Hate on display – climate activists go bonkers over #Irma and nonexistent climate connection

I blame it on Trump Derangement Syndrome, oh wait, some were deranged before he got elected. Here is a collection of some of the most hateful tweets, essays, and posts from climate alarmists that are trying to pin hurricanes Harvey and Irma on the shoulders of climate skeptics. I must not be trying hard enough, because I’m not on the death sentence list.

Brad Johnson, formerly of Think Progress and currently with Climate Hawksdeclared:

The Nation: ‘To refuse to act against global warming…is murder’ – ‘Climate Denialism Is Literally Killing Us’

Mag: After Harvey, ‘climate change denial should be a crime’ – ‘Denial can and will leave people dead’

Not Funny: Monty Python’s Eric Idle: Climate skeptics should be put on trial for ‘crimes against humanity’

Skepticism a crime against humanity? ‘Campaign to discredit scientific evidence [for AGW] amounts to a crime against humanity,whose perpetrators should be punished accordingly’

Climate Depot’s Morano & other skeptics ‘sentenced to death’ for ‘Crimes against Humanity’ – Climate activists set 2029 for big ‘Crimes against Humanity’ trials of skeptics – “Sentenced to death for the critical roles they played in retarding any meaning action to mitigate climate change in the United States were as follows.

Sen. James Inhofe, Marc Morano (CFACT), Chris Horner (CEI), Myron Ebell (CEI), Steve Milloy (CEI), Patric Michaels (Cato Institute), Bjorn Lomborg (CCC), Matt Ridley (CWPF)(sic), Christopher Monckton, Fred Singer, Roy Spenser (sic).”

 

 

Climate Depot’s Morano receives threatening email: ‘You and your children should be burned in public’ – Recent hate mail to Morano: ‘Let’s meet man to man and I’ll rip that stupid smile off your face’ – Other Hate Mail sample to Morano: ‘If you have children, I hope beyond hopes that you must bury them, and that your grief will know no end.’

h/t to Climate Depot for some of the links.

Last but not least, the Pope:

Pope Francis HUGE RANT on Hurricane Irma: History will JUDGE the climate change deniers


Here’s the deal: there’s no current climate to hurricane connection, even NOAA says so. History too.

NOAA doesn’t think the alleged impact of anthropogenic CO2 on storm intensity is detectable.

… It is premature to conclude that human activities–and particularly greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming–have already had a detectable impact on Atlantic hurricane or global tropical cyclone activity. That said, human activities may have already caused changes that are not yet detectable due to the small magnitude of the changes or observational limitations, or are not yet confidently modeled (e.g., aerosol effects on regional climate). …

Read more: https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/global-warming-and-hurricanes/

Fact: Hurricanes Harvey and Irma Can’t Be Blamed on Global Warming

The Hurricane Harvey Hustle

Hurricane expert Klotzbach: #Irma at landfall comes in 7th behind 1935 Labor Day storm

A useful retort for those claiming #Irma & #Harvey hurricanes are a sure sign of ‘climate change’

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

173 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Robert Ballard
September 11, 2017 10:53 am

When will the Climate Wars begin?

Martin Mason
Reply to  Robert Ballard
September 11, 2017 11:14 am

It has started and we will lose.

Sixto
Reply to  Martin Mason
September 11, 2017 11:22 am

I don’t think so. We are better armed, but with truth and firepower.
The N@zis lost. The Communists lost, at least those in Russia. The Warmunistas will lose.
Mother Nature will squash them like bugs. Arctic sea ice is growing.

Sixto
Reply to  Martin Mason
September 11, 2017 11:25 am

For “but”, please read “both”.
I didn’t mean literally squash. If I actually wanted them squashed, I’d be no better than they.

Bryan A
Reply to  Martin Mason
September 11, 2017 12:32 pm

Unfortunately they still have the Press (MSM) which both Drives and informs the Court of Public Opinion

Greg
Reply to  Martin Mason
September 11, 2017 12:41 pm

Pope Francis HUGE RANT on Hurricane Irma: History will JUDGE the climate change deniers

I find that kind of comment pretty hard to take seriously from an organisation of pedo-denyerz. Until they put their own house in order, seriously, don’t even talk to me. Enough of his papal BULL.
As for the judgement day, I’m quite ready to be judged by history or by his or anyone else’s God about the “denial” issue. Note he says we will be judged, he does not pronounce what that judgement will be.

