From an NSF press release, comes this strange new term, look for real estate prices to soar and airports to be built there soon. Oh, wait, that’s Tuvalu/Maldives, which global warming is supposed to inundate with sea level rise. Never mind. But then there’s this:
In September 2011, Kiribati’s President Anote Tong and the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon issued a joint statement [emphasis mine]:-
“[they]….. today stressed that climate change posed the most serious threat to the livelihoods, security and survival of the island nation’s residents and the inhabitants of the wider Pacific region, saying the phenomenon was undermining efforts to achieve sustainable development.
This NSF press release is going to put a crimp on the handout industry, me thinks.
Global Warming Refuge Discovered Near At-Risk Pacific Island Nation of Kiribati
![]()
Ocean currents may mitigate warming near handful of equatorial islands

Scientists predict ocean temperatures will rise in the equatorial Pacific by the end of the century, wreaking havoc on coral reef ecosystems.
But a new study shows that climate change could cause ocean currents to operate in a way that mitigates warming near a handful of islands right on the equator.
Those islands include some of the 33 coral atolls that form the nation of Kiribati. This low-lying country is at risk from sea-level rise caused by global warming.
Surprisingly, these Pacific islands within two degrees north and south of the equator may become isolated climate change refuges for corals and fish.
“The finding that there may be refuges in the tropics where local circulation features buffer the trend of rising sea surface temperature has important implications for the survival of coral reef systems,” said David Garrison, program director in the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) Division of Ocean Sciences, which funded the research.
Here’s how it could happen, according to the study by Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) scientists Kristopher Karnauskas and Anne Cohen, published today in the journal Nature Climate Change.
At the equator, trade winds push a surface current from east to west.
About 100 to 200 meters below, a swift countercurrent develops, flowing in the opposite direction.
This, the Equatorial Undercurrent (EUC), is cooler and rich in nutrients. When it hits an island, like a rock in a river, water is deflected upward on an island’s western flank.
This upwelling process brings cooler water and nutrients to the sunlit surface, creating localized areas where tiny marine plants and corals flourish.
On color-enhanced satellite maps showing measurements of global ocean chlorophyll levels, these productive patches of ocean stand out as bright green or red spots–for example, around the Galapagos Islands in the Eastern Pacific.
But as you gaze west, chlorophyll levels fade like a comet tail, giving scientists little reason to look closely at scattered low-lying coral atolls in that direction.
These islands are easy to overlook because they are tiny, remote, and lie at the far left edge of standard global satellite maps that place continents in the center.
Karnauskas, a climate scientist, was working with coral scientist Cohen to explore how climate change would affect central equatorial Pacific reefs.
When he changed the map view on his screen in order to view the entire tropical Pacific at once, he saw that chlorophyll concentrations jumped up again exactly at the Gilbert Islands on the equator.
Satellite maps also showed cooler sea surface temperatures on the west sides of these islands, part of Kiribati.
“I’ve been studying the tropical Pacific Ocean for most of my career, and I had never noticed that,” he said. “It jumped out at me immediately, and I thought, ‘there’s probably a story there.'”
So Karnauskas and Cohen began to investigate how the EUC would affect the equatorial islands’ reef ecosystems, starting with global climate models that simulate effects in a warming world.
Global-scale climate models predict that ocean temperatures will rise nearly 3 degrees Celsius (5.4 degrees Fahrenheit) in the central tropical Pacific.
Warmer waters often cause corals to bleach, a process in which they lose the tiny symbiotic algae that live in them and provide vital nutrition.

Bleaching has been a major cause of coral mortality and loss of coral reef area during the last 30 years.
Even the best global models, with their planet-scale views and lower resolution, cannot predict conditions in areas as small as these small islands, Karnauskas said.
So the scientists combined global models with a fine-scale regional model to focus on much smaller areas around minuscule islands scattered along the equator.
To accommodate the trillions of calculations needed for such small-area resolution, they used the new high-performance computer cluster at WHOI called “Scylla.”
“Global models predict significant temperature increases in the central tropical Pacific over the next few decades, but in truth conditions can be highly variable across and around a coral reef island,” Cohen said.
“To predict what the coral reef will experience in global climate change, we have to use high-resolution models, not global models.”
The model predicts that as air temperatures rise and equatorial trade winds weaken, the Pacific surface current will also weaken by 15 percent by the end of the century.
The then-weaker surface current will impose less friction and drag on the EUC, so this deeper current will strengthen by 14 percent.
“Our model suggests that the amount of upwelling will actually increase by about 50 percent around these islands and reduce the rate of warming waters around them by about 0.7 C (1.25 F) per century,” Karnauskas said.
A handful of coral atolls on the equator, some as small as 4 square kilometers (1.54 square miles) in area, may not seem like much.
But Karnauskas’ and Cohen’s results say that waters on the western sides of the islands will warm more slowly than at islands 2 degrees, or 138 miles, north and south of the equator that are not in the path of the EUC.
That gives the Gilbert Islands a significant advantage over neighboring reef systems.
