Antarctic weight loss seems to be in the eye of the beholder

Antarctic profile hg
Antarctic profile hg (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

From Newcastle University

New understanding of Antarctic’s weight-loss

New data which more accurately measures the rate of ice-melt could help us better understand how Antarctica is changing in the light of global warming.

The rate of global sea level change is reasonably well-established but understanding the different sources of this rise is more challenging. Using re-calibrated scales that are able to ‘weigh’ ice sheets from space to a greater degree of accuracy than ever before, the international team led by Newcastle University, UK, has discovered that Antarctica overall is contributing much less to the substantial sea-level rise than originally thought.

Instead, the large amount of water flowing away from West Antarctica through ice-melt has been partly cancelled out by the volume of water falling onto the continent in the form of snow, suggesting some past studies have overestimated Antarctica’s contribution to fast-rising sea levels.

Using Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite data, the team calculated ice sheet mass loss by more accurately mapping and removing the mass changes caused by the flow of rock beneath Earth’s surface.

Publishing their findings today in the academic journal Nature, project lead Professor Matt King said the data meant we were at last close to understanding how Antarctica is changing.

“We have tried to weigh the ice in the past but GRACE only measures the combined effect of the ice changes and the land mass changes occurring beneath the Earth’s surface,” explains Professor King, Professor of Polar Geodesy at Newcastle University. “The step forward we have made is to provide a better calculation of the land mass changes so we can correct the satellite measurements to more accurately calculate the changes in ice mass alone.

“Our ice change calculations rely heavily on how well we can account for these important changes taking place beneath the Earth’s surface. While the land beneath the ice is moving by no more than a few millimetres-per-year – the thickness of a fingernail –that seemingly small effect significantly alters the rate at which we estimate the ice is changing.

“By producing a new estimate of the land motion we’re effectively re-calibrating the scales – in this case the GRACE satellite –so we can more accurately weigh the ice. And what we’ve found is that present sea level rise is happening with apparently very little contribution from Antarctica as a whole.”

Because most of the Antarctic land surface is covered by ice it has been incredibly difficult to determine where it is rising and falling and by how much. That has meant GRACE data hasn’t been able to contribute as much as it could to help scientists understand if Antarctica was growing or shrinking.

“We’re now confident it is shrinking,” says Professor King, currently on secondment at the University of Tasmania, Australia. “Our new estimate of land motion helps us narrow the range and shifts the best estimate to the lower end of the ice melt spectrum.

“Worryingly, though, the rate of shrinking has sped up in some important locations. The parts of Antarctica that are losing mass most rapidly are seeing accelerated mass loss and this acceleration could continue well into the future.”

“The sea level change we’re seeing today is happening faster than it has for centuries with just a small contribution from the massive Antarctic ice sheet. What is sobering is that sea levels will rise even faster if Antarctica continues to lose increasingly more ice into the oceans.”

The research is part of a £600,000 project funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) to investigate the changing mass of the Antarctic Ice Sheet.

Ice sitting on the Antarctic continent at the peak of the last ice age 20,000 years ago forced the rock beneath to deform and slowly flow away. After that time ice levels generally reduced and the rock within the Earth’s mantle more than 100km below the surface has been slowly flowing back in. That change affects the GRACE satellites in exactly the same way as ice moving into and out of the continent.

Since their launch in 2002, the GRACE satellites allow scientists to map Earth’s gravity field every 30 days, mapping changes as mass moves around the Earth’s surface as well as below it.

Newcastle University’s Dr Rory Bingham adds: “There are lots of measurements that tell us something about the recent state of the Antarctic Ice Sheet, but none of those measurements gives the complete picture.

“This research starts to pull that picture together, providing the most accurate GRACE estimate so far of Antarctica’s contribution to sea level as a whole, as well as identifying which regions are changing and which are not.

Professor Mike Bentley, of Durham University, UK, who was part of the project team said, “This project brought together a range of scientists including geologists, geodesists and computer modellers to work out the contribution of the Antarctic ice sheets to global sea level rise. We have shown that the Antarctic contribution is smaller than some previous estimates, but the ice sheet is changing very rapidly in some key regions”.

###

From The Age in Australia, it seems that there are some good points, namely about sea level rise:

=============================================================

Although parts of East Antarctica are growing, glaciers in West Antarctica are melting faster, leading to a net loss of ice across the continent, according to a study published in the journal Nature.

”We’re confident that the ice cover is shrinking, and the rate along the Amundsen Sea coast is accelerating,” said Professor Matt King, of the University of Tasmania.

