Climate Protestor Thieves get a Free Pass from a French Judge

President Emmanuel Macron. By Kremlin.ru, CC BY 4.0, Link. Image modified.

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

h/t Dr. Willie Soon; thieves who stole a portrait of French President Emanuel Macron were exonerated because the judge accepted their argument that the President of France is not doing enough to combat climate change.

Protesters who took Macron portrait acquitted on grounds of climate crisis

Kim Willsher in Paris
Tue 17 Sep 2019 21.31 AEST

French judge clears pair of theft, saying their actions were a ‘legitimate call on the president’ to act

Two climate crisis protesters who removed Emmanuel Macron’s portrait from an official building were justified in doing so because of the severity of the environmental emergency, a judge has said.

Prosecutors demanded they be fined €500 (£445). The public prosecutor, Rozenn Huon, told the court: “It’s clearly theft and it has done nothing to help climate change.”

The judge conceded “an object of a very strong symbolic value” had been stolen but said the climate crisis was more serious.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/sep/17/climate-crisis-justified-removal-of-macron-portrait-judge-rules

It is entertaining that the great climate leader President Macron is being criticised for lack of action on climate change.

But there may be more serious consequences. This court case sends a clear message to French criminals; if they want to rob a French bank and be exonerated, they should pick a bank with strong connections to the fossil fuel industry, so they can argue their crime was a symbolic political gesture.

Advertisements

82 thoughts on “Climate Protestor Thieves get a Free Pass from a French Judge

  1. The French are dysfunctional and proud of it. Reminds me of the comment: For Sale, French WWII mauser rifle, never fired and only dropped once.

    • Irrespective of their faults, I guess I will always have a soft spot in my heart for the French. They did keep the British warships bottled up in Yorktown harbor during the battle of Yorktown, thus enabling the end of the Revolutionary War.

      • Yeah, but that was during the French monarchy, prior to the French Revolution. there have been a couple revolutions and empires and five republics since then.

        • Yes, and they only wanted to pimp the British because they had lost the Seven Years War (French & Indian War) to them.

          The count is:
          5 revolutions: 1789, 1830, 1848, 1870, 1958
          2 Empires Napoleon (1800-1815), Napoleon III (1852-1870)
          2 Monarchies Bourbon (1815-1830) and Orleans (1830-1848)
          5 Republics 1795-1804, 1848-1852, 1870-1940, 1945-1958, 1958–
          1 Nazi Puppet Government 1940-1945

          • You don’t understand anything to french history ! The struggle between France and England started in the Middle Age with the wedding of Alienor d’Aquitaine with the King of England. So, during the Hundred Years War (1337-1453), french and english nations are constituted themselves one aganinst the other. Britain always had looking for dividing european nations of the continent, therefore France and Britain were opposed continuously from the Seven Years War to 1815. And Britain won.
            During the Campagne de France (May-june 1940), french army fought with bravery (200.000 deads !) under incompetent miltary authorities (general Gamelin, Weygand…).
            Without Allies in june 1940, Pétain thought that the war was lost because he didn’t understand that this war was global. De Gaulle understood. So, the true government during WWII was in London with de Gaulle and the Free French army (and my father fought at 17 years old in this army !). If french resistance did not act in june 44, the anglo-american landing of June 6th would fail, as said Eisenhower !
            And, excuse me, but photography (Niepce 1822), cinema (Lumière Brothers 1895), automobile (Cugnot 1769), aerostation (de Montgolfier 1785), airplane (Ader 1897)… are french inventions !

      • Yea, icisil, that was then, but now what? The Vichy French fired on US troops landing in North Africa during WWII, and how many were tried for traitors after the war ended? Their only saving grace is using nuclear energy and some great wines.

    • Please do not generalise.. Lots of French read this blog and don’t agree with those climate fascists. Lots of them resisted during WWII and died for that kind of basic freedoms.
      I guess it would not be very nice to associate you to Bernie Sanders, AOC or Obama actions.
      Merci

      • Geoffrey – “Please do not generalise…”
        Agree as it is using Ad Hominem which I thought was a bad thing. No country has a monopoly on the lunacy of AGW. Here we a have a judge who should have confined himself to interpreting the law but instead has abandoned his post and succumbed to group madness.

        • It’s called Legislating From the Bench. This judge just wrote new law in a move totally politically motivated.

          I suggest tar and feathers

          • They do seem well matched: A judge stupid enough to acquit them of the theft of the portrait is at least equalled by those stupid enough to want to steal such a portrait in the first place.

      • I have lived in France for the last 10 years. Mme Delahalle and M Goinciv were exceedingly fortunate in their judge. They will be less so when the prosecutor’s appeal is heard!

        Jokes about the French are common currency among the xenophobic English. Personally I find that I am considerably freer to go about my business here than I was for many years in the UK. At the very least the bureaucracy works for the people rather than for itself!

      • “I guess it would not be very nice to associate you to Bernie Sanders, AOC or Obama actions.”

