Electricity Affordability: States Need to Ditch Climate Policies

From MasterResource

By Roger Donway

Editor Note: The Institute for Energy Research (IER) and Always on Energy Research (AOER) issued the following on Independence Day last week.

“BlueStatesHighRates.com, a new interactive index from Always On Energy Research and the Institute for Energy Research, shows that the steepest increases sit in the bluest states across the 50 states and Washington, D.C.”

WASHINGTON DC (07/04/2026) – As Americans celebrate the 250th anniversary of the nation’s founding on this Independence Day, a new analysis highlights how state energy policies continue to shape the cost of keeping the lights on, starting with the original 13 colonies that declared independence in 1776. The remaining states will be added in the coming weeks. 

This expanded “Blue States, High Rates” analysis spotlights the following policies:

  • Renewable portfolio or carbon-free electricity mandates
  • Net-metering programs
  • Carbon pricing or cap-and-trade participation
  • Adoption (or absence) of data center consumer protections
  • Access to affordable natural gas
  • Utilities pursuing independent net-zero goals

Tom Pyle, President of the Institute for Energy Research, issued the following statement:

Energy affordability remains a top concern for American families and businesses. Federal figures show U.S. electricity prices rose 27% from January 2021 through January 2025, with an additional 11% increase from January through September 2025. However, there is wide variation in electricity prices across states, driven more by state-level policies than by any other factor. Under the Federal Power Act, states have exclusive authority over generation portfolios, siting, retail pricing, and resource adequacy, giving them direct control over which power sources supply the grid and at what cost to families and businesses.

Americans deserve transparent information on how state decisions directly affect their wallets. Electricity prices tend to be significantly higher in traditionally Democratic-leaning states. Across the continental U.S., 86% of states with electricity prices above the national average voted for the Democratic presidential nominee in both the 2020 and 2024 elections. By contrast, 80% of the 10 states with the lowest electricity prices voted for the Republican candidate in those same elections. The bottom line is that the decisions that states make, good or bad, have consequences for American families and businesses when it comes to electricity affordability.

Amy Cooke, the President and CEO of Always On Energy Research, issued the following statement:

“Democrats have realized voters are furious about rising electric bills and are hoping to capitalize on that frustration in the upcoming midterm elections. But before blue-state politicians blame everything from the rollback of federal wind and solar subsidies to new data center development, they should take a hard look in the mirror. 

“BlueStatesHighRates.com, a new interactive index from Always On Energy Research and the Institute for Energy Research, shows that the steepest increases sit in the bluest states across the 50 states and Washington, D.C.

IER Experts Available For Interview On This Topic:

Always On Energy Research Experts Available For Interview on This Topic:

Additional Background Resources From IER and AOER:

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Nick Stokes
July 11, 2026 6:23 pm

“shows that the steepest increases sit in the bluest states”

It doesn’t show that. It is the tired old map of prices. It does not show rate of increase.

Ronald Stein
July 11, 2026 6:39 pm

A popular misunderstanding is that intermittent solar and wind are “free”, but increasing electricity costs are caused by at least two factors:
1.    Two electricity generating systems need to be built. The fact is that because wind and solar are intermittent, two power generation systems need to be built. The renewable system that is powered by wind and solar energy and then a backup generation system powered by coal, gas, nuclear or other “Dispatchable” generation. The second generating system is necessary to provide uninterrupted generation when the sun sets and the wind doesn’t blow.
2.    Wind and solar farms require vast acreage away from populated areas; thus, transmission lines and substations must be constructed to connect the power generation from remotely located solar and wind farms. to bring that “free” electricity back to where people and businesses are located.
The more solar and wind is installed, the higher the cost of electricity.