Colorado River Crisis Brings Major Cuts for California, Nevada, and Arizona

Phoenix is planning to dip into its emergency water bank as a result.

From Legal Insurrection

Posted by Leslie Eastman 

Federal officials are ordering the West to live within the limits of a Colorado River system drained by decades of over-allocation, drought, and policy delay.

California, Nevada, and Arizona allocations will be cut a combined 1.25 million acre-feet annually for the next two years, while the upstream states evade mandatory reductions for now.

Arizona will see the biggest cuts, while states upstream — Colorado, Utah, Wyoming and New Mexico — do not face any for now.

Meanwhile neighboring Mexico will reduce its intake by 250,000 acre-feet (about 310 million cubic meters) under a U.S.-Mexico treaty.

“We’ve been in this 26-year prolonged drought period,” said Andrea Travnicek, the Interior Department’s assistant secretary for water and science. “We continue to see a prolonged drought in our future. So continuing to work together as a whole within the basin is going to be extremely important.”

The current rules governing the use of the river’s water are set to expire in October, and the seven states have been unable to reach a consensus on sharing it over the long term.

Arizona will see the largest cuts, with annual water deliveries reduced by 31%. As a result, the city of Phoenix is planning to dip into its emergency water bank.

Arizona’s large cut results from agreements and court fights over water rights more than 100 years ago.

The result was that Arizona got the lowest priority for Colorado water in times of shortages, and California the highest priority. That’s what the state is living with today.

The City of Phoenix has been preparing for this day.

The city’s plan starts with dipping into an emergency water bank for the first time since its creation more than 35 years ago.

The cuts could significantly affect Nevada, which has been enjoying robust real estate development as Californians flee the Golden State.

In Southern Nevada, Kyle Roerink, senior adviser at the conservation group Great Basin Water Network, said efforts to build a new airport and shopping malls and some public land sales have not progressed, reflecting the dire hydrology inked in the federal documents. Further cuts could slow real estate development in metro Las Vegas, he said.

River water levels are so low that hydropower plants may no longer generate power.

The river’s health often is determined by how much water is in Lake Mead and Lake Powell, the two largest human-made reservoirs in the U.S. Together, the reservoirs are at their lowest point since they began filling, according to a recent paper by Colorado River experts, and approaching levels where they could no longer produce hydropower.

Hoover Dam could lose the ability to generate hydropower if Lake Mead falls below its minimum power pool, reported as roughly 950 feet above sea level. At lower elevations, there is not enough usable water intake to operate the turbines.

It gives a whole new meaning to “Deadpool“.

The minimum level to generate power is 950 feet, and if the level drops to 895 feet, then that’s the dreaded Deadpool.

Deadpool is the point when water can no longer flow downstream from the dam, and if that happens, then the system as we know it fails.

Lake Mead’s reported water-surface elevation is 1,039 feet above sea level, about 190 feet below full pool and approximately 27% full.

Even though this plan is final, the threat of litigation looms.

Tribes, states or other groups are now able to sue Reclamation over its final plan, and could argue that the agency erred in how it conducted its environmental review.

Some tribes, like the Gila River Indian Community (GRIC) in Arizona, have indicated that drastic federal water cuts could force a lawsuit. Many tribes in the basin also have water rights on paper that have never been fully realized.

GRIC Gov. Stephen Roe Lewis said that while litigation is certainly not the community’s first choice, it is an option.

“The community … will not hesitate to turn to the courts to protect our interests and our future,” he said at a CU-Boulder water conference in June.

Perhaps the anticipated historic El Niño will bring the Southwest the rain and mountain snowpack needed to offer the Colorado River system some breathing room.

But precipitation alone will not solve a crisis worsened by decades of over-allocation, political procrastination, and an aversion to building the reservoirs, recharge projects, and other infrastructure needed to capture water when it actually arrives.

The real test will be whether Western leaders can move beyond emergency rationing and litigation long enough to prepare for both the next wet cycle and the inevitable dry one.

Finally, and as a much needed reminder, severe droughts have occurred periodically in this region of the US….long before Henry Ford invented the car.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
4.9 8 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
29 Comments
Scissor
August 29, 2026 2:08 pm

It’s going to be Godzilla wet this winter, I bet.

Reply to  Scissor
August 29, 2026 2:23 pm

The last 3 ‘major’ El Niños produced variable results. Two produced good Colorado basin runoff. One did not. So the coming ‘super’ one is still a water crapshoot.

Scissor
Reply to  Rud Istvan
August 29, 2026 4:34 pm

I just had to do some work on the carburetor of my snow blower, purchased a $1 o-ring at McGuckins and threw away the breather tube which was rotted. I hope this didn’t jinx our ski season.

Sweet Old Bob
Reply to  Scissor
August 29, 2026 5:06 pm

If I get weatherbell.coms free sat. summary right , this El Nino is weakening quite a lot.

August 29, 2026 2:19 pm

While true that the present multiyear relative drought is a contributing factor, it is not the main problem. When Glen Canyon dam was completed in 1964, the combined populations of metro Phoenix and metro Las Vegas was about 825k. It is now about 7.8 million. That is the main problem. Even if future growth in both was forcibly halted, it is agriculture (despite senior water rights) that will predictably suffer.

