Lightning: a new tool for accurately measuring the sun's rotation when sunspots are not present

Patterns of Lightning Activity
Patterns of Lightning Activity

This is one big surprise. Moments of serendipity are some of the best quotes of science: “Hmmm, that’s odd”. As an amateur radio operator myself, I find this study fascinating. If you want to know more about VLF radio, see the NASA online VLF radio receiver link below.

http://www.spaceweather.com/audio/inspire/spherics_big.jpg
Sferics, short for "atmospherics", are impulsive signals emitted by lightning. Sferics are caused by lightning strokes within a thousand kilometers or so of the receiver. The dynamic spectra of sferics are characterized by vertical lines indicating the simultaneous arrival of all audio frequencies.

Learn more (and listen to the signals) at NASA’s INSPIRE online VLF radio receiver. – Anthony


From Tel Aviv University: A Lightning Strike in Africa Helps Take the Pulse of the Sun

 

TAU discovers an accurate tool for tracking solar rotation

Sunspots, which rotate around the sun’s surface, tell us a great deal about our own planet. Scientists rely on them, for instance, to measure the sun’s rotation or to prepare long-range forecasts of the Earth’s health.

But there are some years, like this one, where it’s not possible to see sunspots clearly. When we’re at this “solar minimum,” very few, if any, sunspots are visible from Earth. That poses a problem for scientists in a new scientific field called “Space Weather,” which studies the interaction between the sun and the Earth’s environment.

Thanks to a serendipitous discovery by Tel Aviv University‘s Prof. Colin Price, head of TAU’s Department of Geophysics and Planetary Science, and his graduate student Yuval Reuveni, science now has a more definitive and reliable tool for measuring the sun’s rotation when sunspots aren’t visible — and even when they are. The research, published in the Journal of Geophysical ResearchSpace Physics, could have important implications for understanding the interactions between the sun and the Earth. Best of all, it’s based on observations of common, garden-variety lightning strikes here on Earth.

Waxing and waning, every 27 days

solar_rotation

Using Very Low Frequency (VLF) wire antennas that resemble clotheslines, Prof. Price and his team monitored distant lightning strikes from a field station in Israel’s Negev Desert. Observing lightning signals from Africa, they noticed a strange phenomenon in the lightning strike data — a phenomenon that slowly appeared and disappeared every 27 days, the length of a single full rotation of the sun.

“Even though Africa is thousands of miles from Israel, lightning signals there bounce off the Earth’s ionosphere — the envelope surrounding the Earth — as they move from Africa to Israel,” Prof. Price explains. “We noticed that this bouncing was modulated by the sun, changing throughout its 27-day cycle. The variability of the lightning activity occurring in sync with the sun’s rotation suggested that the sun somehow regulates the lightning pattern.”

He describes it as akin to hearing music or voices from across a lake: depending on the humidity, temperature and wind, sometimes they’re crystal clear and sometimes they’re inaudible. He discovered a similar anomaly in the lightning data due to the changes in the Earth’s ionosphere — signals waxed and waned on a 27-day cycle. Prof. Price was able to show that this variability in the data was not due to changes in the lightning activity itself, but to changes in the Earth’s ionosphere, suspiciously in tandem with the sun’s rotation.

Taking the pulse of the sun

The discovery describes a phenomenon not clearly understood by scientists. Prof. Price, an acclaimed climate change scientist, believes it may help scientists formulate new questions about the sun’s effect on our climate. “This is such a basic parameter and not much is known about it,” says Prof. Price. “We know that Earth rotates once every 24 hours, and the moon once every 27.3 days. But we haven’t been able to precisely measure the rotation rate of the sun, which is a ball of gas rather than a solid object; 27 days is only an approximation. Our findings provide a more accurate way of knowing the real rotation rate, and how it changes over time,” he says.

Prof. Price cannot yet say how this finding will impact life on Earth. “It’s an interesting field to explore,” he says, “because nothing has been done to investigate the links between changing weather patterns and the rotation of the sun.

“Short-term changes in solar activity can also impact satellite performance, navigational accuracy, the health of astronauts, and even electrical power grid failures here on Earth. Many scientists claim that the sun’s variability is linked to changes in climate and weather patterns, so the small changes we observed every 27 days could also be related to small variations in weather patterns.

