The EPA is out of control – now they want to ban hobby race cars

The EPA is seeking to ban the freedom of individuals within the USA to convert street cars into race cars.

street-racecar-conversion

WUWT reader Wolfpack987 writes:

Another example of government abuse of power, the EPA is seeking to remove more freedoms from American citizens in the name of the environment, by prohibiting the act of converting street cars into race cars.  The sheer ridiculousness of this move to can be measured by how little of an impact it will have on the environment, given how little the number of cars converted into racecars per year.

Story:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed a regulation to prohibit conversion of vehicles originally designed for on-road use into racecars. The regulation would also make the sale of certain products for use on such vehicles illegal. The proposed regulation was contained within a non-related proposed regulation entitled “Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles—Phase 2.”

The regulation would impact all vehicle types, including the sports cars, sedans and hatch-backs commonly converted strictly for use at the track. While the Clean Air Act prohibits certain modifications to motor vehicles, it is clear that vehicles built or modified for racing, and not used on the streets, are not the “motor vehicles” that Congress intended to regulate.

“This proposed regulation represents overreaching by the agency, runs contrary to the law and defies decades of racing activity where EPA has acknowledged and allowed conversion of vehicles,” said SEMA President and CEO Chris Kersting. “Congress did not intend the original Clean Air Act to extend to vehicles modified for racing and has re-enforced that intent on more than one occasion.”

SEMA submitted comments in opposition to the regulation and met with the EPA to confirm the agency’s intentions. The EPA indicated that the regulation would prohibit conversion of vehicles into racecars and make the sale of certain emissions-related parts for use on converted vehicles illegal. Working with other affected organizations, including those representing legions of professional and hobbyist racers and fans, SEMA will continue to oppose the regulation through the administrative process and will seek congressional support and judicial intervention as necessary.

The EPA has indicated it expects to publish final regulations by July 2016.

https://www.sema.org/news/2016/02/08/epa-seeks-to-prohibit-conversion-of-vehicles-into-racecars


This is truly insane, the amount of emissions produced by race cars on any given day is miniscule in comparison to the total amount of cars and emissions in the USA every day. They are making a ham-handed attempt at solving a non-existent problem.

number-of-vehicles-in-the-united-states-since-1990[1]

This is what happens when bureaucracy runs out of things to do, they up the ante, completely unaware of how ridiculous they look or how pointless the idea is.

 

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
304 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MarkW
February 9, 2016 2:16 pm

Socialists gotta control, it’s what they do.

jjs
February 9, 2016 2:23 pm

There is nothing the EPA can’t regulate and there is no law the DOJ can’t manipulate. The country is now controlled by three branches – EPA,DOJ and Supreme Court.

Charlie
February 9, 2016 2:26 pm

Memo to EPA : Take a look at this (from your own website) and tell me how ridiculous you are.
http://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/images/ghgemissions/global_emissions_country_2015.png
Source: Boden, T.A., Marland, G., and Andres, R.J. (2015). National CO2 Emissions from Fossil-Fuel Burning, Cement Manufacture, and Gas Flaring: 1751-2011, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, doi 10.3334/CDIAC/00001_V2015

Janice Moore
Reply to  Charlie
February 9, 2016 2:34 pm

+1

KTM
February 9, 2016 2:34 pm

With the Olympics coming up this summer, what’s stopping the EPA from banning all sports? Exercise causes humans to emit more CO2 than a sedentary lifestyle, and high performance athletes emit more CO2 than any other in brief, intense bursts. They may try to ban the Olympics altogether, or at the very least all athletic training, citing the threat it poses to the environment.

February 9, 2016 2:39 pm

It seems funny that the EPA is pushing for Trump, but its hard to understand this in any other way.

Resourceguy
February 9, 2016 2:39 pm

Eventually there will be enough EPA and California EPA employees to enforce a one-child policy too.

MarkW
February 9, 2016 2:50 pm

When you use your own money to buy votes, they call it bribery.
When you use other people’s money to buy votes, they call it socialism.

Alan Robertson
February 9, 2016 3:02 pm

The guys down at Mike Duffy Race Cars in Moore, OK are not going to be happy about this. Mike and crew build racing Mustangs. Mike has made some number of innovations over the years which are now standard racing practice. There are many such race shops across the nation.
Then there are the venues- hundreds of drag strips, oval tracks and road courses cover the nation.
Billions of bucks are spent racing in the US each year.
I’m just not believing this, yet. Can it be true? How could the US gov’t attempt something like this?

February 9, 2016 3:18 pm

Welcome to the EU guys. You now have an ever-expanding unstoppable bureaucracy which will soon be making laws on everything from how many pieces of toilet paper you are allowed to use per visit to what light bulbs you are obliged to buy. The cost of this will accelerate exponentially and taxes will of course have to rise to support it. In Europe it is beginning to look like the days of the ‘progressive’ left may be numbered although only as a result of them having plunged the entire continent into a waking nightmare. Good luck with stopping the American dream turning similarwise nightmarish.

Joel Snider
February 9, 2016 3:30 pm

We could give these guys everything they wanted – ban every substance/practice on their list. The next day they would have a whole new list. That’s why it makes no sense to give them anything at all. Granting the EPA (i.e. government-empowered activists) regulatory power was idiocy – at best their role should be advisory.

