Glaciers Worldwide Are Suddenly Surging, Experts Blame Warming!

From the NoTricksZone

By P Gosselin

Media, “experts” blame global warming for surging glaciers!

The article from Germany’s online Merkur discusses a seemingly paradoxical but dangerous phenomenon in the context of climate change: glacier “surges” (sudden advances).

Symbol image of a Karakoram glacier, generated for illustration purposes only by Grok AI. 

While glaciers worldwide are said to be shrinking due to global warming, there are a number of exceptions. Some are growing suddenly at extreme speeds, extending up to 100 times faster than usual.

The reported sudden advances are said to be triggered by unstable mechanical conditions inside or at the base of the glacier. For example, meltwater can act as a lubricant, causing the ice to slide. The rapid movement can cause massive amounts of ice to become unstable and break off.

Moreover, the advancing ice masses can block valleys, causing lakes to form behind them. If these natural dams burst later, devastating flood waves hit lower-lying regions.

The focus is particularly on high mountain ranges such as the Karakoram (Asia), parts of Alaska, and Svalbard. In the Karakoram, scientists observe the “Karakoram Anomaly,” where many glaciers remain stable or are exhibiting dangerous surges despite global warming.

However, researchers emphasize that these advances are not a sign of glacial recovery or an end to global warming. On the contrary: they claim that climate change is altering glacier dynamics so significantly that such unpredictable and dangerous events may occur more frequently or intensely.

They conclude that these growing glaciers are not a reason to relax regarding climate change; instead, they represent a new, life-threatening danger for mountain regions by significantly increasing the risk of natural disasters.

“The climate change is rewriting the rules of the game: Glaciers are suddenly growing and becoming hotbeds for disasters,” writes the Merkur. “These advances are not a sign of recovery, but rather a symptom of extreme instability in the ice system.”

Experts are claiming that these glacier surges are not caused by more snow falling, but by the ice becoming so unstable that it loses its grip on the ground and “slips” forward at high speed, often leading to floods and landslides.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
4.3 16 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
92 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
March 1, 2026 6:05 am

For example, meltwater can act as a lubricant, causing the ice to slide. 

There already is a layer of water under the glacier caused by pressue. That’s how ice skates work.

Denis
Reply to  Steve Case
March 1, 2026 7:14 am

Also, the water does not cause the ice to slide, it permits sliding. There is a difference. And just how does warming of air cause more water at the bottom of a glacier? Can IR from CO2 penetrate through thousands of feet of ice and raise the temperature there above freezing? I think not.

MarkW
Reply to  Denis
March 1, 2026 11:30 am

By the very nature of glaciers, there are many cracks in them that extend from the surface to the base.

Andrew St John
Reply to  MarkW
March 2, 2026 3:27 am

Have you actually been on a glacier?

Michael Ketterer
Reply to  Andrew St John
March 2, 2026 3:07 pm

At least not in a crevasse.

joe-Dallas
Reply to  Steve Case
March 1, 2026 8:54 am

A Cultural History of Climate 1st Editionby Wolfgang Behringer (Author)

This book has lots of good commentary of glacier advances during the LIA and the destruction of buildings, homes etc



Reply to  joe-Dallas
March 1, 2026 9:43 am

One would think that receding glaciers would be a good thing, but
the Climate Crusade tells us that receding glaciers are a problem.

comment image

Reply to  Steve Case
March 2, 2026 8:07 am

As usual, the authors fail to provide the historical evidence of glaciers surging and retreating. Here is some background regarding one of the important glacier zones:

“Glacier surges and associated ice-dammed lake outburst floods pose significant hazards in the Karakoram, where fragmented historical records show unclear trends in surge behaviour and flood frequency. Therefore, this study integrates historical archives, remote sensing data, digital elevation models (DEMs), surface velocity time series (ITS_LIVE), and ground observations to analyse the surge dynamics and associated glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF) history of the Kumdan group glaciers (Chong Kumdan, Kichik Kumdan, and Aktash).

Historical records cross-verified with original sources and imagery confirm 16 GLOFs since 1835, predominantly from Chong Kumdan and Kichik Kumdan, with none from Aktash, despite its surges. Chong Kumdan exhibits long active phases (7–10 years) and an ∼77-year surge cycle for its primary tributary ‘a’, with asynchronous surges in its tributary ‘b’ and the main trunk. It generated the most devastating floods, including significant events in 1835, 1926, and 1929, but the last GLOF occurred in 1934.

