
This smells like Trenberth’s doings at the behest of Al Gore and his “Dirty Weather” Campaign. If so, then I’m against it, because all this will do is create another bureaucracy loaded with opinionated thinkers sucking up more tax dollars adding to the already out of control federal deficit.
From the National Center for Atmospheric Research/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research.
Experts call on Congress to create first US Weather Commission
WASHINGTON, D.C. — With the U.S. economy vulnerable to weather events costing billions of dollars, an expert panel today asked Congress to create the first U.S. Weather Commission. The commission would provide guidance to policymakers on leveraging weather expertise across government and the private sector to better protect lives and businesses.
“The nation must focus its weather resources on the areas of greatest need in order to keep our economy competitive and provide maximum protection of lives and property,” says Thomas Bogdan, president of the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. “Emerging technologies are providing an opportunity to create forecasts that are more accurate and detailed than ever, and to communicate them instantly to key communities and businesses. We need a U.S. Weather Commission to ensure that our entire weather research and technology enterprise provides maximum benefit to the nation.”
At a time of fast-changing technological innovation, the commission would advise federal policymakers on setting priorities for improving forecasts and creating a more weather-proof nation. The goal is to help ensure cost-effective spending on the nation’s weather systems while minimizing the impacts of both major storms, which last year alone cost about $52 billion, and normal fluctuations in weather, which have an estimated annual economic impact of $485 billion.
Earlier this year, the National Academy of Sciences released a hallmark report, Weather Services for the Nation: Becoming Second to None. The report concluded that, even with recent concerted and much-needed efforts to modernize the National Weather Service, the country faces challenges in harnessing the best science and private sector resources available for protecting the nation from weather impacts.
These challenges are rooted in evolving scientific and technological advances, rapidly changing needs of the nation’s weather information consumers, and an increasingly capable and growing third-party community of weather services providers.
Congress has twice created an ocean commission for setting direction on commerce, research, and defense related to the world’s oceans. But there has never been a U.S. Weather Commission, even though weather has far-reaching effects on all Americans.
Commissioners would provide guidance on issues such as making appropriate investments in satellite and radar systems, protecting vulnerable communities, setting research priorities, and meeting the needs of key sectors, ranging from agriculture to utilities to the U.S. armed forces.
“Weather is immeasurably important to public safety and our economic competitiveness,” says Pam Emch, a senior staff engineer/scientist with Northrop Grumman Corporation and one of the panelists. “Effective organization of the diverse entities that span our weather enterprise is necessary for economic stability, innovation, and the good of the nation.”
“Improved weather information can be an engine for economic growth,” says panelist William Gail, co-founder and chief technology officer of the Global Weather Corporation. “As we develop increasingly detailed understanding of our atmosphere, there is enormous potential for helping the public and businesses.”
“We must keep pace with accelerating scientific and technological advances and meet expanding user needs in our increasingly information-centric society,” says panelist John Armstrong, chair of the Committee on the Assessment of the National Weather Service’s Modernization Program.
Bogdan says that a commission approach, guided by key actors across the entire weather enterprise, will provide needed direction and consensus.
“The U.S. Weather Commission offers the promise of better research, state-of-the-art prediction, and protection for the health and prosperity of the U.S.,” he says. “It will also foster growth for the innovative private weather sector we have all come to rely upon. This is an issue that affects all members of Congress and all their constituents, no matter where they live.”
Today’s panel briefing was the first step in a process that will continue into the next Congress. The panel’s next steps are to brief staff and members on the importance of the commission and the role it will play, seeking their guidance and support for establishing the commission in 2013.
The University Corporation for Atmospheric Research manages the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado, under sponsorship by the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
On the Web:
For news releases, images, and more www.ucar.edu/atmosnews
Now I wonder who they have in mind to enjoy such further taxpayer largeness ?
“The commission would provide guidance to policymakers on leveraging weather expertise across government and the private sector to better protect lives and businesses.”
Ah, yes. “We’re from the government. We’re here to protect you.” Just what we need!
Will this be similar to the Ministry of truth?
So that University Corporation is from the same group that issued that troubling USGCRP 2013-2021 report. Given the fact that I see every NAS released report it is difficult for me not to see this as a continuation of the model of treating the economy and the environment as a single ecosystem that government officials plan to redesign and plan. Then the only science becomes officially approved science.
I think the key words are in the phrase “harnessing the best science and private sector resources available for protecting the nation from weather impacts”. A report that came out about 10 days ago from NAS on Advanced Climate Change Modelling proposed making sure the “Best Minds” went into Climate Change Research. Basically the federal purse that is our taxes or indebtedness tries to corrupt talent with a better paycheck than anyone else is offering.
Ditto on the language about “private sector resources” being harnessed. The government becomes the primary customer and then uses that monopsony power to control development. Much like WalMart with its vendors. Every report I have seen coming out of NAS or UN is adamant about wanting control over future technology development in all areas. In fact the UN wants veto rights to prevent countries from going into the production phase without UN approval.
