Michael Mann gives himself a tongue bath

From the unlimited self-adulation department and the Manntastic Television Network, comes this video.

If anyone out there has recently ingested poison, here’s just what you need to induce vomitting.

Meanwhile, while Mann ups the alarm, real-world data shows there is nothing to fear: Inconvenient Truth: Climate-related death risk down 99.6% over 100 years

4.5 18 votes
Article Rating
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Halla
January 2, 2021 6:23 pm

OMG! Michael Mann is totally blatant. He just doesn’t care about reality, just The Cause.

Reply to  Tom Halla
January 2, 2021 6:33 pm

Is he getting (hoping to?) laid by and pretty young activist?
Stranger things have happened. I always believed that was Guy Macphersons motivation.

Reply to  Mike
January 4, 2021 5:35 am

Well, that’s the entire point of the .modern Democrat Party and the sexual revolution, to encourage more young women to sleep with fossilized politicians and hangers-on.

Reply to  Tom Halla
January 3, 2021 2:31 am

What a disgusting little BIG fraudster, a self deluded vicious lying bully, & disgrace to science & humanity.

January 2, 2021 6:30 pm

This bloke is about as far from a scientist as you can get.
Delusions of grandeur.

Reply to  Mike
January 2, 2021 7:18 pm

The New Climate Bore, same as the Old Climate Bore.

Michael S. Kelly
Reply to  Mike
January 3, 2021 10:10 am

This bloke is about as far from a scientist as you can get.”

That’s why he bills himself as a “distinguished climate scientist.” He’s distinguished from all actual climate scientists.

john harmsworth
Reply to  Michael S. Kelly
January 4, 2021 8:50 am

Not so much. There aren’t many of them you’d want for a brother-in-law.

John in Oz
January 2, 2021 6:42 pm

Di I hear right?

“I would have preferred to have been left alone in the lavatory…”

– where he does some of his best work

Reply to  John in Oz
January 2, 2021 7:58 pm

Producing S**T from both ends.

Reply to  John in Oz
January 3, 2021 2:07 am

I would have preferred to have been left alone in the lavatory…”

The only place he can truly be flushed with success

John Endicott
Reply to  John in Oz
January 7, 2021 8:14 am

Easy to see the confusion, as he does produce the same material in the lavatory as he does in the laboratory, just from different orifices.

John in Oz
January 2, 2021 6:48 pm

Only $29 (US – $39.82 Oz) and you, too, can help Mr Mann rack up a few more dollars to save the world.

If he is so concerned why is he not giving these away as a pdf (plus, as we say in Oz, a block of flats in Tasmania plus a free set of steak knives)?

Joseph Zorzin
Reply to  John in Oz
January 3, 2021 4:56 am

Exactly, saving the Earth is clearly worth sacrificing a few bucks! And of course, he should be living in a mud hut (so no forests will be sacrified for a wood home), he should only ride a horse, never fly in a jet, eat only vegetables. Gee, if God told me to do something to save the Earth, I’d do it. He clearly believes his right- as if God told him. But of course these climatistas are all hypocrites.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
January 4, 2021 11:33 pm

Gee, if God told me to do something to save the Earth, I’d do it.”

Nah, I’d tell him to do his own work. Life is hard enough as it is without him slacking off all the time.

January 2, 2021 6:55 pm

Just had lunch.

Last thing I need to hear is mickey mann blabbering mindlessly. !

January 2, 2021 6:57 pm

What a load of verbal diarrhea.

January 2, 2021 7:11 pm

Thanks to the adequate warnings in the introduction, I was able to avoid clicking on the video and being subjected to Michael Mann vomit-inducing spiel and so I went straight on to enjoy the readers’ comments.

Reply to  nicholas tesdorf
January 2, 2021 7:20 pm

It didn’t cause me to vomit (that much).

Reply to  nicholas tesdorf
January 3, 2021 7:47 am

Also didn’t click on the video and also went straight to the comments here. I have to guess it is either verbally across the boundaries of good taste (pun?) or visibly so, or both, which is hard for me to imagine. Is there a way to assemble a short outline of it, in a way that I and others won’t lose our lunch from such a description?