RWturner
Reply to  Martin Mason
September 11, 2017 1:03 pm

About 97% of comments on any message board that doesn’t instantly ban climate skeptics are people, not just showing skepticism, but ridiculing the climate cult clowns. Not to mention Brexit and this past election, something tells me the majority of people are still too pragmatic to fall for Chicken Little nonsense.

Reply to  Martin Mason
September 11, 2017 2:14 pm

Nature is on our side. Otherwise, I would agree with your pessimism.

Goldrider
Reply to  Martin Mason
September 11, 2017 2:46 pm

Y’know something? “Twitter” is the trap in the bottom of the sink. Any basement-dwelling, underwear-clad two-bit wannabe provocateur can blast out 140 characters to get attention like a 3-year-old. The proper response to squawk from below the sentience threshold is to IGNORE IT! The more daylight we give these trogs, the more traction their POV gets. Just like the dopey radio reporter who tore into an “Alex Jones” conspiracy monger at the 9/11 memorial this morning. Ignore him, he gets ZERO attention. Have a screaming fight with him for the entertainment of a couple hundred thousand listeners, you’ve just made his day. Let the Twits and Trolls of Twitter DIE OF BOREDOM, IGNORED.

John from Europe
Reply to  Martin Mason
September 11, 2017 10:28 pm

No, the truth will always win.

ThomasJK
Reply to  Robert Ballard
September 11, 2017 2:42 pm

The war is an eternal infernal conflict that can have no winners, only losers.
Mundia & Modia: The two worlds in which we live
We humans live in two worlds. One world, I call Mundia, is the world of immutable laws, e.g. gravity, electromagnetism, and supply and demand – it is the world that we see when we look out at the natural landscape.
The other world, I call Modia, is the world of social relationships, e.g. love, hate, admiration, envy, loyalty, and gratitude – it is the world that we see when we look out at the social landscape.
For the full article:
Rishon Rishon: Mundia & Modia: The two worlds in which we live
http://www.rishon-rishon.com/archives/351860.html

Jonathan
Reply to  ThomasJK
September 13, 2017 4:51 am

Very interesting theory for a mundian to understand. I don’t know about a modia and what they would think.

ColA
Reply to  Robert Ballard
September 11, 2017 3:43 pm

Thank goodness Irma ran out of CO2 otherwise it could have been a much worse weathertastrophy!!! 🙂

Reply to  Robert Ballard
September 11, 2017 7:24 pm

The current Pope is a real nut – a far-left nut trying to curry favor with the crazies. I didn’t know that was his job…

Pop Piasa
Reply to  pyeatte
September 11, 2017 8:02 pm

He seems to see himself as the mortal culmination of Jesus’ perfected socialist agape. He doesn’t realize that his goal to be the Pope for the commoners is being perverted by his papal cabinet.

Goldrider
Reply to  pyeatte
September 12, 2017 10:55 am

Because Venezuela is such an inspiration to us all . . . /sarc

RCS
September 11, 2017 10:54 am

The Devil makes work for idle hands. Why can’t these twits get a proper job?

Davies
Reply to  RCS
September 11, 2017 12:34 pm

Democrats make sure one doesn’t need a job, just be a loyal follower.

September 11, 2017 10:55 am

Sanity has left the building…

Sommer
Reply to  John
September 11, 2017 11:59 am

Check out this recent interview with actress, Jennifer Lawrence.

Sixto
Reply to  Sommer
September 11, 2017 12:06 pm

“Proven through science”.
Talk about leading questions.
TV makes me sick, too.

Reply to  Sommer
September 11, 2017 12:06 pm

you do realise this is the price you have to pay to get work in Hollywood?

Sixto
Reply to  Sommer
September 11, 2017 12:15 pm

I do, but she really believes this stuff.
And why wouldn’t she? Scientists say so. Her last formal education was middle school.

fredar
Reply to  Sommer
September 11, 2017 1:06 pm

Damn, I didn’t realise Mother Nature is some kind of sentient being who is capable of feeling hate. She must be pretty hateful then considering all the damage she has done over millions of years. All the ice ages, asteroid impacts, volcanic eruptions, mass extinctions. Billions of animals dead because of her. Mother Nature sounds like a war criminal. Maybe it’s time to wake up and take action?
Sigh… I wish actors would focuse on what they are good at: acting. Instead of pretending to understand how climate and nature works. But guess that is too much to ask. You always need to talk about contemporary issues to show how “smart” you are, whether you understand them or not. “I don’t know” has become a swear word. I get the feeling that if actors like Lawrence would have lived 100 years ago, they would have happily defended eugenics and talked about how great and important it is to sterilize “undesirables” for the “future” of human race.

