Claim: Climate change has likely begun to suffocate the world’s fisheries

[note: open access study, seems to be models all the way down]

New research finds the ocean’s middle depths, home to many commercially fished species, started losing oxygen at unnatural rates in 2021

Peer-Reviewed Publication

AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION

IMAGE: CLIMATE CHANGE IS DRIVING OXYGEN OUT OF THE WORLD’S WARMING OCEANS AT UNNATURAL RATES, LIKELY SUFFOCATING MANY OF THE WORLD’S FISHERIES, ACCORDING TO A NEW STUDY IN GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS. view more CREDIT: PAUL EINERHAND/UNSPLASH

By 2080, around 70% of the world’s oceans could be suffocating from a lack of oxygen as a result of climate change, potentially impacting marine ecosystems worldwide, according to a new study. The new models find mid-ocean depths that support many fisheries worldwide are already losing oxygen at unnatural rates and passed a critical threshold of oxygen loss in 2021.

Oceans carry dissolved oxygen as a gas, and just like land animals, aquatic animals need that oxygen to breathe. But as the oceans warm due to climate change, their water can hold less oxygen. Scientists have been tracking the oceans’ steady decline in oxygen for years, but the new study provides new, pressing reasons to be concerned sooner rather than later.

The new study is the first to use climate models to predict how and when deoxygenation, which is the reduction of dissolved oxygen content in water, will occur throughout the world’s oceans outside its natural variability.

It finds that significant, potentially irreversible deoxygenation of the ocean’s middle depths that support much of the world’s fished species began occurring in 2021, likely affecting fisheries worldwide. The new models predict that deoxygenation is expected to begin affecting all zones of the ocean by 2080.

The results were published in the AGU journal Geophysical Research Letters, which publishes high-impact, short-format reports with immediate implications spanning all Earth and space sciences.

The ocean’s middle depths (from about 200 to 1,000 meters deep), called mesopelagic zones, will be the first zones to lose significant amounts of oxygen due to climate change, the new study finds. Globally, the mesopelagic zone is home to many of the world’s commercially fished species, making the new finding a potential harbinger of economic hardship, seafood shortages and environmental disruption.

Rising temperatures lead to warmer waters that can hold less dissolved oxygen, which creates less circulation between the ocean’s layers. The middle layer of the ocean is particularly vulnerable to deoxygenation because it is not enriched with oxygen by the atmosphere and photosynthesis like the top layer, and the most decomposition of algae — a process that consumes oxygen — occurs in this layer.

“This zone is actually very important to us because a lot of commercial fish live in this zone,” says Yuntao Zhou, an oceanographer at Shanghai Jiao Tong University and lead study author. “Deoxygenation affects other marine resources as well, but fisheries [are] maybe most related to our daily life.”

The new findings are deeply concerning and adds to the urgency to engage meaningfully in mitigating climate change, says Matthew Long, an oceanographer at NCAR who was not involved in the study.

“Humanity is currently changing the metabolic state of the largest ecosystem on the planet, with really unknown consequences for marine ecosystems,” he said. “That may manifest in significant impacts on the ocean’s ability to sustain important fisheries.”

Evaluating vulnerability

The researchers identified the beginning of the deoxygenation process in three ocean depth zones — shallow, middle and deep — by modeling when the loss of oxygen from the water exceeds natural fluctuations in oxygen levels. The study predicted when deoxygenation would occur in global ocean basins using data from two climate model simulations: one representing a high emissions scenario and the other representing a low emissions scenario.

In both simulations, the mesopelagic zone lost oxygen at the fastest rate and across the largest area of the global oceans, although the process begins about 20 years later in the low emissions scenario. This indicates that lowering carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions could help delay the degradation of global marine environments.

The researchers also found that oceans closer to the poles, like the west and north Pacific and the southern oceans, are particularly vulnerable to deoxygenation. They’re not yet sure why, although accelerated warming could be the culprit. Areas in the tropics known for having low levels of dissolved oxygen, called oxygen minimum zones, also seem to be spreading, according to Zhou.

“The oxygen minimum zones actually are spreading into high latitude areas, both to the north and the south. That’s something we need to pay more attention to,” she says. Even if global warming were to reverse, allowing concentrations of dissolved oxygen to increase, “whether dissolved oxygen would return to pre-industrial levels remains unknown.”

###

AGU (www.agu.org) supports 130,000 enthusiasts to experts worldwide in Earth and space sciences. Through broad and inclusive partnerships, we advance discovery and solution science that accelerate knowledge and create solutions that are ethical, unbiased and respectful of communities and their values. Our programs include serving as a scholarly publisher, convening virtual and in-person events and providing career support. We live our values in everything we do, such as our net zero energy renovated building in Washington, D.C. and our Ethics and Equity Center, which fosters a diverse and inclusive geoscience community to ensure responsible conduct.

