Claim: Climate Change Could Make Hailstorms Worse

Essay by Eric Worrall

So what is the point of solar panels?

MAY 28, 2026 REPORT

Hailstorms could grow more dangerous and damaging with climate change

by Paul Arnold, Phys.org
edited by Gaby Clark, reviewed by Robert Egan

Hailstorms can be incredibly dangerous, posing risks to life and property. Then there’s the economic damage to cars, crops, and infrastructure caused by large balls of ice falling at high speed from the sky. And the problems could worsen as our planet heats up.

A new study published in Nature predicts that climate change could produce larger, more damaging hailstones in some regions. The editors of Nature have also published a Research Briefing in the same issue summarizing the work.

They found that hailstorm-induced damage worldwide is projected to increase by 36.5% to 42.1% by the late 21st century, depending on the scenario. Explaining this shift, they wrote, “Globally, increased low-level temperature and specific humidity drive a shift towards larger hailstones, with the frequency of ≥30-mm-diameter hailstones rising by 37.9–51.8%.”

At the same time, the frequency of small hailstones (less than 30 millimeters) is set to decrease by 4.2% to 12.3%.

The parts of the planet most likely to suffer the greatest damage are North America, Europe, and Asia. But it’s not all bad news, as the tropics and subtropics will see a decrease in overall hail frequency because the smaller stones will melt completely before hitting the ground.

Read more: https://phys.org/news/2026-05-hailstorms-dangerous-climate.html

The abstract of the study;

  • Article
  • Published: 27 May 2026

Rising global hail damage potential in a warming world

Nature volume 653, pages 1069–1077 (2026) Cite this article

Abstract

Anthropogenic climate change (ACC) is expected to modify severe convective storms and their associated hazards, including hailstorms, a primary driver of weather-related economic losses1,2,3,4. Despite some research on the response of hailstorms to ACC, most studies have focused on regional-scale changes2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, whereas global-scale assessments of hailstone size remain scarce. Here we show a 36.5–42.1% increase in global hailstorm-induced damage potential by the late twenty-first century, with the magnitude determined by the emission scenario. Our results arise from hailstone trajectory simulations conducted under historical and future scenarios, driven by EC-Earth3 ensemble outputs10 that are cross-validated through multimodel comparisons. Globally, increased low-level temperature and specific humidity drive a shift towards larger hailstones, with the frequency of ≥30-mm-diameter hailstones rising by 37.9–51.8% and <30-mm-diameter hailstones declining by 4.2–12.3%. Regionally, the mid-high latitudes predominantly exhibit increased hail damage potential owing to strong warming and weak moistening, amplifying instability sufficiently to counteract enhanced drag and melting effects. Conversely, tropical and monsoonal regions experience reduced hail damage potential owing to weak warming, strong moistening and limited hail growth depth. Our findings highlight the non-uniform impacts of ACC on global hailstorm damage, providing critical insights for future disaster prevention and mitigation strategies.

Read more (paywalled): https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10543-2

Although the full study is paywalled, it seems likely the study plays fast and loose with thermodynamics. Simplistic models which suggest warmer average surface temperatures would drive more severe weather without limit are just wrong. The total energy available to drive the climate system is set by the amount of sunlight being absorbed by the Earth – and big hailstorms require a lot of energy.

Constrained work output of the moist atmospheric heat engine in a warming climate

F. LALIBERTÉJ. ZIKAL. MUDRYKP. J. KUSHNERJ. KJELLSSON, AND K. DÖÖS

SCIENCE
30 Jan 2015
Vol 347, Issue 6221
pp. 540-543

DOI: 10.1126/science.12571031,23160

Because the rain falls and the wind blows

Global warming is expected to intensify the hydrological cycle, but it might also make the atmosphere less energetic. Laliberté et al. modeled the atmosphere as a classical heat engine in order to evaluate how much energy it contains and how much work it can do (see the Perspective by Pauluis). They then used a global climate model to project how that might change as climate warms. Although the hydrological cycle may increase in intensity, it does so at the expense of its ability to do work, such as powering large-scale atmospheric circulation or fueling more very intense storms.

