By Robert Bradley Jr. — October 28, 2021
“Exposure to [low frequency noise] from wind turbines results in headaches, difficulty concentrating, irritability, fatigue, dizziness, tinnitus, aural pain sleep disturbances, and annoyance. Clinically, exposure … may cause increased risk of epilepsy, cardiovascular effects, and coronary artery disease.”
“… it is recommended that the government set regulations on the requisite distances of wind turbines from residences, for houses near wind turbines to be equipped with airtight windows for sound insulation, and for residents living in close proximity to wind turbines to have their windows closed most of the time to reduce LFN transmission.”
Once ridiculed, the negative health effects of industrial wind turbines on nearby residents has entered the mainstream. The World Health Organization stated in 2018 “strong evidence that noise is one of the top environmental hazards to both physical and mental health and well-being in the European Region.” Wind turbines, do not start your engines.
In the U.S., Robert Bryce noted:
Since 2015, nearly 300 government entities from Vermont to Hawaii have moved to reject or restrict wind projects. Local governments are implementing a panoply of regulations to restrict the growth of wind projects including strict limits on noise, minimum setback distances, and even seeking licenses for heliports. A thorough review of the studies [has] documented the deleterious health impacts of noise from wind turbines.
MasterResource has updated the wind health issue by interviewing experts (Stephen Cooper) and sharing new research from the expert literature (Nature).
Last month, Scientific Reports published Effects of low-frequency noise from wind turbines on heart rate variability in healthy individuals by Chun-Hsiang Chiu, Shih-Chun Candice Lung, Nathan Chen, Jing-Shiang Hwang, and Ming-Chien Mark Tsou. This report is summarized below in its own words (footnotes omitted).
Abstract
Wind turbines generate low-frequency noise (LFN, 20–200 Hz), which poses health risks to nearby residents. This study aimed to assess heart rate variability (HRV) responses to LFN exposure and to evaluate the LFN exposure (dB, LAeq) inside households located near wind turbines. Thirty subjects living within a 500 m radius of wind turbines were recruited. The field campaigns for LFN (LAeq) and HRV monitoring were carried out in July and December 2018.
A generalized additive mixed model was employed to evaluate the relationship between HRV changes and LFN. The results suggested that the standard deviations of all the normal to normal R–R intervals were reduced significantly, by 3.39%, with a 95% CI = (0.15%, 6.52%) per 7.86 dB (LAeq) of LFN in the exposure range of 38.2–57.1 dB (LAeq). The indoor LFN exposure (LAeq) ranged between 30.7 and 43.4 dB (LAeq) at a distance of 124–330 m from wind turbines.
Moreover, households built with concrete and equipped with airtight windows showed the highest LFN difference of 13.7 dB between indoors and outdoors. In view of the adverse health impacts of LFN exposure, there should be regulations on the requisite distances of wind turbines from residential communities for health protection.
Wind energy is used around the world as a source of clean energy. However, wind turbines generate low-frequency noise (LFN) in the range of 20–200 Hz. As many community complaints have centered around the LFN from wind turbines, it is important to evaluate the health impacts of LFN on residents near wind farms.
Introduction
LFN exposure has been found to cause a variety of health conditions. Exposure to LFN from wind turbines results in headaches, difficulty concentrating, irritability, fatigue, dizziness, tinnitus, aural pain sleep disturbances, and annoyance. Clinically, exposure to LFN from wind turbines may cause increased risk of epilepsy, cardiovascular effects, and coronary artery disease.
It was also found that exposure to noise (including LFN) may have an impact on heart rate variability (HRV). HRV is the variation over time of the period between adjacent heartbeats, which is an indicator of the activities of the autonomic nervous system, consisting of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and parasympathetic nervous system (PNS). Autonomic imbalance usually represents a hyperactive SNS and a hypoactive PNS and results in reduced HRV.
An autonomic imbalance may increase the morbidity and mortality of cardiovascular diseases. A review paper indicated that road traffic noise may overactivate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis (HPA) and sympathetic-adrenal-medullar axis (SAM), increase the blood pressure and reduce HRV, and finally affect the cardiovascular system.
A recent study analyzing 658 measurements of HRV obtained from 10 healthy males (18–40 years old) indicated reductions in HRV due to environmental LFN exposure. However, few studies have specifically examined the effect of LFN from wind turbines on HRV in healthy individuals; thus, this was the aim of this study.