Last edited 2 years ago by Russell Cook
January 2, 2021 7:50 pm

Yes Micheal Mann, What about PR China?? A true believer in anthropocentric CO2 excess should be front in condemning China’s enormous and ongoing coal power station expansion.
their 4442 coal plants are more than the rest of the world combined.

Reply to  Antonym
January 3, 2021 1:55 am

Minor point, 4442 is annual CO2 emissions in million tonnes not number of coal plants. And China continues to increase emissions and assist construction of coal plants in the third world.

Harry Passfield
Reply to  Taphonomic
January 3, 2021 8:59 am

Being China, they know they can emit as much as they like and the useful idiots of the West will claim the responsibility is ALL THEIRS! What a great play – for China. The West needs to get its act together to counter it – but…Biden….(sigh).

Reply to  Antonym
January 2, 2021 9:59 pm

Don’t mention the war.
I did once, but I think I got away with it.

Joseph Zorzin
Reply to  Antonym
January 3, 2021 4:58 am

In China, he’d vanish as quick as those doctors who early on raised the flag about Covid.

Mumbles McGuirck
January 2, 2021 8:15 pm

Of course, if he REALLY wanted to stay in his laboratory and remain anonymous there is nothing to stop him. The seductive glare of TV lights lures him out… time and again. He’s all ego.

Reply to  Mumbles McGuirck
January 2, 2021 10:56 pm

”The seductive glare of TV lights lures him out… time and again. He’s all ego”
So true. The BBC loves him. I heard him dribbling on there the other night. The nonsense he comes out with is embarrassingly shallow – BBC sucks it down like coca-cola. Win win!
Last summer he had the nerve to lecture us in aus about the cause of the fires. A politically motivated, odious little worm of a man.
Mann truly is the great stomach-turner.

Last edited 2 years ago by Mike
Reply to  Mike
January 3, 2021 3:48 am

its a hard call tween him n the goracle for mouthing drivel in a sententious manner
pray covid travel bans keep BOTH the mucky sods out of aus for the foreseeable future(and billygates too)

Hoyt Clagwell
January 2, 2021 8:20 pm

Pretty soon the young gerneration will experience a week of August temperatures in the 90s and firmly believe that nobody before them ever had to suffer such a fate.

Joel O'Bryan
January 2, 2021 8:38 pm

A Jeffrey Toobin-approved video.

Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
January 4, 2021 7:39 am

Mann, Toobin, tongue bath.

Is it legal to put all three of those in the same comment stream?

Last edited 2 years ago by Kpar
January 2, 2021 8:44 pm

“Michael Mann gives himself a tongue bath”
He forgot the Ivory Soap.

Reply to  noaaprogrammer
January 2, 2021 9:15 pm

“He forgot the Ivory Soap”.

Not enough to get rid of the many layers of putrid green slime. !

Margaret LaFranier
Reply to  noaaprogrammer
January 2, 2021 9:50 pm

He doesn’t use Ivory soap. He still thinks it comes from poaching endangered elephants.

Alexy Scherbakoff
January 2, 2021 9:30 pm

I misunderstood the title of the post. I won’t be able to sleep tonight.

January 2, 2021 10:47 pm

As with everything manniacal does, his self tongue bath is incredibly sloppy.
Manniacal can’t even do that correctly.

January 3, 2021 12:10 am

What is the carbon footprint of Manns book?

Assuming it’s a hardback we have 4kg of CO2 -eq per book x the number of books in a normal print run (400,000) = 1,600,000kg of CO2 -eq.

Number of books given away, let’s say 1000
Number of books sold, likely 3 (Loydo, Griff, Simon)
Number of books pulped = 398,997 (say 1,600,000kg of CO2 -eq)

So Manns books carbon footprint for this one book is 3,600,000 CO2 -eq

Way to go Mikey.

