Oh noes! Wind driven global warming hot spots

From CSIRO  – Warming in the Tasman Sea a global warming hot spot

Oceanographers have identified a series of ocean hotspots around the world generated by strengthening wind systems that have driven oceanic currents, including the East Australian Current, polewards beyond their known boundaries.

The hotspots have formed alongside ocean currents that wash the east coast of the major continents and their warming proceeds at a rate far exceeding the average rate of ocean surface warming, according to an international science team whose work is published in the journal Nature Climate Change today.

Paper co-author, CSIRO’s Dr Wenju Cai, said that while the finding has local ecological implications in the region surrounding the hotspots, the major influence is upon the ocean’s ability to take up heat and carbon from the atmosphere.

In Australia’s case, scientists report intensifying east-west winds at high latitudes (45º-55ºS) pushing southward and speeding up the gyre or swirl of currents circulating in the South Pacific, extending from South America to the Australian coast.  The resulting changes in ocean circulation patterns have pushed the East Australian Current around 350 kilometres further south, with temperatures east of Tasmania as much as two degrees warmer than they were 60 years ago.

“We would expect natural change in the oceans over decades or centuries but change with such elevated sea surface temperatures in a growing number of locations and in a synchronised manner was definitely not expected,” said CSIRO’s Dr Wenju Cai.

“Detecting these changes has been hindered by limited observations but with a combination of multi-national ocean watch systems and computer simulations we have been able to reconstruct an ocean history in which warming over the past century is 2-3 times faster than the global average ocean warming rate,” says Dr Cai, a climate scientist at CSIRO’s Wealth from Oceans Research Flagship.

The changes are characterised by a combination of currents pushing nearer to the polar regions and intensify with systematic changes of wind over both hemispheres, attributed to increasing greenhouse gases.

Dr Cai said the increase of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has been the major driver of the surface warming of the Earth over the 20th century. This is projected to continue.

He said the research points to the need for a long-term monitoring network of the western boundary currents. In March next year, Australian scientists plan to deploy a series of moored ocean sensors across the East Australian Current to observe change season-to-season and year-to-year.

Lead author of the paper was Dr Lixin Wu, of the Ocean University of China, with contributing authors from five countries, many of whom are members of the Pacific Ocean Panel working under the auspices of the World Meteorological Organisation.

The research was partly funded by a grant from the Australian Climate Change Science Program supported by the Australian Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

78 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
January 30, 2012 9:03 am

This says it all: The research was partly funded by a grant from the Australian Climate Change Science Program supported by the Australian Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency.

Eustace Cranch
January 30, 2012 9:06 am

Dang, it’s always something…

MarkW
January 30, 2012 9:08 am

Sounds like yet another negative feedback.
By moving the heat poleward, it’s easier to get rid of it.

tonyc
January 30, 2012 9:12 am

Not very creative in their brainstorming methods for trying to determine the drivers for these changes in currents, are they?

January 30, 2012 9:13 am

The only gyre in operation here is the rolling of eyes……

January 30, 2012 9:16 am

CSIRO is a notorious Quango (Quasi Non-governmental Organization) which does not march unless the Aussie government says go! Jump? How high?
If there is a partitioning of a fluid into a “hot spot” then there must be a concomitant “cold spot” of equal and opposite strength to bring us a mean. But, of course, they won’t search for the “cold spot”.

Russ in Houston
January 30, 2012 9:24 am

“Detecting these changes has been hindered by limited observations but with a combination of multi-national ocean watch systems and computer simulations
I quite reading right about there.

Anopheles
January 30, 2012 9:29 am

It’s the windfarms. Sucking power out of the wind in one place leads to unpredicable changes elsewhere. Must do. Should have used the precautionary principle before putting them up. However, a little grant money should point the way.

Dave
January 30, 2012 9:30 am

Let’s see… Argo era vs. pre-Argo era. It couldn’t have anything to do with our increased knowledge of ocean temps, could it? Nah…

Goracle
January 30, 2012 9:30 am

“Detecting these changes has been hindered by limited observations but with a combination of multi-national ocean watch systems and computer simulations we have been able to reconstruct an ocean history…”
Observations? Real data? Who needs them when you have computer models.

Frank K.
January 30, 2012 9:32 am

Eve Stevens says:
January 30, 2012 at 9:03 am
“This says it all: The research was partly funded by a grant from the Australian Climate Change Science Program supported by the Australian Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency.”
Yes – that is ALL you need to know about this “study.” Research funded by “BIG CLIMATE.” Follow the money!