The recent surge (2001–2010) caused the terminus to advance ∼100 m short of the Shyok River, which was therefore not dammed. Kichik Kumdan shows shorter active phases (∼2 years) with cycle lengths decreasing from 33 years (1833–1866) to 27 years (1970–1997). Its last significant GLOF occurred in 1903, with post-1970s surges failing to form stable ice dams. Aktash shows periodic surges but no GLOFs occurred due to effective subglacial drainage that prevents river blockages.

We observe a decline in surge-induced GLOFs because of climate warming, which reduces mass accumulation, shortens surge cycles, and weakens ice dams. DEM analyses show recent thickening in reservoir zones of Chong Kumdan (∼22 m) and Kichik Kumdan (∼20 m) from 2015 to 2022, indicating potential future surges. These findings provide crucial insights for policymakers and local communities in managing glacier-related hazards for improved risk assessment and mitigation strategies.”

The paper implies that warming periods reduce ice mass and dams, lowering the risk of flooding, once again warming is a good thing.

Paper: Historical analysis of glacier surges and ice-dammed lake outburst floods in the Kumdan group, Karakoram, Halder and Bhambri (2026)

Michael Ketterer
Reply to  Steve Case
March 2, 2026 3:00 pm

That’s how ice skates work.

That’s waht your highschool teacher said. In physics we know better at least since the 1990ies.


Reply to  Michael Ketterer
March 3, 2026 4:24 am

“..know better…”?

Michael Ketterer
Reply to  daNorse
March 3, 2026 6:23 am

This article sums up current knowledge on ice skates:

March 1, 2026 6:06 am

So if the glaciers are receding it’s global warming. If the glaciers are advancing it’d global warming and if they are doing neither it’s global warming. It’s win win. Or should that be win win win?

SxyxS
Reply to  JeffC
March 1, 2026 6:32 am

Everything is global warming (even the ice age scare once it can no longer be ignored).

The only problem is, that those supercompetent megaexperts with the gigamodels and ultracomputers can never ever predict a single of such events,
but as soon as it happens they only need 5 minutes to understand what they missed for decades and tell you why – and the explanation is always somehow global warming.

Denis
Reply to  SxyxS
March 1, 2026 7:26 am

This is the problem with the “climate change” meme. It is used to explain all sorts of climate changes without the “expert” having to think about the problem. The usual way glacier movement increases is increased snow at higher elevations. Is there or is there not more snow on the Karakoram? Alternately, the glacier could have worn down or fractured off some impediment to its flow. Has anybody checked for such changes to the Karakoram?

Reply to  Denis
March 1, 2026 7:37 am

Maybe all the earthquakes caused by climate change have shaken the glaciers causing them to advance! /s

SxyxS
Reply to  Denis
March 1, 2026 9:55 am

Well, it is not a “problem” but a feature.

From a pure propaganda perspective it is absolutely necessary that all roads lead to rome or, as in this case, climate change.

Fear by permanent exposure to a mantra, disguised as science.
The goal is to indoctrinate and subjugate.

Now in terms of glaciers : The bigger they get, the more likely is that they will move more as result of more pressure/ weight/ gravity,
the more liquid will be under the glacier as result of it, the closer we get to the breaking points and movements.
The bigger the calving ? parts that will break away .

But such an approach is useless for propaganda and may even ruin ones career.

Mac
Reply to  SxyxS
March 1, 2026 7:48 am

When I was teaching at UCLA many years ago the running joke was: An expert is a person 50 miles from home with a box of slides.
Now: An expert is a “climate scientist” with an incredible computer program that can forecast climate now and the next 100 years! Always wild claims that contradict!

Denis
Reply to  Mac
March 1, 2026 8:15 am

I side with Feynman who said “Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.”

Jakub
Reply to  Mac
March 1, 2026 8:37 am

Per Mahatma Gandhi: “An expert studies more and more about less and less until he knows everything about nothing”

MarkW
Reply to  SxyxS
March 1, 2026 11:32 am

Everything inside global warming, nothing outside global warming.
Apologies to Benito Mussolini.