*****

Paper title:
“Emerging Global Ocean Deoxygenation Across the 21st Century”

Authors:

  • Yuntao Zhou (corresponding author) and Hongjing Gong, School of Oceanography, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • Chao Li, Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science (Ministry of Education), East China Normal University, Shanghai, China; School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China

JOURNAL

Geophysical Research Letters

DOI

10.1029/2021GL095370 

ARTICLE TITLE

Emerging Global Ocean Deoxygenation Across the 21st Century

ARTICLE PUBLICATION DATE

19-Nov-2021

Disclaimer: AAAS and Eurek

From EurekAlert!

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
1.7 19 votes
Article Rating
136 Comments
matt
February 2, 2022 8:16 am

“Climate Modeling” IOW “More BS”

February 2, 2022 8:25 am

Sheesh, “ocean oxygen content due to temperature”….Did it not occur to these scientists that fish gills evolved to supply sufficient oxygen over a wide range of water temperature ? And even survive red tides where O2 levels are very low, but fish can normally just swim deeper….

RevJay4
February 2, 2022 8:27 am

Another prediction which is bogus due to the methods used to make it. “Models”. Apparently, these bought and paid for “scientists” haven’t figured out that their credentials are pretty much no longer respected as having any meaning. Well, other than impressing the barista at the coffee shop, along with the 5 dollar bill to pay for the beverage. Yup.

Duane
February 2, 2022 8:44 am

The change in solubility of oxygen in water with temperature is a nothing burger of a change at the rate that ocean temperatures are increasing, if at all. There is nothing that conceivably change ocean temperature by even a tiny fraction (hundredths) of 1 deg C over the next 60 years.

The difference in temperature across the water column in oceans varies by thousands of times that much – ranging from as high as 30 deg C at the surface in tropical areas to 0 deg C at the seabed.

In other words, with overall temps varying at most a few hundredths of 1 deg C over time, at a constant depth and latitude, and no changes in overturning currents, a fish would only need to increase their “average swimming depth” – if there is such a thing – by a couple of feet to maintain exactly the same constant oxygen content in the seawater.

Seriously, THIS is what they’re worried about?

SMH

This is the equivalent of the apocryphal theologians arguing over how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.

Vuk
February 2, 2022 8:44 am

EU is revolting !
Nuclear and natural gas energy plants could be counted as “green energy” under controversial EU plans just unveiled.
The European Commission says it has decided that both types of energy can classify as “sustainable investment” if they meet certain targets.
But the move has divided the EU, and been fiercely opposed by some members.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60229199

Garboard
February 2, 2022 8:47 am

Since this is nothing more than modele warming only modeled fish will be affected

Duane
February 2, 2022 8:47 am

Apparently “climate scientists” are “evolution deniers”.

TeddyLee
February 2, 2022 9:06 am

All this from the Zhous Who of the CCP climate subversion army.

February 2, 2022 9:21 am

Wild guess prediction based on climate computer games.
Computers can be programmed to predict anything.
There are no data (no data for the future)
Just unproven theories, speculation and wild guess assumptions.
Meaningless climate astrology..
Not real science.
Why is this here?
For comedy?

February 2, 2022 9:23 am

“The middle layer of the ocean is particularly vulnerable to deoxygenation because it is not enriched with oxygen by the atmosphere and photosynthesis like the top layer, and the most decomposition of algae — a process that consumes oxygen — occurs in this layer.”

“This zone is actually very important to us because a lot of commercial fish live in this zone,”

So the depth zone that is not enriched with oxygen is where a lot of commercial fish live?

It makes me cry when I read things like this from so-called scientists. Did *anyone* actually read this paper before it was published?

Commercial fish live where the environment provides what they need. That’s food and oxygen. Why would commercial fish live in a worse environment for their survival when they can move to one that is better? That just goes against every evolutionary theory I’ve ever read!

February 2, 2022 9:27 am

Gee, “model” finds “tipping point,” disaster inevitable. Haven’t seen that before.

How in the world is this considered research? A mildly skilled pre-teen could program a computer to input a bunch of gibberish and model a disaster.

I’d be willing to bet that 97% (I chose that number because, Science) of “researchers” at universities haven’t spent enough time outside to acquire even a mild suntan.

February 2, 2022 9:37 am

Gish-galloping climate catastrophism won’t make it so.
But that won’t stop them trying.

February 2, 2022 9:46 am

Not so fast…
Has anyone had a chance to use onezoom with an incredible fractal online fast zoome for >2 billion species?

Have a look at this little critter :

https://www.onezoom.org/life/@Nitrosopumilus_maritimus_SCM1=922115?img=best_any&anim=flight#x341,y225,w0.7277

This guy produces O2 in the dark, no photosynthesis , and the ocean is stuffed with them.
In other words this critter is independent of Solar insolation, and CO2.
This guy is a Nitrogen fixer also.
See:

https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/the-nitrogen-cycle-processes-players-and-human-15644632/

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2021/04/01/2021.04.01.436977.full.pdf

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrosopumilus

None of this in in the models for sure, yet.