Peta of Newark
January 3, 2021 1:10 am

Sooooo wrong on soooooo many levels.

But but but, what I see here is simple prostitution.
He is selling himself (his book ostensibly)

So why is he behaving like a cheap hooker?

But lets not denigrate hookers.
They do what they do because they have to do it – because they have nothing else of value to offer society. Or, a dysfunctional society creates the demand for them.
So is Mann

More buts: Actual Hookers are The Most Realistic and Down-to-Earth people you could ever meet. Why’s that?

(Peta, its coz they’re gurlz)
Oooooh yes. How could I not notice :-/

But then, how can a member of The Intelligentsia be so lacking in self-awareness and Value To Society and even worse, be unknowing of same?…..

Simple. Its found in your local food-store, in the bakery section and alcohol aisle.

A-ha. That’s it!
ctm, You Are Genius….

The ‘Poison‘ you mention is ‘sugar’
Mann’s video is a remedy for fatness, stupidity, diabetes, dementia, myriad ‘co-morbidities’ and the Dysfunctional Society

epic. simply epic

Last edited 2 years ago by Peta of Newark
Hokey Schtick
January 3, 2021 1:30 am

From a scientific point of view, he’s got beady weird little eyes that are too close together.

January 3, 2021 1:50 am

30 seconds was as much as I could stomach

You don’t need a laboratory to work at a computer, he is not a scientist he is charlatan

Ron Long
January 3, 2021 2:25 am

Any willing participant in the mis-use of Greta Thunberg should be facing child abuse charges. That trend is not going to end well as she is not getting the coaching to adapt to a normal life she needs. Aspergers Syndrome, now high-function Autism (due to fMRI studies), has some actual benefits, such as higher IQ and free (and innovative?) thinking.

Reply to  Ron Long
January 3, 2021 4:38 am

Greta is likely to be summoned to the Green King’s Palace as Lady in Waiting.

What Mann would do at that Palace is yet to be seen. He could ask Dr. John Schellnhuber, CBE, the great de-carbonizer, what’s it like to be be-knighted.

According to the Prince’s Davos opinion, this is now Year Zero of the Great Reset.
Looks like the Gregorian Calendar has been replaced by the Green Calendar – set your clocks everybody!
Maybe Mann could be the Green-wich Meantime clock-winder in their Clockwork Universe?

Matthew Sykes
January 3, 2021 2:59 am

He is a classic psychopath.

  • socially irresponsible behaviour
  • disregarding or violating the rights of others
  • inability to distinguish between right and wrong
  • difficulty with showing remorse or empathy
  • tendency to lie often
  • manipulating and hurting others
  • recurring problems with the law
  • general disregard towards safety and responsibility
January 3, 2021 3:18 am

The media domination of the global doomsday narrative continues, with the same old tired tales regurgitated relentlessly – as exemplified by the BBC:
The major websites questioning in various ways the ‘dangerous climate change, we’re to blame’ dogma (as far as I see it) are Jo Nova, Watts up with That, Roy Spencer, and Not a Lot of People Know That, plus the Global Warming Policy Foundation.
Hardly internet ‘click bait’ titles, are they?
Not, I suggest, the first place a member of the public might go to.
In my view, the sceptical side needs to get its act together. Grouchy posts on a website don’t achieve anything – people just argue amongst themselves time and again.
How about ‘Climate Lies’ as a good click bait title?
Present all of the tired propaganda, and counter it with referenced facts which anyone can look up – but don’t let the public comment on it. On no account let the trolls in, just stick to the facts.
The power of the internet needs to be harnessed, and in my view it isn’t happening.

Reply to  Carbon500
January 3, 2021 4:38 am

4 yrs ago I put a climate fact-website together – https://www.use-due-diligence-on-climate.org/
with moderate success 2.8milion pages read, but only 138,000 individual people ( we need this stuff to be seen by millions ) sadly it need constant updating… links go dead, stuff is disappeared (as Anthony & mods know well).

