​What natural disasters should teach us

Hurricanes, landslides and other disasters show Africans why we need fossil fuels

Steven Lyazi

I express my deepest sympathies to the people in the Caribbean and United States who have been impacted by Hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria. The loss of life was tragic but has thankfully been much lower than in many previous storms. Buildings are stronger, people get warned in time to get out, and they have vehicles to get to safer places until the storms pass.

I also send my sincere sympathies to my fellow Ugandans who have been affected by terrible landslides in eastern Uganda, near Kenya. Natural disasters often strike us hard. Sometimes it is long droughts that dry up our crops and kill many cattle. This year it is torrential rains and landslides.

This time we were lucky. The collapsing hillsides destroyed three villages, but thankfully it was daytime and people were outside. They lost their homes, cattle and ripened crops, but not their families. A horrendous mudslide in the same mountainous area in 2010 buried 350 parents and children under 40 feet of mud and rock.

People there have been cutting down trees for decades – for fuel, lumber and to grow crops. Now no roots hold the hills together when it rains. More cracks have appeared in the hills, so more slides are likely. But people don’t want to leave their lands, and they’re not planting new trees either.

Some people are ignoring all this history and the human roles in causing these “natural” disasters. They are blaming the rains and mudslides on global warming, climate change and the fossil fuels that modern industrialized countries burn to provide modern homes, travels and living standards.

These false claims are intended to divert us from real problems. They are intended to justify demands and campaigns that Ugandans and other Africans should rely on a few wind turbines and solar panels and should never use oil, natural gas or coal to provide cheap, reliable and plentiful energy so that we can live more like Americans or Europeans.

These people want to become our Jesus, and save us from “global warming disasters,” by keeping us poor and at the mercy of Mother Nature. Former vice president Mr. Al Gore said manmade global warming has increased the number and strength of tornadoes and hurricanes, Mount Kilimanjaro’s glacier would disappear by 2016, and Arctic summers would be ice-free as soon as 2014.

None of this happened. So he just changed the year when the disasters will hit. Mr. Gore declares in his film that “it is right to save humanity.” Yes, it is and I support that with no argument.

But I would suggest that he and his friends begin by injecting their own billions of dollars into fossil fuels and nuclear energy to create jobs around the world, help us build modern homes, uplift economies so that people can live a self-sustainable life, and get rid of the diseases that are killing us.

He needs to stop trying to scare us by spreading false gospels about mankind and fossil fuels. He needs to stop trying to save humanity from movie disasters, when we face real disasters. He needs to stop making us rely on renewable energy, while he continues to have many big homes, drive around in big cars and fly in private jets all over the world.

Just in the last 25 years, fossil fuels have helped over 1.5 billion people in developing nations get electricity and escape deprivation, starvation, and lung and intestinal diseases that used to kill them and their children. But Africa, India and Asia still have vast regions that need to be electrified. More than a billion people in those regions still do not enjoy the wonderful blessings that electricity brings.

These places need more coal, gas and nuclear power plants. Thankfully they are building them, no matter what Mr. Gore and his radical friends say. Mr. Gore and his friends have fancy homes with every modern technology that electricity can bring. They have cars and modern hospitals.

My family in Kampala has a few of these things – a few lights and a radio, small stove and not even a little refrigerator. I just got a used computer that a friend sent me from the United States. Someday we would like a television and a normal sized refrigerator, like what we see in Europe and the States. Can we dream that someday we will have air conditioning?

Can the people in eastern Uganda dream of a time when they can rebuild their homes with more than mud and sticks? And actually have electricity, lights, refrigerators and stoves?

Radical Al Gore, renewable energy cheerleaders and climate activists have sweet homes and nice cars, jets and trains to take them anywhere they want to go 24/7. They cannot even come close to understanding how it feels to live in darkness, drink dirty water, and have no medicine except herbs and the grace of God when they get sick from malaria and other diseases they have never even heard of. They cannot imagine not being able to have a cold drink or hot coffee when they want one.

But they tell us we should be happy to enjoy the tiny improvements we might get from wind and solar power, as an “acceptable” and “preferred” and “sustainable” alternative to really better lives.