MarkW
Reply to  Sommer
September 11, 2017 1:20 pm

When you care, you don’t have to be smart.

Reply to  Sommer
September 11, 2017 1:30 pm

There was an earthquake several years ago (in South America, I think) that Danny Glover blamed on Bush.
I can’t recall a role that he or Jennifer Lawrence played, that I saw, where I have anything critical to say about their performance. But a movie role is not the real world.

JohnKnight
Reply to  Sommer
September 11, 2017 2:18 pm

fredar,
“Sigh… I wish actors would focuse on what they are good at: acting.”
I’m pretty sure that’s what we’re seeing (for the most part). It kinda puzzles me that many don’t seem to consider that possibility . . Occam’s razor and all that . .

Goldrider
Reply to  Sommer
September 11, 2017 2:47 pm

Because we alll go to twenty-something BIMBOS for our “science.” /sarc

Jean Paul Zodeaux
Reply to  Sommer
September 11, 2017 4:27 pm

“you do realise this is the price you have to pay to get work in Hollywood?”
James Woods still gets work in Hollywood. Micheal Crichton is doing fine in Hollywood. Victoria Jackson not so much, but come on, who really believes it is her stance on climate change that keeps her from getting work? One note actors who are not impossibly sexy will it hard to get work in Hollywood.

JohnKnight
Reply to  Sommer
September 11, 2017 5:33 pm

Jean Paul,
There is the “flip side” to consider it seems to me . . If there are celebs with skeletons in their closets, so to speak, they might be induced to perform by those who have access to certain evidence . . much as in D.C. no doubt. And if a big fish says to a little fish; If I go down I’ll take you with me . . that could cause a rather pronounced case of SSC (sudden scientific certainty ; )

Kpar
Reply to  Sommer
September 11, 2017 5:34 pm

Little Jenny can add “High Priestess of Mother Gaia” to her C.V.

Reply to  Sommer
September 11, 2017 7:33 pm

Poor girl is in over her head. She is a photogenic, talented actress – she should stick to that, and leave political movements alone – they can only hurt her career. Few people, like Clint Eastwood, can do it.

Steve Borodin
Reply to  Sommer
September 12, 2017 1:48 am

Gosh, she looks more than 8 years old.

Sixto
Reply to  Sommer
September 12, 2017 12:28 pm

Jean Paul Zodeaux September 11, 2017 at 4:27 pm
Michael Crichton has, sadly, been dead for quite some time.

Jean Paul Zodeaux
Reply to  Sommer
September 14, 2017 6:38 pm

Sixto;
Dead nearly a decade and still selling works to Hollywood. Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom (based on characters created by Crichton) will be released next year and HBO’s Westworld will be releasing a second season in the spring of next year. Nobody in Hollywood cared about Crichton’s climate change skepticism while he was alive and they don’t care now. Kind of in the same way they don’t really care about climate change. An inordinate amount of Hollywood players live in homes along the coast and on cliffs.

Auto
Reply to  John
September 11, 2017 1:41 pm

Who is Jennifer Lawrence?
Pleasant enough to view, but does she have any scientific education?
See Feynmann’s classic exposition on ‘Science’

Gorgeous.
Auto

Not Chicken Little
September 11, 2017 10:56 am

Remember – climate scientology is NOT a cult! And climate scientologists are real scientists, even if they do not know or understand or practice the scientific method, and even if their theories and predictions do not match observations. I’ve seen them in their white lab coats, I trust them!

Roger Knights
Reply to  Not Chicken Little
September 11, 2017 11:41 am

“I’ve seen them in their white lab coats, I trust them!”
A l,ab coat is the Emporer’s new clothing.

Reply to  Roger Knights
September 11, 2017 12:09 pm

I’ve gotta white coat.
Why don’t you trust me?comment image

Greg
Reply to  Roger Knights
September 11, 2017 12:29 pm

Fake scientist: no clip board 😉

Reply to  Roger Knights
September 11, 2017 1:34 pm

Kenji is a “Concerned Scientist” and he doesn’t have a clipboard.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/10/07/friday-funny-the-newest-member-of-the-union-of-concerned-scientists/

Nigel S
Reply to  Roger Knights
September 11, 2017 2:42 pm

Because I have to clean up after you?

drednicolson
Reply to  Not Chicken Little
September 12, 2017 8:23 pm

The white lab coat has replaced the white collar and surplice as the vestment of the clergy.

