Left: President Trump. Right: George Monbiot Explaining his Climate Theories. Screenshot from Novara Media

Monbiot: Green Energy Advocates are Now Pragmatic Patriots Because of Iran and Trump

Essay by Eric Worrall

“Who’d have thought a fossil-fuel shill like Trump would be the one to spark a green revolution?”

Who’d have thought a fossil-fuel shill like Trump would be the one to spark a green revolution?

George Monbiot
Sat 18 Apr 2026 17.00 AEST

The US attack on Iran has made the need for renewable energy inarguable. Environmentalists are now being seen for the pragmatists that they are

Donald Trump has done more to accelerate the energy transition than anyone else alive. …

It’s not that the fossils are suffering yet. … As promised, Trump has gutted clean energy rules and programmesgreen alternatives and environmental science. A fortnight ago, he stated, with the usual quantum of evidence (zero): “The environmentalists, I mean, they are terrorists … I call them environmental terrorists.”

… Through grid-scale batteries, we could quickly eliminate the need for fossil fuel plants as the power source of last resort. This would greatly reduce the price of electricity.  …

We are on the cusp of vast, cascading shifts in energy supply and storage. Any country that fails to respond will remain trapped in the fossil age, facing high bills and insecurity, while others transform their economies. …

Governments should seek the electrification of everything that can be electrified, and the retirement of much that cannot. …

Greens who were long dismissed as “idealistic” and “unrealistic” now look like hard-headed pragmatists and true patriots. …

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/apr/18/fossil-fuel-trump-green-revolution-us-iran-renewable-energy

Are EVs a viable replacement for ICE vehicles?

In the short term at least the answer is an unequivocal no. No nation has the electrical capacity to service a large fleet of EVs. Nor is there any economically viable pathway to that capacity in the foreseeable future – an immediate showstopper for Monbiot’s vision of a sweeping green victory.

But for some people they might work. I took a ride in an Uber a few days ago, the vehicle was a Cherry E5 or similar. The Uber driver was wildly enthusiastic about his vehicle, he claimed his vehicle lasted all day on a single charge – a significant improvement over a few years ago. For some people like that Uber driver, an EV might be a viable solution.

I’m still not buying one. My rugged armoured 4WD is far more suitable for driving around rural Queensland. Whenever I hit an animal, a sad inevitability in rural Australia, even when driving around town, it’s the animal which bounces off, not the vehicle. The largest road hazards in our area, big red kangaroos which can weigh as much as an adult human, and the occasional feral pig, which can weigh significantly more, you really don’t want to be driving in a cheap piece of Chinese plastic if you hit one of these.

Britain also has wildlife hazards. Like most places Britain also has large feral wildlife, if you hit a big deer you’ll write off your vehicle, unless maybe you are driving a big armoured 4WD. I got lucky one night driving around Farnborough, most deer have no road sense, but the big buck I almost hit jumped out of my way just in time.

That Uber driver? When I asked about rural driving he replied “Of course, I also own a diesel 4WD, my knockabout car“.

Of course it is haulage and towing where EVs really fail. Australia’s long distances and harsh climate make EV haulage utterly impractical. And don’t even mention farming – my friend’s small acreage burns through 1000 litres of diesel per week during sowing or harvest season. The cost of replacing that energy burn with a solar / battery system would be unimaginable.

Monbiot’s vision of environmentalists vindicated is as nonsensical as pretty much everything else he writes. Gasoline and diesel demand is still running strong, as you would expect from a relatively inelastic resource like energy. People are fed up with green incompetence messing up their lives, and will vote for politicians who secure those gasoline and diesel supplies, say by authorising the exploitation of the estimated 158 million barrels of oil currently sitting idle under Gatwick Airport in Britain.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 12 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
55 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
April 19, 2026 10:02 am

Those eyes say it all!

Scissor
Reply to  JeffC
April 19, 2026 10:44 am

Communist Eyes

Reply to  Scissor
April 19, 2026 11:47 am
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
April 20, 2026 10:23 am

Attention…

Reply to  JeffC
April 19, 2026 2:02 pm

loopy loon !!

paul courtney
April 19, 2026 10:08 am

Should give the house troll “………..loaded” credit for a story tip, he cited this fiction to make a point or something.

Reply to  paul courtney
April 19, 2026 11:47 am

Looks like it got a bit too close for comfort 😉

paul courtney
Reply to  Eric Worrall
April 19, 2026 2:15 pm

Mr. Worrall: My take is, a Monbiot lie this hilarious is Mr. ……….loaded’s best shot, and (of course) he was happy to oblige by jumping in and taking credit. Here, he thinks he’s getting the attention he craves, which he can’t differentiate from a beating.