        Good points, Geoffrey. 🙂

    • Classic John Cleese:
      ALERTS TO THREATS IN EUROPE: BY JOHN CLEESE

      by John Cleese – British writer, actor and tall person

      The English are feeling the pinch in relation to recent events in Syria and have therefore raised their security level from “Miffed” to “Peeved.” Soon, though, security levels may be raised yet again to “Irritated” or even “A Bit Cross.” The English have not been “A Bit Cross” since the blitz in 1940 when tea supplies nearly ran out. Terrorists have been re-categorized from “Tiresome” to “A Bloody Nuisance.” The last time the British issued a “Bloody Nuisance” warning level was in 1588, when threatened by the Spanish Armada.

      The Scots have raised their threat level from “Pissed Off” to “Let’s get the Bastards.” They don’t have any other levels. This is the reason they have been used on the front line of the British army for the last 300 years.

      The French government announced yesterday that it has raised its terror alert level from “Run” to “Hide.” The only two higher levels in France are “Collaborate” and “Surrender.” The rise was precipitated by a recent fire that destroyed France ‘s white flag factory, effectively paralyzing the country’s military capability.

      Italy has increased the alert level from “Shout Loudly and Excitedly” to “Elaborate Military Posturing.” Two more levels remain: “Ineffective Combat Operations” and “Change Sides.”

      The Germans have increased their alert state from “Disdainful Arrogance” to “Dress in Uniform and Sing Marching Songs.” They also have two higher levels: “Invade a Neighbour” and “Lose.”

      Belgians, on the other hand, are all on holiday as usual; the only threat they are worried about is NATO pulling out of Brussels .

      The Spanish are all excited to see their new submarines ready to deploy. These beautifully designed subs have glass bottoms so the new Spanish navy can get a really good look at the old Spanish navy.

      Australia, meanwhile, has raised its security level from “No worries” to “She’ll be alright, Mate.” Two more escalation levels remain: “Crikey! I think we’ll need to cancel the barbie this weekend!” and “The barbie is cancelled.” So far no situation has ever warranted use of the last final escalation level.

      A final thought – ” Greece is collapsing, the Iranians are getting aggressive, and Rome is in disarray. Welcome back to 430 BC”.

    • Petty vandalism in the name of protesting climate change is acceptable?
      What level of antisocial behavior is unacceptable to the French when done in protest?
      Large scale vandalism?
      Arson?
      Bombings?

      Seems they got rather awfully upset when murder was committed in the name of Islam.

      • “What level of antisocial behavior is unacceptable to the French when done in protest?”

        My guess is the French criminals will test this out for us after seeing this verdict.

        A large percentage of the Western world has gone crazy over human-caused climate change. This judge’s verdict is further confirmation.

      • It all depends on what you are protesting.
        If it is a cause that the judge doesn’t agree with, then there is no level of protesting that is acceptable.

    • I get it. Mausers were German rifles. The French service rifle at the time was the MAS-36.

      So for a Frenchman to get hold of a Mauser he must have captured it from a German.

      So it’s a slur on Germans! Take that Energiewende!!!

  2. Facial recognition being used to justify a crime,now theres a twist. Ironically the face has committed a crime in suppressing the truth of climate alarmism, things are getting bad very bad.

  3. The rule of law has been corrupted when the judges permit the purported ends to justify the means.
    This is a rather trivial incidence, but once the camel’s nose is into the tent…what sort of transgression will be allowed next in the name of protest action, bombings?

  4. Frankly, they’re welcome to the picture of Macron. We don’t want it, you can keep it.

    Now if I rob a bank, can my defense be that Ben Franklin never did ANYTHING to combat climate change?

    • What about the Smithsonian Aerospace exhibit? The Wright Flyer certainly contributed to the problems today, in fact it was the source of Evil Airlines

  5. I hope there will be an appeal !
    Can’t be true, it’s not a case of self-defense…
    A crime is a crime, for what reasons ever.

    • I do not know French Law, but here in the US once you are found innocent by the state (any state) you cannot be tried again for the same offense.
      Even if at a later date you admit to the crime, you cannot be tried again in a criminal court.
      An unfortunate loophole, but one that exists to prevent the state from continually prosecuting you until they find a sympathetic jury or judge.

      • If a revision wasn’t excluded, isn’t it possible that the case pass to an higher instance ?
        In France I found that:

        The Court of Appeal is the ordinary court of second instance.

        It is responsible for retrying a case when one of the parties has appealed against a judgment rendered by a court of first instance.

        Example: the judgment of the High Court.

        A party to the proceedings may contest the judgment. To do so, it must appeal to the competent court of appeal.

        There are 2 levels of jurisdiction in France:

        the courts of first instance: they settle a conflict during a trial;
        appellate courts: they rejudge the conflict, in fact and in law.

        In addition, the Court of Cassation is the supreme court of the judicial system, competent only to judge questions of law.

