Here’s the headline from the press release today, which will undoubtedly be regurgitated worldwide:
Stanford climate scientists forecast permanently hotter summers
Oh gee, where have wee seen this before? It’s another example of model madness, and it fits in with the now famous: Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past. Let’s compare expert quotes:
A. According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia,within a few years winter snowfall will become “a very rare and exciting event”.
“Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,” he said.
Right, we saw how that worked out.
B. “According to our projections, large areas of the globe are likely to warm up so quickly that, by the middle of this century, even the coolest summers will be hotter than the hottest summers of the past 50 years,” said the study’s lead author, Noah Diffenbaugh
From Eurekalert
Stanford climate scientists forecast permanently hotter summers
The tropics and much of the Northern Hemisphere are likely to experience an irreversible rise in summer temperatures within the next 20 to 60 years if atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations continue to increase, according to a new climate study by Stanford University scientists. The results will be published later this month in the journal Climatic Change.
In the study, the Stanford team concluded that many tropical regions in Africa, Asia and South America could see “the permanent emergence of unprecedented summer heat” in the next two decades. Middle latitudes of Europe, China and North America – including the United States – are likely to undergo extreme summer temperature shifts within 60 years, the researchers found.
“According to our projections, large areas of the globe are likely to warm up so quickly that, by the middle of this century, even the coolest summers will be hotter than the hottest summers of the past 50 years,” said the study’s lead author, Noah Diffenbaugh, an assistant professor of environmental Earth system science and fellow at the Woods Institute for the Environment at Stanford. The study is co-authored by Stanford research assistant Martin Scherer.
“When scientists talk about global warming causing more heat waves, people often ask if that means that the hottest temperatures will become ‘the new normal,'” Diffenbaugh said. “That got us thinking – at what point can we expect the coolest seasonal temperatures to always be hotter than the historically highest temperatures for that season?”
Climate models, past and future
To determine the seasonal impact of global warming in coming decades, Diffenbaugh and Scherer analyzed more than 50 climate model experiments –including computer simulations of the 21st century when global greenhouse gas concentrations are expected to increase, and simulations of the 20th century that accurately “predicted” the Earth’s climate during the last 50 years. The analysis revealed that many parts of the planet could experience a permanent spike in seasonal temperatures within 60 years.
“We also analyzed historical data from weather stations around the world to see if the projected emergence of unprecedented heat had already begun,” Diffenbaugh said. “It turns out that when we look back in time using temperature records, we find that this extreme heat emergence is occurring now, and that climate models represent the historical patterns remarkably well.”
According to both the climate model analysis and the historical weather data, the tropics are heating up the fastest. “We find that the most immediate increase in extreme seasonal heat occurs in the tropics, with up to 70 percent of seasons in the early 21st century (2010-2039) exceeding the late-20th century maximum,” the authors wrote.
Tropical regions may see the most dramatic changes first, but wide swaths of North America, China and Mediterranean Europe are also likely to enter into a new heat regime by 2070, according to the study.
Environmental impact
This dramatic shift in seasonal temperatures could have severe consequences for human health, agricultural production and ecosystem productivity, Diffenbaugh said. As an example, he pointed to record heat waves in Europe in 2003 that killed 40,000 people. He also cited studies showing that projected increases in summer temperatures in the Midwestern United States could reduce the harvest of staples, such as corn and soybeans, by more than 30 percent.
Diffenbaugh was surprised to see how quickly the new, potentially destructive heat regimes are likely to emerge, given that the study was based on a relatively moderate forecast of greenhouse gas emissions in the 21st century.
“The fact that we’re already seeing these changes in historical weather observations, and that they match climate model simulations so closely, increases our confidence that our projections of permanent escalations in seasonal temperatures within the next few decades are well founded,” Diffenbaugh said.
The research was supported by the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy, the National Institutes of Health and the World Bank.
This article was written by Donna Hesterman, a science-writer intern at the Woods Institute for the Environment at Stanford University.
The real insanity in all this is that the modelers are committed to a wholistic account of Earth’s climate. Apparently, they really believe that the only way to research Earth’s environment is to simulate the whole thing. That is sheer, unadulterated metaphysics. It does not have the leavening needed to merit the name religion.
“It’s tough to make predictions, especially about the future.”
– attributed to that great philosopher Yogi Berra
“According to both the climate model analysis and the historical weather data, the tropics are heating up the fastest”
=================================================
I see this in print several times lately….