I’m old & tired & not computer literate, therefore its hard work for me on my own.
If anyone would like to collaborate / take over / use any-all ; please contact me by email via Mods

Last edited 2 years ago by 1saveenergy
Simon Derricutt
Reply to  saveenergy
January 3, 2021 5:34 am

saveenergy – I visited your site, and the first section I looked at was https://www.use-due-diligence-on-climate.org/home/climate-change/scandals-scam-frauds-in-climatology/how-can-we-prove-the-new-adjusted-temperature-data-is-wrong-fraud/ . I’d suggest you look again at your assumption that the volume of the atmosphere is constant, and thus that the gas laws imply no temperature changes. The pressure at any level is simply the summed weight per area of the gas above it, and the actual volume we assign to the atmosphere depends on what pressure we define as the top. Constant average pressure just means that on average the total mass of the atmosphere hasn’t substantially changed. Maybe better to just point people at the Hadley CET (from 1659 onwards) where though it can’t be regarded as global it is at least actually measured rather than inferred from proxies.

As regards the North West Passage, the fact that it had a name and that the Franklin expedition (very expensive for the time) set out to find it implies that it was known to sailors for a long time, possibly many centuries. In the same way, the name for the melted ice in Greenland implies that the modern appearance of such events isn’t actually new and unprecedented. These days, “unprecedented” seems to describe events beyond the memory of the person being interviewed, such as the 13-year’old boy interviewed about the local flooding by the BBC a few years back. “I haven’t seen it this bad in my life!” I should have bookmarked that….

It’s a good site, and maintaining it against bit-rot does look like a big (and largely thankless) task. I’ll point a few more people at it.

Reply to  Simon Derricutt
January 3, 2021 3:19 pm

Undoubtedly, simili modo, the fact that unicorns have a name implies that they were known to scientists and sailors for a long time. The famous Lost Expedition (Tarquinius J. Lost, D.Phil) had unicorns on their list of things to search for. They surely would not have searched for them if they didn’t exist.

Last edited 2 years ago by jorge
Reply to  saveenergy
January 3, 2021 11:38 am

saveenergy: thanks for the link to your excellent website. I’ve had a quick look and will enjoy browsing through it further. This highlights the problem – I’ve been interested in the CAGW affair for years, yet wasn’t aware of your website until today.
I think that the sceptics need to become more publicity savvy – something which the likes of Al Gore are experts at doing.

January 3, 2021 3:45 am

the header gave me the shudders
need brain bleach to remove the minds-eye pic of that!!
and the clip just made me angry!
useless git

Joseph Zorzin
January 3, 2021 4:54 am

In the comments on the YouTube site- somebody mentioned that Mann hasn’t released his data. Somebody replied to that and said it was released 15 years ago? What’s the fact on that? Didn’t he also fail to release his methods, like software? Just curious.

Peter W
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
January 3, 2021 5:26 am

As I recall, he did release his data for statistical analysis, and the result was that a competent statistical analysis showed how invalid his conclusion was. Since then he has claimed that it is proprietary. When he next tried to sue the statistitian and National Review Magazine he eventually lost the lawsuit because he refused to make his data available again

January 3, 2021 5:06 am

Meanwhile, back in reality, Mann’s Hockey Stick Generator program (written in FORTRAN 4–a computer language dating back to stone knives and bearskins) was so manipulated, randomized NHL game scores could be run through to produced a hockey stick graph….seriously…

Ah, yes…. The Left is always about, “The $cience”….

January 3, 2021 5:49 am

They’re not all locked up.

January 3, 2021 6:53 am

Planned Harvard balloon test in Sweden stirs solar geoengineering unease


Last edited 2 years ago by john
wolf at the door
Reply to  john
January 3, 2021 8:14 am

“We’re not after truth here.What we’re after is plausible deniability”- Michael Mann from Climategate e mails.

Fred Dombrose
January 3, 2021 8:46 am

Here’s something more realistic – evidence.