Science, this issue p. 540; see also p. 475

Abstract

Incoming and outgoing solar radiation couple with heat exchange at Earth’s surface to drive weather patterns that redistribute heat and moisture around the globe, creating an atmospheric heat engine. Here, we investigate the engine’s work output using thermodynamic diagrams computed from reanalyzed observations and from a climate model simulation with anthropogenic forcing. We show that the work output is always less than that of an equivalent Carnot cycle and that it is constrained by the power necessary to maintain the hydrological cycle. In the climate simulation, the hydrological cycle increases more rapidly than the equivalent Carnot cycle. We conclude that the intensification of the hydrological cycle in warmer climates might limit the heat engine’s ability to generate work.

Read more: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1257103

Even if they got the thermodynamics right, in a world where energy policy is driven by evidence and reason, any risk of more violent weather in the future should have long since ruled out fragile weather vulnerable systems like solar.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 3 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
24 Comments
rovingbroker
May 29, 2026 3:13 am

But … but … but … think about the reduction in automobile accidents and related costs by global warming’s reduction in snow and ice related accidents as well as a drop in dollars spent on road-salt and snow removal … and the drop in human back injuries related to shoveling snow.

It’s all good!

May 29, 2026 3:28 am

The existence of severe convective weather – with hailstones forming at high altitude and making it back to the surface still frozen – is an obvious indication that energy cannot be made to accumulate down here as sensible heat by the minor incremental IR absorbing power of rising pCO2.

So any assumption that “ACC” – that’s what we’re calling it now?? – is responsible for ANY of the reported “warming” or a trend of ANY climate variable has been inherently unsound all along.

I could be wrong. But I don’t think so.

Thank you for your patience in this long-running matter of cause and effect.

strativarius
May 29, 2026 3:34 am

So what is the point of solar panels?

They keep Chinese Uyghur slaves off the streets…

Bryan A
Reply to  strativarius
May 29, 2026 5:41 am

And Employed!

May 29, 2026 3:43 am

So what is the point of solar panels?”

Target practice?

Reply to  Right-Handed Shark
May 29, 2026 3:59 am

It’s a bit more challenging to hit the spinning blades of a wind turbine, but large hailstones would no doubt be very damaging.

Reply to  David Dibbell
May 29, 2026 5:19 am

It’s a bit more challenging to hit the spinning blades of a wind turbine

But birds and bats do it all the time…

George Thompson
Reply to  David Dibbell
May 29, 2026 7:32 am

An interesting question. Springfield MO had a hellacious hailstorm that blew out auto windows while the autos were on the road-somehow nobody killed, but what would tennis ball sized hail do to windmill blades? One wonders.

May 29, 2026 4:03 am

Fake science. Predicting changes to three significant figures?

Reply to  pflashgordon
May 29, 2026 5:38 am

Assuming CO2 will have those effects is Fake Science.

They start out assuming too much: That CO2 has an effect on the Earth’s weather or climate. This has never been established as a fact, yet these guys assume it has been.

This is called “seeing what you expect to see”, not what’s really there, and this is not science, it is self-delusion.

Sean2828
May 29, 2026 4:37 am

One thing is for certain, the deployment of utility scale solar will increase the amount of damage to the grid from severe weather.
Cliff Mass also wrote about the influence of climate change on wildfires in the northwest. The modeling he did suggested that a warming world would have less intense cold high pressure systems over the northern Rockies leading to a weakening of strong easterly winds that caused wildfire outbreaks. The Seattle Times was not amused as it didn’t fit the narrative.

strativarius
May 29, 2026 4:50 am

Climate Change [Alarmism] can make things PR even worse…

—————————

BBC Forced to Edit Misleading Pro-Net Zero Headline
The BBC has edited a headline that suggested the Confederation of British Industry backed “green jobs.” Typical…

BBC Scotland published an article headlined: “Green jobs contributing £10.2bn to Scotland’s economy, says CBI.” Only, it doesn’t… – Guido Fawkes

strativarius
May 29, 2026 5:08 am

O/T How difficult can you make it to park a car?