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  JeffC
March 1, 2026 6:36 am

It’s heads they win, tails we lose.

Reply to  JeffC
March 1, 2026 7:13 am

Yes yes yes the Climate crisis can’t be beat.
It’s the crisis that is ever so sweet
Even when it snows on Mulberry street
                                                      The Lorax

Reply to  Steve Case
March 1, 2026 7:38 am

It’s so sweet it has generated trillions of dollars for the ruinables industries.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
March 1, 2026 9:30 am

Joseph,

Unaffordable Impoverishing Ruinables, UIRs, as wind, solar, batteries, etc., primarily are about super-safe, long-term tax shelter schemes, invented by Wall Street folks for their elite clients to pay less taxes on huge incomes.

These elites own/control the mass media to thoroughly brainwash people that CO2 is an evil/poison, whereas it actually is a life giving gas.

Higher CO2 ppm increases flora and fauna, reduces desert areas, such as the Sahara, and increases crop yields per acre to better feed 8 billion people. Plants love 1000 to 1200 ppm.

On this site, all comments should start with these three sentences.

The Expulsive
Reply to  JeffC
March 1, 2026 10:13 am

As my civil engineering prof said about modelling: BS baffles brains…so think it through, do the math, prepare your model, test it, and then prepare to debate your output data. It is the last two things that are so-called climate experts don’t seem to want to do.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  The Expulsive
March 2, 2026 5:06 am

My engineering professor advised me that the math in the model is either correct or incorrect and a simple test can prove that. The real challenge, he pointed out, is identifying the assumptions, (stated, unintentional, and deliberate) and challenging them. It is the assumptions that drive the model results.

bobclose
Reply to  The Expulsive
March 2, 2026 5:08 am

I think it’s more like prepare to debate your Inputs!

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  JeffC
March 2, 2026 5:02 am

Ah yes, the old 3-headed coin trick, 99!

sherro01
March 1, 2026 6:15 am

Even if the lubricant effect is changing in some places, what can be done about it except lie back, close your eyes and think of the motherland?
Particularly concerned individuals are not banned from moving their homes to places distant from glaciers. Such people have little to contribute with hypothetical alarmism. Get a Life, alarmists. Geoff S

Reply to  sherro01
March 1, 2026 7:19 am

“Even if the lubricant effect . . .

The lubricant effect is bullshit.

Reply to  Steve Case
March 1, 2026 7:40 am

It’s K-Y Jelly for glaciers. 🙂

Reply to  Steve Case
March 1, 2026 9:31 am

ExLax would really move these glaciers

Reply to  wilpost
March 2, 2026 5:31 am

If we could get to the bottom of these glaciers many ages ago, we might see tree trucks being ground to powder, such as at the onset of a glaciation period.

MarkW
Reply to  Steve Case
March 1, 2026 11:34 am

The lubricant effect is real and well documented.

1saveenergy
Reply to  MarkW
March 1, 2026 4:02 pm

That’s what my wife says !!! (;-))

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  MarkW
March 2, 2026 5:07 am

True. What is not properly debated is the MAGNITUDE of the lubricant effect.

Frankemann
Reply to  MarkW
March 2, 2026 6:45 am

Well, that’s what she said – But can you document that human emission of CO2 impacts it in any way shape or form?

Reply to  sherro01
March 1, 2026 7:39 am

Right- just like back and enjoy it. I think a judge said that once. 🙂

mleskovarsocalrrcom
March 1, 2026 6:26 am

It’s statements like this that bring more people to the skeptic side of AGW.

Bruce Cobb
March 1, 2026 6:27 am

Climate Caterwaulers say the darnedest things! Where’s Art Linkletter when you need him?

JohnT
March 1, 2026 6:58 am

A lot has been written in the glaciological literature about surges.

It’s basically a mass-balance problem: thinning in the lower reaches and accumulation in the upper reaches of the glacier. There’s an equilibrium line at some point where nett accumulation exceeds summer melting and melting exceeding accumulation below that line.

Glacier bed ice-rock interaction is also well studied. In polar glaciers melt water from the surface reaches the base through crevasses, or moulins and flows to the snout through sub-glacial tunnels. It is these water flows which determine the effective friction force against sliding.

