Governor Newsom doubling down to dismantle the California economy

clip_image001

By Ronald Stein

Founder and Ambassador for Energy & Infrastructure of PTS Advance, headquartered in Irvine, California

Published December 16, 2019 at California Political Review http://www.capoliticalreview.com/capoliticalnewsandviews/stein-governor-newsom-doubling-down-to-dismantle-the-california-economy/

With California’s energy costs for electricity and fuels among the highest in the country, Governor Newsom just doubled down to increase inflation with actions to further reduce oil production and putting more electrical loads on a state that cannot generate enough electricity to meet its own needs. The Governor’s recent actions will further “fuel” (no pun intended) the growth of the homeless and those on poverty.

With its green dreams of an emission free state, California has not even been able to generate enough of its own electricity in-state and imported 29% of its needs in 2018. The good news is that other state had the extra power. The bad news is that imported electricity comes at higher costs and those costs are being borne by residents and businesses alike. California households are already paying 50% more, and industrial users are paying more than double the national average for electricity.

The future of electricity in California does not bode well either as the State has chosen to not challenge the closure of the States’ last nuclear zero emission generating plant at Diablo Canyon and will be shuttering three natural gas generating plants in Southern California.

With NO plans for industrial wind or solar renewable intermittent electricity projects to generate “replacement” electricity in-state for the shuttered plants there will be a need to import greater percentages from other states (if they can generate enough) to meet California’s electricity needs in the years ahead. As you may know, the public has been underwhelmed with the huge land requirements for those renewables, so future large wind and solar sites are becoming less likely. And as you guessed it, more costs to the consumers and businesses who are already infuriated with high costs.

Governor Newsom should know California is the only state in the union that currently imports most of its crude oil energy from foreign countries. The California Energy Commission (CEC) data demonstrates that this dependency on foreign sources of oil requires expenditures of $60 million dollars EVERY DAY to oil rich foreign countries to support the 5th largest economy in the world for it’s military, aviation, cruise ships, and merchant ships, just to make up for the States’ choice to continue decreasing in-state production.

The Governor seems to be oblivious to the fact that one hundred percent of the industries that use deep earth minerals/fuels to “move things and make thousands of products” to support the economies around the world, are increasing their demand and usage each year of those energy sources from deep earth minerals/fuels, not decreasing it.

clip_image003

The Governors latest moves to reduce production and require larger setbacks for existing production wells will further decrease production and require the State to increase its monthly imports resulting in expenditures approaching a whopping $90 million EVERY DAY for foreign countries to support our infrastructures.

California has chosen to be the only state in America that imports most of its oil needs from foreign countries and relies on the U.S. Navy to pay a steep price keeping an aircraft carrier with escorts on station to deter attacks on oil tanker traffic operating in and around the Persian Gulf.

There are scary similarities between Governor Newsom’s goals for California and Vladimir Putin’s objectives. Both support California being more and more dependent on imported foreign oil, and both support anti-fracking in California as a successful fracking enterprise would lessen the states’ dependency on that foreign oil. Does the Governor know his actions are supportive of California becoming a National Security risk to America?

The charge into green will require retraining of a huge displaced workforce used to a certain lifestyle. A minimum wage earner is not afforded the time nor the resources to enjoy leisure activities.  Their mainstay in life is to make ends meet.  Most times that requires two and three such jobs and maybe even both heads of household working two of those low wage jobs to break even financially. How does the Governor plan to feed the families of displaced workers when he shuts down their means of survival? By default, his actions will increase the welfare numbers.

Regarding the Governor’s move to require EV’s to replace state fuel driven vehicles, I have no problem having the state buy EV’s but I have a major problem with the Governor “blowing off” the transparency of the child labor atrocities and mining irregularities in the EV battery supply chain. The Governor should read the laws, starting with The California Transparency in Supply Chains Act SB657 and followed by the U.S. with H.R.4842 – Business Supply Chain Transparency on Trafficking and Slavery Act of 2014.  The richest most powerful companies in the world, and now the Governor of California are still making excuses for not investigating the supply chains and continue to power manufactured EV’s with “dirty batteries”.