Rod Evans
January 3, 2021 9:27 am

Everything that needs to said about Michael Mann has been said over and over again. Despite the overwhelming amount of condemnation heaped on him he still manages to find someone, prepared to publish in book form, the product of his twisted and tortured mind?.
With that being the situation far too typical in the world today? What hope for enlightened society is there? When the charlatans continue on, unaffected by valid criticisms, no sense of contrition for past well documented unsound science, people actually being applauded for completely bogus stories, think David Attenborough and tumbling walrus for a prime example. It begs the question.
What can we do to bring the masses back to healthy questioning of the “science”? When having done exactly that, the fraudsters in the AGW movement when found out take absolutely no notice and continue on regardless?

January 3, 2021 10:19 am

Let me know when he agrees to publish his data, then we’ll talk.

Peter W
Reply to  Philip
January 3, 2021 10:34 am

Hopefully unedited, including sources. The problem with his data, as I understand it, is that he obtained it from different sources, and then pick and chose what he wanted from each source in order to obtain the results he was looking for.

Bruce Cobb
January 3, 2021 11:25 am

He’s got that climate schtick down pat. Oh, and he plays the martyr card like a pro.

January 4, 2021 12:02 am

Hid books are not exactly flying out the door so to speak . His 2013 book The hockey schtick and something else ? is rated on Amazon at 191,580 in Books .

Sam L.
January 4, 2021 9:55 am

May Mann and NRO BOTH lose!

Robert Coutts
January 4, 2021 11:50 am

What a poor, poor victim of his own ‘repeat after me until everyone remembers it my way’ non-scientific opinion … who someone mistakenly allowed to graduate.

January 5, 2021 6:32 am

Ingest this…

WASHINGTON—The Environmental Protection Agency is issuing new rules that will give preference in future decisions about public health to scientific studies that disclose their underlying data.
Administrator Andrew Wheeler said the changes are aimed at increasing transparency so that the public has a chance to scrutinize findings that underlie major regulations.
“By shining light on the science we use in decisions, we are helping to restore trust in government,” Mr. Wheeler wrote in a commentary published by The Wall Street Journal late Monday. “We want the EPA to be able to say, ‘you can check our work.’”
The policy change, in the works since the start of the Trump administration, has been opposed by public-health experts, scientists and former staff who say it could undermine the agency’s effectiveness.
Many public-health studies rely on information about individual patient health that is required to be kept confidential, which may now exclude groundbreaking health findings from EPA consideration, these critics say.
The rules apply to the EPA’s consideration of “dose-response studies,” used to figure out how much exposure to a chemical or pollutant increases the risk to a person’s health. Those determinations are fundamental to many core EPA rules on public health.

In future decisions, the agency must now give greater consideration to studies in this area in which underlying dose-response data is available for independent validation. And when it proposes new regulations it must make available that science informing the rule to the public.
The rule won’t categorically exclude any data, Mr. Wheeler wrote, adding that the new practices can be applied without releasing personal information or violating confidentiality.
The rule will prevent agency leaders from trying “to cherry pick research to derive politically helpful results,” he wrote. It outlines specific criteria for when the administrator can make case-by-case exemptions to these requirements.
Several scientists and health experts have questioned Mr. Wheeler’s claims and say it is in many cases impossible to require these types of disclosures without violating patient confidentiality. In the end that is more likely just to narrow what research will be considered, they said.
“If left unchallenged, this rule would essentially bar the agency from using the most relevant medical studies when creating rules about air pollution, toxic chemicals, water contaminants,” Chris Zarba, a former director of the EPA’s Science Advisory Board, said in a statement. “The rule…doesn’t ensure transparency in science, but rather is detrimental to high-quality impartial decision-making.”
Mr. Zarba was joined in the statement by other former EPA employees, who say the change will benefit industrial interests by excluding certain types of studies.
They noted the EPA has long had a public-review process for the science it uses, one that includes several review boards and committees of outside experts from academia and industry to ensure transparency and scientific quality.

%d bloggers like this:
Verified by MonsterInsights