Mike Worst
January 30, 2012 9:33 am

Oh dear how inconvenient and devastating Oh wait?–
Hot spots> are they unprecedented? woe is us..
Any previous info/affirmation on those currents that were supposedly 350 whatsits further north at some point in the past?
Synchronized?, methinks Bloveld is involved here.
“Detecting these changes has been hindered by limited observations” Oh noes, does that mean what I think it does?
“He said the research points to the need for a long-term monitoring network of the western boundary currents.” Hey man, gotcha drift there matey.
“Dr Cai said the increase of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has been the major driver of the surface warming of the Earth over the 20th century. This is projected to continue.” [Trimmed. Such language doesn’t contribute … Robt]

F. Ross
January 30, 2012 9:47 am



Dr Cai said the increase of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has been the major driver of the surface warming of the Earth over the 20th century. This is projected to continue.

[emphasis added]
Well of course, this goes without saying; what else could possibly be the cause? /sarc
Waddaloadacr#p

PJB
January 30, 2012 9:47 am

Straw, meet grasp.

January 30, 2012 9:49 am

I agree with bubbagyro:
“If there is a partitioning of a fluid into a “hot spot” then there must be a concomitant “cold spot” of equal and opposite strength to bring us a mean. But, of course, they won’t search for the “cold spot”.”
I think this goes for the cherry picking the warmers are citing with receding glaciers also. There are large glaciers that are increasing also.

Fredrick Lightfoot
January 30, 2012 9:50 am

Having sail the Tasman many times I have sailed over an underwater volcano ( south east of Norfolk Island ) which distorted the horizon, sailing through it the water temp. changed 8c in 4/5 miles, the height of the water in the center must have been at least 20 feet higher as you could see it miles away, the depth we measured at just over 2 miles, that one hell of a lot of heat !

Richard111
January 30, 2012 9:52 am

So is the wind pushing the ocean currents or is it the ocean currents pushing the wind? Where is the historical data? Surely this has happened before?

Rob Crawford
January 30, 2012 9:53 am

“This says it all: The research was partly funded by a grant from the Australian Climate Change Science Program supported by the Australian Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency.”
I thought funding could only be used to indict skeptical studies.

George E. Smith;
January 30, 2012 9:54 am

“”””” MarkW says:
January 30, 2012 at 9:08 am
Sounds like yet another negative feedback.
By moving the heat poleward, it’s easier to get rid of it. “””””
Actually, that makes it harder to get rid of. The rate of radiation loss at the poles is much lower that it is in the tropical deserts; T^4 and all that.

crosspatch
January 30, 2012 9:54 am

They seem to miss the obvious. By these currents pushing closer to polar regions, they result in greater heat dissipation. The overall result will be an increased loss of heat from the oceans. This is probably part of a natural feedback that helps to maintain the overall heat content of the oceans. Notice how the heat content in the upper 700 meters of the ocean has flattened out over the past few years.

Robinson
January 30, 2012 9:58 am

“He said the research points to the need for a long-term monitoring network of the western boundary currents. ”
Please, allow me to translate for the non-Scientists:
“He said the research points to the need for long-term grant funding, so he can continue to pay his mortgage and feed his children”.

Jim G
January 30, 2012 10:01 am

“Dr Cai said the increase of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has been the major driver of the surface warming of the Earth over the 20th century. This is projected to continue.”
Well, I guess that makes it an indisputable fact. Dr. Cai said it’s so.
“Detecting these changes has been hindered by limited observations but with a combination of multi-national ocean watch systems and computer simulations”
Aha, can’t be wrong here! We have simulations.

January 30, 2012 10:02 am

Tasmania is 2 degrees warmer??
Lucky buggers !!!

Richard M
January 30, 2012 10:13 am

Follow the money == confirmation bias.
Anyone want to bet they didn’t even look for another cause?

Rogelio Escobar
January 30, 2012 10:14 am

Australian Science went down the drain a long time ago, probably nearly every discipline. They haven’t produced ANYTHING since the 60’s. Just look at having someone like Tim Flannery as a “Climate scientist”. The guy is a shill responsible for billions of damage to the Queensland economy for advising that it would never rain there again. Anyway, these kind of articles are killing the whole AGW movement so keep them coming LOL

1 2 3 4
Verified by MonsterInsights