Miliband Overrules His Inspectors to Approve Britain’s Second-Largest Solar Farm

From THE DAILY SCEPTIC

by Will Jones

Ed Miliband has approved Britain’s second-largest solar farm on 4,000 acres of prime farmland after overruling opposition from his own inspectors. The Telegraph has the story.

The Energy Secretary on Wednesday said he had granted planning permission to the One Earth Solar Farm development to be built on prime farmland across Nottinghamshire and Lincolnshire.

It comes despite a recommendation to block the development from Miliband’s own planning inspectors.

They warned that the scheme would be destructive for the environment, would put historic structures at risk, damage the health and well-being of local people and cause transport problems.

The controversial decision marks the third large solar farm approved by Miliband in recent days, coming a week after he backed two other large solar farms, Pear Tree Hill in East Yorkshire and Dean Moor in West Cumbria.

Sceptics suggest the Energy Secretary is trying to sign off as many such developments as he can before Andy Burnham takes office and potentially moves him to a new position.

One Earth has been cleared for construction on 4,000 acres of prime farmland near Bassetlaw, Newark and Sherwood and West Lindsey district council areas.

Besides the thousands of Chinese-made solar panels, the scheme will also include giant batteries to store surplus electricity.

It is set to be the second largest solar farm in the UK after the Springwell Solar Farm in Lincolnshire, an 800-megawatt project approved by the Government in April.

Confirming his decision, Miliband said: “The only way to have energy security is if we take a pro-growth approach to building more clean energy in Britain. For two years that is exactly what this Government has done.”

However, the new scheme is controversial because it will see several rural communities largely surrounded by solar panels covering what were once fields and hedgerows.

The village of North Clifton, around 10 miles from Lincoln, would have solar farms to the north, east and south, with some of the local farms being completely surrounded.

Property owners cannot claim any compensation for the likely devaluation of their homes.

Worth reading in full.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
4.8 4 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
15 Comments
July 11, 2026 10:21 pm

Google AI says:
The latitude of Nottinghamshire is 53°09′ N and Lincolnshire is 53°12′ N

And just out of curiosity
Scotland has numerous operational solar farms. . .

Bill Toland
Reply to  Steve Case
July 12, 2026 12:25 am

Britain is too far north for solar power to work well. Scotland is particularly bad for solar power. However, this didn’t stop solar farms being built in Scotland with the aid of gigantic subsidies. The capacity utilisation of these white elephants in Scotland in winter is just 1%.

https://web.archive.org/web/20210618114258/https://euanmearns.com/solar-pv-potential-in-scotland/

Reply to  Bill Toland
July 12, 2026 1:03 am

Between the spring equinox and the autumnal equinox they work reasonably well, around the summer solstice they generate between the hours of 0630 to 2000. However, during the winter around the solstice the maximum hours of generation lie between 1100 and 1400. This is based on my observations of the panels we have on our south, south west facing roof in a town some 12 miles south of the city of Nottingham. All timings are approximate.
The Scottish installations probably generate for a few hours longer in the summer and significantly less, if at all, in the winter. Although the further north you go the number of summer daylight hours increase, the altitude the sun reaches at noon reduces.

The major problems are statements like “could supply power for up to N thousand homes” based on the instantaneous output of all panels on a bright day; that there’s no storage facility for the generated electricity, which would require huge numbers of batteries or other storage devices which would take up at least the same area as the solar panels themselves (guesstimate); unless actively cooled the efficiency of the panels drops significantly in high temperatures.
As Ed Milliband has a first degree in Politics, Philosophy and Economics and a masters in Economics, he’s hardly in a position to make, what are after all, physics, electrical and electronic engineering decisions.

D Sandberg
Reply to  Steve Case
July 12, 2026 1:16 am

London is at 51 N latitude, solar above 50N is seriously “less than wise”. Einstein’s supposed take on human lack of intelligence being comparable to infinity comes to mind.

