The 1947 Heatwave, Which The Met Office Keeps Quiet About

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

https://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/articles/cpwpneyj05eo

We are told that these sort of temperatures are unheard of at this time of year and are only occurring because of climate change. Weather like this would have been  impossible in the past, they infer. And it is an omen of what the future holds, as records successively get broken by a degree or more.

But is any of this true? Have we never had equally hot weather at this time of year?

In 1947, another intense heatwave hit England at the end of May and the first three days of June. Temperatures peaked on the 3rd June, hitting 94F at RAF Waddington in Lincolnshire, as well as at two London sites, Camden Square and Kensington.

This compares to the record of 95F at Kew yesterday.

  Bear in mind that RAF Waddington was little more than a grass field in 1947, flying Avro Lincolns, the successor to the Lancaster on which it was based. The aerodrome is in a perfect rural environment and would have had none of the artificial heat sources that affect modern airfields, such as Heathrow, Coningsby and Waddington itself now.

In contrast, 95F at Kew probably includes at least three degrees of UHI. It is certainly true that the UHI effect in London is much greater now than in 1947, so the temperatures at Camden and Kensington then are probably comparable to Kew.

The 1947 heatwave came from an easterly direction and it was widespread. As well as Waddington and the two London sites, six other locations registered 93F:

Norwich

Mildenhall

Santon Downham

Cambridge

Greenwich

Regents Park

Significantly only four sites were hotter than 93F on Monday:

Kew

Heathrow

Northolt

Teddington

The last three are all junk sites.

By all estimation, the June 1947 heatwave was every bit as intense as this week’s, arguably more so. Yes, it occurred three days after the end of May, so technically is counted as in June. But is there any climatological or meteorological significance to those three days?

Of course not. Average temperatures on Tuesday 3rd June would be no different to Saturday 31st May.

It is always difficult comparing one weather event with another, particularly eight decades apart, because they are all unique,. But the evidence from June 1947 does more than undermine Met Office claims that this week’s heatwave is evidence of climate change. It raises the question why they are not giving the public all of the relevant facts by telling them we have had similar weather in the past.

Let’s be clear.

This week’s heatwave is an exceptionally rare event for this time of year, but it is not unprecedented, even during the few brief years our temperature records date back.

It has happened before and will undoubtedly happen again.

It has nothing to do with climate change.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 5 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
27 Comments
Neil Pryke
May 28, 2026 10:19 pm

If in doubt, lie…or, better still, conceal…

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Neil Pryke
May 29, 2026 6:48 am

Repeat the lie often enough…

— Goebbels

Rod Evans
May 28, 2026 10:53 pm

As a ‘victim’ of this latest heat wave, can I just say I am getting worried.
I have experienced a general feeling of wellbeing and happiness as I sit on my patio enjoying the pleasantly warm air and comfortable guilt free enjoyment of an extra beer to facilitate rehydration.
My wife has even adopted ice cubes in a glass of white wine which is an evolutionary event, as her usual preference for plain cold water may have been broken.
These ‘changes’ in environmental stimulants may have long term economic consequences. I will now have to add a couple of bottles of white wine to my weekly essential provisions….

Tusten02
May 28, 2026 11:33 pm

1947 was also an excellent wine year, one of the best in Bordeaux!

May 28, 2026 11:36 pm

We’re all gonna die with a huge smile on our face…can’t let that happen with heat that freezes and cold that heats or? Cheers Rod, I also enjoyed a cold beer or two on my deck.

People use the word ‘unprecedented” and can’t even remember what they had for breakfast or lunch the day before…I always laugh

Reply to  varg
May 29, 2026 2:42 am

I also enjoyed a cold beer or two on my deck.

I had some work to do so I enjoyed a cold beer or two on my desk.

Randle Dewees
May 29, 2026 12:29 am

On the other hand – it was cool, breezy, and rainy here in the Mojave Desert. There was even snowfall at 6,000 feet in the Sierra. Late May we’re usually hitting low 100’s.

FrankH
May 29, 2026 12:32 am

You haven’t got the message yet, have you?
Normal British weather is just weather, nothing to see here, just move along.
Anything slightly out of the ordinary: hotter, colder, wetter, windier, that’s climate change. PANIC! PANIC! WE’RE ALL GONNA DIE!

May 29, 2026 12:39 am

Wasn’t the winter of 1947 also cold with not insignificant snow? Thus the temperature difference between January 1947 and May 1947 is larger than the temperature difference between January and May this year, although the
average temperature for this year over the same months will be higher than the 1947 data.
I have complained to the BBC over their description of the science behind a heat dome being caused by hot air being trapped under a high pressure system at altitude, rather than the downward flow of air causing an adiabatic temperature increase due increasing pressure (courtesy of https://weather.com/science/weather-explainers/news/2025-06-20-death-ridge-heat-dome-explainer).

MrGrimNasty
May 29, 2026 1:04 am

The clustering is interesting if Google AI is correct, 4 years between 1944 and 53 reached 30C in May, then not until 2005, and 2 more years since including 2026.

Anthony Banton
May 29, 2026 1:33 am

“But is there any climatological or meteorological significance to those three days?”

Yes:
You have to look at the inherant warmth of the airmass,
On the 3rd Jun 1947 at 850mb (5000′) in SE England the temp at that level was ~ 15C. At 00Z on 26th May 2026 it was ~ 17C
So ~ 2C warmer …. which is what the max temps on 26th were above the previous record.

it is the source region of the airmass that endows it with heat. That in these extreme cases is N Africa (The Sahara is under the subsidence zone of the Equatorial Jet and as such the air us very dry – precisely the place where GHGs have max effect in absence of high WV content).

comment image

comment image

“It raises the question why they are not giving the public all of the relevant facts by telling them we have had similar weather in the past.”