I have said this in my past articles, and I will still say it again. In Sub-Saharan Africa, nearly 700 million people still cook with wood, charcoal and animal dung, Hundreds of millions get horribly sick every year – and thousands die every year from lung and intestinal diseases, because we have to breathe smoke from open fires and don’t have refrigeration, clean water and safe food. Hundreds of millions are starving and malnourished, and try to survive on a few dollars a day.

Mr. Al Gore, how many dollars do you “survive” on per day? How many homes and refrigerators do you have? Can your refrigerators hold more than a few vegetables and a few bottles of milk or water?

To use the words of Rabbi Daniel Lapin, our impoverished masses simply want to take their rightful, God-given places among Earth’s healthy and prosperous people. Instead, we are being told “that wouldn’t be sustainable.” We are being told that improving our health, living standards and life spans is less important than avoiding the forthcoming climate cataclysm that Mr. Gore and his movies and computer models say will happen if we Africans modernize with fossil fuels.

These claims – and the false solutions to make-believe problems sometime in our future – ignore the real disasters and deaths that face us right now, every day of the year. They are intended to divert us from the better lives and sweet homes we dream of. They are intended to make Mr. Gore and his friends and the radical cheerleaders feel like they are saving Africans and our planet, while in reality they are killing millions of us every year.

Right this very minute, climate alarmists are blaming hurricanes and landside on fossil fuels. While they enjoy fancy homes, cozy beds and sofas, heating and air conditioning that keep them comfortable all year round, televisions and Alexa music, air travel whenever they want to go somewhere – they tell us Africans we should be happy and content with our “simple lives.” They tell us we should keep our oil, gas, coal and nuclear energy underground and untouched.

This is disgraceful. It is unacceptable. We will no longer tolerate it.

Alexander King was the co-founder of the Club of Rome, which wrote The Limits to Growth book. During World War II, he organized production of a new insecticide and gave it the name DDT. The chemical saved the lives of thousands of Allied troops in the Far East. It was also used to stop typhus epidemics in Europe after the war.

But later on he said: “My own doubts came when DDT was introduced for civilian use. In Guyana, within two years, it had almost eliminated malaria, but at the same time the birth rate had doubled. So my chief quarrel with DDT, in hindsight, is that it has greatly added to the population problem. Of course, I can’t play God on that one.”

But King and his followers did play God. They got DDT banned and even blocked its use in preventing malaria for decades. Millions of African parents and children died. Now his descendants want to keep us from using fossil fuels. Where is the justice and humanity in any of this?

Steven Lyazi is a student and worker in Kampala, Uganda. He served as special assistant to Congress of Racial Equality-Uganda director Cyril Boynes, until Mr. Boynes’ death in January 2015. He plans to attend college and help his country and Africa get the energy and other modern technologies they need.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

86 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mike
September 29, 2017 9:34 am

Excellent post and well said Steven Lyazi.. Jambo Habarree!

Russell Varnam
September 29, 2017 9:42 am

A moving plea.
What is powering the conveyances carrying those fleeing Pacific volcanoes?
What is powering the movement of supplies to the islands devastated by hurricanes?
Al Gore’s hot air, perhaps?

Latitude
September 29, 2017 9:43 am

Bravo!……

MJPenny
September 29, 2017 9:47 am

Very powerful essay. I wish Steven success in bringing electricity and other modern conveniences to Uganda and the rest and Africa.
Al Gore should be required to respond to Steven.

Mary Catherine
Reply to  MJPenny
September 29, 2017 3:06 pm

Yes, Al Gore should be required to respond to Steven, but I doubt if he’s capable. Steven is absolutely right, and I wish this essay could be more widely diseminated.

September 29, 2017 9:47 am

Excellent post indeed

Myron Mesecke
September 29, 2017 9:48 am

This shows the true nature, the real human cost of the agenda of the climate alarmists and the ‘green’ movement.

RayG
September 29, 2017 9:50 am

A big “Thank you” to Mr Lyazi for writing his essay and another to Anthony for providing a forum to make it public. It is an enormous indictment of the MSM that this essay will not pass by the MSM keepers of the holy flame of CAGW.

Mike Bryant
September 29, 2017 9:51 am

A voice of reason… every point is well made and demonstrably true. When will Africa be allowed to prosper?