“Our data may help researchers examine short-term connections between weather, climate, and sun cycles. With this tool, we now have a good system for measuring the pulse of the sun.”

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
114 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
jack mosevich
November 11, 2009 3:33 pm

I am interested in further explaination, for I assume the sun to be homogeneous and so its rotation would have no effect on the ionosphere.

Jim
November 11, 2009 3:44 pm

Gee, since the Sun is a ball of gas, it could be they are measuring the rotation of the bulk material. Or they could be measuring the rotation of some structure within the Sun that may or may not rotate at the same frequency of the bulk material. I wonder how they will figure that one out?

chillybean
November 11, 2009 3:46 pm

I found it interesting up to this point.
‘Prof. Price, an acclaimed climate change scientist,’
Does that mean he is a real scientist and we should read this or a railway engineer who knows nothing about science. I think the title ‘climate CHANGE scientist’ is so wrapped up with the corrupt science that it should be used only as a derogatory term. I have no idea whether this man is a scientist or not. Maybe ‘Climatologist’ would be a better term for real scientists and ‘Climate change scientist’ for the tea leaf brigade.
Apologies to the Prof if he is really a ‘climatologist’ and a ‘real’ scientist.
Getting cranky in my old age.

MD
November 11, 2009 3:48 pm

No, no, no.
because the science is settled; & our experts know that it cannot have any affect upon the Earth & it’s atmosphere, therefore the Sun does NOT rotate.

MD
November 11, 2009 3:50 pm

it’s should read- its.
Serves me rights for being a smart-a*se

Bill Illis
November 11, 2009 3:51 pm

Very interesting, I’m not sure this would have been predicted.
It can probably be matched up with the solar irradiance data which also exhibits a cycle related to the rotation of the Sun.
http://lasp.colorado.edu/cgi-bin/ion-p?ION__E1=PLOT%3Aplot_tsi_data.ion&ION__E2=PRINT%3Aprint_tsi_data.ion&ION__E3=BOTH%3Aplot_and_print_tsi_data.ion&START_DATE=1900&STOP_DATE=2500&TIME_SPAN=6&PLOT=Plot+Data

Kath
November 11, 2009 3:53 pm

I wonder if it has anything to do with coronal holes.

crosspatch
November 11, 2009 4:00 pm

““Even though Africa is thousands of miles from Israel”
Obviously not a geography major.

rbateman
November 11, 2009 4:02 pm

Sunspots are a surface phenomenon (IMHO) in the visible whereas the EUV I believe are just off the surface. Plus the Sun (normally) has differential rotation. So my question would be like Jim’s:
What layer and what latitude are the lightning strikes representing, and how do you tell the difference?
What happens when there are Coronal Holes in Earth LOS?
Is the lightning going to be confined to the same latitudes, higher or lower latitudes that Coronal Hole strobings are?

stumpy
November 11, 2009 4:03 pm

yet again another solar influence on the climate is found, will the IPCC maintain the sun has no influence other than changes in TSI or will they remove their blinkers? If we are going to model the climate LETS DO IT RIGHT PLEASE!

rbateman
November 11, 2009 4:05 pm

~Is the lightning going to be confined to the same latitudes, higher or lower latitudes that Coronal Hole strobings are?~
Correction: Are the lightning readings going to be confined to the same latitudes, higher or lower latitudes that Coronal Hole strobings are?

Jerry
November 11, 2009 4:08 pm

I believe the sun has a magnetic field. So if it rotates, the field would as well, and this would impact any charged particles within it’s reach. And that’s what the ionosphere is all about.

November 11, 2009 4:09 pm

I think the title ‘climate CHANGE scientist’ is so wrapped up with the corrupt science that it should be used only as a derogatory term.
He used to be a “climate warming scientist”.

tallbloke
November 11, 2009 4:11 pm

Interesting. I wonder if there’s a second order modulation at around 13 months frequency.

