Lightning: a new tool for accurately measuring the sun's rotation when sunspots are not present

Patterns of Lightning Activity
Patterns of Lightning Activity

This is one big surprise. Moments of serendipity are some of the best quotes of science: “Hmmm, that’s odd”. As an amateur radio operator myself, I find this study fascinating. If you want to know more about VLF radio, see the NASA online VLF radio receiver link below.

http://www.spaceweather.com/audio/inspire/spherics_big.jpg
Sferics, short for "atmospherics", are impulsive signals emitted by lightning. Sferics are caused by lightning strokes within a thousand kilometers or so of the receiver. The dynamic spectra of sferics are characterized by vertical lines indicating the simultaneous arrival of all audio frequencies.

Learn more (and listen to the signals) at NASA’s INSPIRE online VLF radio receiver. – Anthony


From Tel Aviv University: A Lightning Strike in Africa Helps Take the Pulse of the Sun

 

TAU discovers an accurate tool for tracking solar rotation

Sunspots, which rotate around the sun’s surface, tell us a great deal about our own planet. Scientists rely on them, for instance, to measure the sun’s rotation or to prepare long-range forecasts of the Earth’s health.

But there are some years, like this one, where it’s not possible to see sunspots clearly. When we’re at this “solar minimum,” very few, if any, sunspots are visible from Earth. That poses a problem for scientists in a new scientific field called “Space Weather,” which studies the interaction between the sun and the Earth’s environment.

Thanks to a serendipitous discovery by Tel Aviv University‘s Prof. Colin Price, head of TAU’s Department of Geophysics and Planetary Science, and his graduate student Yuval Reuveni, science now has a more definitive and reliable tool for measuring the sun’s rotation when sunspots aren’t visible — and even when they are. The research, published in the Journal of Geophysical ResearchSpace Physics, could have important implications for understanding the interactions between the sun and the Earth. Best of all, it’s based on observations of common, garden-variety lightning strikes here on Earth.

Waxing and waning, every 27 days

solar_rotation

Using Very Low Frequency (VLF) wire antennas that resemble clotheslines, Prof. Price and his team monitored distant lightning strikes from a field station in Israel’s Negev Desert. Observing lightning signals from Africa, they noticed a strange phenomenon in the lightning strike data — a phenomenon that slowly appeared and disappeared every 27 days, the length of a single full rotation of the sun.

“Even though Africa is thousands of miles from Israel, lightning signals there bounce off the Earth’s ionosphere — the envelope surrounding the Earth — as they move from Africa to Israel,” Prof. Price explains. “We noticed that this bouncing was modulated by the sun, changing throughout its 27-day cycle. The variability of the lightning activity occurring in sync with the sun’s rotation suggested that the sun somehow regulates the lightning pattern.”

He describes it as akin to hearing music or voices from across a lake: depending on the humidity, temperature and wind, sometimes they’re crystal clear and sometimes they’re inaudible. He discovered a similar anomaly in the lightning data due to the changes in the Earth’s ionosphere — signals waxed and waned on a 27-day cycle. Prof. Price was able to show that this variability in the data was not due to changes in the lightning activity itself, but to changes in the Earth’s ionosphere, suspiciously in tandem with the sun’s rotation.

Taking the pulse of the sun

The discovery describes a phenomenon not clearly understood by scientists. Prof. Price, an acclaimed climate change scientist, believes it may help scientists formulate new questions about the sun’s effect on our climate. “This is such a basic parameter and not much is known about it,” says Prof. Price. “We know that Earth rotates once every 24 hours, and the moon once every 27.3 days. But we haven’t been able to precisely measure the rotation rate of the sun, which is a ball of gas rather than a solid object; 27 days is only an approximation. Our findings provide a more accurate way of knowing the real rotation rate, and how it changes over time,” he says.

Prof. Price cannot yet say how this finding will impact life on Earth. “It’s an interesting field to explore,” he says, “because nothing has been done to investigate the links between changing weather patterns and the rotation of the sun.

“Short-term changes in solar activity can also impact satellite performance, navigational accuracy, the health of astronauts, and even electrical power grid failures here on Earth. Many scientists claim that the sun’s variability is linked to changes in climate and weather patterns, so the small changes we observed every 27 days could also be related to small variations in weather patterns.

“Our data may help researchers examine short-term connections between weather, climate, and sun cycles. With this tool, we now have a good system for measuring the pulse of the sun.”