February 2, 2022 9:47 am

Not so fast…
Has anyone had a chance to use onezoom with an incredible fractal online fast zoome for >2 billion species?

Have a look at this little critter :

https://www.onezoom.org/life/@Nitrosopumilus_maritimus_SCM1=922115?img=best_any&anim=flight#x341,y225,w0.7277

This guy produces O2 in the dark, no photosynthesis , and the ocean is stuffed with them.
In other words this critter is independent of Solar insolation, and CO2.
This guy is a Nitrogen fixer also.
See:

https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/the-nitrogen-cycle-processes-players-and-human-15644632/

None of this in in the models for sure, yet.

Reply to  bonbon
February 2, 2022 9:49 am

A good overview here :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyhJJLk7St8&list=LL&index=10&t=1s

Numerous published papers linked at that page…

Reply to  bonbon
February 2, 2022 10:42 am
February 2, 2022 10:10 am

The new study is the first to use climate models to predict how and when …

Looks like settled science!…

Alfred T Mahan
February 2, 2022 10:33 am

This is a load of codswallop.

Clyde Spencer
Reply to  Alfred T Mahan
February 2, 2022 12:37 pm

But, it makes for a halibut of a good line.

HOJO
February 2, 2022 10:44 am

I see this as the same old NWO story as they tell us we are the killers when those who spoke it dealt it . They seem to be wanting all living things from bugs to fish to humans and every animal to not exist anymore. I just don’t get the bigger picture . You can’t rule what is not their.The push is massive and seems to have something to do with agenda 2030. Call me a nut but the pieces are coming together. Model my as*

Philip
February 2, 2022 10:47 am

Who thought the oceans would be knee deep in bullcrap.

Peter Fraser
February 2, 2022 10:58 am

These grifters keep producing this climate porn while most western countries are experiencing upticks in youth suicide.

Paul C
February 2, 2022 11:26 am

Presumably the conclusion is that offshore wind farms must be eliminated in order for coastal oxygenation of seawater to be restored? Or perhaps that ocean circulation patterns PDO, AMO, ENSO, etc have some trivial effect on the water, so we have to observe multiple complete cycles. Or maybe that the Chinese are staving off de-oxygenation by removing all the oxygen consuming fish? Or perhaps that they just need an awful lot more funding to run more models, and perhaps if they score sufficient grants will go off for extended field research in the south pacific.

February 2, 2022 11:32 am

More grant money wasted on tea leaves. Modelling cannot tell us what will happen to oxygen in the oceans unless the model is validated by proving ability to accurately predict. If there is a problem of declining O2 in the ocean it should be easy to demonstrate with numbers from actual measurements. Where are those numbers?

Why should we believe that CO2 in the atmosphere that is many times lower than the average during the blossoming of ocean and land organisms on earth, will lead to warming that, at present is much less than the average on planet Earth during the past few billion years. And then we are to believe that will lead to devastation of ocean life due to low oxygen levels, when there is no evidence this ever happened in the past at higher CO2 and temperature levels.

If I had the same models I would sell them for scrap and spend the paltry proceeds on cold beer.

whatlanguageisthis
February 2, 2022 11:34 am

Am I reading this correctly? This study used the output of an atmospheric climate model as an input to model the O2 levels of the ocean in three zones, and based on that model of a model, determined the oceans started suffocating last year? Since it is a past event, is there measured data to confirm this?

Another question – does O2 drive ocean circulation now? I was of the understanding that the currents were driven by the plant’s rotation, temperature differences, and salinity differences. This is the first I heard that dissolved oxygen was the driver.

February 2, 2022 11:36 am

“The study predicted when deoxygenation would occur in global ocean basins using data from two climate model simulations…”

data from models? why do they let idiots write stuff like this?

Clyde Spencer
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 2, 2022 12:39 pm

Their jobs depend on it!

William B Handler
February 2, 2022 11:46 am

I really do not understand this concern. If you look at the information on the solubility of oxygen (https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/oxygen-solubility-water-d_841.html) does not change suddenly with temperature, its a very gradual change, and is also affected by salinity and pressure. Is it not more likely that dead zones are caused biologically, like we get in the great lakes due to algae blooms.

DHR
February 2, 2022 12:04 pm

ARGO information shows that the temperature of the top few hundred feet of the ocean is cyclic and colder water can hold more oxygen than warmer water. For the past several years ocean near-surface water temperature has been declining. Surface water has a hard time getting much above 28C because increasing evaporation as the water warms eventually plateaus the temperature increase. The temperature of the deep ocean is not changing. ARGO data also show that the top few hundred feet of the ocean’s surface has been freshening and fresher seawater can hold more oxygen than saltier seawater. These data suggest that the subject study is likely wrong.