September 11, 2017 10:59 am

Actually all these comments prove beyond any doubt that they don’t understand or care about real climate science. So its just some kind of publicity stunt to fool the other idiots into “liking” them or some other meaningless self aggrandisement!

Joel Snider
Reply to  davezawadi
September 11, 2017 12:33 pm

I prefer the term ‘moral exhibitionism’ – and as far as how it happens, just think moral relativity.
In a way, it’s kind of a B/8 problem – where the difference is difficult to explain, because it should be obvious.
Example: Seen through the prism of moral relativity, you could make the logic argument that there is no difference between God and the Devil, just a matter of perspective. But there IS a difference – one is about Creation, and the other is about Destruction.
This dovetails nicely about how evil can’t perceive itself (like a vampire in a mirror) – which, when you remove the mysticism, has consistently proven quite true – and so the obvious difference is no longer obvious.
Throw in a long tradition of people in large numbers performing evil acts in the name of God, cross-bred with the idea that you’re ‘saving the planet’, and presto, you have a marching hate-group with a ‘by any means necessary’ credo, that will forgive themselves for any acting out that might occur.
Hate is a virtue when you’ve established your enemy as worthy of hate.
THAT’s what Progressive propaganda is all about.

Radical Rodent
Reply to  davezawadi
September 12, 2017 12:23 pm

Thank you, Mr Snider. I will be nicking your comment and posting it elsewhere.

September 11, 2017 11:03 am

I wonder how many of them have a “Coexist” bumper sticker on their car?

Roger Graves
Reply to  Gunga Din
September 11, 2017 11:22 am

When you see a ‘Coexist’ bumper sticker, what it really means is “you have to coexist with me but I don’t have to coexist with you.”

Mark from the Midwest
Reply to  Gunga Din
September 11, 2017 11:56 am

Last year I was cutoff by a Prius with a “coexist” bumper sticker. Too bad for them that 1) I was driving my F350 with the mat black ruggedized HD front bumper, 2) I belong to a volunteer search-rescue-EMT response group and know every cop in the area on a first name basis, 3) their b.a.c. was .011.
It did not end well for the driver of the Prius. As for my front bumper, we still aren’t sure which scratch was due to that incident.

Bruce Cobb
September 11, 2017 11:04 am

First the Islamic State. Then the Climate State.
Peas in a pod.

Joel Snider
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
September 11, 2017 12:19 pm

Note that both share a common enemy.

NME666
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
September 11, 2017 3:49 pm

Pees in a pot

David A
September 11, 2017 11:05 am

Sadly these haters are amazed when hate is returned.

September 11, 2017 11:07 am

And they accuse Trump supporters of being full of hate and (fill in the blank)phobia!

Joel Snider
Reply to  Gunga Din
September 11, 2017 12:18 pm

Standard defense mechanism – accuse the opposition of what you are, in order to hide it.
They use it on every single issue – you will find that Climate Change is just the tail of the dragon.

Another Scott
September 11, 2017 11:08 am

These comments are pent up fury – they have been waiting years for some good hurricanes to hit so they can start screaming. Anthony mentioned “Trump derangement syndrome”. Much as I hate name calling they are suffering from “Global Warming derangement syndrome”.

gnomish
Reply to  Another Scott
September 11, 2017 1:52 pm

this was the hurricane that was supposed to impeach!
have some idgaf to go with that maga…lol

gnomish
Reply to  Another Scott
September 11, 2017 2:02 pm

the hype was cat 5, at least..
this morning on npr they were bewailing the lack of crisis actors to do testimonials about personal devastation.
drudge has nothing but a puppy in a cage somebody put out in a photogenic parking lot… no teddy bears atop piles of rubble…
it’s sad when there’s no real pain to watch, eh?
i don’t know what they’ll think of next but it better be quick and tragic or ppl might get really bored with this nothing burger narrative…
boredom would be really catastrophic – and not in a good way.