One result of the findings is that melting ice in Antarctica is not contributing as much to a rise in global sea levels as some other studies have assumed.

‘The melt in some key areas is sped up between 2006 and 2010, when the study ended,” he said. ”So it shows that sea level rise can be expected to change quite sharply if the melt rate continues to increase, on top of what’s already happening.”

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/environment/weather/190m-tonnes-of-ice-a-day-has-sea-rising-1mm-a-year-20121022-2817w.html#ixzz2A3CZEDAa

===============================================================

Still, all this is hard to reconcile with the sea ice graph from Antarctica showign a growing trend over the period of the satellite record since 1979:

Cryosphere Today – Arctic Climate Research at the University of Illinois – Click the pic to view at source
0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

59 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
BLACK PEARL
October 23, 2012 10:53 am

If I empty my ice cube trays into the sink wonder how long it will take to melt down the drain hole.
Where can I apply for a grant, as I think this would be interesting to know ?

Ferd
October 23, 2012 11:21 am

How many schizophrenic “scientific” reports do we have to suffer thru?
It isn’t as bad as we thought but it is worse than expected?
Antarctic ice is shrinking and contributing to known (and dangerous) sea level change… but Sea Level Rise is on a near straight line since the end of the Little Ice Age…. And really isn’t that bad….
This insults the intelligence of even the minimally intelligent.

mwhite
October 23, 2012 11:48 am

“Australia’s Antarctic supply ship Aurora Australis is stuck in ice near Casey Station. The Antarctic Division’s operations manager, Robb Clifton, says it is not a problem at this stage with scientists out on the ice doing research work as normal.”
http://www.eureferendum.com/blogview.aspx?blogno=83261

October 23, 2012 2:33 pm

Not sure what got that from onion means? Simply an observation that the graphs showing the increase in c02 since the industrial revolution would look similar if you replaced c02 with water storage. As well as pumping c02 into the atmosphere we have also been taking water out of a closed loop system. If the climate computer models were modified to take water storage into consideration we might start to get some answers that match what is actually happening. If warming is due to greenhouse the effect should be greater than what we currently observe.

Lars P.
October 23, 2012 3:39 pm

jack mosevich says:
October 22, 2012 at 12:48 pm
Quote: …” Antarctica overall is contributing much less to the substantial sea-level rise than originally thought” Who says the sea level rise is substantial? At its present rate (3.1 mm/yr) sea level will rise by 8 inches in 100 years..
The accelerated sea-level rise (3.1 mm/yr) always gives me a giggle…
It was interesting to learn that the 18 cm sea level rise in the 20th century is actually a number supported by a model, it was very nicely explained by the deceased John Daly here:
http://www.john-daly.com/ges/msl-rept.htm
Since 1993 we have satellite record. The first results one can see still on Daly’s page. This record covers also the 1998 el nino which arises like a peak – under the title The Poseidon Adventure. There one can see for 1993-2000 period covered by satellite +0.9 mm/year
In 2003 this changes and the trend from the previous:
http://www.science-skeptical.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Menard-2000.gif
becomes:
http://www.science-skeptical.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Aviso-2003.jpg
so that it results in 2.3 mm/year (for 1993-2003)
In 2004 the rise was with the change to Jason1 3.0 mm/year for (1993-2004)
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/uc_seallevel_2004r3.png
from 2004 to 2005 the sea level is stationary, however the total result is 3.1 mm/year – of course for the whole period!
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/uc_seallevel_2005r5.png
Interesting to look here again at the 2004-2005 years in the 2006 chart:
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/uc_seallevel_2006r3.png
but nevertheless we get already 3.2 in 2006 (for 1993-2006 period!) and a nice spike at the end
Now what is interesting is the 2007 one, it is again a big step. At first view there is nothing spectacular to the 2007 when one looks at the graph the respective year, it is the same height as 2006 but the rate overall jumped to 3.5 mm/year! (3.5 for the whole period 1993-2007)
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/uc_seallevel_2007r2-1.png
If one watches the dark line in the 2007 chart and compare it with the 2006 chart one will see that it goes somewhere lower between the green points but it is still steeper then 2006!
At first sight the 2 look close, but the green points relative to the elevation do not fit any more.
In 2008 continues with no rise, actually all 3 years 2006-2008 there was no rise. Rate goes down to 3.3:
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/uc_seallevel_2008r4.png
In 2009 it continues the trend with no actual rise, and the overall trend goes to 3.2 mm/year:
http://ecotretas.blogspot.co.at/2009/04/subida-descer.html
In 2010 the trend goes further down to 3.1 mm/year (1993-2010)
http://ecotretas.blogspot.co.at/2010/10/going-down.html
The next update takes very long. At this moment the sea is not rising or stationary but sinking, so we learned from NASA that 6 mm of world sea rained in Australia:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/08/24/nasa-notes-sea-level-is-falling-in-press-release-but-calls-it-a-pothole-on-road-to-higher-seas/
Finally the numbers come with a bonus surprise, the rise is now 3.2 mm with an additional 0.3 GIA adjustment per year retroactively for the whole period 1993-2011 – so as per the “old” measurement would be 2.9 mm/year for the 1993-2011 inclusive the other adjustments.
In 2012 we see stationary, very slow rise, the rise is now down to 3.1 mm for the whole period. (actually 2.8 mm/year as of old…)
http://sealevel.colorado.edu/content/2012rel4-global-mean-sea-level-time-series-seasonal-signals-retained
Some of the satellite adjustments are shown here:
http://suyts.wordpress.com/2012/04/10/sea-level-rises-to-new-lows/
http://jeremyshiers.com/blog/sea-levels-still-rising-and-envisat-records-altered-to-show-this/
here in german:
http://www.science-skeptical.de/blog/was-nicht-passt-wird-passend-gemacht-esa-korigiert-daten-zum-meeresspiegel/007386/
And finally Frank does a recomputation here:
http://joannenova.com.au/2012/05/man-made-sea-level-rises-are-due-to-global-adjustments/

