From the busy BEES at Drexel University, worry that beach sand temperature 40 to 50 centimeters deep will be affected by the global warming air temperature rise of 0.8C over the last century, projected to increase. The models identified this as the leading projected cause of climate-related decline in leatherback turtles. They say “if actual climate patterns follow projections in the study, the eastern Pacific population of leatherback turtles will decline by 75 percent by the year 2100.” Gosh.
But they write in their press release as if the projections are actually happening:
Leatherback turtles, Spotila says, are in critical need of human help to survive. “Warming climate is killing eggs and hatchlings,” Spotila said. “Action is needed, both to mitigate this effect and, ultimately, to reverse it to avoid extinction. We need to change fishing practices that kill turtles at sea, intervene to cool the beach to save the developing eggs and find a way to stop global warming. Otherwise, the leatherback and many other species will be lost.”
It makes you wonder how the turtles ever survived the Roman Warm Period or the Medieval Warm Period or the early part of the Holocene?

Credit: Jolene Bertoldi / ZA Photos, via Flickr
Rising heat at the beach threatens largest sea turtles, climate change models show
PHILADELPHIA (July 1, 2012)—For eastern Pacific populations of leatherback turtles, the 21st century could be the last. New research suggests that climate change could exacerbate existing threats and nearly wipe out the population. Deaths of turtle eggs and hatchlings in nests buried at hotter, drier beaches are the leading projected cause of the potential climate-related decline, according to a new study in the journal Nature Climate Change by a research team from Drexel University, Princeton University, other institutions and government agencies.
Leatherbacks, the largest sea turtle species, are among the most critically endangered due to a combination of historical and ongoing threats including egg poaching at nesting beaches and juvenile and adult turtles being caught in fishing operations. The new research on climate dynamics suggests that climate change could impede this population’s ability to recover. If actual climate patterns follow projections in the study, the eastern Pacific population of leatherback turtles will decline by 75 percent by the year 2100.
Modeling the Ebb and Flow of Turtle Hatching with Climate Variation
“We used three models of this leatherback population to construct a climate-forced population dynamics model. Two parts were based on the population’s observed sensitivity to the nesting beach climate and one part was based on its sensitivity to the ocean climate,” said the study’s lead author Dr. Vincent Saba, a research fishery biologist with the NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Fisheries Science Center, visiting research collaborator at Princeton University, and a Drexel University alumnus.
Leatherback turtle births naturally ebb and flow from year to year in response to climate variations, with more hatchlings, and rare pulses of male hatchlings, entering the eastern Pacific Ocean in cooler, rainier years. Female turtles are more likely to return to nesting beaches in Costa Rica to lay eggs in years when they have more jellyfish to eat, and jellyfish in the eastern Pacific are likely more abundant during cooler seasons. Turtle eggs and hatchlings are also more likely to survive in these cooler, rainier seasons associated with the La Niña climate phase, as this research team recently reported in the journal PLoS ONE. In addition, temperature inside the nest affects turtles’ sex ratio, with most male hatchlings emerging during cooler, rainier seasons to join the predominantly-female turtle population.
The researchers applied Saba’s combined model of these population dynamics to seven climate model projections assessed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The climate model projections were chosen based on their ability to model El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) patterns on the temperature and precipitation in the region of Costa Rica where this team has conducted long-term leatherback studies.
Hot Beaches, More Warm Years Threaten Turtles’ Recovery
The resulting projections indicate that warmer, drier years will become increasingly frequent in Central America throughout this century. High egg and hatchling mortality associated with warmer, drier beach conditions was the most significant cause of the projected climate-related population decline: This nesting population of leatherbacks could decline by 7 percent per decade, or 75 percent overall by the year 2100.
The population is already critically low.
“In 1990, there were 1,500 turtles nesting on the Playa Grande beach,” said Dr. James Spotila, the Betz Chair Professor of Environmental Science in the College of Arts and Sciences at Drexel. “Now, there are 30 to 40 nesting females per season.”