Once the mass-imbalance reaches a critical level (dare I say, a tipping point???!!), the surge begins with the effects described in the post.

Aerial photographs show such an event occurring on the Roslin Glacier in the Stauning Alps in NE Greenland (71.75degN, 25degW) in the 1950s. The surface over its full length was riven by massive crevassing and the snout extended almost the full width of the Schuchert valley below. By the 1970s the 18 mile length was one smooth surface (up which you could drive a truck) marked by massive melt streams and a system of moulins (sink holes by which melt water reaches the glacier bed)..

A recent overflight (August 2025) showed how the snout had retreated many hundreds of metres back into the valley and the surface of the lower sections had dropped dramatically (200-300 ft). However, in the upper sections the ice was at, or slightly above the levels surveyed during expeditions in the 1970s.

The small increase in average annual temperature over the last 50 years may have influenced the position of the equilibrium line slightly. But the Roslin will surge again. It’s just the way Mother Nature works. I just might not be around to watch it!

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  JohnT
March 2, 2026 5:09 am

A tipping point is the threshold at which a system transitions rapidly from one stable state to another (usually lower energy). So, yes, tipping point could, repeat could, well be applicable.

C_Miner
Reply to  JohnT
March 2, 2026 11:58 am

We see it all the time in rock mechanics during mining. If you want a stable slope buttress the toe (unlike it melting, in this case) and unload the crest (unlike more ice accumulation in this case.

Mode of failure can either be a slide (disconformity at the base so that’s accurate in this case) or a circular failure where the failure propagates through the heterogeneous materials after reaching stress levels higher than the limits of the components.

max
March 1, 2026 7:20 am

There were spots in the Olympics talking about “glacial retreat”, and how people skied “on those glaciers”, but can’t now. Unless l miss my guess, it would be extremely difficult to ski on ice. On snow over the ice, sure…

Joe Crawford
Reply to  max
March 1, 2026 12:11 pm

Guess it all depends on where you learned to ski. Many years ago a crazy friend of mine, originally from Northern Wisconsin, moved to Colorado after a year on the US Ski Team. That spring he skied most of Clear Creek above the beer factory as a promo for Lange Skis. It was mostly blue ice at the time. Said he only fell once :<)

22GeologyJim
March 1, 2026 7:20 am

“Glaciers are suddenly … becoming hotbeds for disasters” (Palm slap to face)

Another “climate-stupid” line is created

Somewhere Leslie Nielsen is chuckling.

March 1, 2026 7:34 am

Both the Merkur article and the University of Portsmouth article are thinly veiled pleas for more money to perform more research to write more artcles to plead for more funding.

Missing from these articles is any explanation of how water under the “suge-glaciers” is increasing due to climate change. If more heating is causing more water to melt under the glaciers, wouldn’t the source of heating be from below the surge-glaciers? Perhaps they have figured out how to invert the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

MarkW
Reply to  isthatright
March 1, 2026 11:37 am

Water melting at or near the surface of glaciers penetrates to the base of glaciers via the many cracks that form in the glaciers.

Reply to  MarkW
March 1, 2026 7:56 pm

The movement of glaciers is caused by gravity acting on mass. Not lubrication. The ”lubrication” is caused by the pressure from addition of ice in the first place. In other words, without the weight of added snow, the glacier would not move.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Mike
March 2, 2026 5:12 am

That is a factor, but not the only factor. There is no single “control knob.”

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  MarkW
March 2, 2026 5:11 am

That water sinks in ice is true, but it also loses energy and some percentage freezes, pressure being a factor. That is now a snow pack becomes an ice pack.

March 1, 2026 8:01 am

may occur more frequently or intensely.

As compared to when? Do we have enough data about glacial behavior 2000 years ago, 5000, 10000, to have a comparison?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Tony_G
March 2, 2026 5:12 am

“may”

March 1, 2026 8:04 am

Anthony thank you for your archive, it works great!