Robertvdl
October 24, 2012 1:42 am

AUSTRALIA’S $46 million Antarctic airstrip is melting, leaving the government scrambling to find a new air link to the frozen continent.
The Wilkins runway — carved into ice near Casey station, about 3400 kilometres south-west of Hobart — was commissioned under the Howard government and hailed at its 2008 opening by then Environment Minister Peter Garrett.
But unexpected surface melt has sharply curtailed use of the summer-time airstrip.
http://www.theage.com.au/national/frozen-46m-runway-melting-20121023-283nk.html
Wilkins runway 66° 41′ 27″ S, 111° 31′ 25″ E
http://toolserver.org/~geohack/geohack.php?pagename=Wilkins_Runway&params=66_41_27_S_111_31_25_E_type:airport_region:AU
you can find it on Google Earth
A polar circle is either the Arctic Circle or the Antarctic Circle. On Earth, the Arctic Circle is located at a latitude of 66° 33′ 44″ N, and the Antarctic Circle is located at a latitude of 66° 33′ 44″ S
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_circle
66° 33′ 44″ Antarctic Circle
66° 41′ 27″ Wilkins runway
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Polarkreis_-_zwischen_Narvik_%26_Mo_i_Rana_Norwegen.JPG
You think someone with a brain thought of that spot to build a runway on the ice ? If the sun is warm enough in Norway to make plants grow don’t you think it is warm enough to melt the upper part of the runway on the Antarctic in summer ?

October 24, 2012 2:37 am

As many others noted, the repetition of “the substantial sea-level rise” bespeaks more an effort to sell a Big Lie than anything else.

October 24, 2012 4:02 am

It isn’t an Antarctic summer now and summer doesn’t even start for two months. Summer melts are usually after summer has started, there is a lag, just like here.
Has anyone pointed out the difference between antarcitic sea ice and an antarcitic ice sheet?
Let’s compare just a couple of differences! Antarctica has two ice sheets left over from the Ice Age, the EAIS and the WAIS.
Ask the normal person to describe the three most unusual things they know about Antarcitica as a continent and they’ll get one of them right and say it’s cold or it’s the coldest continent. I doubt they will say it’s the driest and windiest continent. Antarctica is 1.3 times the size of Europe a desert and if it gets precipitation, it usually along the coast. It also has strong katabatic winds along the coast that can reach hurricane speeds and it will just blow snow out to sea. The winds are generated at higher altitudes, because the interior of Antarctica is so cold it can freeze carbon dioxide to dry ice. Much of Antarctica has an elevation above two miles and much of the antarctic sea ice has an elevation of four inches.
Do you think most people know this is what Antarctica looks like without the ice?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b7/AntarcticBedrock.jpg/1024px-AntarcticBedrock.jpg

October 24, 2012 4:52 am

But unexpected surface melt has sharply curtailed use of the summer airstrip.
Planes deposit black carbon on an Antarctic airstrip and the surface melts. Well, surprise, surprise.
http://www.canberratimes.com.au/environment/climate-change/antarctic-airstrip-melting-away-20121023-283kx.html