Leon de Boer
Reply to  paul courtney
April 19, 2026 5:17 pm

I think reloaded is a Mrs to take floggings and not fight back is very battered wife syndrome. It would also explain a lot of the fear and emotions in postings.

Reply to  Leon de Boer
April 21, 2026 5:07 am

You forgot to put in crazy cat lady there somewhere.

It would also explain a lot of the fear and emotions in postings.

You confuse me with bnice

DipChip
Reply to  Eric Worrall
April 20, 2026 6:41 am

Initially I assumed you were plagiarizing the Onion.

Tom Halla
April 19, 2026 10:41 am

He is nicknamed Moonbat for a reason.

ntesdorf
Reply to  Tom Halla
April 19, 2026 6:00 pm

I thought he was called ‘Moonbot’.

Ed Zuiderwijk
April 19, 2026 10:53 am

Monbiot has an unwaveringly sure compass pointing to being wrong. I sometimes wonder how he does it but do not care enough to find out.

Reply to  Ed Zuiderwijk
April 20, 2026 12:03 am

Not surprising as he writes for The Guardian.

missoulamike
Reply to  Graemethecat
April 20, 2026 2:12 am

Better to call it The Grauniad

oeman50
Reply to  Ed Zuiderwijk
April 20, 2026 4:21 am

“Through grid-scale batteries, we could quickly eliminate the need for fossil fuel plants”

“Could.” The ultimate weasel word. No mention of costs, transmission limitations, or other such practical matters.

Wrong again.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  oeman50
April 20, 2026 10:28 am

Quickly?

bwahahaha

MarkW
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
April 20, 2026 10:55 am

Before even a quarter of these grid scale batteries could be built, it would be time to start replacing the first ones.
And that is assuming that they haven’t managed to self-immolate prior to being warn out.

As is usual for him, cost doesn’t enter the equation.

mleskovarsocalrrcom
April 19, 2026 10:54 am

Talk about making a silk purse out of a pig’s ear …. all the ‘war’ proved is how much we rely on fossil fuels. “… Through grid-scale batteries, we could quickly eliminate the need for fossil fuel plants as the power source of last resort. This would greatly reduce the price of electricity. …” This is a recurring theme among the alarmists that proves they have no concept of what that really means.

Rud Istvan
Reply to  mleskovarsocalrrcom
April 19, 2026 11:18 am

“All the war did”…was prove how useless the UK and its EU NATO brethren are.
Turns out Iran lied about the range of its ballistic missiles, which put the EU and London in range. No different than it lied about its nuclear intentions, until Trump sent B2s to stop them. And then decimated Iran’s Navy, Air Force, antiaircraft defenses, ballistic missiles, and the capability to make more missiles and drones—making it easy to stop them from trying to go nuclear again if necessary.

The Chemist
Reply to  mleskovarsocalrrcom
April 19, 2026 11:19 am

Might as well have said “through a large herd of flying unicorns…….”

he wants us all to go away- Like the Monty Python parrot…. And soon….

Reply to  mleskovarsocalrrcom
April 19, 2026 12:57 pm

He must think grid-scale batteries are also almost free, like the wind and sun.

paul courtney
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
April 19, 2026 2:22 pm

Mr. Zorzin: My thought too, “grid scale batteries” delivered by unicorns. Mr. Istvan correctly points out Iran lies about ballistic missiles, but if UK relied on the imaginary grid scale batteries, Iran would not need a ballistic missile to hit ’em I bet.

MarkW
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
April 20, 2026 10:58 am

I doubt he’s thought it through. Like most socialists, he believes that as long as government is paying for it, it’s free.

Reply to  mleskovarsocalrrcom
April 20, 2026 12:05 am

George Moonbat honestly believes batteries are a source of energy, not merely a means of storing energy. The Law of Conservation of Energy is beyond him.

MarkW
Reply to  mleskovarsocalrrcom
April 20, 2026 10:57 am

Instead of a power system that is always available and occasionally expensive, he wants to shirt to one the is occasionally available and always expensive.

Rud Istvan
April 19, 2026 10:58 am

Monbiot said “Grid scale batteries…would greatly reduce the price of electricity”. Of course, the opposite is true, as both South Australia and California ‘experiments’ have shown.
No wonder his nickname is Moonbat!

cgh
Reply to  Rud Istvan
April 19, 2026 6:30 pm

Does anyone actually read anything Moonbat writes on anything? This has been going on so long that it seems like mere kabuki theatre – all style and gesture, no substance.

MarkW
Reply to  cgh
April 20, 2026 10:59 am

Apparently Eric does. He deserves hazard pay for it though.

April 19, 2026 11:04 am

Watch the pea under the thimble.

Did you notice that global warming and saving the planet from a heating catastrophe…. all vanished, gone? Now its all energy security and lower prices.