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
114 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
AnonyMoose
November 11, 2009 8:05 pm

What’s odd is that there would have to be something asymmetric about the Sun which would be causing this. Whatever it is has lasted long enough to be noticed.
The Lunar timing is interesting, and I’m sure they had fun eliminating that.
Incidentally, the rotation period of part of the Sun is not sufficient when you’re playing with numbers. It has to be offset by the distance which the Earth moves along its orbit in 27 days, which is significant. Of course, maybe the part of the Sun which is causing the effect is rotating faster than the slowest part, and happens to be in sync with the Earth. Odd coincidence.

D Gallagher
November 11, 2009 8:15 pm

Yaakoda,
One second is defined as 9,192,631,770 cycles of the radiation of caesium atoms, that won’t change with sea level. We can monitor the rotation of earth from the background stars (sidereal time).
Every so often, scientists add in an extra second in a year to keep sidereal time lined up with the universe.
If the rate of spin changed we would know all about it.

DaveE
November 11, 2009 8:16 pm

Yaakoba (19:59:01) :

It would increase in speed, because there is more gravity from the weight of the salt.

As evan said

No, it would decrease. The extra water humps up ever so slightly in a band around the equator. Earth spins slower for the same reason a twirling figure skater extending her arms spins slower. (The differences, however, are almost immeasurably small.)

In fact LOD has increased, but it’s <1s/Yr total effect.
If anyone knows better, I will stand corrected on that one.
DaveE

November 11, 2009 8:31 pm

Apostrophe rules
[Sorry Evan, they left you out.]

Evan Jones
Editor
November 11, 2009 8:32 pm

BTW, possessive of Jones can either be Jones’ or Jones’s. Consistency is important — just don’t mix forms.

Mark Webbers
November 11, 2009 8:35 pm

DaveE
Thanks, I need all I can get, I tend to leave them lying around.

DaveE
November 11, 2009 8:37 pm

Don’t wanna fall out over it guys, times & styles change I guess 😛
BTW. I should probably have said much less than 1s/Yr total LOD change effect.
DaveE.

D Gallagher
November 11, 2009 8:44 pm

In the UK is there such an expression as “Keeping up with the Joneses”?
Just Curious

Yaakoba
November 11, 2009 8:48 pm

Gravity is kinetic energy. With the earth’s population of people, animals, and modern building, there will be more gravity energy created, increasing thermal heat. As ice melts and becomes liquid, this also increases gravity pull, which creates more energy created by kinetic heat. As the gravity of the earth increases with population this will increase the earths rotation, creating more kinetic heat. Speeding up time.

crosspatch
November 11, 2009 9:01 pm

“First off, the sun does not rotate every 27 days, it’s not a solid body and there is a different rotation rate for each latitude.”
I thought exactly the same thing. The rotation period of the sun varies with latitude.
Wikipedia:

As the Sun exists in a plasmatic state and is not solid, it rotates faster at its equator than at its poles. This behavior is known as differential rotation. The period of this actual rotation is approximately 25.6 days at the equator and 33.5 days at the poles. However, due to our constantly changing vantage point from the Earth as it orbits the Sun, the apparent rotation of the star at its equator is about 28 days.

The solar magnetic field extends well beyond the Sun itself. The magnetized solar wind plasma carries Sun’s magnetic field into the space forming what is called the interplanetary magnetic field. Since the plasma can only move along the magnetic field lines, the interplanetary magnetic field is initially stretched radially away from the Sun. Because the fields above and below the solar equator have different polarities pointing towards and away from the Sun, there exists a thin current layer in the solar equatorial plane, which is called the heliospheric current sheet. At the large distances the rotation of the Sun twists the magnetic field and the current sheet into the Archimedean spiral like structure called the Parker spiral. The interplanetary magnetic field is much stronger than the dipole component of the solar magnetic field.

So it would appear that equatorial rotation period would be what is interesting.

DaveE
November 11, 2009 9:04 pm

D Gallagher (20:44:14) :

In the UK is there such an expression as “Keeping up with the Joneses”?

Yes and it always infuriated me as I’d had it drummed into me from an early age, at home AND at school, that you don’t pluralise Evans, which is my surname, as Evanses but Evans’

p.g.sharrow "PG"
November 11, 2009 9:06 pm

As I read the article the very first thing that slapped me in the face was the 27 day rotation of the sun effecting the propagation of lignting EMF, wasn’t that the orbital timing of the moon? But of course it is!
Is this new science discovery or new BS postulation ??

