Congressional Races Will Impact Energy Affordability and Reliability

By Isaac Orr

Michigan families, businesses, and manufacturers are already feeling pain at the plug. According to our recent report, Blue States, High Rates, Always On Energy Research, and the Institute for Energy Research, Michigan’s electricity prices are the highest in the Midwest, and it is worth considering how the policies supported by Congressional candidates will shape energy policy in the coming years.

In the race for Michigan’s 10th Congressional District between Republican Mike Bouchard and Democrat Christina Hines, the candidates’ proposed energy policies have fallen along predictable ideological lines.

For example, Ms. Hines has stated that she supports “Fighting climate change while creating American jobs.” Hines has also stated that she will “support legislation like the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) that helps bring clean energy manufacturing back to the U.S. while reducing carbon emissions and strengthening our domestic supply chains.”

While these types of campaign promises sound good in theory, in practice, they carry as much weight as promising that spending this money will cause the Detroit Lions to win the Super Bowl.

According to an analysis from the Cato Institute, the IRA would have lavished $935 billion to $1.97 trillion in taxpayer dollars on wind, solar, and electric vehicles from 2025-2034. Data from the Rhodium Group show that the vast majority of the tax subsidies that were actually distributed under the law went to more conservative states, like Texas, Georgia, and Tennessee, which have lower taxes and more reasonable regulatory regimes.

On the other hand, Michigan did manage to secure projects, but many of them were heavily subsidized using additional state taxpayer dollars. An analysis from the Mackinac Center found IRA-linked projects received $873 million in subsidies and created just 194 jobs so far, a cost of $4.5 million per job.

One Michigan electric vehicle (EV) project receiving these subsidies has already abandoned the EV market because the overwhelming majority of Americans don’t want to buy them. Even with federal tax credits available, EVs accounted for just 8.1% of new-vehicle sales in 2024. After the credits expired, their market share fell to just 5-6% by July 2026.

Furthermore, IRA subsidies for wind and solar projects are essentially energy bailouts for blue states with high renewable energy mandates, like Public Act 235, which was signed into law by Governor Gretchen Whitmer (D) and established aggressive renewable energy mandates of 50% by 2030 and 60% by 2035. The law also requires an 80% “clean energy” standard by 2035 and 100% by 2040.

In contrast, Mr. Bouchard has stated he supports energy independence to rein in fuel prices and reduce regulatory barriers to building more power plants as part of a broader energy dominance agenda.

Energy dominance in the Trump administration’s second term has consisted of boosting natural gas and oil production, financing new nuclear power plants and reforming our permitting process for nuclear plants to facilitate their timely and cost-effective production, facilitating more geothermal energy production, and keeping existing coal plants online to bolster the grid as demand for electricity surges to power data centers and a reshoring of American manufacturing.

In our recent report, Blue States, High Rates, Always On Energy Research and the Institute for Energy Research found that 86% of the top ten states in the continental U.S. with the highest electricity prices have voted for the Democratic candidate in each of the last two presidential elections, while 90% of the 10 states with the lowest electricity prices have voted for the Republican candidate.

Pro-energy policies make the U.S. the world’s largest producer of oil and natural gas, help facilitate a revival of our environmentally friendly nuclear energy industry, and recognize the importance of keeping existing coal plants online to keep the lights on. Repeating the same energy policy mistakes of the IRA and expecting different results will end poorly for Michiganders and America.

Isaac Orr is the Vice President of Research at Always On Energy Research.

This article was originally published by RealClearEnergy and made available via RealClearWire.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 3 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
19 Comments
August 29, 2026 10:20 am

Michigan uses mostly fossil energy to produce electricity. This explains why it costs so much in Michigan. Domestic fuel sources, like wind and solar, reduce costs to consumers and increase national security

Beta Blocker
Reply to  Eric Flesch
August 29, 2026 10:37 am

When he was president, Joe Biden had legal authority to declare a climate emergency and to impose a fossil fuel lockdown on the American economy, including the adoption of a regulatory system of EPA carbon pollution ‘fines’ which are the functional equivalent of a legislated tax on carbon.