Bryan A
July 11, 2026 11:40 pm

Here’s a map of the project limits.
Soooo much land, lost, for the purpose of virtue signalling Miliband’s Ego.
740 MW nameplate will likely produce 75MW/hr from 10am until 2pm on sunny summer days and about 7-8MW/hr during sunny winter days. And absolutely nothing at night during peak demand time…when energy is needed most.
When people are home from work and
Heating
Cooling
Cooking
Recharging their Force Purchased EVs

A big expense for so little benefit AND a big waste of prime farmland.
I guess Climate Change WILL bring about a large reduction in food production after all… at least fighting the great invisible boogeyman will anyway.

Looking at their map it isn’t readily apparent exactly where the panels would be placed.
comment image

Bryan A
Reply to  Bryan A
July 11, 2026 11:56 pm

This map indicates the panel locations (tan colours)
comment image

Bill Toland
Reply to  Bryan A
July 12, 2026 12:43 am

Vandalism on an epic scale. According to the World Bank, Britain is the second worst country in the world for solar power. Miliband should be in jail for this appalling decision.

Bill Toland
Reply to  Bill Toland
July 12, 2026 1:07 am

I have noticed that the usual trolls have not commented on this thread. Even they cannot defend Miliband’s decision.

GeeJam
July 11, 2026 11:41 pm

I despair.

Ddwieland
July 11, 2026 11:43 pm

What a dogmatic idiot Milliband is. The UK just keeps sliding down in economic prosperity, general well-being, and responsible government. Its “green” obsession is a cautionary tale for all, and I hope my Canadian government heeds the lessons.

SxyxS
Reply to  Ddwieland
July 12, 2026 1:29 am

Are you kidding.

Your government is the same as Britains, with the head of the Bank of England installed out of nowhere to pretend to represent people(as if a bankster had a snowball chance in hell to get elected by and for the left).
And the other head of your country is Prince Charles.

Both are full scale globalists and AGW is just an expansion of BiS global central banking system under a different name =
Canada will double and triple down on everything Milliband does.
There is nothing to learn – just a plan to execute; wether it’s beach resorts in Antarctica or Solar Farms in Britain or any other crazy idea.

No need to pretend that there is any difference between the Canadian and UK government – and once META data analysis show that Starmer, Carney,Turdeau, Johnson etc have become too unpopular and therefore too damaging for the democracy facade, they’ll be replaced by another sockpuppet.

strativarius
July 12, 2026 12:02 am

Miliband is a climate vandal

Reply to  strativarius
July 12, 2026 1:31 am

An energy vandal. Stealing inexpensive energy from the poor to give it to the rich who can afford unreliable, expensive energy; the main virtue being making the rich feel like they’re “doing something” about the mythical climate apocalypse they’ve infested their fevered minds with, though their expensive energy will do nothing to prevent or delay the non-existent climate apocalypse.

July 12, 2026 1:07 am

“The only way to have energy security is if we take a pro-growth approach to building more clean secure, (reliable) energy in Britain.”

Fixed it. Leftists live in a made-up fantasy world disconnected from reality where words that mean things in the real world have been perverted to mean something else in the fantasy world because if you just say those words it makes you feel good even if they don’t actually have the same meaning anymore. Like “freedom of speech” (only the speech that leftists approve of), “democracy” (only the kind that leftist ruling elites think will keep them in power), “gender” (whatever leftists say it is, unrelated to biological sex), “rights” (what leftist ruling elites grant; usually services and commodities paid for by others like health care, food, and housing; unrelated to natural rights inherent to being human like life, liberty, safety, and the ability to pursue your own aspirations).

In the real world, energy security means energy that is reliable and available all the time. Solar- and wind- generated electricity are the opposite of that. They’re fickle, boutique power sources that rely on reliable electricity generation (notice what I did there?) to back them up. Why even bother with the unreliable power sources?

Bruce Cobb
July 12, 2026 1:11 am

Minibrain should be tarred and feathered.