Like the green movement effects on the economies in Germany and Australia, the governor’s plan of moving forth at such an abrupt pace to end the states’ dependence on fossil fuels and convert to one hundred percent renewable electricity (folks, it’s not renewable energy, it’s only intermittent electricity) will break the back of the oil industry in the state and severely damage the California economy.

Ronald Stein, P.E.
Founder and Ambassador for Energy & Infrastructure
clip_image004
PTSadvance.com
 
0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

85 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bryan A
December 17, 2019 2:35 pm

Twould be nice is ALL the progressives left Ca for elsewhere, then the remainder could get the pendulum swinging in the other direction. towards sanity

Sara
Reply to  Bryan A
December 17, 2019 6:23 pm

I don’t want them here in my kingdom!!! Let them move to Mars! Mars is cold, dry and windy and like west Texas in a sandstorm has winds that will drive Martian dust right through your window frames.

Oh, wait – the REAL Martians might not like that, either.

Philo
December 17, 2019 6:08 pm

“With NO plans for industrial wind or solar renewable intermittent electricity projects to generate “replacement” electricity in-state”.

Viva Germany! Lets mandate the state into into bankruptcy and get billions in Federal relief. I trump not.

The Governor and his cronies seem to overlook the fact that other states aren’t required to ship electricity to them. If there is some sort of rate setting agreement in place I can see it being abrogated in the near future.

December 18, 2019 5:03 am

While some comments argue the graph data, the point of article is interesting plus all of these comments. As a descendent of 1849ers who were mostly cattlemen, dairymen and dry-land grain farmers, the San Joaquin Valley changes through 4 or 5 generations could be alarming. Water issues being one thing but the anti-carbon phenomena and the fear of carbon is maddening. I still argue that the anti-CO2 concept is anti-life. Part of the power problem has been PG&E and Edison caving to the Sacramento “dems” lobbies and environmental community. Regulation understatement, but there is so much bad use of science fueling whole industries. Now, the state wants total control of groundwater rights. Back in 1999 there was a writer and columnist in Las Vegas, Vin Suprinovitz (spell?). He was warning then of “fuel and power rationing.” I guess we are there now, plus more, with plant shutdowns based on faulty environment reasoning.

DocSiders
December 18, 2019 5:24 am

If things turn really bad in California there will still be lots of jobs…shoveling excrement and needles from sidewalks.

Daniel
December 18, 2019 9:24 am

It has been proven that American oil companies sell a large bulk of their production to foriegn countries. We then buy oil from outside our country. The problem isnt renewable energy. California needs to move in the direction it is going. The oil and energy companies need to keep our resources at home. What is being produced off our coast is likely going to China. Big corporations is profit 1st. Yet have been afforded large tax breaks. Not making the country great. Just greedy.

NickSJ
December 18, 2019 9:34 am

Californians are getting the government they voted for. Hope they enjoy the results.

RJ
December 18, 2019 9:47 am

The only result of rooftop solar in CA is going to be less houses built because of the cost of installing solar. The legislature believes the average cost will be around 10K. Show me a residential solar installation that costs that little, and I’ll eat my hat. And my hat is made of leather.

Bryan A
Reply to  RJ
December 18, 2019 12:37 pm

1 inverter and 3 panels (enough to open your garage door.)
My house would take around 30 – 40 panels (and would require a support structure be built over the carport) Canna putem onda roof

Bryan A
Reply to  RJ
December 18, 2019 2:36 pm

The reg would require that the Rooftop Solar Panels be sufficient in amount to produce the entire daily requirement of Juice for that particular house.

John Endicott
Reply to  RJ
December 19, 2019 5:07 am

The legislature believes the average cost will be around 10K. Show me a residential solar installation that costs that little

Well, that depends on if you are counting the true cost or the “cost” after all the subsidies (OPM) that are used to make it look affordable?