Reply to  Rud Istvan
August 29, 2026 3:15 pm

When the flood-season next returns, the armchair experts like RI will be pointing out that “the main problem” is that the authorities failed to raise the dams sufficiently to store all the excess snowmelt / runoff.
And that’s why longtime residents of the Intermountain West pay no attention whatsoever to Wisconsin Dairy Farmers or Florida retirees.
————
Here’s a little prediction for what will happen if the Fed Intervention goes as described above. Farms & communities will relocate (from AZ/NV) across state lines to St-George (Utah), in order to take advantage of the expanded aqueduct bringing Lake Powell water over to the upper Virgin River valley (Zion Canyon / Washington County). They’ve already built an Airport there to serve a metropolis 2-million strong. Said Airport straddles the AZ-UT border & is an easy drive from the Vegas metroplex.
————
Immediate relief from the present SNAFU could be obtained by cutting off Southern California (30 millions of people) from AZ-NV-UT-generated hydroelectric power and from the long-distance canals serving their otherwise dry-as-Death-Valley farmlands. Let lowland California desalinate ocean water (Pacific / Sea of Cortez), just like they do in Israel and the Persian / Arabian Gulf States.

Scissor
Reply to  Whetten Robert L
August 29, 2026 4:39 pm

Your comment is a bit harsh. Most here respect and value RI’s thoughts and insights.

With regard to desalination, California has 12 operational seawater facilities along its coast, alongside numerous brackish groundwater desalination plants located further inland.

AWG
Reply to  Rud Istvan
August 29, 2026 6:20 pm

I have an idea. Lets just open the border even more and invite tens of millions of new consumers into that area of the country. (Cloward/Piven)

August 29, 2026 2:31 pm

Doesn’t California have several desal plants operating and in construction?

I wonder if they will get to the stage of recycling waste water.. that’s always fun for politicians 😉

Reply to  bnice2000
August 29, 2026 5:27 pm

California already does. By 2030, wastewater reuse is projected to be about 800,000 acre feet. Of course, all non potable uses—watering parks, golf courses, ag (almonds, citrus, plums, not produce), and industrial cooling. Buildout requires a separate water distribution system, so is highly dependent locally.
Injecting directly into groundwater aquifers for replenishment is very controversial, so not yet done. Those aquifers usually supply both ag and local potable water.

Reply to  Rud Istvan
August 29, 2026 5:53 pm

Sounds very much like Perth water system….

They had the option of injecting treated water into their aquifers, while cheaper, it was politically unviable, so they are expanding two of their de-sal plants and building a couple more.

Parts of Sydney use “recycled” water for parks and garden, using “with-holding” periods of locked games etc after watering..

… but the big one is in western Sydney where treated waste-water is used to supplement the environmental flows down the Hawkesbury River, thus saving water releases from Warragamba Dam.

Reply to  bnice2000
August 29, 2026 6:50 pm

typo… “locked games ” => “locked gates”

Mac
August 29, 2026 2:39 pm

I think part of the problem was the high pressure dome over the west particularly New Mexico and Colorado this last winter. I saw a high temperature in the winter of 90F. That certainly caused a lot less moisture in the form of rain and snow. The Rio Grande river is very dry, the only water in the conservancy canal. If the El Nino produces a significant amount of moisture then things will improve. Of course the underlying problem of water use because of much greater population growth in major metropolitan will continue to stress available resources.
Back in the 80s in Los Angeles I had a patient who was a big wig with the Metropolitan Water District. He told me the politics was unbelievable particularly between northern Calif and southern Calif since the north supplied much of LAs water. Not much has changed!

August 29, 2026 3:34 pm

“Finally, and as a much needed reminder, severe droughts have occurred periodically in this region of the US….long before Henry Ford invented the car.”

I have to assume that was meant tongue-in-cheek.

About that Inside Climate News post on X which Matthew Wielicki re-posted –
” Scientists published today the world’s first climate attribution study to link major fossil fuel emitters’ emissions to water loss in the Western U.S. Almost half of decreased snowpack and streamflow in the region, they found, is attributable to 122 oil, gas and cement producers.”

They are NOT going to stop with this nonsense without a knock-down, drag-out fight (figuratively!). In my view, skeptics of climate alarm have been giving up the high ground for a long time by conceding the primary attribution of *some* of the reported “warming” to emissions of CO2. NO ONE KNOWS that the CO2 emissions from oil, gas, and cement producers have had ANY perceptible influence on ANY climate variable. An inference from spectral details does not suffice for positive attribution.

The IPCC/CMIP models tell you NOTHING of value about incremental CO2 because of the rapid buildup of uncertainty in the time-stepped iteration.

ERA5 tells you that the “warming” tendency (say 4 W/m^2) of even 2XCO2 is vanishingly weak within the general circulation, as the dynamic range of energy conversion (in W/m^2) is thousands of times greater in both directions.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1knv0YdUyIgyR9Mwk3jGJwccIGHv38J33/view?usp=sharing

Thank you for your patient attention to these matters.