They are – see …..

https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/blog/2026/record-breaking-heat-rewrites-may-temperature-records-across-the-uk

It’s the media who did not mention it NOT the MetO.

Reply to  Anthony Banton
May 29, 2026 1:48 am

Your last sentence is a fair comment. Until we get a brave new MSM mogul the MSM will continue to promote only the climate alarmist position.

Editor
Reply to  Anthony Banton
May 29, 2026 2:31 am

I read the Met Office article you cited, and another that it cited. No mention of similar weather in the past that I could see.

Anthony Banton
Reply to  Mike Jonas
May 29, 2026 5:20 am

“Many of the previous records that were exceeded dated back several decades, with a notable concentration from the 1940s and 1950s. For instance, previous benchmarks at 24 sites including Ross-on-Wye, Goudhurst and Leeming were set during notable warm spells in 1944 and 1947.”

MrGrimNasty
Reply to  Anthony Banton
May 29, 2026 7:15 am

The BBC’s coverage was at times hysterical and ignorant ‘misinformation’. Several times they interviewed different in-house weather presenters (I do not know who employs them, BBC or MO), but they were outwardly astonished, agitated and excited, the lady one near tears it seemed, at the climate change red-flag event unfolding.

The core of their rhetoric was that it was normal for records to be beaten by tenths of a degree but 2 whole degrees, my o my, this was impossible without climate change.

But of course that is the very nature of weather and exactly what you would expect.

“Yes, exactly. Because the climate is a chaotic, non-linear system, temperature records are not always broken by tiny fractions of a degree. Instead, they can occasionally be shattered by large, statistically significant margins.”

Anthony Banton
Reply to  MrGrimNasty
May 29, 2026 7:25 am

“But of course that is the very nature of weather and exactly what you would expect.”

No it isn’t.
Show me to wrong (before the most recent decades).

rtj1211
May 29, 2026 2:11 am

What of course is not being reported is the cooler/colder than average temperatures across Eastern Europe, from the Baltics to the Black Sea and Turkey.

Anthony Banton
Reply to  rtj1211
May 29, 2026 7:18 am

It’s not reported because our media are interested in our weather and not that of elsewhere unless it is notable.
Also, that’s the way atmospheric planetary waves work – for every warm ridge there is usually a cold trough before and behind.

Jono1066
May 29, 2026 2:43 am

step repeat, the day that Australia burned . . 2009,
oops sorry . .1983,
oops sorry . . 1974,
oops sorry . . 1851

ozspeaksup
May 29, 2026 4:38 am

considering millions more people buildings high rises cars aircons planes etc id say recent temps were Below the 47 ones by a few degrees in truth , even Kew would now be getting extra from vehicle exhaust aircon heat on the area and less airflow due to higher buildings all round

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  ozspeaksup
May 29, 2026 6:54 am

Ah, the very real anthropogenic climate change.
Nothing to do with CO2, just more people and the support systems (aka infrastructure) effects that come with sustaining the population.

May 29, 2026 5:23 am

From the article: “This week’s heatwave is an exceptionally rare event for this time of year, but it is not unprecedented, even during the few brief years our temperature records date back.

It has happened before and will undoubtedly happen again.

It has nothing to do with climate change.”

Exactly.

The United States has certainly recorded temperatures in the past that were just as warm as today. There is no unprecedented weather today. Which means there is no evidence of measurable CO2 warming, since there is more CO2 in the air today, yet it is no warmer today than in the past when there was less CO2 in the air.

CO2 produces no visible effects on the Earth’s weather or climate.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Tom Abbott
May 29, 2026 6:55 am

visible = measureable

May 29, 2026 6:20 am

As Ed Hawkins is quoted as saying in the BBC article: “Today’s heat events are… occurring across a much warmer background climate.

He’s right. In the 30 years leading up to the 1947 heatwave (May 1917-May 1946), the average May temperature in England was 10.8C; in the 30-years leading up to the 2026 heatwave, the average May temperature in England was 11.8C, fully +1.0C warmer.

Average May temperatures over the past 30-years in England have been increasing at a rate of +0.4C per decade, so over the next 30-years (assuming no acceleration) we can expect to add at least one further degree C on top of that.

If the new normal background temperature is higher then you would expect the warm excursions from it to be higher too.

Data here.

oeman50
Reply to  TheFinalNail
May 29, 2026 6:56 am

Two points,

  1. UHI increases on temperature measurements
  2. Rebound from the Little Ice Age
Anthony Banton
Reply to  oeman50
May 29, 2026 7:22 am

UHI does not increase temperatures at 5000′ altitude within an airmass sourced from the Sahara.
See my post above.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  TheFinalNail
May 29, 2026 7:28 am

No one has claimed there is no global warming.
The question is not a warmer background, but rather the quantification associated with “much warmer.”

If one does the math responsibly, the 0.4 C per decade is the slope of the curve, meaning end to end shows a slope of 1.2 C per 30 years. The climate temperature is 0.6 C above the interval starting point. Now, back it up 1 year. What fraction of a degree change occurred between the current 30 year climate interval and the 1 year prior 30 year interval.

Climate change is the trend of 30 year averaged over a longer interval.

It is not done this way, so continues the corruption of Science.

FYI, the change in average monthly maximum temperatures for the 30 years ending in 2025 is 0.1 C higher than the 30 year average of monthly maximum temperature for the year ending in 2024 per the data in the posted link.