Bath and North East Somerset Council 

Councillor Manda Rigby, Cabinet Member for Communications and Community, shared: “We have three brilliant Park and Ride sites that run fast, regular and convenient services into the city and provide free parking for those using the service.

“One of our proposed changes is to increase the cost of 24-hour parking at these sites for motorists not using the service, and we want to hear your views.”

Under the proposed charging system, a vehicle’s size would be measured in square metres by multiplying its length by its width, excluding wing mirrors, with 11 different charging bands.
Meanwhile, the smallest vehicles, measuring up to five square metres, would qualify for a £20 discount on a first permit. This would primarily impact larger vehicles, which are currently using petrol and diesel, with the council sharing that a diesel BMW X1 Xdrive18D Xline Auto would face charges of £16.16 for the first permit, before moving to a whopping £80.80 for the second permit. GBN

11 charging bands? Obviously, more pen pushers needed.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  strativarius
May 29, 2026 6:37 am

Did they model this with multiple scenarios?

May 29, 2026 5:12 am

Even if they got the thermodynamics right, in a world where energy policy is driven by evidence and reason… 

Well, there’s your problem right there…

May 29, 2026 5:18 am

Hailstorms could grow more dangerous and damaging with climate change
by Paul Arnold, Phys.org

Paul Arnold

Author

Paul is a versatile freelance writer with a BSc in Biology from the University of London. He worked at the BBC producing science and medical documentaries, traveling the world interviewing scientists in places like Antarctica and the Canadian High Arctic. He now freelances from sunny southern Spain. 

BSc in Biology freelancing from sunny southern Spain, got it…

SxyxS
Reply to  Phil R
May 29, 2026 5:29 am

The only thing Climate Change made better was the salaries of climate experts.
Everything else has to get worse if they want to keep their jobs.

strativarius
Reply to  SxyxS
May 29, 2026 5:39 am

The change in climate between the colder 1960s and today is the weather is a bit warmer and… better.

Denis
May 29, 2026 6:02 am

Total column water vapor is down slightly since 1983 – as far back as Ole Humlum’s graph in climate4you.com goes. Less water makes more hailstones? Hard to believe but then belief is the key ingredient for climate change.

May 29, 2026 6:23 am

They found that hailstorm-induced damage worldwide is projected to increase by 36.5% to 42.1% by the late 21st century, depending on the scenario.

But just the other day Stokes claimed that climatology doesn’t indulge in “predictions or projections”.

Sparta Nova 4
May 29, 2026 6:34 am

“the magnitude determined by the emission scenario”
“simulations conducted under historical and future scenarios”
At best an educated guess.
“cross-validated through multimodel comparisons”
Use the model outputs to validate the model outputs.

Further corruption of Science.

Sparta Nova 4
May 29, 2026 6:43 am

“Hailstorms could grow more dangerous and damaging with climate change”

Hailstorms are weather. Climate is a 30-year average of weather in modern context. How does an average of numbers cause weather?

BTW, the way “climate change” is presented is the delta between the start and end points of a graph. It is not calculated correctly. If one plots the running 30 year averages, one finds the climate change is a radically different number.

“Climate change” does not cause anything. “Climate change” is the result, not the cause, of weather.

Further corruption of science.

May 29, 2026 6:55 am

First sentence in the above article:

“So what is the point of solar panels?”

These points:
— Kill off vegetation located in the daytime shadow underneath the panels.
— Increase the albedo of Earth.
— Create a local “heat island”.
— Be a visual “blight” on the landscape.
— Most importantly—due to their power output intermittency and variability (day versus nigh time, cloud coverage, rain/snow/fog obscuration, change of Sun’s elevation and azimuthal angles in the sky over the course of a year with respect to the fixed tilt and lengthwise compass alignment of the rows of panels)—require backup/reserve fossil fuel or hydro power plant capacity as a direct additional costs.

Mr.
May 29, 2026 7:06 am

The brain-drain caused by these nonsensical studies is not limited to just those that produce them in the first place.

Others with more rational minds have to expend their brain cells in debunking the tosh.