Reply to  David Dibbell
August 29, 2026 3:51 pm

Correct on all counts!

Bob
August 29, 2026 3:39 pm

All natural resources have a limit. It is foolish to not recognize those limits and utterly stupid to know about them and act like they aren’t there. With a little due diligence and common sense we should be able to get a handle on this problem and figure out a usable guide for how much we can take from the Colorado river system.

Reply to  Bob
August 29, 2026 4:13 pm

We already have an interim federally imposed answer for present conditions—about a third less than now. The problem is that makes Nevada, Arizona, and California voters VERY unhappy. Bad news, they are partly legitimate voters. Good news, they mostly voted for Harris in 2024, so doesn’t really matter.

Reply to  Rud Istvan
August 29, 2026 5:57 pm

Not imposed equally across the 3 states.
Next elections dont have Harris but Senate and HR seats ups for grabs.
15 republican houses in those states up for election . So sad for them

Arizona27% CutFaces the steepest mandatory reduction; heavily impacts agricultural water allocations.
Nevada16% CutPrimarily managed through aggressive municipal recycling and indoor conservation.
California10% CutLower reduction percentage due to senior water rights, but represents a large volumetric loss.

Richard Rude
August 29, 2026 3:46 pm

Maybe we should think about limiting population growth in the arid southwest. Nobody talks about that.

Reply to  Richard Rude
August 29, 2026 4:06 pm

Without water, that will eventually happen all by itself.

Factoid. The last major California water reservoir, New Melones, was completed in 1979. That year, the California population was about 22.3 million. It is now about 39.4 million. Cut California off completely from the Colorado and let them deal with the consequences of their own stupidity.

It was their importation of non-native striped bass for sport fishing that caused the functional extinction of the delta smelt in 2018. They still waste lots of water on an inconsequential fish that no longer exists in the wild.

Reply to  Rud Istvan
August 29, 2026 6:03 pm

A Sacramento Delta fish isnt affected by Colorado river water
Since 1980 , Nevada, Arizona, Florida, Utah, Texas, and Idaho have far outpaced it in percentage growth
Anyway a lot of the water is for agriculture for the whole nation . Since 1980 LA has reduced its per capita use by 25%
Some urban water districts by much less

Daily residential water use for Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) customers dropped to 70 gallons per person by 2022—representing a nearly 60% decline from 1980 baselines

Reply to  Duker
August 29, 2026 6:53 pm

How much does LA use for hosing down the sidewalks.. or don’t they bother ?

Reply to  Duker
August 29, 2026 11:41 pm

Duker, actually it is, albeit indirectly. California has a water system that sends ‘winter’ water from the north where it is seasonally abundant to the south where it isn’t. The Sacramento delta smelt water release could be conserved and sent south via the existing water distribution system. Southern California is where Colorado water is otherwise consumed.

Reply to  Richard Rude
August 29, 2026 4:15 pm

Limiting population growth … Nobody talks about that.

Oh contraire, mon frere!
That’s all they wanna talk about.
Let’s limit your own population first …
… then you’ll have some ground (6′ under) for limiting someone else’s.

August 29, 2026 3:47 pm

However, Gov. Hobbs uses her crystal ball to determine that the drought will end yesterday.

1saveenergy
August 29, 2026 4:02 pm

[“long before Henry Ford invented the car.“]

Henry Ford didn’t invent the car …
1st self-powered road vehicle was Nicolas Joseph Cugnot’s in 1769;

1801 – Richard Trevithick’s ‘Puffing Devil’.
1807 – Francois Isaac de Rivaz of Switzerland invented the first internal combustion-powered automobile (Hydrogen ).
1885 – Karl Benz Tricycle;
1888-  the first electric car Andreas Flocken’s ‘Elektrowagen’
1896 – the Ford Quadricycle;

but Ford revolutionised the way cars are built.

Reply to  1saveenergy
August 29, 2026 4:20 pm

Columbus wasn’t the first to ‘Discover America’.
Rather he was that last one to do so.
Even so, Henry Ford was indeed the last to ‘Invent an Automobile.’

Allen Pettee
Reply to  Whetten Robert L
August 29, 2026 6:07 pm

Columbus was the most important one to discover America. History always teaches that it doesn’t matter who got there first, but who is there now.

AWG
August 29, 2026 6:16 pm

The real test will be whether Western leaders can move beyond emergency rationing and litigation long enough to prepare for both the next wet cycle and the inevitable dry one.

I’ve been alive long enough to know that “Western leaders” don’t procrastinate just because of sheer incompetence, they wait for something to turn into full calamity and become a Federal Crisis Emergency where the “engineers” (like climate “scientists”) can claim that it will cost 10x what it would in reality cost to remedy. The 90% of waste going in to grift, new programs, shoring up looted state treasuries and pension funds.

Its easier to get Congress to write blank checks when the threat to human life and liberty are real—not because they care about human life and liberty, they don’t, that is why they let it get to crisis levels first so that the public is screaming for Congress to “DO SOMETHING” and something they most certainly will do.