Editor
February 9, 2016 3:35 pm

This is the best possible news I could have imagined. If the EPA loses the support of all the racing fans in the US, there may be hope for reform.
w.

Steve from Rockwood
Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
February 9, 2016 4:09 pm

Put a gun rack in the back of that race car and you could be President (because it’s about time people fought back against this idiocy).

Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
February 9, 2016 4:59 pm

Willis, I agree with you on this. A Bridge too Far.

u.k(us)
Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
February 10, 2016 6:28 pm

It won’t just be the racing fans, it will also be all those that ever dreamed of racing.

February 9, 2016 3:51 pm

Supremes over rule Obama on new EPA crimes.

Bubba Cow
Reply to  fobdangerclose
February 9, 2016 4:05 pm

Supreme Court blocks Obama carbon emissions plan – (just in)
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-carbon-idUSKCN0VI2A0

MarkW
Reply to  fobdangerclose
February 10, 2016 9:39 am

They didn’t over rule it, they suspended enforcement while the case works it’s way through the court system.

February 9, 2016 4:01 pm

The appeal arguments by the 27 states June this year.
The state plans were / ? are due Sept so no way will the plans be done.
5 to 4 once more.

Reply to  fobdangerclose
February 9, 2016 4:15 pm

Blah

Marcus
February 9, 2016 4:01 pm

D’oh Bama’s Green snot plan gets beetch slapped by the Supremes….AGAIN !!

sciguy54
February 9, 2016 4:18 pm

Yesterday it was the creek in your backyard, today its amateur racing, tomorrow your grill, and next week your weed-eater. As far as the current administration is concerned, these are interests of only the bible-thumping, gun clinging, redneck OTHER, so they believe these restrictions will hardly make a dent in their voting base.

littlepeaks
February 9, 2016 4:27 pm

Since I’m getting older, I’m worried that the EPA won’t allow me to die, because of all the greenhouse emissions from my decomposing bodily tissues.

Janice Moore
Reply to  littlepeaks
February 9, 2016 5:12 pm

Heh.
Well, don’t worry, Little P., they like money — a LOT. They’ll gladly let you die so they can collect the taxes on your estate (hopefully, you have a living trust or the like to avoid all you can).

Tom in Florida
Reply to  Janice Moore
February 9, 2016 6:35 pm

Be careful of trusts. The tax on earned income inside certain trusts goes to the highest rate at $11,900. Be sure to check with your financial advisor.

bit chilly
February 9, 2016 4:36 pm

excellent news. knowing the american love of racing and modifying big engined cars, this may well be the straw that breaks the camels backs.
people need to realise government bodies like the epa are made up of people,usually the boring types scared of their own shadows. start speaking to them in person to show your displeasure . do not allow them to hide behind the veil of big government.

RCS
February 9, 2016 4:43 pm

As a non-US person, I thoyght that Congess could overrule the EPA. Have I got this wrong? Is the EPA unaccountable to Congress.
If a Republican wins the election, because to an outsider this seems the least worse option, surely an early act would be to reign in the EPA?

Janice Moore
Reply to  RCS
February 9, 2016 5:15 pm

Yes. Congress can abolish or seriously trim the EPA by more than one means: defunding and also repealing or revising the EPA’s enabling legislation, The Clean Air Act. Also, the POTUS can reign in the EPA.

MarkG
Reply to  RCS
February 9, 2016 9:13 pm

Why just rein it in? The EPA is blatantly unconstitutional, and should just be closed down. Like the other unconstitutional 90% of the Federal government.

February 9, 2016 5:11 pm

Sounds like a great idea. But make it conditional…agree to banning hotted up cars if you also agree to ban private jets because …environment.

Alx
February 9, 2016 5:29 pm

I think the EPA’s missions statement includes, “Solving non-existent problems with expensive, damaging, and senseless solutions.
Maybe Obama’s EPA can be a study for a graduate student in how large bureaucracies given too much power go stupid.

Alx
February 9, 2016 5:54 pm

Apparently the EPA thinks it needs to punch amateur car enthusiasts in the nose in order to make up for the EPA’s willful reckless negligence in the Colorado mine spill, and standing around with their thumbs up their arse while the citizens of Flint were being poisoned.
Can these bureaucrats really find nothing useful to do.

José Tomás
February 9, 2016 6:30 pm

OFF-TOPIC: This video is going viral in Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/gary.yourofsky/videos/886039734784609/
It literally full of bullshit, and I think “someone” could prepare a refutation and Anthony could make it a blog post for us to have a single place to link to as refutation.

markl
Reply to  José Tomás
February 9, 2016 7:00 pm

José Tomás commented: “… I think “someone” could prepare a refutation…”
No need to. Anything that states “livestock covers 45% of the earth’s total land” won’t be taken seriously.

Tom in Florida
February 9, 2016 6:31 pm

Perhaps just a deflection as they knew they were going to lose in the Supreme Court.

kramer
February 9, 2016 6:50 pm

“The EPA is out of control”
Bet this is nothing compared to what’s coming.

David Zuniga
February 9, 2016 7:20 pm

What they don’t realize is that to some people, building specialized vehicles for track use isnt just a hobby for some people. For some, its a career, its a job, its a living.

Janice Moore
Reply to  David Zuniga
February 9, 2016 8:22 pm

Good point, Mr. Zuniga. And when you add in all the parts manufacturing and selling jobs, that’s quite a few families who will be missing that paycheck.