TA
Reply to  Mike Bryant
September 29, 2017 9:24 pm

“When will Africa be allowed to prosper?”
As soon as foreigners stop exploiting them.

MRW
September 29, 2017 9:51 am

BRAVO! BRAVO! BRAVO!

Duncan
September 29, 2017 9:54 am

I vow to save the planet by living like Al Gore does. I will be starting a crowed funding campaign soon, I am sure the interest will be high.

September 29, 2017 10:04 am

Beautifully said!

Med Bennett
September 29, 2017 10:32 am

Bravo! Well spoken.

RWturner
September 29, 2017 10:34 am

Could you imagine a major evacuation where everyone was relying on EVs to get out? Now THAT would be a disaster.

crackers345
Reply to  RWturner
September 29, 2017 2:33 pm

ironic — in the Irma evacuation
of FL, it was gas-powered autos that
faced a serious shortage — EVs did
just fine at Tesla’s supercharging
stations.

Crispin in Waterloo
Reply to  crackers345
September 29, 2017 6:09 pm

Both of them.

Dafranzl
Reply to  crackers345
October 2, 2017 2:43 am

Stupid, it all were e-cars none would have enough electricity for loading (besides it would take much time…)

Moderately Cross of East Anglia
September 29, 2017 10:37 am

Steven shames Al Gore and his ilk in the imperialist eco-terrorist movement.

Nigel in Santa Barbara
September 29, 2017 10:46 am

Precisely!

Tom Halla
September 29, 2017 10:47 am

It helps to remind everyone just how callous and misanthropic the greens are, which Mr Lyazi does.

September 29, 2017 10:57 am

Excellent article to which I would add the following observation:
Many third world countries have coal reserves. Developing them would create investment, jobs and infrastructure in country, possibly at some point export revenue. By persuading the World Bank to refuse funding for coal plants, the greens are trying to get what little money third world companies have sent to China to purchase solar panels and wind mills to produce horrendously expensive terribly unreliable power. Developing their own coal reserves is a win-win-win for third world countries. Going with wind mills and solar panels is lose-lose-lose, the only beneficiaries being the manufacturers of those products. No wonder China publicly endorses wind and solar, it is good for their business. Behind the scenes they’re doing what makes sense for their economy which is coal (among other things).

Reply to  davidmhoffer
September 29, 2017 11:48 am

The Global Coal Plant Tracker portal confirmed that coal is on a tear, with 1600 plants planned or under construction in 62 countries. The champion of this coal-building binge is China, which boasts 11 of the world’s 20 largest coal-plant developers, and which is building 700 of the 1600 new plants, many in foreign countries, including high-population countries such as Egypt and Pakistan that until now have burned little or no coal.
All told, it will be a 43% increase in coal-fired power capacity.
https://rclutz.wordpress.com/2017/09/27/paris-is-a-parrot/

Griff
September 29, 2017 10:57 am

If we are talking disaster, worth noting solar panels in both Antigua and Florida survived the hurricane and were able to supply power in the aftermath
http://www.pennenergy.com/articles/pennenergy/2017/09/solar-power-antigua-s-well-built-pv-systems-sustain-impact-of-hurricane-irma.html
And large scale solar – not just a few panels – and batteries – would provide a massive boost to Uganda’s power and could be built out very quickly.

