Wrong, Oceanographic Magazine, Sea Level Rise in Hawaii Is Not a Looming Catastrophe

Oceanographic Magazine (OM) recently published the article “Most Hawaiins are already feeling the affects of sea level rise” by Eva Cahill on February 17, 2026, asserting that Hawaii residents are already experiencing the impacts of rising seas and that it is accelerating. This framing is false, unsupported by local data. The actual long-term measurement record at Honolulu shows that sea levels are rising at less than half the rate  that OM claims.

“Over the past three decades, the rate of global sea level rise has doubled, with the best estimate of the rate of global-average rise over the last decade being 3.6 millimeters per year,” the article states, continuing, “83% believe that the impacts of sea level rise will be catastrophic within the next 50 years.”

These claims are debunked by actual data, and thus the people’s fears of catastrophe are unwarranted. As the graph below show, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) long-running Honolulu tide gauge record, the rate of sea level rise there has not measurably increased during the recent period of modest warming, and is far below, less than half in fact, of the 3.6mm rate of rise in the last decade claimed by OM.

Local relative sea level, measured by tide gauges, is the only real direct measurement of sea level rise and it is what determines flooding risk on Oʻahu. Satellite measurements from space are a calculation, based on a model. Thus, it is an indirect measurement.

This distinction matters because sea level does not “operate” uniformly at the state level. Local trends reflect regional ocean dynamics, vertical land motion, and multi-decadal variability. NOAA’s tide gauge station description for Honolulu notes that interannual and decadal fluctuations are influenced by factors such as ENSO and broader Pacific circulation patterns. Short-term peaks during strong El Niño events can create the impression of sudden jumps, but the century-scale record smooths those oscillations and shows a far more modest rise.

That rise measured by the Honolulu tide gauge is not trivial, and it requires sensible coastal planning. But it is not the kind of rapid rise implied when a global satellite-era average is presented as if it defines local reality. The 3.6 mm/year figure cited by OM refers to a recent global-average estimate derived primarily from satellite altimetry, not a site specific measurement. Further, a recently published peer reviewed paper suggests that the satellite data has serious errors in it, saying:

Statistical tests were run on all selected datasets, taking acceleration of sea level rise as a hypothesis.

In both datasets, approximately 95% of the suitable locations show no statistically significant acceleration of the rate of sea level rise.

OM also leans heavily on public perception, citing survey results about “catastrophic” expectations. But beliefs are not measurements; what determines long-term shoreline change is not a survey but sediment budgets, reef health, storm patterns, and vertical land motion. That is why it is important to consider the growing body of research on island dynamics, summarized in my colleague H. Sterling Burnett’s article “Rising Seas Aren’t Swamping Small Island Nations,” which discusses peer-reviewed findings that many reef islands and atolls have remained stable or increased in area over recent decades due to sediment transport and reef-driven processes. The article notes that islands are dynamic landforms, shaped continuously by waves and currents, not static platforms waiting to drown.

Climate at a Glance’s “Islands and Sea Level Rise” also highlights studies showing that numerous Pacific Islands have maintained or expanded their land area even as global sea level has risen. That does not mean every shoreline is stable, but it does mean the simplistic narrative that rising seas automatically translate into uniform land loss is not supported by the empirical record.

With regard to Hawai’i in particular, volcanic activity has increased the size of the main island, adding height, mass, and acreage. From January 1983 to September 2002, lava flows added 543 acres to the island. An additional 875 acres were added from May to July 2018 alone as a result of lava flow from the 2018 lower Puna eruption. In short, Hawai’i is increasing in size even in the face of modest sea level rise – as is true for other islands as well.

None of these facts argue against prudent adaptation. Limiting development in flood-prone areas, improving building standards, and preserving natural buffers are common-sense policies regardless of whether the rise is 1.5 mm/year or 3.6 mm/year. But presenting a global satellite number as if it accurately describes Hawaii’s observed coastal trend is misleading in the extreme.

Oceanographic Magazine conflates global statistics, public anxiety, and local coastal management into a single storyline of impending doom. The actual sea level measurements at Honolulu report relatively slow sea level rise. That is not climate reporting grounded in observation; it is advocacy framed as inevitability.

Anthony Watts Thumbnail

Anthony Watts

Anthony Watts is a senior fellow for environment and climate at The Heartland Institute. Watts has been in the weather business both in front of, and behind the camera as an on-air television meteorologist since 1978, and currently does daily radio forecasts. He has created weather graphics presentation systems for television, specialized weather instrumentation, as well as co-authored peer-reviewed papers on climate issues. He operates the most viewed website in the world on climate, the award-winning website wattsupwiththat.com.

Originally posted at ClimateREALISM

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 11 votes
Article Rating
37 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ddwieland
February 24, 2026 6:38 pm

You can’t really expect high quality articles from a magazine with editorial standards that allow “affects” to mean “effects”.