Glacier National Park Quietly Removes Its ‘Gone by 2020’ Signs (7 years ago)
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/06/06/glacier-national-park-quietly-removes-its-gone-by-2020-signs-2/

Glacier National Park quietly removed ‘Gone by 2020’ signs in 2019—Update (6 years ago)
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/01/01/glacier-national-park-quietly-removed-gone-by-2020-signs-in-2019-update/

also

Dr. Willie Soon Reveals the Real Driver of Climate Change in New Video

https://pjmedia.com/tom-harris/2026/02/28/dr-willie-soon-reveals-the-real-driver-of-climate-change-in-new-video-n4950042

Ed Zuiderwijk
March 1, 2026 8:16 am

Glaciers shortening, our fault. Glaciers lengthening, our fault as well.

It’s a pre-Copernican worldview because it implies that we live at a very special time and therefore that time is organised around us, the center of the universe. Primitive and profoundly anti-scientific.

John XB
March 1, 2026 8:41 am

How does “melt water” permeate glaciers which are between 100 to 500 metres thick?

Sweet Old Bob
Reply to  John XB
March 1, 2026 9:31 am

a system of moulins (sink holes by which melt water reaches the glacier bed)..

skitheo
March 1, 2026 8:42 am

Glacier Bay National Park: The other day I was looking at a map of it and noticed some oddities: Brady Glacier has been growing and the extreme recession that occurred between 1780 and 1880, before extensive use of “fossil fuels”. Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Change, I’m sure.

ssm59
March 1, 2026 8:43 am

Well, in this case, they might actually be right. There has been a long-standing theory that in order to get a glacial age, we need to warm up to maximize the amount of water vapor delivered to the continents.

March 1, 2026 9:08 am

Warm is bad and caused by Climate Change®.
Cold is bad and caused by Climate Change®.
Rain is bad and caused by Climate Change®.
Drought is bad and caused by Climate Change®.
This is nearly a perfect scam. All it takes is support from corrupt governments and academia, along with a sufficient percentage of credulous fools.

Reply to  Shoki
March 1, 2026 10:39 am

Exactly the problem. The average citizen, who doesn’t spend any time studying the science, cannot tell weather from climate. Any weather event, which is outside of “normal”, is climate change. It is one of the greatest fraudulent misrepresentations of science in the history of mankind. Or should I say “personkind” to be politically correct.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  John Aqua
March 2, 2026 5:15 am

Minor correct… “is climate change” should read “is caused by climate change.”

Note: Climate change is the result of weather variations. A statistical calculation does not cause anything.

Victor
March 1, 2026 9:49 am

At what altitude are the glaciers?
Has the temperature and air composition changed at this altitude?
Is the amount of oxygen lower at the height of the glaciers?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Victor
March 2, 2026 5:15 am

Oh, now, stop it. You are asking questions and we all “know” that is not allowed.
/s

March 1, 2026 10:10 am

Glaciers move by thick ice thinking as a plastic solid. If the slip on water underneath, they move as a block, leaving upstream gaps. Is anyone suggesting that’s happening?

It takes a long time for heat to propagate through ice to the base. Yes, water gets to the base through pipes and fissures. Is there any study that shows meltwater is going down in extraordinary volumes?

Surging glaciers is nothing new.

This reads like a report done by climate alarmists who were told glaciers were advancing but lack the technical knowledge to understand how glaciers move. So they use their imagination.

Glacial movement is a process of plastic deformation when the weight of ice squeezes the lower portions beyond their internal structural limits. It’s like squeezing toothpaste out of the toothpaste tube. In ice fields without exit valleys, the ice flows up the basin edges, where the lateral rock walls won’t deform and redirect mostly horizontal forces vertically.

But it’s just another of the 97% Climate Science Says that predicts doom if we continue to feed people with fertilizers and keep them cool during heat waves.

JohnT
Reply to  Douglas Proctor
March 1, 2026 1:47 pm

It takes a long time for heat to propagate through ice to the base. Yes, water gets to the base through pipes and fissures.

Not strictly true. Glaciological research shows that the ice temperature at about 10m below the surface is approximately the average annual air temperature at that location. It’s a Bessel function driven by the changing air temperature propagating down through the surface layers of ice. It would then be a case of the rate at which the longer term average air temperature changed (12.5degC since 1850??) the temperature significantly at any greater depth.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  JohnT
March 2, 2026 5:19 am

The nit is your stated longer term average air temperature, which appears to be the global statistical construction, not the air at the site of the glacier.