In view of the adverse health impacts of noise exposure, many countries and international organizations have established regulations for noise control. These regulations are set for noise in the full spectrum of human hearing (20–20 k Hz). The Ministry of Environment of Finland set limits for wind farm noise of 45 dB (LAeq) during the day and 40 dB (LAeq) during the night. In the United Kingdom, the fixed limit for turbine noise is 40 dB (LAeq) for the daytime and 43 dB (LAeq) for the nighttime.
In the United States, noise levels of ≤ 55 dB (LAeq) are set for outdoors in residential areas, farms, and other outdoor areas as requisites for public health protection, and levels of 45 dB are set for indoor residential areas, hospitals, and schools.
In addition to the full noise spectrum, the Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) also established regulations for LFN to avoid impacts on residents, since wind farms have been set up very close to residential communities. The LFN standards for wind turbines in the daytime (7 a.m.–7 p.m.) and evening (7 p.m.–10 p.m.) are 39 dB (LAeq) for environments requiring tranquility such as residential areas, 44 dB (LAeq) for mixed residential and commercial/industrial areas, and 47 dB (LAeq) for industrial areas; those at nighttime (10 p.m.–7 a.m.) are 36, 36, 41, and 44 dB (LAeq), respectively.
This study assessed the LFN in the indoor environments of households near wind turbines to evaluate whether the LFN levels meet the Taiwan EPA standards.
One of the most important factors influencing residential noise exposure from wind turbines is the distance of the wind turbine from the observer. For example, at a distance of 120–500 m, the measured turbine noise levels decreased by 3–5 dB (LAeq), while at a distance of 1000 m the noise was reduced by 6–7 dB (LAeq).
Hansen et al. reported variations in indoor LFN levels (15–45 dB (LAeq)) for two households (houses made of sandstone/concrete/iron or bricks with windows remaining closed or half open) at different distances from wind turbines. This study assessed the indoor/outdoor differences in LFN exposure in several households located at varying distances from wind turbines.
Our main focus was on the indoor LFN levels in several recruited households; we did not intend to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the influential factors. These households serve the purpose of demonstrating the potential impacts of influential factors.
Besides distance from turbines, building materials also affect indoor LFN exposure. This work assessed the indoor LFN levels for several recruited households with different building materials and open/closed windows to illustrate their potential impacts. It is known that materials have different sound absorption coefficients.
The overall sound pressure level and spectrum of external noise change when transmitted to the interior of a building. Mid- and high-frequency noises are selectively attenuated by roofs and walls, causing the building structure to function like an LFN pass filter. Outdoor to indoor noise reduction generally decreases with frequency, which is related to housing construction and room dimensions.
Factors contributing to indoor/outdoor noise reduction also include structural resonances, room modes, and coupling between the air volume inside the residence and the stiffness of the walls, roofs, and ceilings. It is known that the appropriate choice of construction materials and designs can contribute to LFN exposure reduction for residents. Hence, these factors are not evaluated comprehensively in this study.
Taiwan is a small and highly populated island. Wind farms have been set up near residential communities, affecting the day-to-day lives of the residents. The hypothesis of this study is that LFN from wind turbines might affect HRV of residents. In order to verify the hypothesis of this study, we defined two objectives: to evaluate the LFN and HRV relationship with an intervention design and to assesses the actual LFN exposure of the community residents.
This investigation is the first in Asia examining the impact of LFN from wind turbines on the HRV of healthy residents. In addition, the variations in LFN exposure inside several residences constructed of different building materials are examined. The findings of this study would serve as a useful reference for Asian countries planning to launch or promote wind power generation.
Conclusion
LFN from wind turbines is potentially annoying to residents living nearby and affects human health. This study assessed the response of HRV indicators (SDNN and LF/HF) to LFN exposure and evaluated the LFN exposure inside households located near wind turbines. The results showed the association of changes in HRV with LFN exposure and an SDNN reduction of 0.43% with an increase of 1 dB (LAeq) in LFN. The households’ average LFN levels were 34.8 ± 6.9 and 43.4 ± 5.7 dB for indoors and outdoors, respectively.
In addition, the average indoor LFN levels at nighttime in four of the seven households monitored were above 30 dB (LAeq), the threshold for good sleep quality. Taiwan has a high population density, and wind farms have been set up near residential communities.
