Oh noes! Models say that climate change, ENSO, and beach sand heat will kill sea turtles

From the busy BEES at Drexel University, worry that beach sand temperature 40 to 50 centimeters deep will be affected by the global warming air temperature rise of 0.8C over the last century, projected to increase. The models identified this as the leading projected cause of climate-related decline in leatherback turtles. They say “if actual climate patterns follow projections in the study, the eastern Pacific population of leatherback turtles will decline by 75 percent by the year 2100.” Gosh.

But they write in their press release as if the projections are actually happening:

Leatherback turtles, Spotila says, are in critical need of human help to survive. “Warming climate is killing eggs and hatchlings,” Spotila said. “Action is needed, both to mitigate this effect and, ultimately, to reverse it to avoid extinction. We need to change fishing practices that kill turtles at sea, intervene to cool the beach to save the developing eggs and find a way to stop global warming. Otherwise, the leatherback and many other species will be lost.”

It makes you wonder how the turtles ever survived the Roman Warm Period or the Medieval Warm Period or the early part of the Holocene?

Caption: A leatherback sea turtle hatchling crawls across the beach toward the ocean. Heat-related deaths of turtle eggs and hatchlings in nests before they emerge and enter life at sea was identified as the leading projected cause of climate-related decline in leatherback turtles in the eastern Pacific in a new study. The study suggests that climate change could exacerbate existing threats that have already made leatherbacks critically endangered, and nearly wipe out the eastern Pacific population in the 21st century. The study, by a research team from Drexel University, Princeton University, other institutions and agencies, is published online in Nature Climate Change on July 1, 2012.
Credit: Jolene Bertoldi / ZA Photos, via Flickr

Rising heat at the beach threatens largest sea turtles, climate change models show

PHILADELPHIA (July 1, 2012)—For eastern Pacific populations of leatherback turtles, the 21st century could be the last. New research suggests that climate change could exacerbate existing threats and nearly wipe out the population. Deaths of turtle eggs and hatchlings in nests buried at hotter, drier beaches are the leading projected cause of the potential climate-related decline, according to a new study in the journal Nature Climate Change by a research team from Drexel University, Princeton University, other institutions and government agencies.

Leatherbacks, the largest sea turtle species, are among the most critically endangered due to a combination of historical and ongoing threats including egg poaching at nesting beaches and juvenile and adult turtles being caught in fishing operations. The new research on climate dynamics suggests that climate change could impede this population’s ability to recover. If actual climate patterns follow projections in the study, the eastern Pacific population of leatherback turtles will decline by 75 percent by the year 2100.

Modeling the Ebb and Flow of Turtle Hatching with Climate Variation

“We used three models of this leatherback population to construct a climate-forced population dynamics model. Two parts were based on the population’s observed sensitivity to the nesting beach climate and one part was based on its sensitivity to the ocean climate,” said the study’s lead author Dr. Vincent Saba, a research fishery biologist with the NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Fisheries Science Center, visiting research collaborator at Princeton University, and a Drexel University alumnus.

Leatherback turtle births naturally ebb and flow from year to year in response to climate variations, with more hatchlings, and rare pulses of male hatchlings, entering the eastern Pacific Ocean in cooler, rainier years. Female turtles are more likely to return to nesting beaches in Costa Rica to lay eggs in years when they have more jellyfish to eat, and jellyfish in the eastern Pacific are likely more abundant during cooler seasons. Turtle eggs and hatchlings are also more likely to survive in these cooler, rainier seasons associated with the La Niña climate phase, as this research team recently reported in the journal PLoS ONE. In addition, temperature inside the nest affects turtles’ sex ratio, with most male hatchlings emerging during cooler, rainier seasons to join the predominantly-female turtle population.

The researchers applied Saba’s combined model of these population dynamics to seven climate model projections assessed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The climate model projections were chosen based on their ability to model El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) patterns on the temperature and precipitation in the region of Costa Rica where this team has conducted long-term leatherback studies.

Hot Beaches, More Warm Years Threaten Turtles’ Recovery

The resulting projections indicate that warmer, drier years will become increasingly frequent in Central America throughout this century. High egg and hatchling mortality associated with warmer, drier beach conditions was the most significant cause of the projected climate-related population decline: This nesting population of leatherbacks could decline by 7 percent per decade, or 75 percent overall by the year 2100.

The population is already critically low.

“In 1990, there were 1,500 turtles nesting on the Playa Grande beach,” said Dr. James Spotila, the Betz Chair Professor of Environmental Science in the College of Arts and Sciences at Drexel. “Now, there are 30 to 40 nesting females per season.”

Spotila, a co-author of the study, has been studying leatherback turtles at Playa Grande in Costa Rica, the largest leatherback nesting beach in the eastern Pacific, with colleagues and Drexel students, for 22 years.