“While the mitigating effect of a strengthened Equatorial Undercurrent will not spare corals the perhaps-inevitable warming expected for this region, the warming rate will be slower around these equatorial islands,” Karnauskas said.
“This may allow corals and their symbiotic algae a better chance to adapt and survive.”
If the model holds true, even if neighboring reefs are hard-hit, equatorial island coral reefs may survive to produce larvae of corals and other reef species.
Like a seed bank for the future, they might be a source of new corals and other species that could re-colonize damaged reefs.
“The globe is warming, but there are things going on underfoot that will slow that warming for certain parts of certain coral reef islands,” said Cohen.
“These little islands in the middle of the ocean can counteract global trends and have a big effect on their own future,” Karnauskas said, “which I think is a beautiful concept.”
-NSF-
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Let me translate this: “We don’t know squat. And the thing we know least of all is how little we really know.”
More variables in this system than the economy–and they can’t begin to get that one right.
I had a lovely flight last night from Minneapolis to Amsterdam. Under the faint light of night, I can say I know one thing about the Arctic/subarctic right now: It looks d_mned cold. I was quite thankful for the climate change inside that fuselage, esp compared to the -76 degrees F at 39,000 feet.
Well a more likely threat to that soon to be inundated aquarium nation is that American anglers, will stop going there to fish the bonefish flats.
“”””” Eric Simpson says:
May 1, 2012 at 9:41 am
“Entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.” –Noel Brown (1989), ex Director of the UN Environment Program [it’s now 2012] “””””
Well in the spirit of “Pluto is no longer a planet”, perhaps it is time to suggest that these are not really “entire” nations. Seems that something is missing; like sustainability.
On the bright side, this article is evidence that the “sinking island” meme is dead. It has been variously applied to the Maldives, and island off Alaska, Kiribati. I think there was an actual sinking island near Rabaul, which was used as “proof” of rising oceans, rather than obvious geological issues. All these memes are meant to get around the uncooperative warmth meters.
This article achieves a new World Class level of stupidity. It reads like an amateur attempt at a graceful exit from association with the failure of their predictions of the catastrophic effects of global warming on sea level rises.
The Earth was as much as 10 to 12C warmer during the Eocene and the temperatures more erratic (note the warming was mostly in the winter – think Willis’ thunderstorm thermostat hypothesis: How clouds and thunderstorms control the Earth’s temperature. )
The Holecene (right) has had much more even temperatures. (The lower graph is temperature and the upper CO2)
Peer reviewed paper on Eocene temperatures.
And the corals did just fine.
While the whole article was reminiscent of this month’s predictions from your local paper’s resident astrologer, this bit caught my eye as uncharacteristically specific:
“The model predicts that as air temperatures rise and equatorial trade winds weaken, the Pacific surface current will also weaken by 15 percent by the end of the century.
The then-weaker surface current will impose less friction and drag on the EUC, so this deeper current will strengthen by 14 percent.
“Our model suggests that the amount of upwelling will actually increase by about 50 percent around these islands and reduce the rate of warming waters around them by about 0.7 C (1.25 F) per century,” Karnauskas said.”
So, in about 90 years time, they reckon the Pacific surface current will have weakened by 15%, and the deeper current will increase by 14%. How on earth can they make these kinds of statements with a straight face? Do they have the faintest comprehension of how big the Pacific Ocean is, and what massive and complex forces its currents and upwellings are? They make it sound like measuring flow rates in a little mountain stream. And, using numbers the way they do to describe the way it all works, at that level of precision, is just laughable.
These people have no sense of the absurd, or of proportion.
So, what “wreaked havoc”?
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/millennia-old-bison-skeleton-found-in-whitehorse-couples-basement/article2419618/
Ice age bison, such as this one, died off along with prehistoric mammals like the woolly mammoth, possibly as a result of climate change.
Centuries ago there was a lot of backing and filling going on to keep the geocentric model of the universe as the “concensus” model and it did not give way easily. Our present understanding of the universe came not in a flash but in fits and starts over several centuries. We are still making discoveries.
Some day CO2 will find its rightful role in the earth’s climate process. Actually, CO2 “knows” its rightful role but it remains for us to discover it. Then the backing and filling such as we see in this article will no longer be necessary.
Let me guess…
Kristopher Karnauskas and Anne Cohen fancied a taxpayer funder holiday in Kiribati, so…….
Nothing much happened between 1900 and 1950, then suddenly nothing much happened between 1951 and 1997, then suddenly 1998 was the warmest year in the entire century. After that nothing much happened.
Because there’s extensive and incontrovertible evidence that nothing much happened before and since 1998, we’ve tuned our models to show that the “nothing much happened” period is already ending, and that the Earth will warm to unprecedented levels which will make 1998 look like “nothing much happened” that year.
Gail Combes;
So IF CO2 warms the planet, especially the poles, we’re headed back to the Eocene Optimum?? Probably with nice ‘Arctic Sea Ice’-free summers, enabling fast cheap trans-hemispheric sea transport?
Bring it on!!