoria and along the coast in the southwest.