Goldrider
Reply to  gnomish
September 11, 2017 3:49 pm

When you tell people over and over and OVER again that the winds will be 140, but they turn out to be only 40, it starts to smell like “Fake News.” Be prepared for a lot fewer people to be willing to evacuate the next time the hype-stream starts; reflexively crying wolf can indirectly boost fatalities.
Of course, it also makes the idea that we can predict weather a hundred years from now even more laughable. One guy said of weathermen, “Why do we pay them?” The public really thinks prediction is an exact science, or should be. I vote we STOP paying “climate scientists” for their counterproductive drivel.

PiperPaul
Reply to  Another Scott
September 11, 2017 2:28 pm

comment image

Reply to  PiperPaul
September 11, 2017 2:37 pm

Nice, simple summary.
“Forget what we said then. Remember what we say now!” 😎

John
September 11, 2017 11:11 am

Well, the Pope is quite familiar with fiction and fraud.

Old44
September 11, 2017 11:11 am

With every Greenie and left-winger in the country having an orgasm at the thought of Donald Trump’s mansion at Palm Beach being destroyed, Irma, after taking out arch warmist Richard Branson’s island getaway veers left at Key Largo, travels up the wrong side of the Florida Pennisular and then crosses back when safely missing Trump. Next target, Gore.
You have to laugh.

Duncan
Reply to  Old44
September 11, 2017 12:11 pm

*Laughing*…good point.

Mark from the Midwest
Reply to  Old44
September 11, 2017 12:19 pm

The American Red Cross has hosted fund raisers at The Donald’s Resort several times, all overhead costs were absorbed by said property owner as a donation to the Red Cross. They don’t raise a few bucks at these things, they raise hundreds of thousands at these gigs. But don’t expect a liberal to know any of that.
And in South Florida the #1 priority for the Red Cross is preparing for events like Irma.

Reply to  Mark from the Midwest
September 13, 2017 2:31 am

When Trump donated a million after Hurricane Harvey the far left sneered, “Its only a tax deduction.”
When the Clinton Foundation skimmed millions donated to the poor people of Haiti, and the villagers died unaided, after the devastation of the 2010 earthquake, the silence was deafening.
Or it was deafening until Trump was so brash as to suggest Hillary meant what she said when she announced, “It takes a village,” because she had taken many.

Walt D.
September 11, 2017 11:13 am

Climate Alarmists are no different from looters.
Using a natural disaster to rip people off.

Mike
September 11, 2017 11:20 am

I wonder what they think of Lincoln’s second inaugural speech, “… with malice towards none…”. I suspect they would say he was being too soft on those rebels.

PRD
Reply to  Mike
September 12, 2017 6:37 am

Lest ye forget: Lincoln was a Republican.

PRD
Reply to  Mike
September 12, 2017 6:37 am

Lest ye forget: Lincoln was a Republican.

catweazle666
Reply to  Mike
September 13, 2017 3:07 pm

“Lest ye forget: Lincoln was a Republican.”
Indeed.
And the KKK is a Democrat supported organisation.

September 11, 2017 11:22 am

There’s nothing wrong with hate speech between consenting adults who hate each other.
The only thing I hate more than hate is hate hypocrites hide. Carry, but don’t conceal.

Jean Paul Zodeaux
Reply to  Brad Keyes
September 11, 2017 4:38 pm

It is, of course, that invisible hate you speak of that is so insidious. The fundamental right to hate speech between consenting adults (arguably children have this right too as long as its consensual) is the kind of hate we can all appreciate and even admire. That concealed hate, however, is just so…well, hidden! How can we admire hate we can’t even see? Thank heavens for the A-list celebrity crowd who have no qualms in spewing their hate openly and nefariously.

David M. Lallatin
September 11, 2017 11:22 am

This should be narrated by Christopher Walken!

Winnipeg boy
Reply to  David M. Lallatin
September 11, 2017 11:29 am

+1

Tony Gales
September 11, 2017 11:22 am

I quite like the idea of putting officials who reject science in jail. Presumably, we’ll start with the ‘97% consensus’ lot, because consensus has nothing to do with science. We can then move on to the ‘science is settled’ bunch, because science is never settled.