D Gallagher
November 11, 2009 9:15 pm

Yaakoba,
You are correct, but don’t worry you’ll speed up too. So even though your life is going to go past much faster, you’ll be able to fit more into it.
Trust me, it will all even out. Find something else to worry about.

mr.artday
November 11, 2009 9:21 pm

Back before Digital TV took over, when I didn’t want to see the commercials on TV I would switch channels to a channel that was empty in the Seattle area. Usually chan.3. Occasionally I would get a weak signal, very occasionally the signal would be strong enough to produce a picture. From an ad for a rug company I found I was getting chan.3 from Phoenix AZ. Once I got PBS Prairie States and once I got some other PBS station. Seemed more likely to happen during rain storms. Stranger than that is Hams transmitting long distances by bouncing signals off the ionized trails that micrometeorites make as they burn up in the upper atmosphere.

Evan Jones
Editor
November 11, 2009 9:25 pm

In the UK is there such an expression as “Keeping up with the Joneses”?
In the US, too.
I’d had it drummed into me from an early age, at home AND at school, that you don’t pluralise Evans, which is my surname, as Evanses but Evans’
Well, my mother was a copy editor (U.S.). The way I got it was that you can’t use an apostrophe to denote a plural. I think Evanses is correct, after all, for plural of Evans. And, of course, Evans is plural of Evan.
Plural of Jones is Joneses.
(Hmm. Would being named Evan Jones count for anything?)

DaveE
November 11, 2009 9:28 pm

Thanks for the typo correction with the requested snip.
You moderators go above & beyond the call of duty & it’s appreciated. 😀
DaveE.
[REPLY – Well, I was there already, so I figured, why not. (Normally I don’t copy edit posts.) ~ Evan]

crosspatch
November 11, 2009 9:29 pm

Joneses and Jones’ are two different things. Joneses is plural, Jones’ is possessive as in belonging to the Joneses.
The Joneses up the street have a mower. I borrowed Mr. Jones’ mower to cut my lawn.
It is the difference between cats and cat’s for example. The first showing plurality, the second showing possession. I chased the cats. I took the cats’ ball from them.

Evan Jones
Editor
November 11, 2009 9:33 pm

Yes. And Jones’s is acceptable for possessive singular. (It would be Joneses’ for plural possessive.)
So far as I know, both the s’ and s’s form are correct for possessive (when singular ends in s). Pick one and make sure you are consistent throughout the document in question.

DaveE
November 11, 2009 9:34 pm

As I understand it Evan. My name, David Evans, is akin to David son of Evan, Evans being the possessive of Evan.
Who says we’re all anonymous?
I’m actually proud of my Welsh name, it’s just that DaveE is shorter to type.
DaveE.

DaveE
November 11, 2009 9:39 pm

Incidentally.
The Welsh pronunciation of David is Taffit which is why the Welsh are often given the nickname Taff.
DaveE.

Evan Jones
Editor
November 11, 2009 9:45 pm

That may be the etymology, but to denote actual possessive, you’d need the apostrophe. The apostrophe was dropped out of last names by convention, but possessive of Evan is definitely Evan’s.
Google no doubt has more on possessives. I’m sure Strunk/White has a web page. (I do have a couple of professional copy edit/proofreader credits, but I am not really a qualified expert.)
Evan Jones is about as Welsh a name as it gets, but I am not Welsh, myself.

DaveE
November 11, 2009 9:57 pm

I earlier posted the location of the Rugby UK VLF communications aerial. As far as I know this is now rarely used but the whole point of VLF was that you could transmit signals around the world without the need for repeaters. Rugby was about 15kHz.
I may have been misinformed but I was given the impression that there were even lower frequency transmitters on the military network, (telephone frequency 3kHz & lower).
DaveE.

DaveE
November 11, 2009 10:05 pm

I think we’ll agree to disagree on possessive apostrophes.
I can only go by what I was taught, more moons ago than I really care to remember.
I nearly mistyped that as moans. Probably not that inaccurate, 😉
DaveE.

Evan Jones
Editor
November 11, 2009 10:09 pm

Agreement on astrophysics is more important than agreement on apostrophes.

steve
November 11, 2009 10:24 pm

Was an attempt made to correlate the flux in lightning patterns with heliospheric current sheet crossings?