Spotila, a co-author of the study, has been studying leatherback turtles at Playa Grande in Costa Rica, the largest leatherback nesting beach in the eastern Pacific, with colleagues and Drexel students, for 22 years.
Poaching of turtle eggs was a major cause of the initial decline, and was once such a widespread problem that virtually no turtle hatchlings would survive at Playa Grande. Spotila and colleagues worked with the local authorities in Costa Rica to protect the leatherbacks’ nesting beaches so that turtle nests can hatch in safety. By catch of juvenile and adult turtles in fishing operations in the eastern Pacific remains a threat.
For the population to recover successfully, Spotila said, “the challenge is to produce as many good hatchlings as possible. That requires us to be hands-on and manipulate the beach to make sure that happens.”
Spotila’s research team is already investigating methods such as watering and shading turtle nests that could mitigate the impact of hot, dry beach conditions on hatching success.
Link to this Nature Climate Change study: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE1582
Link to recent news release about a related study by this research team in PLoS ONE: http://www.drexel.edu/now/news-media/releases/archive/2012/May/El-Nino-Climate-Change-Threaten-Leatherback-Sea-Turtles/
============================================================
Maybe this is a bigger problem? From Wikipedia:
Asian exploitation of turtle nests has been cited as the most significant factor for the species’ global population decline. In Southeast Asia, egg harvesting in countries such as Thailand and Malaysia has led to a near-total collapse of local nesting populations.[62] In Malaysia, where the turtle is practically locally extinct, the eggs are considered a delicacy.[63] In the Caribbean, some cultures consider the eggs to be aphrodisiacs.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Spotila’s research team is already investigating methods such as watering and shading turtle nests that could mitigate the impact of hot, dry beach conditions on hatching success.
Shame the team aren’t investigating how to mitigate rising sea level drowning the beaches…
And I thought enviroactive pseudo-science had reached a nadir
I wonder if I could get a research grant for a study of the Las Vegas Articulated Chipmonk ….. it’s mating season is the first two weeks of february, oddly enough the same two weeks as the Superbowl and the Brewers convention. If these guys can get funding for this horsebleep, I think I’ve got about a 50/50 shot. (I like those odds). I’m going to need about 50 research assistants, anyone?
It’s a 15 yr study, BTW.
Leading projected cause…Gee, what if you didn’t project a cause, then?
It makes you wonder how the turtles ever survived the Roman Warm Period or the Medieval Warm Period or the early part of the Holocene? Or for that matter, differences in burial depth caused by the ineptitude of Mama Turtle? Or….Difference in irradiance caused by variable cloudiness?
What on EARTH are these people smoking?
“We need to change fishing practices that kill turtles at sea, intervene to cool the beach to save the developing eggs and find a way to stop global warming. Otherwise, the leatherback and many other species will be lost.”
Wow, that’s some tall order you have there. All from one guess? Fabulous!
Nah. The plot falls apart for a documovie. I can’t seem to wrap my head around turtle-man being eaten by said turtles and turned into scat.
“. . . the eggs are considered a delicacy” etc.
With modern food technology it should be possible to make a substitute that Frigate birds, crabs, and the aphrodisiac crowd will find acceptable. Then convince the latter folk that the product will do the trick for them. This is an amazing plan, for it initiates a new industrial category and employs hundreds of eager (and unemployed) believers doing the dispersal of faux turtle eggs on beaches, and promoting their sale to those in need.
Ref: “world famous Balls O’ Fire salmon eggs”
http://www.pautzke.com/pautzke_egg.php
Full disclosure – I have no relationship to this company.
Ok, so GW is harmful to clownfish and now sea turtles too. Hmmmm. Which critter from “Finding Nemo” will they pull out next? I smell a sequel: “Finding Nemo a New Home”, Nemo now all grown up is “drunk” all the time, so the last living sea turtle and friends devise an intervention, helping him find a cooler home, perhaps under the floating continent of plastic where the aquarium fish ended up. The suspense is killing me, how will GW effect Dora and the rest of the characters, I guess we’ll just have to wait for the next “science” article to find out.