justadumbengineer
Reply to  Griff
September 29, 2017 11:37 am

Griff,
I admire your constant ambition to highlight how good and wonderful solar and wind and renewable energy generation is. In the world I work in, I don’t buy into religion of green energy, I go with what works. A few questions:
1. Is solar and wind cheaper on a per kwh basis than coal, natural gas, or hydro…..without subsidies
2. If so, why do solar and wind need subsidies
3. If so, why aren’t businesses stumbling over themselves to use solar and wind. If it cheaper and you can make more profit, dump gas and coal tomorrow and get the cheapest energy available
4. Is solar and wind reliable. Better than coal and gas.
5 If so, why do you need coal and gas backup at all. Just get rid of coal and gas, no need for reliable backup
6. In my business, we use coal and gas for power. We need to. We need our plant to run 24/7 without a hiccup. In fact, I pay the local utility a standby charge to make sure that if I have any power surges, they can serve that immediately….not an hour from now.
I have had many solar companies come and try to sell me solar. they ask for my annual electric bill. they go away and do their calcs and come back and say they cant help me. apparently my use of coal/gas is cheaper than solar. and that’s assuming the solar is subsidized as well and it still isn’t competitive with fossil fuel generation.
Would it be wise to switch to more expensive solar and charge my customers more? Ok, maybe to feel good, but I would still need to have a panel and switch to get coal/gas power when the renewable drops out. Does that make any sense.
I think its a pretty well known fact. Solar and wind is not the cheapest per kwh type of energy. If you want to do it to feel good about something, fine, but costs, profit and reliability mean something in the real world. cars leaving florida to get out the way of a hurricane cant be electic or it would be a disaster. likewise, if im in for surgery, I want the surgeon to have reliable and constant power…not hope a cloud doesn’t block the sun in the middle of the surgery.
Maybe solar has its place, a little “free” energy here and there. Power the globe, industry, transportation of goods, medical uses…I think not.

Edwin
Reply to  justadumbengineer
September 29, 2017 11:56 am

Griff missed the entire point of the essay. You don’t chopped down trees for more land to grow more crops because of they high loss rate due to lack of modern preservation AND then convince people to cover the same land with solar panels. First who pays? Oh, yea the evil USA. Will solar panels be built on hillsides and prevent erosion and mudslides? The CAGW crowd really do believe that solar and wind are free. They seldom mention maintenance of wind turbines and the need for ultimate replacement. They certainly don’t discuss what it takes to keep solar panels running as efficiently. It requires that they be cleaned usually with clean water. One of the most significant issues throughout the third world is having clean water, so they are now going to clean water and then use it to clean solar panels. As this author points out clearly we have an entire movement that wants to dictate to the rest of the world how we should live while they suck their thumbs floating in their pools eating gourmet food.

rocketscientist
Reply to  justadumbengineer
September 29, 2017 12:14 pm

Edwin, agreement on most points.
Solar panels also have a limited lifetime before they become increasingly weaker, usually around 20 years. The inverters needed to convert DC to AC are more problematic and have lifetimes around 15 years.
For optimal solar power generation the panels should be clean and detritus free. However, you do not need to clean the panels with potable water drinking water. There are no water borne pathogens which can affect them. Of course you don’t want to be spraying these with mud, but river water should be fine.

crackers345
Reply to  justadumbengineer
September 29, 2017 2:31 pm

edwin: rooftop solar.

ClimateOtter
Reply to  justadumbengineer
September 29, 2017 3:15 pm

crackers345 – what roofs?

rocketscientist
Reply to  Griff
September 29, 2017 12:05 pm

Not so lucky for the fields of solar panels in PR.
BTW, all the power generation in the world won’t help if the transmission lines are down.

crackers345
Reply to  rocketscientist
September 29, 2017 2:30 pm

rooftop solar
doesn’t need
transmission
lines.

MarkW
Reply to  rocketscientist
September 29, 2017 5:27 pm

Many inverters won’t output power unless connected to the mains.

Reply to  Griff
September 29, 2017 2:32 pm

Griff
“If we are talking disaster, worth noting solar panels in both Antigua and Florida survived the hurricane and were able to supply power in the aftermath…………”
During daylight hours. Too bad it gets dark once every 24 hours, and people die at night too.

crackers345
Reply to  HotScot
September 29, 2017 2:35 pm

batteries
wind
car charged and ready to go
its battery as a nighttime source

Reply to  HotScot
September 29, 2017 2:53 pm

crackers345
You live up to your moniker.
What batteries, where?
What wind, I assume you mean wind turbines, which all had their blades torn off and are now utterly useless waiting for their own aid to arrive.
Car charged, from what?
How much energy can the non existent batteries provide night time rescue workers with heavy machinery, tools and equipment?

MarkW
Reply to  Griff
September 29, 2017 3:34 pm

Fossil fuel plants survived the storm as well. It was the power lines and other infrastructure that went down.
Without those, even your renewables are worthless.

catweazle666
Reply to  Griff
September 30, 2017 9:15 am

You really are completely shameless aren’t you, Skanky?
(Drop the incessant name calling!) MOD

September 29, 2017 11:21 am

One of the greatest impediments of Mankind has always been, well, men.comment image

Reply to  Gunga Din
September 29, 2017 11:24 am

It would seem that some think there are just too many people.