In view of the adverse health impacts of exposure to turbine-generated LFN, it is recommended that the government set regulations on the requisite distances of wind turbines from residences, for houses near wind turbines to be equipped with airtight windows for sound insulation, and for residents living in close proximity to wind turbines to have their windows closed most of the time to reduce LFN transmission.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Makes me wonder if these low frequency vibrations are damaging structures over time as well.
You sure wouldn’t want these near cities built on ancient lake beds like Mexico City, entire buildings could start sinking (well, sinking faster).
Hmmm, many Chinese authors documenting human problems with wind turbine. Solar panels are mad in China and wind turbines come from Germany. No, there is no special interest here.
BTW, I happen to believe that both wind turbines and solar panels as a solution to any Climate Change problems are rubbish.
But just skeptical about there being only one article. Many independent researchers publishing the same findings would be valuable.
Holy Cow I’ve just sussed it…
Our lungs are behaving as ears or microphones.
Because of their size they will be sensitive to some very low frequencies.
And lookee there what’s jammed up against them in the fairly confined space that is our Rib Cage
Our heart
Enter ‘Heart Rate Variability’
Those machines are ‘forcing’ our hearts almost directly
I’m not at all impressed with this article. Perhaps they concentrated on low frequency noise and ignored infrasound because they were dealing with a regulatory agency that followed the US OSHA noise rules that are based on the dBA weighting which models normal hearing – and hence excludes infrasound and ultrasound. Ultrasound isn’t much of a problem on industrial wind turbine scales as air alone will attenuate higher frequencies. That’s why you can hear the “crack” of a nearby lightning strike but only rumbles from distant ones.
Infrasound appears to affect things from stones in our balance organ, hence the feeling vertigo.
I bought a Raspberry Shake & Boom, see https://raspberryshake.org/products/ , in July with the hope of making some wind turbine infrasound. Then learn enough about digital signal processing to transmogrify it in to something audible so I and others can hear how it changes over the course of a night. However, too many distractions so far.
Not the least is that the RSB is an incredible device. The seismic side picks up big quakes like the MM8.2 quake in Alaska, the recent Haiti quake, local quakes, e.g one that was 100 km away but only four “did you feel it” reports came from more than 10 km away. Also helicopters, gravel mine explosions 16 miles away, even joggers running by!
The infrasound side hasn’t been as distracting, but it recorded what I’m convinced was a daytime meteor explosion on a cloudy day. A lot of people heard it, GOES-16 got one image of it. That spawned a lot of speculation. My RSB and one 20 miles away both got great recordings that taught me a <i>lot</i> about such events.
I shared my analysis on FaceBook, see https://www.facebook.com/ric.werme/posts/10159672841096550?__cft__%5B0%5D=AZUqyOcAaSFwTphX7Ohg1EV0l-1G8tI2H2pCJaKU3j7PbDbJ7jWa17VaBAaOKMb3pEQoGD4qup8xWy3zUa8Ny3UUOZDzg28l657vWy45G49CISP9HE76urg8AFAWMV4uqxE&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R with the local NWS and the American Meteor Society. The latter was thrilled to get our analysis as they are beginning to looks at RSBs to augment their full-sky camera systems.
See also https://www.facebook.com/alan.kafka.1/posts/10158373237753061?__cft__%5B0%5D=AZVQ0IUTy10RNmXctK8eKszJBB3PM-b5mKJz7kp-ZdWTkrZtqv3so92mbl5DSUTy7XHJcNNcoUeTExIaFdAM9ZBIpSZfXcxwR692fMTz7y4ZJ1Q4MDBC8XLTITrVN8N0DBE&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R
(Do those work here?)
I may be getting close to turning my attention to those wind turbines….
My seismic data is at https://dataview.raspberryshake.org/#/AM/RB3C2/00/EHZ , HDF is the infrasound.
If you’re not allowed to give opinions on social media contrary to WHO recommendations, you get a warning, if not a termination of your account. So, I intend to report at least one person who promotes wind turbines as safe and clean. I cannot have people promoting falsehoods on social media.
airtight unopenable windows in concrete homes in the taiwan tropics
throw in the humidity mould and cooling bills / freshair needs re covid,
because of birdshredders..and the death toll TO the migratory birds using the corridor nth to sth