Reply to  Tony Gales
September 11, 2017 4:42 pm

Tony
resist the incarceration temptation. “Officials” are scientifically-illiterate humanities/business graduates until proven otherwise, and cannot usually be blamed for their obliviousness to Rule Zero of Science Club (opinion is non-evidence, and overwhelming opinion is overwhelming non-evidence).
As a rule, a scientific background is a precondition for mens rea. (After such knowledge, what forgiveness, as TS Eliot asked?) And when we finally get serious about Science Change and are in a mad scramble to minimize the damage, then yes, I’m all for a war-crimes trials for the b@st@rds who have guilty knowledge—some sort of Science Nuremberg. Let them spend the rest of their lives in Science Jail, and everything after that in Science Hell, where (according to the latest scientists) there is a soundproof honeymoon suite awaiting the most egregious pseuds and saboteurs of science, and it has only one piece of furniture: Michael Mann.
But spare the illiterates. The vast remainder of the climate apparatus-men and apparatus-chicks have the defense of ignorance. In a sense they’re as much victims of the scam as they are its perpetrators, because they couldn’t tell pseudoscience from science at 20 feet.

PeterInMD
September 11, 2017 11:23 am

I wonder how they would feel if the call went out that all climate alarmists should be hauled away to live in, oh say Ethiopia in conditions that they wish for the rest of the world to some day live in. Would they see the similarities to their comments?? Me thinks not, but the thought did bring a smile to my face.

Reply to  PeterInMD
September 11, 2017 11:33 am

PeterinMD, I think it would suit us all because they would not have the internet to pass on their ignorance to others.

Reply to  PeterInMD
September 12, 2017 6:33 am

Actually, I think they would make good lithium miners. Of the “artisanal” variety.

Caligula Jones
September 11, 2017 11:28 am

Wonder how many of these basement fascists actually passed any high school math courses.

Old44
Reply to  Caligula Jones
September 11, 2017 12:07 pm

How many of their teachers did?

Mark from the Midwest
Reply to  Caligula Jones
September 11, 2017 12:21 pm

Pleeeeze … Everyone is an A+ student in the liberal realm

MarkW
Reply to  Mark from the Midwest
September 11, 2017 1:22 pm

Only if you can properly repeat the mantra. Everyone who refuses to toe the liberal line will be lucky is flunking is all that happens to them.

Roger Knights
Reply to  Mark from the Midwest
September 11, 2017 4:21 pm

The average grade at Harvard College is A-. (Yet until a few years ago the concept of grad inflation was being mocked as a conservative myth.)

SMC
September 11, 2017 11:28 am

“I must not be trying hard enough, because I’m not on the death sentence list.”
Mr. Watts, you slacker you. Get your act together. :))

Editor
September 11, 2017 11:31 am

The last major hurricane to make landfall on the United States was Hurricane Wilma, which hit Florida on Oct. 24, 2005, the deadliest in US history was in 1900 in Galveston, 8000 dead. So almost 12 years have passed with no major hurricanes and the deadliest was 117 years ago, before AGW was even thought of.

Reply to  andrewmharding
September 11, 2017 12:44 pm

One of the most important things I’ve learned from over a decade of participation in this “debate” is that true believers in the AGW hypothesis can’t be swayed by facts or rational argument of any kind. When presented with either they resort to ad hominem across the board and without exception.
The literally refuse to be confused by facts.

Greg Woods
Reply to  Bartleby
September 11, 2017 2:16 pm

ditto that

NorwegianSceptic
Reply to  Bartleby
September 12, 2017 12:24 am

Classic Orwellian Doublethink.)

Reply to  Bartleby
September 12, 2017 2:12 am

You are correct, it is a religion as opposed to science. Hysteria transcends logic!

Bruce Cobb
September 11, 2017 11:32 am

Warmenistas showing their true colors.

Luc Ozade
September 11, 2017 11:43 am

I’m grateful to have the views that I do have. I couldn’t live with the thought of having people like that supporting the cause I believed in.

GeeJam
September 11, 2017 11:49 am

These are the same people who, when you ask them just how much man-made CO2 is up there in the sky, always reply “THERE’S A LOT”.

September 11, 2017 11:51 am

Pope Francis HUGE RANT on Hurricane Irma: History will JUDGE the climate change deniers.

Maybe so, but I think history has already judged the current Pope.

Clay Sanborn
Reply to  Alan Watt, Climate Denialist Level 7
September 11, 2017 12:55 pm

God will judge Pope Francis, as He will all of us. But I think our various positions on climate will not be a concern of God’s. However, how we treated each other will.

Barbara
Reply to  Alan Watt, Climate Denialist Level 7
September 11, 2017 2:36 pm

Doesn’t the Pope know that hurricanes have been recorded for more than 400 years which is long before there was climate change to blame?

Non Nomen
Reply to  Barbara
September 12, 2017 2:13 am

As a true bliever he isn’t prone to facts.

1 2 3