Scissor
Reply to  Ddwieland
February 24, 2026 7:38 pm

They don’t even know the difference between the Big Island and the state of Hawaii.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Scissor
February 25, 2026 9:50 am

The article makes no reference to the Big island.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Ddwieland
February 25, 2026 9:49 am

That is a transcription error.

mohatdebos
February 24, 2026 6:48 pm

Didn’t Michelle and Barak Obama buy oceanfront property in Hawaii.

Ex-KaliforniaKook
Reply to  mohatdebos
February 24, 2026 10:45 pm

I thought it was a “gift”.

oeman50
Reply to  Ex-KaliforniaKook
February 25, 2026 4:29 am

How about “grift” instead of “gift?”

SxyxS
Reply to  mohatdebos
February 25, 2026 8:11 am

Residing to them is an extrem sport,
just like surviving white supremacy.

They want to show the world how brave they are.

Iirc correctly, just as in Marths Vineyard, they instantly started violating existing environmental laws by building stuff that no one else is allowed to built there as soon as they aquired the property.

The oppression and discrimination they face is so real
and even experts have a hard time to figure out wether they suffer more from oppression or climate.
But It’s a bit strange that people who believe so much in global warming chose locations that are 10+ degrees warmer than the global average.
They should be chosing locations that are at least 2 degrees below the global average to compensate for the incoming runaway warming.

Michael S. Kelly
Reply to  mohatdebos
February 25, 2026 8:37 pm

Yes, it was a property used as a set in the the 1980s American TV program Magnum PI. Private Investigator Thomas Magnum lived in the guesthouse on the 200 acre estate of Robin Masters as quid quo pro for some earlier favor, and ongoing security for The Robins Nest, as the estate was known. The show was highly rated while it lasted, and I recall it fondly. Obama had the mansion bulldozed after acquiring the property, so that he could build something more to his taste. Plus he had an illegal seawall erected. I don’t know why, since his nomination for President the first time around signalled the receding of the oceans, and the planet beginning to heal (his words from his acceptance speech).

antigtiff
February 24, 2026 6:53 pm

The Hawaiian Islands are volcanic islands developed from volcanoes that are formed as the earth’s crust moves over a hot spot. The northern islands are somewhat small because of erosion – the islands move towards the northwest and are doomed to become smaller…and smaller due to erosion.

Reply to  antigtiff
February 25, 2026 4:15 pm

Which means no oil, gas, or coal deposits. All the fossil fuels that they consume are brought in by sea.

DD More
Reply to  antigtiff
February 25, 2026 9:21 pm

And it has been doing so for millions of years.
Ocean floor top map has a line of the old islands streching to Russia.

comment image?width=1080&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=dfc3cd532a0f11fc529ff49d88663b521fb23b53

https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/2fudq4/an_extremely_detailed_map_of_the_pacific_ocean/

Reply to  DD More
February 28, 2026 10:31 am

Thank you for the Reddit link. I downloaded the image. Just one of the links in the comments there led to an active page, Amazon. (The Reddit article is 12 years old)

KevinM
February 24, 2026 7:14 pm

“83% believe that the impacts of sea level rise will be catastrophic within the next 50 years.”

If I own waterfront property in Hawaii in 2076… I already won.

KevinM
Reply to  KevinM
February 24, 2026 7:17 pm

Also: If the globe is going to get too hot for vacation on a Hawaiian beach, and if the oceans are going to reabsorb Hawaii – Maybe ‘we’ should ‘get’ Greenland?

leefor
Reply to  KevinM
February 24, 2026 9:40 pm

The new tropical paradise.

February 24, 2026 7:17 pm

What does “greater government action” on the issue actually mean? All the Hawaiian Islands are eroding north of Kilauea as the crustal plate moves so they all are destined to become extinct underwater anyway.

I suppose Hawaiians could tax themselves to ship dirt from the mainland and dump it, while jacking up the coastal highrises. But I’ve never heard anyone suggest that as a viable solution.

Or, they could raise taxes and pay more government workers to sit around and talk about it, which is what “More government action” is for the most part anyway.

Scissor
Reply to  doonman
February 24, 2026 7:42 pm

What about coral reefs?

Nevada_Geo
Reply to  Scissor
February 25, 2026 12:32 am

Great idea! Grind them up and dump them onto the beaches to offset the ocean’s rise.

Reply to  Scissor
February 25, 2026 8:45 am

Climate science says warmer water will bleach the coral reefs.

Here’s a map of where corals are found around the world.

Reply to  Steve Case
February 25, 2026 9:39 am

Here’s Google AI response to questions about ocean
temperature and coral reef temperature tolerance

What is the temperature range for coral reefs?

Shallow-Water Tropical Reefs thrive in waters 
23°C-29°C and tolerate a broader range 16°C-35°C.

Is there a limit to ocean surface temperatures? 

Scientists estimate that under current climate 
conditions, large-scale monthly averages for 
open ocean surfaces are limited to about 30°C

KevinM
Reply to  Steve Case
February 25, 2026 6:52 pm

So according to AI, coral reefs can tolerate non-existant waters (30-35C)?
Well okay I gues ‘average’ is different than ‘possible’.