It would not be an overstatement to say the bureaucrats and politicians really do want to control and direct economic development and human behavior of the masses going forward. And honestly that has never worked well anytime in history. There is no more likely cause of a stagnant economy than making the only prosperity for the political entrepreneurs. The players with their own lobbyists.
Goebbels would be proud.
“We’re from the Gov’t and we’re here to help.” Right.
Anthony:
You write
I remind that I have been warning about the likelihood of such bureaucracies because –
as the AGW-scare fades away – those in ‘prime positions’ will attempt to establish rules and bureaucracies to impose those rules which provide immortality to their objectives. Guarding against those attempts now needs to be a serious activity.
I wrote on WUWT and elsewhere saying the AGW-scare was killed at the failed 2009 IPCC Conference in Copenhagen. I said then that the scare would continue to move as though alive in similar manner to a beheaded chicken running around a farmyard. It continues to provide the movements of life but it is already dead. And its deathly movements provide an especial problem.
Nobody will declare the AGW-scare dead: it will slowly fade away. This is similar to the ‘acid rain’ scare of the 1980s. Few remember that scare unless reminded of it but its effects still have effects; e.g. the Large Combustion Plant Directive (LCPD) exists. Importantly, the bureaucracy which the EU established to operate the LCPD still exists. And those bureaucrats justify their jobs by imposing ever more stringent, always more pointless, and extremely expensive emission limits which are causing enforced closure of UK power stations.
Bureaucracies are difficult to eradicate and impossible to nullify.
Richard
Are we going to close NOAA down then? How many federal agencies do we need to figure out when a storm is coming?
Leftwing Boondoggle. EPA double down on junk science and ruining people and business.
Big State.
I thought that went out with Khruschev.
Or Brezhnev, anyway.
Even on this side of the pond, the Shadow Chancellor [Opposition finance chappie] has indicated a ‘ruthless’ review of state spending – and he of the neo-endogenous growth theory [ I F I understood him!], was the architect of the colossal state spending that, even now, sees the UK Government spend two thousand pounds – for every man woman and child in the country – that it doesn’t raise in taxes, fees, charges etc. – this year alone, adding to the already mountainous debts we have from the Brown Profligacy. And so H.M. Government borrows those many many tens of billions. We have to pay that back – and interest in the meantime.
So.
Guess what – look out for INFLATION [also called Quantitive Easing when it’s an mewling infant].
We need weather commission? What do you call NOAA?
Oh… NOAA doesn’t have any power to make law.
I have an idea… Try advising Congress rather than circumventing it. It is far more Constitutional.
Jeebous.
“…Becoming Second to None…” {snicker, yeah, I’ve seen that before}
It should be more … factual.
“Second to None, First to Nobody, and Third in a Class all by themselves.”
Writing from the almost bankrupt UK I have no dog in this fight, but it seems that you have a National Science Foundation which manages the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research which manages the National Centre for Atmospheric research which wants to set up (and manage) a U.S. Weather Commission, to provide “better research and state-of-the-art prediction”. How many layers of management can you afford before you get to where someone does any actual work?
And if it’s going to be “better research and state-of-the-art prediction” what’s the betting that it’ll be models all the way down?
Apologies for interfering from this side of the pond.
[Snip. Sorry, Nik, this is a family blog. — mod.]
More pork. And this one is greasier than most.
Just what you need, your very own Met Office, with huge and expensive computers, hundreds of staff, shiny state-of-the-art buildings and overseen by over-paid zealots.
Nothing good can possibly come from this.
You just sense that the Commission will not have your best interests at heart. In Australia they set up a Climate Commissioner with huge annual remuneration and he is as useful as a Wombat at helping anyone on weather or climate.
No, sorry, that does a dis-service to Wombats.
Looks like it’s almost 10:1, we should focus on “normal fluctuations of weather”.
By 485 to 52 billion normal is the new bad! Who’d a thunk?
I bet the EPA have already got their application in to acquire this new role.
What a wonderful new government sponsored scam. If there is a drought, the commission can pay for rain dances.
Perhaps the commission can hire the UK MET weather forecasters to provide long range forecasts for the US.
Everyone complains about the weather. This new commission can really do something about it.
“Tear down the wall!” – Pink Floyd, 1982
“Tear down this wall!” – Ronald Reagan, 1987
My original post was to the Judge animated character from a Pink
Floyd movie which I labelled: “Tribunal.”
From the picture credit:
Sounds scary.
So, just to compare, how many people lost their lives due to tornadoes and hurricanes in every other decade?
What is the trend? It’s definitely in the DOWN direction…
“The nation must focus its weather resources on the areas of greatest need in order to keep our economy competitive and provide maximum protection of lives and property, … ”
In other words: Pass new laws on the basis of completed scientific papers.
“Commissioners would provide guidance on issues such as making appropriate investments in satellite and radar systems, protecting vulnerable communities, setting research priorities, ”
In other words: The government will choose which scientific papers are to be completed.
They truly think they can control the planets climate. And they will probably convince the moron’s in Washington that they can. God help us!