Another bold forecast – destined for "climate FAIL"

Here’s the headline from the press release today, which will undoubtedly be regurgitated worldwide:

Stanford climate scientists forecast permanently hotter summers

Oh gee, where have wee seen this before? It’s another example of model madness, and it fits in with the now famous: Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past. Let’s compare expert quotes:

A. According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia,within a few years winter snowfall will become “a very rare and exciting event”.

“Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,” he said.

Right, we saw how that worked out.

B. “According to our projections, large areas of the globe are likely to warm up so quickly that, by the middle of this century, even the coolest summers will be hotter than the hottest summers of the past 50 years,” said the study’s lead author, Noah Diffenbaugh

From Eurekalert

Stanford climate scientists forecast permanently hotter summers

The tropics and much of the Northern Hemisphere are likely to experience an irreversible rise in summer temperatures within the next 20 to 60 years if atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations continue to increase, according to a new climate study by Stanford University scientists. The results will be published later this month in the journal Climatic Change.

In the study, the Stanford team concluded that many tropical regions in Africa, Asia and South America could see “the permanent emergence of unprecedented summer heat” in the next two decades. Middle latitudes of Europe, China and North America – including the United States – are likely to undergo extreme summer temperature shifts within 60 years, the researchers found.

“According to our projections, large areas of the globe are likely to warm up so quickly that, by the middle of this century, even the coolest summers will be hotter than the hottest summers of the past 50 years,” said the study’s lead author, Noah Diffenbaugh, an assistant professor of environmental Earth system science and fellow at the Woods Institute for the Environment at Stanford. The study is co-authored by Stanford research assistant Martin Scherer.

“When scientists talk about global warming causing more heat waves, people often ask if that means that the hottest temperatures will become ‘the new normal,'” Diffenbaugh said. “That got us thinking – at what point can we expect the coolest seasonal temperatures to always be hotter than the historically highest temperatures for that season?”

Climate models, past and future

To determine the seasonal impact of global warming in coming decades, Diffenbaugh and Scherer analyzed more than 50 climate model experiments –including computer simulations of the 21st century when global greenhouse gas concentrations are expected to increase, and simulations of the 20th century that accurately “predicted” the Earth’s climate during the last 50 years. The analysis revealed that many parts of the planet could experience a permanent spike in seasonal temperatures within 60 years.

“We also analyzed historical data from weather stations around the world to see if the projected emergence of unprecedented heat had already begun,” Diffenbaugh said. “It turns out that when we look back in time using temperature records, we find that this extreme heat emergence is occurring now, and that climate models represent the historical patterns remarkably well.”

According to both the climate model analysis and the historical weather data, the tropics are heating up the fastest. “We find that the most immediate increase in extreme seasonal heat occurs in the tropics, with up to 70 percent of seasons in the early 21st century (2010-2039) exceeding the late-20th century maximum,” the authors wrote.

Tropical regions may see the most dramatic changes first, but wide swaths of North America, China and Mediterranean Europe are also likely to enter into a new heat regime by 2070, according to the study.

Environmental impact

This dramatic shift in seasonal temperatures could have severe consequences for human health, agricultural production and ecosystem productivity, Diffenbaugh said. As an example, he pointed to record heat waves in Europe in 2003 that killed 40,000 people. He also cited studies showing that projected increases in summer temperatures in the Midwestern United States could reduce the harvest of staples, such as corn and soybeans, by more than 30 percent.

Diffenbaugh was surprised to see how quickly the new, potentially destructive heat regimes are likely to emerge, given that the study was based on a relatively moderate forecast of greenhouse gas emissions in the 21st century.

“The fact that we’re already seeing these changes in historical weather observations, and that they match climate model simulations so closely, increases our confidence that our projections of permanent escalations in seasonal temperatures within the next few decades are well founded,” Diffenbaugh said.

###

The research was supported by the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy, the National Institutes of Health and the World Bank.