Please explain to us why Joe Biden didn’t use his legal authority as president to declare a climate emergency, and then to go just as far as he was allowed to go in using his Article II powers to quickly reduce America’s carbon emissions.

Reply to  Beta Blocker
August 29, 2026 10:41 am

Why did you expect President Biden to do these things?

Beta Blocker
Reply to  Eric Flesch
August 29, 2026 11:20 am

“Why did you expect President Biden to do these things?”

Joe Biden claimed that climate change was an existential threat to humanity; he and his top administration officials said that American leadership in reducing our own carbon emissions was crucial to convincing other nations to follow suit; and that a whole-of-government approach was necessary to quickly reduce our carbon emissions.

So if we were to take Joe Biden at his word, we would expect that he would indeed use the full power at his command under his Article II powers as president to go just as far and as fast as he was legally allowed to go in reducing America’s emissions.

But Joe Biden didn’t do that. He didn’t come anywhere close to doing the kinds of things he could have done to throttle the use of fossil fuels and to promote the adoption of wind and solar backed by batteries as a replacement for coal, gas, and nuclear.

And yet in spite of his lack of truly effective action in keeping his environmental promises, he was never called to account by the environmental activist community. Tell us Eric …. why was Joe Biden never called to account?

Bryan A
Reply to  Beta Blocker
August 29, 2026 12:16 pm

Because Biden was a dottering old fool and even the Dems realized this. His selection of Harris as a running mate was about the only brilliant thing he did during his 4 year tenure as it kept him from being removed using the 25th amendment. He was nothing but a figurehead for President Otto Penn and the committee behind it.

Beta Blocker
Reply to  Bryan A
August 29, 2026 2:30 pm

Biden and Harris were chosen by the Democratic Party Powers that Be even before the 2020 primary season began. See my response to SxyxS here for the reasons why.

Reply to  Beta Blocker
August 29, 2026 2:23 pm

You are pushing a false narrative based on strange expectations you set for everyone else. Somehow because President Biden didn’t act in an exact way you believe he should have, it means other, unnamed people should have been angry. I’m really not sure what you are on about

SxyxS
Reply to  Eric Flesch
August 29, 2026 1:44 pm

You’re question is spot on.

How can anyone expect a demented president who has been fighting with every single word he was trying to read from the TelePrompTer
to do anything ?

Yet this president, who wasn’t mentally there, had the very same policies
and made the exact same “mistakes” as his counterparts in the western world – conflicts, energy,open borders, war on farmers, minorities including his sudden obsession with gays, trans etc he never had in the first 70 years of his life;
a transformation as miraculous and impossible as the MSM’s total ignorance of Joes Alzheimer after 4 years of trying to tell the world how demented Trump was.

Now – there is an answer why Joe/Blinken never went full climate emergency.
He knew he’d had no chance to win the reelection if he’d have hit the economy even harder than he already did.
+ the renewable replacement capacities are limited.
Shutting things down without a phony replacement would have totally enraged the masses.

Beta Blocker
Reply to  SxyxS
August 29, 2026 2:25 pm

In reality, Joe Biden was a figurehead controlled by a central committee of advisors operating behind the scenes who formulated all the Biden policies and made all the Biden decisions.

So when I say that Joe Biden could have done this, or Joe Biden could have done that, what I am saying here is that it was the behind-the-scenes Biden puppet masters who could have walked the Biden talk of Net Zero by 2050, had they decided to do so.

Anyway, what is now known is that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris were the Chosen Ones for the 2020 Democratic Party nominations even before the 2020 primary season began. Spring 2020 on the Democratic Party side was mere kabuke theater.

Those two were chosen by the DNC Powers that Be in part because they gave the outward appearance of being weak candidates to a Trump campaign which was (a) clearly overconfident in success; and which (b) paid no attention whatsoever to the warning signs emerging in the summer and fall of 2020 that massive election fraud was in the works.