Edwin
Reply to  Gunga Din
September 29, 2017 12:09 pm

Having dealt with all aspects of the environmental movement most of my life I can assure you that it is more than some that think there are just too many people. They truly believe if you do not believe in the latest orthodoxy then you are not needed in the world. It doesn’t matter whether or not you even know about the latest orthodoxy, if you oppose it even through ignorance than “mother earth” doesn’t really need you. They see, and I have debated this in public, humans as a disease. They see the night picture of the earth from space as analogous to a petri dish with bacteria and fungus. Where the “some” comes in is when they think about those in third world, undeveloped nations. While here at home they pretend to be tolerant and accepting of all people, they really don’t have the same consideration for those living in what they consider are “more primitive conditions.” Note: The DDT example is a good one of western liberals playing God. DDT was first introduced to third world countries to stop insect vectored diseases, malaria specifically, birth rates did initially rise but then leveled off and in some countries actually declined until malaria became epidemic again. When a family is dependent on sons and daughters producing for the whole family only some survive infancy and they have recurring malaria you try to have more children for the family to produce enough to live. It takes a few years once malaria is controlled for a family to get beyond that.

GoatGuy
Reply to  Gunga Din
September 29, 2017 11:31 am

Men? I’d kind of be inclined to agree, excepting for the fact that men also until recent have been responsible for discovering 99% of science, technology, medicine and concrete business practices. Writing most law, manning armies, navies, air forces and police / fire departments. Don’t take it wrong: I included the magic words ‘until recently’ there. Times are a’changing.
I think Mr. Shultz said it exactly right. Not “men”. They’re “the other critical half” of civilization. Historically.
GoatGuy

rocketscientist
Reply to  Gunga Din
September 29, 2017 12:15 pm

No, just too many stupid people.

markl
September 29, 2017 11:24 am

Well said. Eco fascists only care about themselves and expect other people to do their ideological bidding. The African continent is long overdue for its’ place in the modern world.

kokoda - AZEK (Deck Boards) doesn't stand behind its product
September 29, 2017 11:28 am

Shouldn’t this be sent to every member of IPCC and UNFCCC and every Government leader?

MRW

No. What are they going to do about it except file it in the waste paper basket?
This needs to go to everyone but politicians or fatcat NGOs. (Believe me, sending it to your congressman is futile. He’s fund-raising right now, and doesn’t give a sweet flying ph*k what an African writes or thinks.)
Give a copy to your kid or grandchild, send it to your pastor, your local newspaper. Stick a copy up on the local library bulletin board (and if you’re truly brave, try the local Snowflake university). It may seem inconsequential to you; however, the people to educate are the grassroots. They are the ones who can tell politicians to stuff it. Witness presidential election 2016.
What this excellent article underscores is the utter callow selfishness and arrogance the global warming activists have retained for the rest of the world. As long as their needs and desires are met, screw everyone else. Especially some Darkies in some African village. Whatevah! Who cares whether they prosper. Sustainability is the only law that counts, our sustainability, ‘cuz me and my kind rule it so, it’s already 97% settled and we know best, and we have to retain our purity.