Chris Hanley
February 24, 2026 7:52 pm

A 10 year trend analysis of the Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level (PSMSL) data for Honolulu shows no overall acceleration.
Thermal expansion of the ocean as measured by satellites reduces the density of a column of water locally but does not affect the total mass, thermal expansion does not displace water laterally and becomes less significant approaching zero at coastlines.
That is fully explained by Professor Humlum at his website climate4you -> oceans.

sherro01
February 24, 2026 9:54 pm

Please keep in mind that almost all articles on ocean level change assume that the volume of the ocean basins does not change enough to affect measurements.
Caution is advised, because we know that the rocks of the floors and walls that form the basins have movement like sea floor spreading, subduction, shrinkage from omnipresent rock cooling, changes in sediment volume added at river mouths, additions from lava flows, new islands rising through the ocean surface etc.
Also, there are probable cyclic effects as rainfall and snowfall at various times can deposit a load of more or less water from the oceans to over the land, whose drainage efficiency back to the oceans also varies over time.
In measurement practise, the verification of container size like volumetric flasks in bench chemistry, is an accepted prerequisite.
Geoff S

Reply to  sherro01
February 25, 2026 3:11 am

A large diameter bulge of only a few cm/year forming under the Pacific Ocean, could easily cause 1 to 2 mm/year sea level rise around the globe…. And there would be no way of detecting it.

Wasn’t there a whole island that just appeared recently ?

KevinM
Reply to  bnice2000
February 25, 2026 6:55 pm

“Lost’s plot centers on survivors of a plane crash on a mysterious island with supernatural properties, forcing them to confront their pasts and a conflict between two immortal brothers, Jacob and the Man in Black, who manipulate the island’s energy and its inhabitants.”

StephenG
February 25, 2026 7:29 am

“83% believe that the impacts of sea level rise will be catastrophic within the next 50 years.”

Of course “they” do. That’s what the press has been telling them for 20 years. The progressives are masters of messaging.

Does that make it so? Of course not.

Thanks!

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  StephenG
February 25, 2026 9:52 am

20 years? No. More like 50 years.

February 25, 2026 8:41 am

The survey found that “… most Hawai’i residents believe sea level rise is already affecting the state.” They believe it, as opposed to knowing it.

Jeff Alberts
February 25, 2026 9:00 am

But it is not the kind of rapid rise implied when a global satellite-era average is presented as if it defines local reality. “

The global average doesn’t represent reality.

Also, I see no mention of the accuracy of the measuring devices. Are any of them capable of millimeter-scale measurements?

Sparta Nova 4
February 25, 2026 9:45 am

My understanding (and correct me if I am wrong) is that satellites measure with a minimum 1 cm sampling resolution.

Sparta Nova 4
February 25, 2026 9:47 am

Anthony, you have a typo in the link. The link says “effects,” not “affects.”

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
February 25, 2026 2:52 pm

When I click the link as is, I get a 403 (forbidden) error, which might be due to my VPN. When I turn it off, the link as is redirects to the “effects” link.

Edward Katz
February 25, 2026 2:08 pm

How’s the population reacting to this sea level rise? Are people moving to the North American interior to avoid inundation? If so, I I haven’t met any yet.

antigtiff
February 25, 2026 6:03 pm

The entire planet “bulges” a bit near the equator….due to centrifugal force of rotation.

February 26, 2026 7:20 pm

If I were a Hawaii resident, I’d keep an eye on Kilauea and not the surf.

Dave Burton
March 1, 2026 3:57 am

Great article, Anthony! Absolutely spot on!

Honolulu has one of the very best sea-level measurement records in the world. Unlike many other locations, it is not much affected by vertical land motion, sedimentation, or erosion. It has 121 years of continuous measurements, with a very typical trend, and without even a single missing month of data. It’s at a nearly ideal measurement site, near the middle of the world’s largest ocean, on a tectonically stable island with near-zero vertical land motion, small tides, and little ENSO distortion.

Data just doesn’t get much better than this:

comment image

Interactive version:
https://sealevel.info/MSL_graph.php?id=honolulu

As you can see, rising CO2 levels have had no detectable effect on the sea-level trend there.

Other careful analyses using data from many measurement sites have found a barely detectable average acceleration of only about 0.01 mm/yr². That is negligible. An acceleration of 0.01 mm/yr², were it to continue for 150 years, would increase sea-level by just 4.4 inches.

This table from (Houston, 2021) summarizes the results of ten of the best papers:

comment image

From: Houston, J.R., 2021. Sea-level acceleration: Analysis of the world’s high-quality tide gauges. Journal of Coastal Research, 37(2), 272–279. Coconut Creek (Florida), ISSN 0749-0208, https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-20-00101.1

Some papers claim much higher rates of acceleration, but they’re based on low quality data, cherry-picked endpoints, splicing together data from different locations for different times, or other errors. The best long measurement records do not show enough acceleration in sea-level rise to be worrisome.