MarkW
March 1, 2026 11:29 am

If this increase in glacier length was truely being caused by surging, then there would also be noticable thinning of the thickness of the same glaciers.

gezza1298
March 1, 2026 1:04 pm

And yet in places where ice has retreated archaeologists are finding human artifacts which clearly show that the ice retreat is not unprecedented and despite all this alleged warming, Greenland is still not green unless it was named ironically.

Bob
March 1, 2026 2:04 pm

I don’t give a damn what these guys say, it would be interesting to hear the actual cause for why some glaciers are advancing.

Reply to  Bob
March 1, 2026 4:22 pm

… it would be interesting to hear the actual cause for why some glaciers are advancing.

Warmer air temperatures equals increased precipitation and in many regions where there are glaciers, precipitation falls as snow in winter.

This is offset, overall, by warming surface temperatures. Thus, in some regions there are increases in glacial mass, for the most part, glaciers are receding.

Reply to  TheFinalNail
March 1, 2026 8:04 pm

Warmer air temperatures equals increased precipitation and in many regions where there are glaciers, precipitation falls as snow in winter……for the most part, glaciers are receding.

So let me get this straight. Some regions are getting more snow due to global warming – increasing glacial mass and some regions are getting less snow due to global warming – decreasing glacial mass. Got it.

Reply to  TheFinalNail
March 2, 2026 2:17 am

So now warmer temperature INCREASE snowfall.

We will here no more from the climate zealots about decreased snowfall… right! 😉

Reply to  Bob
March 2, 2026 6:24 am

In the case of the Thwaites glacier in Antarctica the cause is  is relatively warm ocean water from the Amundsen Sea reaching and eating away at the base of the glacier.  The glacier’s ice shelf has lost contact with underwater ridges, or “pinning points” which previously held it in place, allowing for faster, unchecked flow. The ice shelf is losing its ability to hold back the ice behind it, leading to faster flow toward the ocean. In this case the effect is that the glacier is experiencing rapid retreat, acceleration, and thinning.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/antarcticas-doomsday-glacier-is-melting-even-faster-than-scientists-thought/#:~:text=4%20min%20read-,Antarctica's%20'Doomsday%20Glacier'%20Is%20Melting%20Even%20Faster%20Than%20Scientists%20Thought,warming%20water%20than%20previously%20believed.

C_Miner
Reply to  Bob
March 2, 2026 12:14 pm

It is the nature of raised rocks and ice to want to go down to the sea. Erosion is one of the simplest forms. Rock mechanics documents many ways rocks and slopes can mechanically fail. To prevent failure, remove weight from the top and add a buttressing weight at the toe.

Ironically, melting ice at the toe weakens the resistance-to-movement of the entire slope, making a slope failure more likely. You’ll often see this when a creek floods and washes away the toe of a nearby slope, causing the slope to collapse.

DStayer
March 1, 2026 2:13 pm

I think it is time to stop using the term “experts”, name them, show their credentials and require them to detail their methods, assumptions to come to their conclusions.

March 1, 2026 3:17 pm

While glaciers worldwide are said to be shrinking due to global warming, there are a number of exceptions. 

Strange terminology.

Glaciers worldwide “…are said to be shrinking due to global warming…” and “… there are a number of exceptions.”

One declaration is stated with the caveat: “… are said to be…”; the other is stated as a fact: “… there are

The simple fact is that, on average, glaciers worldwide are shrinking due to increased temperatures.

Reply to  TheFinalNail
March 2, 2026 1:16 am

How do you know this alleged warming has anything to do with anthropogenic CO2?

Reply to  TheFinalNail
March 2, 2026 2:18 am

Did you know that MANY of these glaciers didn’t even exist before the Little Ice Age. !

March 1, 2026 3:44 pm

“These advances are not a sign of recovery, “
So, in their minds, snowball Earth is recovery and their preferred condition?

Reply to  John in Oz
March 1, 2026 4:10 pm

So, in their minds, snowball Earth is recovery and their preferred condition?

Doesn’t follow, does it, John? When you think about it.

Reply to  TheFinalNail
March 1, 2026 8:16 pm

Yes the preferred condition is for everything to remain as it was <> 100 years ago and remain unchanged for the rest of eternity. I got news!

Bruce Cobb
March 1, 2026 4:33 pm

Climate “experts” need to get a grip.