GoatGuy
September 29, 2017 11:43 am

I learned a parallel lesson about 3 dozen years ago. Sticks with me still. One of life’s great ironies.
For well over 40 years I have been a software designer, writer and career entrepreneur. One of the big ideas my partner and I had was, “let’s write some REALLY good, progressive tape-drive backup software”. This was in the late 1980s, when cheap tape cassette drives finally hit and when filesystems WITH folders got well used on networks. Time for good software.
So, I invested about 2½ years writing awesome software with my team. Great stuff. My partner in the meantime was selling PCs like hotcakes on a cold winter day. One day, he desparately needed a certain hard disk. My PC had one. So, under pressure, I agreed to make a back up of my system then hand over the drive. You guessed it: the very software we wrote did the backup, but the restore didn’t work.
The problem tho’ was something that only Beezlebub could engineer. A teeny-tiny chip of iron oxide (the stuff that the tapes are made of) imbedded itself into the read-head. The read head dutifully scraped a long channel down the entire tape, thus ruining the backup. The MULTIPLE backups. I was doomed. Years of leading-edge research (I was over a year ahead of our previous releases) … gone.
THE LESSON was simple: never commit your backups to only one technology solution. Especially if they’re critical. Take the time to figure out another or a third way to back the super-critical stuff up.
BUT THERE IS A LIFE LESSON too, not unlike that which the author of this piece intended. Essentially it is, Never become dependent on a single critical resource, for civilization, business, enterprise or health care. If the whole world were to “go electric” and eschew all gas, coal, oil, nuclear power, and do something 100% electrical … and that thing were to turn out to be prone to “little chips on the read-head”, well … we could be doomed for a long time to come.
That’s what this hexagenerian brings to the party.
A VERY bad, but Murphy-gummed-up problem.
Dependent on a single technology.
Dâhmn.
GoatGuy

Reply to  GoatGuy
September 29, 2017 1:09 pm

Had a similar experience early in my first (consulting) career. Worked literally 20 hours a day by 7 days a week for a month to recreate a business model against a deliverable deadline. Ever since, backed up everything early, often, in more than one way. For my two private businesses now winding down, now much easier–cloud and external hard drive. Plus for all the legal and IPR stuff, outside law firm keeps a separate copy.
Any busin ss or society that becomes overly reliant on one thing is inherently fragile. Not only will Murphy’s law apply, Murphy was an optimist.

Reply to  ristvan
September 30, 2017 3:27 pm

ristvan September 29, 2017 at 1:09 pm wrote:
“…backed up everything early, often…”
Backing up is easy enough to do. But as goatguy seemed to be saying, you have to be sure the backup is good. That’s far from easy. I’ve tried several times to simply transfer systems from one PC to another while everything was intact and working. No could do. Oh yes, I tried backing up with backup software – no cigar. It wouldn’t take on the new computer. And that’s with an almost ideal situation. The only way it could be better is if you had two identical PCs, including identical hard drives. For ordinary PC users backing up is mostly feel good activity.
When we’re debating overpopulation vs whatmeworrylation, how does backup theory help? How are you going to “back up” seven billion people and everything they need to survive and prosper while you experiment with how many billion human beings the earth can support indefinitely?
Edwin September 29, 2017 at 12:09 pm wrote:
“… more than some that think there are just too many people. They truly believe if you do not believe in the latest orthodoxy then you are not needed in the world. It doesn’t matter whether or not you even know about the latest orthodoxy, if you oppose it even through ignorance than “mother earth” doesn’t really need you. ”
So – concern over overpopulation is “the latest orthodoxy”? .
and “more than some “, aka “many”, who express that concern want to see everyone who doesn’t dead??

September 29, 2017 11:43 am

Well said sir.

Coeur de Lion
September 29, 2017 11:47 am

Looking at the world by satellite night, there’s a black hole where North Korea should be and another larger one , the disgrace of the West, over central Africa.

Reply to  Coeur de Lion
September 29, 2017 11:53 am

Greenland isn’t much better than North Korea.

Reply to  Mark S Johnson
September 29, 2017 12:45 pm

How many people live in Greenland?

Reply to  Mark S Johnson
September 29, 2017 12:47 pm

PS From Wikipedia:
Population
• Estimate
56,483 (14 September 2016)[5]
• Density
0.028/km2 (0.1/sq mi) (last)

D. J. Hawkins
Reply to  Mark S Johnson
September 29, 2017 12:56 pm

The difference being that where it’s black in N Korea there are people, where it’s black in Greenland, there aren’t.

Reply to  Mark S Johnson
September 29, 2017 2:45 pm

“Greenland isn’t much better than North Korea.”
I can’t believe he just said that.

D. J. Hawkins
Reply to  Mark S Johnson
September 29, 2017 3:06 pm


Yeah, he went there.

Crispin in Waterloo
Reply to  Mark S Johnson
September 29, 2017 9:40 pm

“Greenland isn’t much better than North Korea.”
Yes it is: you can hunt polar bears in Greenland.

John Hardy
September 29, 2017 11:52 am

well said Steven

Verified by MonsterInsights