Did the Sun’s “Terminator” Predict the Coming 2026 El Niño? New Research Says Yes

h/t to SpaceWeather.com Headlines are announcing the formation of a significant El Niño in the Pacific Ocean, and at least one solar physicist says he saw it coming three years ago.

Robert Leamon of NASA and the University of Maryland (Baltimore County) published a 2023 paper predicting that the next El Niño would arrive in 2026. His forecast wasn’t based on ocean models or climate simulations. It was based on the sun.

Specifically, it was based on a solar phenomenon he and colleague Scott McIntosh call the “Terminator”: a magnetic event that marks the end of one solar cycle and the ignition of the next. By averaging the past five solar cycles into a composite “standard cycle” and projecting it forward, Leamon identified a recurring pattern. El Niños tend to follow Terminator events by roughly five years. The most recent Terminator occurred in December 2021. Do the math: that puts the next El Niño squarely in 2026. His model doesn’t speak to the strength of the event, but on timing, it appears to be spot-on.

Adapted by Dr. Tony Philps from Fig. 5 of Leamon (2023), this chart highlights two apparently successful predictions based on the Terminator

This isn’t the first time the Leamon-McIntosh framework has made a successful call. The pair previously demonstrated that every Terminator since the 1960s coincided with a flip from El Niño to La Niña conditions. That framework correctly predicted the onset of the triple-dip La Niña that began in 2020, and it revealed what may be a meaningful physical connection between solar variability and the ENSO (El Niño-Southern Oscillation) cycle.

What’s the mechanism?

That remains an open question, and an honest one. Most researchers working in this space favor “top-down” models, where solar activity modifies the upper atmosphere in ways that eventually propagate down to surface weather. But the specific physical pathway hasn’t been pinned down.

Leamon and McIntosh initially suspected (in their 2021 work) that galactic cosmic rays were the link. Cosmic ray flux varies with the solar cycle and affects atmospheric ionization. But by 2023, Leamon had reconsidered, as the timing didn’t fit well enough, and he now leans toward geomagnetic activity as a more plausible driver.

It’s worth noting that the search for a solar-ENSO connection is not new. Sir Gilbert Walker, who first identified the Southern Oscillation (the “SO” in ENSO) in the early 1900s, explicitly looked for a sunspot connection and came up empty. Researchers throughout the 20th century made similar attempts with similarly inconclusive results.

What’s different here is the Terminator concept itself, a relatively new framework that McIntosh and Leamon began developing about a decade ago. It offers a more precise solar marker than sunspot counts, and it appears to do a better job of both hindcasting solar cycles and anticipating ENSO transitions.

A possible geomagnetic-stratosphere-ENSO chain

The Terminator marks a rapid reorganization of the sun’s magnetic field at solar cycle boundaries. This reconfiguration produces a measurable shift in the solar wind and the interplanetary magnetic field, which in turn modulates Earth’s geomagnetic activity. That’s the entry point.

From there, geomagnetic disturbances are known to affect the distribution of electrical currents in the upper atmosphere. Those currents influence the stratospheric circulation, particularly the polar vortex and the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO), both of which are established modulators of tropospheric weather patterns.

The tropical Pacific is particularly sensitive to stratospheric forcing because the deep convective systems there, the engines of ENSO, respond to even small changes in the temperature gradient between the equatorial stratosphere and the surrounding atmosphere. A Terminator-driven nudge to the stratospheric circulation could plausibly tip the balance between the trade wind patterns that sustain La Niña and the weakening that triggers El Niño onset.

Why the five-year lag?

This is where it gets interesting. The Terminator doesn’t flip a switch instantly. The post-Terminator solar cycle ramps up gradually, and the cumulative geomagnetic forcing takes time to work its way through the stratosphere and into the ocean-atmosphere coupling of the tropical Pacific. Five years is roughly consistent with the timescales of both stratospheric adjustment and the oceanic heat content buildup that precedes a major El Niño.

Caveats

This is a plausible chain, not a proven one. Each link, from solar magnetic reorganization to geomagnetic activity, to stratospheric circulation, to tropical convection, to ENSO, is individually uncertain, and the compounding of those uncertainties is substantial. The honest position is that this mechanism is testable in principle, which is exactly what makes the Leamon-McIntosh prediction record worth watching closely.

Bottom line

Two successful predictions, the 2020 La Niña onset and now apparently the 2026 El Niño, is not proof of a causal mechanism, but it is more than coincidence deserves to be called. Science advances on exactly this kind of pattern recognition followed by mechanism-hunting. The Terminator hypothesis is young, the mechanism is unknown, and confidence should remain appropriately provisional.

But the prediction was made. It’s on record. And the El Niño appears to be arriving right on schedule.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 4 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bruce Cobb
May 17, 2026 2:13 pm

They call it “the terminator” because it will always “be back”.

Sweet Old Bob
May 17, 2026 2:25 pm

Do earthquakes also match this pattern ?

jvcstone
May 17, 2026 2:50 pm

What??? No mention of CO2. What’s wrong with those guys??? /s

Bob
May 17, 2026 2:51 pm

You know what stands out in this post? This:

“Leamon and McIntosh initially suspected (in their 2021 work) that galactic cosmic rays were the link. Cosmic ray flux varies with the solar cycle and affects atmospheric ionization. But by 2023, Leamon had reconsidered, as the timing didn’t fit well enough, and he now leans toward geomagnetic activity as a more plausible driver.”

They proposed something, it didn’t match observations so they looked for a better answer.

Scarecrow Repair
Reply to  Bob
May 17, 2026 3:19 pm

And they reported their conjecture ahead of time. They didn’t hide it, then throw it away when disproven.

Rud Istvan
May 17, 2026 3:01 pm

Well, I had never heard of solar Terminator events, so looked it up. The best (and simplest) explanation is at spaceweatherarchive.com. It references the original (and still controversial) 2020 paper in Solar Physics, supposedly predicting the solar sunspot cycles—but not venturing on to El Niño/La Nina.
I think the 2023 ‘Terminator’ prediction of an El Niño in 2026 noted by this post is mostly just luck—not to mention the absence of an explanatory mechanism. There are several reasons.

  1. The solar cycle is about 11 years. The claimed magnetic field terminator events range from 10-15 years, which is why most solar physicists don’t buy the original 2020 terminator solar cycle initiation claim.
  2. Per NOAA, the El Niño/La Nina cycle ranges anywhere from 2-7 years. La Nina is when the westerly equatorial Pacific trades strengthen, pushing the surface warm pool west, causing cold upwelling in the east. El Niño is when the trades weaken, allowing the warm pool to slosh east, killing the upwelling and the marine life supporting nutrients it brings to the eastern central Pacific surface. That cycle bears no relationship to either the solar cycle or the termination cycle.
  3. The westerly trades are a lower troposphere phenomenon. Coupling to the stratosphere as hypothesized is at best very weak. For example, undulations from zonal to meridional jet stream flow (west to east, opposite the trades) near the troposphere boundary (think polar vortex) don’t affect tradewinds much at all.
  4. From a purely probabilistic view, knowing there was a strong La Niña from 2020-2022, predicting in 2023 that there would be an El Niño in 2026 has a high likelihood. Per NOAA both 7 year and 2 year frequency are rarer than something in between. So predicting in 2023 that El Niño would happen in 2026, 4 years after the big long La Niña, only requires visiting NOAA.gov. The most common ENSO periodicy per NOAA is 4 years.
May 17, 2026 3:08 pm

Even blind squirrels . . .

Rud Istvan
Reply to  Steve Case
May 17, 2026 3:26 pm

These two guys may not be blind, but they sure are squirrelly—and government funded!