If the beach gets “drier” is it still “the beach”?
My psychic friend Ms. Cleo, says a major climate change journal (perhaps Nature Climate Change?) will soon publish a paper explaining how higher temperatures at the end of the Cretaceous (due to elevated CO2 levels of course) caused all the baby dinosaurs to be born male and contributed to their extinction.
You think I’m kidding? Place your bets.
” “if actual climate patterns follow projections in the study, ”
The climate has not followed the models yet. Why would they start now?
[SNIP: that sounds an awful lot like a racist, ethnocentric comment and, being married to one of them, I don’t have much tolerance for such remarks. -REP]
(Pronunciation warning, expert help requested)
Presumably from the same female. Failure not caused by the eggs being moved to a safe location on the beach, turns out all 130 eggs were never fertilized. Clutches are rare there, one was found in 2004, also unfertilized.
But the news is not all bad.
The usual method of human intervention by removing the eggs and hatching and raising elsewhere doesn’t work, unless you could immediately drop them safely in the ocean right when they hatch. (Perhaps a moored “hatching barge” with a climate controlled sand pit?)
But a possible synergistic relationship can exist that would help them, basically like how paid private hunting benefits endangered big game. The species is threatened by poachers. So sort through the clutches, separate the eggs (unfertilized also have watery albumen, should be detectable), replant the viable in safe locations and sell the non-viable, providing a legal trade in the eggs.
That will benefit the species far more than a carbon tax ever could.
One reason I remember from a long time ago, and I just searched for it and found it, is this:
“The first thing a newly hatched baby turtle does is head towards the nearest light it can see, which means we usually see them scuttling off towards the sea as they see the moons reflection in the sea. However, sadly, this can not always be the case, as most beaches now have buildings and other developments taking place on the coastline, which confuses the newly hatched turtles, causing them to take the wrong direction and most likely not survive.”
Which has NOTHING to do with AGW.
It is not possible that sources can be releasing this kind of alarmist news fodder and other easily debunked stories like eastern sea level at this incredible pace by accident. It is not plausible that there are simply this many shoddy / stupid scientists out there. They are ALMOST producing junk science faster than the defenders of science can debunk them. This is a coordinated disinformation campaign. Each of these disinformation stories must have a common funding source. Who is funding Nature Climate Change?
Ah the beach and grant funding, it does not get any better than this.
So long as it doesn’t affect the hairless beach bunnies, I’m ok with this.
HalfEmpty says:
July 2, 2012 at 4:05 am
My kin in Key West did more damage to the ickel turtles 100 years ago than any warmer can imagine. They hunted the suckers down and ate or sold them. Tasty too. Recipes on request.
============================================================================
And they’ll be pre-cooked!
Seriously though, why not set anti-frigate and seagull guns on all the beaches.
(OK. That wasn’t serious.)
Even if the above fairytale about fried turtles were to happen and the turtles could not adapt or evolve (which they had done during warmer periods like the Holocene Climate Optimum and the Eemian) wouldn’t the turtles breeding range increase north and south along with their food sources? Just askin’.
Jimbo says:
July 2, 2012 at 1:51 pm
Even if the above fairytale about fried turtles were to happen and the turtles could not adapt or evolve (which they had done during warmer periods like the Holocene Climate Optimum and the Eemian) wouldn’t the turtles breeding range increase north and south along with their food sources? Just askin’.
===================================================================
Whether or not they’d do better is not the (scare) point. It would be a “change” from what it’s “supposed to be”.
But, they hatch at night.
Man, they keep coming up with new and creative ways to get grant money from “global warming”.
The claim will be crocodilians and sharks next.
Has anyone actually read the paper?
Yes, what’s your point?