This article was written by Donna Hesterman, a science-writer intern at the Woods Institute for the Environment at Stanford University.

5 1 vote
Article Rating
91 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
June 6, 2011 8:07 am

The more extreme the forecast, the more observation will differ from expectation.
But, you notice, there are no specific dates? What we want is the warmist to say, “In 2015 you will fry eggs on the sidewalks, if the chickens haven’t already died from too much heat.”
The rise in CO2 is the one item the warmists cannot ignore. It drives every forecast, but you can’t fudge the number. Each day the CO2 rises should make Hansen more uneasy – the End-of-Time is supposed to happen during his retirement.

June 6, 2011 8:13 am

Ooh, ok within 60 years. Yup that gets you out of the poo if you are not quite on target, Git.

Roger Longstaff
June 6, 2011 8:17 am

I hope so – can’t come soon enough!
Even though 2010 was the “hottest year ever”, here in London we started the year buried under snow and ice, had a miserable summer (mostly cold and wet) and then ended the year buried under snow and ice again.
But hey, they may be right – the world might end, pigs might fly…………..

Typhoon
June 6, 2011 8:20 am

GIGO: Garbage In, Garbage Out

John F. Hultquist
June 6, 2011 8:22 am

This article was written by Donna Hesterman, a science-writer intern at the Woods Institute for the Environment at Stanford University.
A female intern! Poor thing, she must be traumatized. A pronouncement this grave is usually reserved for high level government officials or a UN bureaucrat – trained in the delivery of bad news.
Can we nominate Donna for a fantasy fiction writer award?
“. . . fantasy is the literature of longing: instead of writing about the world as it might some day become, it writes about the world as we wish it could be or have been.
http://www.treitel.org/Richard/sf/fantasy.html

Steven Hill
June 6, 2011 8:22 am

Oh sure, I remember 1977 very well, the ICE AGE has returned. I am sick of stupid.

June 6, 2011 8:26 am

Presumably, this is another “peer reviewed” paper of what computer models “predict”. But where is the peer reviewed science?

Theo Goodwin
June 6, 2011 8:27 am

The authors of this report are not scientists. No scientist would touch such claims with a ten foot pole. The claims are based on no actual physical hypotheses and cannot be genuine predictions for that reason alone. The claims are not falsifiable, obviously, because they are based on models, no less than 60. So, if the claims turn out to be false in 2071, what gets rejected? Is there some element of one model that can be rejected and thereby improve the model, as is normal scientific practice? Of course not? You have to reject the whole model; that is the nature of models. In this case, you have to reject 60 of them. Of course in 2071, no one will be able to find so much as one reference to these models. The authors are worthy of a middle school newspaper trying to hype something. Pathetic! Stanford needs to clean house big time.

Mycroft
June 6, 2011 8:27 am

Sounds like some one pushed the reset button,could have come from Hansen’s 88 diatribe!
And what about South America and Australia, New Zealand.thought is was Global Warming??
And can some one verify this statement:
“According to both the climate model analysis and the historical weather data, the tropics are heating up the fastest”.
I seem to remember it was the Arctic was heating up the fastest?

June 6, 2011 8:27 am

These quacks seem to be using the scattergun technique. They will forecast everything – so at least something will come true. Now if we examine how much they get correct, then we see that a monkey has a better score than the experts.

DJ
June 6, 2011 8:27 am

Permanently hot summers?
Apparently they didn’t read the comment of this article at the Reno Gazette Journal about chains and snows required on Mt. Rose Hwy and I-80!!
http://www.rgj.com/comments/article/20110606/WEATHER/110606003/Chains-snow-tires-required-stretches-80-Mount-Rose-Hwy-
Read the comment…it’s hysterical!!!

TerryS
June 6, 2011 8:27 am

Lets shamelessly take a quote out of context:

The fact that we’re already seeing these changes in historical weather observations,

They are obviously using NASA GISS and have noticed how the historical weather observations keep on changing.