Reply to  SxyxS
August 29, 2026 2:25 pm

Says much about you that you think a speech impediment is a sign of mental ability and Alzheimer’s

Reply to  Eric Flesch
August 29, 2026 12:40 pm

FYI, in a modern industrial economy about 80% of energy use is thermal energy provided by the utilization of fossil fuels. The heavy industries, the heavy transportation systems, agriculture, and military and emergency vehicles will always use enormous amounts of fossil fuels. Fossil fuels will always used for space and water heating, for cooking and baking in residential houses and for personal transportation.

Wind and sunlight are not “Domestic fuel sources…”. In fact wind turbines and PV solar farms destabilizes the electrical system.

I live in Canada which has long cold and snowy winters. Fossil fuels keep 41 million people from freezing to death in winter.

Nowadays, here is much loose and ignorant talk about global warming, but there is little or no mention about winter in the social media.

BTW: How do you heat your house in winter and cool it in the hot summer?

Reply to  Harold Pierce
August 29, 2026 2:26 pm

You don’t think people talk about winter 🙄.

Scissor
Reply to  Eric Flesch
August 29, 2026 1:20 pm

Solar and wind are incapable of generating anything more than nuisance amounts of electricity in Michigan.

Russell Cook
Reply to  Scissor
August 29, 2026 2:43 pm

 . . . Michigan uses mostly fossil energy to produce electricity. This explains why electric rates are still affordable in Michigan. Domestic fuel sources, like wind and solar, will ultimately vastly increase costs to consumers across the board, and decrease national security with the real potential of electrical grid failure.

Fixed his sentence for him. His original one is the type of talking points that folks repeat when they’re driven by emotional response to a situation rather than by operating on critical thinking.

Reply to  Eric Flesch
August 29, 2026 1:37 pm

Any place you have an idiotic politically motivated statutory requirement to remove reliable sources of electricity and replace them with unreliable sources of electricity…

.. the supply will ALWAYS become more costly and more unreliable.

This has happened everywhere this nonsense has infected the electricity supply system.

Reply to  bnice2000
August 29, 2026 2:28 pm

Fossil energy sources are very unreliable. One orange idiot can drive up prices and cause shortages.

sidabma
August 29, 2026 10:27 am

America needs to bring back coal, but now combust it in ways so it’s almost as clean as natural gas. The technologies are there.
Natural gas can also be consumed to near 100% energy efficiency. Our residential market and some industry is doing it. The rest of America’s natural gas consumers also need to be encouraged to utilize those ways – so we don’t waste it. Stop blowing so much up all those chimney’s.
Waste Is Not Waste If It Has A Purpose.

ResourceGuy
August 29, 2026 12:08 pm

State and Local Dems in Michigan do what they are told by the UAW and the big three automakers. And DC Dems do as they are told by unions, eco nonprofits, and state Dems plus Bernie. That’s why you can identify all Dems by the small union logo on their printed materials and business cards. Climate change amounts to a periodic chant around the big tent, but it’s also a nedulous, low cost talking point and spending bill of other people’s money for the eco corner.

Russell Cook
August 29, 2026 2:49 pm

I’d already emailed several Michigan GOP candidates on the possible national leadership praise they would gain by going on full offense against Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel’s ‘climate damages’ lawsuit against British Petroleum. These candidates could set their Democrat opponents’ hair on fire (the new ground zero for ClimaChange™! ) by simply suggesting the lawsuit should be thrown totally out of the court system on the grounds that not only its science claims are unsupportable, but also that its accusations about ‘crooked skeptic climate scientists’ may actually stray into epic level defamation territory.

Thanks to Isaac Orr’s guest post here, I fired off this leadership tip to GOP House candidate Mike Bouchard a short time ago. Political candidates usually don’t answer these kinds of ‘tips’ emails, but as the old saying goes, “nothing ventured, nothing gained.” Imagine the blistering response if just one GOP candidate nailed the “ExxonKnew” lawsuits to the wall for what they are: a backdoor means of implementing climate policy without voter approval.