Jeff L
November 11, 2009 4:13 pm

It would be interesting to look for other periodicities of 27 days in wx data.
An initial thought though – the orbit of the moon has a periodicity of 27.3 days, see
http://www.windows.ucar.edu/tour/link=/the_universe/uts/moon1.html&edu=high
– very close to the 27 day periodicity described in the article, so why do the researchers think this is a solar related phenomena & not a lunar phenomena?? Arcticle is a bit scant on details & science

hareynolds
November 11, 2009 4:29 pm

Didn’t QST have an article a few years ago on building a low frequency radio receiver to “hear” lightning?
[QST is the monthly publication of the American Radio Relay League, ARRL, or A-double R-L, the US organization for Amateur Radio; “hams”]
Have a look. Hams do great stuff, even if we are a big bunch of hyper-nerds.
http://www.arrl.org/
de K5HAR

Jim
November 11, 2009 4:47 pm

********************
hareynolds (16:29:42) :
Didn’t QST have an article a few years ago on building a low frequency radio receiver to “hear” lightning?
**************
I built one. I was “looking” for whistlers. We don’t get many at my latitude, plus the Sun was winding down. The radio is really just a audio frequency amplifier with a high-impedance front-end. Here is the one I built …
http://www.auroralchorus.com/bbb4rx3.htm

November 11, 2009 4:54 pm


“We know that Earth rotates once every 24 hours”

No it doesn’t; that’s just the average length of a ‘day’ here on earth (relative to that glow in the sky termed ‘the sun’).
The actual rotational period is 23 hr 56 min 4 secs (approx.)
Quote Wiki “The rotation period of an astronomical object is the time it takes to complete one revolution around its axis of rotation relative to the background stars. It differs from the planet’s solar day, which includes an extra fractional rotation needed to accommodate the portion of the planet’s orbital period during one day.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotation_period
Trivia, I know …
.
.

fred
November 11, 2009 4:57 pm

Jack M, 15:33:27
The sun is not a solid body and so does not have a rotation rate in that sense. It moves faster at the equator than towards the poles and that velocity can be applied to give a physical rotation rate “as defined”, but that is not the same as a rotating solid.
The Israeli paper speaks of a periodicity which can only exist if there is some anisotropy in the magnetic field that is somewhat stable over time. How this relates to the equatorial rate is not clear.

fred
November 11, 2009 5:01 pm

Jeff L (16:13:29)
“An initial thought though – the orbit of the moon has a periodicity of 27.3 days,… very close to the 27 day periodicity described in the article, so why do the researchers think this is a solar related phenomena & not a lunar phenomena??”
Dang good point.

John Cooper
November 11, 2009 5:08 pm

At the risk of dating myself, back in the 1950s, Popular Electronics published an article about building a LF receiver and antenna which could be used to detect lightning. If I’m not mistaken, it would give you a direction and a distance.

Editor
November 11, 2009 5:12 pm

crosspatch (16:00:18) :
> “Even though Africa is thousands of miles from Israel”
> Obviously not a geography major.
Look at the lightning strike map. My guess is that they are monitoring lightning from the equatorial region. Likely 30+ degrees of latitude, or 1800 nautical miles.
I suspect Leif can list lots of ways solar rotation manifests itself on Earth beside visible wavelengths or this lightning data. Heck, just look at the full suite of SOHO products at http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/realtime/ – even though it is really, really boring today.

Neil O'Rourke
November 11, 2009 5:19 pm

fred (17:01:26) :
Jeff L (16:13:29)
“An initial thought though – the orbit of the moon has a periodicity of 27.3 days,… very close to the 27 day periodicity described in the article, so why do the researchers think this is a solar related phenomena & not a lunar phenomena??”
Dang good point.

Because if it is lunar in nature, then this maniac might be correct in a whole bunch of things!
https://www.predictweather.co.nz/#/home/
And if this maniac is correct, whell then the whole AGW thing might just collapse, mightn’t it?

Retired Engineer John
November 11, 2009 5:20 pm

Prof. Price’s website is http://www.tau.ac.il/~colin/. He has a long list of publications. The statement “changes in the Earth’s ionosphere, suspiciously in tandem with the sun’s rotation” is very interesting. Do we have other evidence of such a direct physical connection between the sun and the Earth?

1 2 3 5