Latitude
June 6, 2011 8:29 am

So what are we talking about here….
1/100th of a degree hotter?
1/10th of a degree hotter?
“According to both the climate model analysis and the historical weather data, the tropics are heating up the fastest”
No they are not, there’s been no change at all…..
http://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/chart_33.png

Alpha Tango
June 6, 2011 8:29 am

LOL “…likely to enter a new heat regime 2070”
Could it be any more vague? How likely? What sort of new heat regime? How big was the grant?

DesertYote
June 6, 2011 8:38 am

“The research was supported by the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy, the National Institutes of Health and the World Bank.”
All one needs to know, 4 organizations with extreme Marxist agendas.

Gaelan Clark
June 6, 2011 8:43 am

These alarmist “forecasts” are not benign. I often get asked by my friends, “Who cares if they are not right?”
Take for instance the “no snow” mantra being cast around in ’06-’07 winter in Europe, they said ski resorts would need to find alternative activities in order to survive. The banks listened to the alarmists and stopped lending money to cash-strapped resorts in need of snow blowers, new lifts, etc, and those resorts suffered as a result of not being able to get capital investment to endure the lower turnout as a result of the vacationers listening to the alarmists.

Engchamp
June 6, 2011 8:46 am

So far, it is impossible to create a reliable model for predicting climate cycles; there are too many variables, and not enough is known yet about extraterrestial interaction.
This post would appear to be yet another pile of misanthropic twaddle in an effort to maintain the dying embers of the AGW fanatics’ fire, funded by, inter alia… the World Bank, for which read “the UN”.

oeman50
June 6, 2011 8:46 am

From the subject article:
“….. simulations of the 20th century that accurately “predicted” the Earth’s climate during the last 50 years…….”
At least the news writer had the sense to put “predicted” in quotes. The last time I checked, “prediction” required anticipating the future, not hindcasting. Any model can be tweaked to represent the past….

crosspatch
June 6, 2011 8:57 am

many parts of the planet could experience a permanent spike in seasonal temperatures within 60 years.

It depends on what one means by “permanent”. If you mean permanent, permanent, then there is nothing at all “permanent” about Earth’s climate. The variation over any given 100,000 year period is astounding. If by permanent you mean a change lasting the duration of most people’s lifetimes, sure, that is going to happen anyway, it always does.
For example, a change right now that lasts for 30 years would be “permanent” for most people over 40 years old. It is my personal opinion that we will see a regimen of cooler temps over the next 30 years compared with the past 30. And at the end of that 30 year period we will likely see a shift upwards again (warm PDO cycle).
This from Stanford is basically stating that water is wet. Yes, within the next 60 years we will see a pattern that is warmer set in for a duration that will be “permanent” for many people, particularly aging academics. This statement from them really doesn’t mean much.

John F. Hultquist
June 6, 2011 9:01 am

DJ says:
June 6, 2011 at 8:27 am
Read the comment…it’s hysterical!!!

Thanks for the link to that. May be the best comment ever. I’ll save that.

Enduser
June 6, 2011 9:04 am

“According to both the climate model analysis and the historical weather data, the tropics are heating up the fastest.”
Wait. I thought that it was established that the poles will heat up the fastest.

Layne Blanchard
June 6, 2011 9:05 am

When Elvis returns from the heavens astride a purple Unicorn, I’ll consider that AGW might have some merit.

glacierman
June 6, 2011 9:06 am

Is this a prediction, or a scenario? Because climate scientists are not very good at predictions, but they are absolute experts at scenarios. Of course one deals with reality, which they are also not very good at.

Sam Glasser
June 6, 2011 9:06 am

Predicting Weather: within 6 hours – most likely; within 6 days – pretty iffy; but “within 60 years”? You have to be kidding yourself!

ZT
June 6, 2011 9:09 am

1st rule of climatology: never make predictions that can be tested during your career.

1 2 3 4