        Translated with http://www.DeepL.com/Translator

        French source</a<

      • @Rocketscientist an appeal is not a retrial the facts have been established in the trial, the argument is the judge made an errorin decision given the facts. Appeals under US law work exactly the same, a higher court simply looks at the facts that were determined in the case and looks if a judge made the correct decision based on those facts.

        In the case it looks like they have established they took the picture so I think on appeal they are in trouble.

  6. Some steal any photos of the judge for not doing enough to fight theft.

    Actually, since nothing of value was taken, maybe the ruling was proper.

    • Destruction/theft of government property.
      Somebody had to pay a poster shop to make the pictures. The funds came out of some department’s budget.
      500 euros is an inexpensive lesson that should be taught.

      • No debate that public funds were spent, but, as is often the case, nothing of value was obtained (and I was trying to be humorous).

  7. Progressives in Oregon get the same free pass for any illegalities they choose to engage in.
    Wherever they have the power, they’re already doing it.
    And pretty much ALL the democrat candidates are campaigning on how much worse they’re going to screw us than the person standing next to them.
    Of course, when we-the-screwed get justifiably angry, and say so, it’s called ‘hate’.

  8. For decades now, Europe has been little more than a museum to the greatness of Western Civilization. Soon, it won’t even be that.

  9. Personally, I would have gone for the defense that a portrait of Emanuel Macron has no value.

    • Bingo.

      In fact, given Micron’s recent attempts at “saving” the Amazon, Bolsonaro should now go before the UN and state that Brazil is ready to support the establishment of an international force to help France get rid of its gilets jaunes. How about that?

    • Yet theft of an item with no value is still theft. The law does not include a minimum value clause, nor does it have a justifiable theft defence. Value and excuses might be considerations when it comes to sentencing, but have no bearing on the finding of the court.

  10. Maybe someone should kick the judge in the balls and say it’s because the judges house is too big and uses too much energy.
    Hopefully this obvious attempt at humour doesn’t cross the line of advocating actual violence.

  11. Let’s see the ruling when a group tries to harm the French wine making industry for not controlling their CO2 emissions during the fermentation process (and don’t tell me it’s a trivial amount; so is bovine burps).

  12. The judge has singlehandedly struck down the rule of law. By his “logic” no law is sacrosanct, up to and including murder when it comes to “saving the planet”.

  13. Aussies have two levels of arousal: “Is it Friday yet?” and total outrage.

    When Aussies are totally outraged they’re probably referring to Pauline Hanson.

    • Hunt Yarra,

      There are very many Aussie expressions.
      For example, regarding arousal, some say that Aussie foreplay consists only of the words “Are you awake, luv?”

      What these expressions truly mean is quite debatable. Geoff S

  14. Wow.

    Once the acts of anarchy and acts of propagation towards anarchy within the main social and civil human structure, not only allowed to persist, but also supported and legitimized and justified in courts of law and order, then the question arising from this given, will be in the lines of some thing like;

    “How long it will take before history repeats itself again, how long from this point of start to something like
    Holocaust allover again…
    how long it could actually take this time around, for the full devastating impact of the fascism, if it again nourished and allowed and supported to successfully set within the power domain of this world?… how long and how expensive?” … any one?!

    cheers

  15. While the U.S.ians and the U.K.ians do not like to admit it, the French often lead the world in fashion and fashionable ideas. It scares the heck out of me that a judge in any country would condone an illegal act because it was done in support of a fantasy crisis. Judciary and politicians have a strong tendency to be numerically and scientifically challenged. It is expecting too much to hope that they might draw well reasoned conclusions about a complex scientific issue. If the French judiciary can be convinced that twenty years of minor warming constitutes a sufficient threat that the rule of law can be disregarded then we should all be very worried that the age of reason/ enlightenment which began in France is well and truly replaced by the age of politically correct group think.

  16. Was it any more illegal than gluing one’s self to a street or building to purposely impede traffic?
    The methods these cretins choose are all meant to disrupt normal activities for those they wish to influence. Very similar to preschool temper tantrums, they are ill-considered, extreme emotions on display for those around them.
    IMHO, 95% emotion and 5% rationale.

  17. Liberals believe, to the bottom of their black little hearts, that laws should not apply to them.
    Even liberal judges have bought into this line.

  18. OMG – is this not fake news? for real – thank God for Judge Vasta in the Peter Ridd case in Aus
    I’m shocked!! the judge is part of the mob mentality

  19. This Macron is simply stupid.

    He confesses Notre Dame at Ile de France can not be rebuilt original because in France there is no more trees to carry the ridge of the roof.

    But these trees still exist: in Lebanon.

    https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-huawei&sxsrf=ACYBGNRfGU1NFuKfyCQxB2lVr0DGmU3Btg%3A1569145608900&ei=CEOHXce0Ns-lmwXwyZ3YCg&q=cedar+forests+of+lebanon&oq=cedar+forests+Lebanon+&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-serp.

    Why doesn’t he know that – because he is plain stupid.

Comments are closed.