The Central England Temperature Record has been getting some inconvenient attention as of late. Joe D’Aleo at ICECAP pointed out recently:
The Central England Temperature record is one of the longest continuous temperature record in the world extending back to the Little Ice age in 1659. December 2010 was the coldest December in 120 years with an average of -0.7C just short of the record of -0.8C recorded in December 1890 and the Second Coldest December Temperature in the entire record (352 years).
I don’t know if it is simply sloppy webkeeping or related to the fact that the CET isn’t cooperating with the AGW expectations, but the Met Office seems to be burying the data from easy public access. They haven’t eliminated it, but it is now harder to find, and what was once a direct link now points to a general purpose climate change page.
WUWT reader Steve Rosser writes:
…the UK Met Office website, it’s undergoing a refresh at the moment and the CET link seems to have been mysteriously cut. It used to be readily accessible via the UK Climate summaries page, see below, however this link now redirects you to a global temperature page instead.
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/2010/
Thinking it may be a genuine mistake I e-mailed an enquiry and received a very polite response redirecting me to find it via the obscure link below. It’s hard to argue that this location provides a sufficiently high profile for such an august dataset..
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/people/david-parker
It may be that the original link will reinstated over the next few days in which case this is a non story. However, it looks suspicously like they are taking the focus away from the CET as after 2010 it’s showing an embarrasing disinclination to follow the AGW orthodoxy (+0.4 deg C since 1780). To do so would be a betrayal of their lack of impartiality which I’d personally find very disappointing. It would also send a message that rather than face-up and make the case for 2010 being a rogue year for UK temperatures they’d rather brush the whole thing under the carpet. I hope I’m wrong.
I checked the pages, and what he says is true. First here’s the main climate page of the Met Office: http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/2010/
Note the CET link highlighted in yellow:
This is the page that CET link takes you to:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate-change/guide/science/monitoring

There’s not a single mention of the CET on that page, but plenty of other datasets are mentioned.
Fortunately, the CET data page is still available, on another Met Office server here, but if you don’t know where to look, you won’t find it easily via the Met Office Climate page.
As I said earlier, this may be sloppy, or it may be intentional.
Given the mess related to the winter forecast we’ve recently seen from the Met Office, I’m inclined to invoke the
“never attribute malice to what can be explained by simple stupidity”
clause.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

If they had a virtual rug, they would have swept it under..which IS what they have done…
poor things, the facts aren’t fitting their agenda..
I heard Moe, Larry and Curly took over at the Met Office.
Odd, but when you look at it from their point of view this current part of the record is not “taxing” enough.
nope, this is too important and central to their argument/agenda….
….someone had to have asked
and the answer they got was to move it
Actually they moved the data to “hadobs” ages ago, around the time of the Climategate scandal. All that has gone missing is the specific link from the Met Office web page. I really would attribute that to, er, mess-up rather than conspiracy. Particularly as the “hadobs” site is actually a mine of very useful information with no attempt to hide it.
It would be best that anybody interested in the data bookmarks the following link until such time as the metoffice web site link is restored.
http://hadobs.metoffice.com/index.html
The difficulty in finding the actual data series is compounded by the reality that the original temperatures are not shown, only the anomalies, which seem to have a hockey stick like positive bubble until recently.
Note that other charts, such as precipitation, now are equally harder to find.
I think we’re seeing conspiracy theories when none exist.
I don’t know what method others have been using to access information but the ones I always use haven’t changed.
This is the record back to 1659.
http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcet/cetml1659on.dat
This is the version back to 1772-much less interesting as we miss out on the extraordinary warming from 1700
http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcet/
Interestingly the first CET mean average in 1659 was exactly the same as the 2010 figure at 8.83C.
Historic temperature records covering the little ice age can be found on my web site here;
http://climatereason.com/LittleIceAgeThermometers/
Tonyb
What a surprise. Same as the ARGO data. we paid for this buoy system, and are entitled to have access, and now it is showing cooling oceans it is difficult or impossible to access. They still state that oceans are warming.
REPLY: The ARGO data is easily available, and they have created a downloadable analysis tool for it. I’ll do a post on this in the future to dispel such rumors. – Anthony
Monthly and daily (yes, daily) CET datsets through the KNMI Climate Explorer have also not been updated since December 2010, which would happen if the Met Office shifted the webpage and didn’t advise KNMI.
Monthly CET data through the KNMI Climate Explorer:
http://climexp.knmi.nl/getindices.cgi?UKMOData/cet+Central_England_Temperature+t+someone@somewhere
Daily CET data:
http://climexp.knmi.nl/getindices.cgi?UKMOData/daily_cet+Central_England_Temperature+t+someone@somewhere+366
Government-funded science is hopelessly corrupt.
The big question is whether others have downloaded and archived the data, since those folks seem not to be trusted.
/Mr Lynn
Hmm this one has also disappeared
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climatechange/science/monitoring/hadcrut3.html
It was a priceless page, where the inconvenient post-2002 decline in the HadCRUT3 series was covered by a sidebar.
CET January temperature of 1.2C, although 2C higher than for Jan 2010 (-0.9C) , is still fractionally below the average (1.27C) for the 1878-2011 period.
A I reading the post wrong as the following link now points to David Parker
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/people/david-parker
http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcet/
I heard Moe, Larry and Curly took over at the Met Office.
The MET office is doing even worse than that !!! 😉
This one appears not to have been updated since end Dec 2010 either.
http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcet/data/download.html
Bob, thanks for the links. Can we alert the people who run KNMI to the new locations?
Trying to find the data for the entire UK as opposed to just Central England is just as difficult as I found out in writing this article posted on notrickszone web page
http://notrickszone.com/2011/01/29/should-britons-buy-bermuda-shorts-or-long-johns/
Am I right in understanding that one of the weather stations used to compile the CET is Manchester Airport which, from being a grassy field some 50 years ago, is now ine of the busiest airports in Europe?
CET is linked from David Parkers page, with slightly ominous wording:
David has helped develop and improve the 350-year Central England Temperature (CET) dataset
(my bold).
Good data source for all of UK
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/datasets/Tmean/date/UK.txt
No. Hell, no.
You may not, at this point, after all that they have done, ascribe to stupidity what should be ascribed to malice and deceit.
It is wrong to give them the benefit of any doubt. Stupidity would include some element of chance that the ‘errors’ they make would not support the alarmist position, and that is clearly not the case. They lie, and you know they lie, and they know you know they are lying.
In defense of stupid — I was a professional web site builder and manager and can attest to how easy it is to have some low level staffer mess up a linking scheme on a large complicated web site. I suggest giving them time to fix it now that it has been pointed out.
vukcevic says:
CET January temperature of 1.2C, although 2C higher than for Jan 2010 (-0.9C) , is still fractionally below the average (1.27C) for the 1878-2011 period.
Those numbers are the minimum (Monthly_HadCET_min.txt) as the January CET mean was 1.4 deg C for 2010 and 3.7 for 2011 (Monthly_HadCET_mean.txt)
The same is true of their much heralded, but quickly forgotten yearly global temperature forecasts. They were ever so easy to find until the actual temperature was way out, and then … it they were hidden if not removed entirely.
The Met Office are just despicable and the sooner taxpayers money stopped going to this eco-political propaganda machine the better.