Poaching of turtle eggs was a major cause of the initial decline, and was once such a widespread problem that virtually no turtle hatchlings would survive at Playa Grande. Spotila and colleagues worked with the local authorities in Costa Rica to protect the leatherbacks’ nesting beaches so that turtle nests can hatch in safety. By catch of juvenile and adult turtles in fishing operations in the eastern Pacific remains a threat.

For the population to recover successfully, Spotila said, “the challenge is to produce as many good hatchlings as possible. That requires us to be hands-on and manipulate the beach to make sure that happens.”

Spotila’s research team is already investigating methods such as watering and shading turtle nests that could mitigate the impact of hot, dry beach conditions on hatching success.

###

Link to this Nature Climate Change study: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE1582

Link to recent news release about a related study by this research team in PLoS ONE: http://www.drexel.edu/now/news-media/releases/archive/2012/May/El-Nino-Climate-Change-Threaten-Leatherback-Sea-Turtles/

============================================================

Maybe this is a bigger problem? From Wikipedia:

Asian exploitation of turtle nests has been cited as the most significant factor for the species’ global population decline. In Southeast Asia, egg harvesting in countries such as Thailand and Malaysia has led to a near-total collapse of local nesting populations.[62] In Malaysia, where the turtle is practically locally extinct, the eggs are considered a delicacy.[63] In the Caribbean, some cultures consider the eggs to be aphrodisiacs.

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

80 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Brian H
July 5, 2012 8:25 am

Evidently the complement to the Big Lie strategy is the Blizzard of Lies.

Sierra 117
July 5, 2012 9:20 am

Then clearly, nobody understands it. A warming of nearly 3 degrees C in only 90 years is not enough time for adaptation. Especially for a species that doesn’t mature until 15 to 25 years of age. Natural warming (natural climate variability) occurred over 1,000’s and 10,000’s (and more) of years which left time for adaptation. I can’t get over the lack of basic scientific knowledge among all of these comments.

July 5, 2012 9:33 am

Sierra 117 says:
“Natural warming (natural climate variability) occurred over 1,000′s and 10,000′s (and more) of years which left time for adaptation. I can’t get over the lack of basic scientific knowledge among all of these comments.”
It appears that it is you who lacks basic scientific knowledge. Temperatures have changed by tens of degrees on decadal time scales. Naturally.

Sierra 117
July 5, 2012 9:42 am

Right ! And this event caused mass extinction. Why do you think mammoths are no longer here? The Pleistocene megafauna are no longer extant, possibly due to climate.

kadaka (KD Knoebel)
July 5, 2012 11:44 am

Sierra 117 said on July 5, 2012 at 9:42 am:

Right ! And this event caused mass extinction. Why do you think mammoths are no longer here? The Pleistocene megafauna are no longer extant, possibly due to climate.

Google “frozen woolly mammoth found”. We’re still finding them. Here is a 2012 BBC report about one found in Siberia. It contains the following factoids:
# Thought to have become extinct around 3700 years ago.
# Lived in the northern hemisphere, and were forced northwards to Siberia and northern Europe when the Pleistocene ice age began to draw to an end around 15,000 years ago.

Wikipedia notes: “It disappeared from most of its range at the end of the Pleistocene (10,000 years ago), with an isolated population still living on Wrangel Island until roughly 1700 BC.[2]”
For mammoths in general, see the Extinction section of the Wikipedia mammoth entry:

A definitive explanation for their mass extinction has yet to be agreed upon. The warming trend (Holocene) that occurred 12,000 years ago, accompanied by a glacial retreat and rising sea levels, has been suggested as a contributing factor. Forests replaced open woodlands and grasslands across the continent. The available habitat may have been reduced for some megafaunal species, such as the mammoth. However, such climate changes were nothing new; numerous very similar warming episodes had occurred previously within the ice age of the last several million years without producing comparable megafaunal extinctions, so climate alone is unlikely to have played a decisive role.[13][14] The spread of advanced human hunters through northern Eurasia and the Americas around the time of the extinctions was a new development, and thus might have contributed significantly.[13][14]

Mammoths were walking supermarkets, with meat, hide, and bone for making tools and other things. Other research is showing that while assorted paintings may envision giant parties of valiant cavemen hunters bringing them down, the reality was more like one quick sneaky spear thrust to the gut then following it around for days to weeks until infection killed the beast.
Wikipedia may think there’s controversy, but I don’t. Humans have fangs, we eat meat, we hunt. Humans ate the mammoths to extinction.
For comparison see the fate of another example of megafauna from the period, the Aurochs (aka the super-cow). They went extinct less than 400 years ago. Yeah, we did them too.

Verified by MonsterInsights