…they can’t all be that stupid or crooked
Can someone point me to what they are looking at?
The historical weather data that says the tropics are heating up the fastest………
http://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/chart_33.png
I am just an old retired lawyer. The proper use of words is essential in law and should be in science too.
To me “climate” is a compendium of regional weather related anomalies over a period of several decades from or more from which average global anomalies are extracted. Climate is an open ended historical record, not a force of nature.
If I am correct, how can climate be a factor that influences or forces how weather forms and changes over extended periods? At best, climate indicates weather trends that may carry over into the future. Or, the trends may not occur, which is indicative of cycles or natural variation over time.
I hate the term “climate” because it has been high-jacked in order to control the AGW narrative. It is time for new verbiage to be inserted into the climate change dialog.
There are no climate models that predict cooling.
They all have temps at 2.0C to 3.5C by the middle of century.
Nobody gets funded or gets results published for a climate model that predicts cooling. Even the IPCC in AR4 restricted climate models to having sensitivity between 2.0C and 4.5C per doubling. The lowest one was programmed with 2.1C and the highest one was programmed with 4.4C sensitivity.
The results do not magically pop out. They are programmed in.
You know, all this reliance on models is all very well, but like the toy Spitfire I once made as a boy, they share only the most general semblance to the real thing. ‘Analysing’ even a hundred such models would give an observer only the vaguest idea of aerodynamics, and little about how the real thing worked.
Empiricism and observation rule.
The research was supported by the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy, the National Institutes of Health and the World Bank.
Figures.
simulations of the 20th century that accurately “predicted” the Earth’s climate during the last 50 years
That’s not a prediction, that’s a hindcast.
It does not guarantee that warming will continue.
The warming of the 1930’s ended, and so did the cooling of the 70’s, when the climate rolled in it’s trend and changed course.
Climate Changes. Yes, it does that too.
Paddy says:
June 6, 2011 at 2:35 pm
“If I am correct, how can climate be a factor that influences or forces how weather forms and changes over extended periods?”
To the modelers, climate is the cloud of CO2 that embraces Earth. It is also their sky god. They won’t say these things directly, but after a while you can read between the lines.
Bill Illis says:
June 6, 2011 at 2:51 pm
There are no climate models that predict cooling….
….The results do not magically pop out. They are programmed in.
Likewise, there apparently aren’t any models that allow their…er…”predicted” warming to be reversed. But on the bright side, dear skeptics, although there is no black box inside of the models whose unknown unknowns magically prove “the physics”, it looks like anthropogenic rule of the whole Solar System next is not at all out of the question!
Obviously these Stanford climate scientists haven’t spent much time in Florida.
Where do these people live? Venus? Not on this planet.
So in a roundabout way these alarmists are unwittingly endorsing a forecast which just happens to correlate to the non-alarmist approximate 30 year cycles.
If circa 2000 for end of warming, figure cooling phase out to like 2030-ish, another turnaround with warming out to 2060-ish (covering his by the middle of this century prediction).
It looks to me like there is a plus/minus 5-10 year attached to the 30 year-ish phase resulting in like 20 or 25 year segments (e.g., IMHO warming was from about 1985-2005), so the dates are of course flexible.
So the alarmist quoted here can actually be correct for all the wrong reasons! Of course if he thinks that ‘warming’ will last and not turnaround again, say 2060-ish, well I say he is wrong.
Freeze me today and thaw me out in 2090 and I gurantee there will be plenty of snow and wicked blizzards in the previous decade: 2080-2090. Oh, and Greenland will still be white.
I know it could get to be boring endlessly quoting Willis’ classic post, but this is obviously ‘Models All The Way Down’ – again!
These people are all over the place. It was not half a decade ago that the “experts” said with confidence that AGW will be most felt in the poles, during winter, and at night. The IPCC issued several signatures of AGW, and one of the most iconic (outside of the Hockey Stick) was the mid tropesphereic tropical hotspot. Yes, the tropics would warm, but the warming would be aloft.
The goalposts have changed so much in recent months it is impossible to figure out what these people are saying. Perhaps this study is just following the tradition of publishing AGW warmists studies during a period of heat waves. I still remember a Yahoo story form July of 2006 which predicted that Pheonix Arizona would suffer really hot summers due to AGW.
Whoever wrote all that clearly had a lot of left over stupid they had to use up before it went off.