Almost as if the electric society powered by wind and solar was a solution in search of a problem all along.

KevinM
Reply to  michel
April 19, 2026 11:59 am

‘Climate Change’ has been absent in places I’d become used to seeing it. I suspect it shall return after the next election cycle.
(unless a better ‘next thing to worry about’ appears. AI does not scare kids born in this millenium)

Rud Istvan
Reply to  KevinM
April 19, 2026 1:51 pm

Some of the ‘climate change’ gang seem to be converting to ‘microplastics’ even tho there seems to be no ‘there’ there either. The newly alarmist ‘microplastics in the brain’ paper was as sadly scientifically defective as Mann’s hockey stick. Two easy to spot issues in that paper:

  1. Ignored the well known ‘blood brain barrier’ that even prevents many individual drug molecules (e.g. chemotherapeutics) from accessing the brain—even if there were somehow microplastics in the blood, which there aren’t.
  2. Ignored the less well known fact that essential blood lipids (e.g. cholesterol) show up as ‘microplastics’ in the imaging method used.
spetzer86
April 19, 2026 11:19 am

Well, the Enviros wanted to get rid of a Gatwick runway or two anyway.

KevinM
April 19, 2026 11:52 am

“Through grid-scale batteries, we could quickly”

Name something human-made after 1980 that was both grid scale and happened quickly.

I had to edit in the words “human made” because every example that came to mind was a natural disaster.

It took 14 years to build Mount Rushmore in 1941… Imagine that? Barack Obama was the President of the United States in 2012, 14 years ago now. USA would be “just finishing” under Trump now if Obama had started construction then. Would either of those two quietly accept the faces congress spinelessly delegated the other one to select? Would Obama have selected Hugo Chavez instead of Washington? Would Trump replace Jefferson with himself? USA seems to have lost the ability to make grid-scale anything, and the word ‘quickly’ might never have been reasonable.

John Endicott
Reply to  KevinM
April 20, 2026 9:54 am

“Would Trump replace Jefferson with himself?” Not just Jefferson, All the faces. And he’d include, in big bold letters, “Trumpmore” on the side of the monument. Joke (or is it?).

MarkW
Reply to  KevinM
April 20, 2026 11:01 am

I believe work on Mt. Rushmore was halted during the war years.

Bruce Cobb
April 19, 2026 12:11 pm

One moment please…
Checking….
Checking….

Ok, here it is: “Green Energy advocates are still whackjobs, morons, and traitors, just like they’ve always been.”
Thought so.

Mary Jones
April 19, 2026 12:49 pm

Greens who were long dismissed as “idealistic” and “unrealistic” now look like hard-headed pragmatists and true patriots.

Not in the least. They fail at both math AND science, and they completely ignore the mass killing of birds, bats, insects and whales by wind and solar.

April 19, 2026 12:54 pm

“he claimed his vehicle lasted all day on a single charge”

Yuh, riding around an urban area- he could give rides to several people and still not go many miles. Nothing to brag about. But last time I looked, I was told- by many people- that Uber drivers don’t make much of an income- and having to pay for an EV?

CD in Wisconsin
April 19, 2026 1:13 pm

“[H]e claimed his vehicle lasted all day on a single charge – a significant improvement over a few years ago”

I suppose the charge would last all day in Queensland’s tropical climate. But during a polar vortex on a January day in Wisconsin? Seriously? I wonder.

I also can’t help but wonder about Monbiot’s state of mind when his eyes grow to be the size of ping pong balls. Whatever you do Britain, don’t let him fill any meaningful positions of authority.

Denis
April 19, 2026 1:48 pm

Monbiot’s vision: Through grid-scale batteries, we could quickly eliminate the need for fossil fuel plants as the power source of last resort. This would greatly reduce the price of electricity. …

A great idea? Monbiot should invest in battery makers and other industries that can charge those batteries and his cheap electricity would make him the richest man in the world. Is he?

Edward Katz
April 19, 2026 2:10 pm

Monbiot is like the typical climate/environmental dreamer. He puts a positive spin on any occurrence he approves of and denounces any that go against his chronic alarmism. They never let the facts get in the way of reality and that’s why their credibility levels are consistently rock-bottom.

April 19, 2026 3:50 pm

The US attack on Iran quixotic rules made by China has made the need for renewable fossil- and nuclear-fuelled energy inarguable

If the Straits of Hormuz are a single point of failure making renewables an effective alternative then so is a single supplier of those renewables a similar argument for having other forms of energy production.

His idea of ‘grid scale batteries’ is also going to produce myriads of reasons why these are NOT viable

stevo
April 19, 2026 3:56 pm

Monbiot has been a lunatic for as long as I can remember.. Nothing has changed… he still can’t tell reality from fantasy.

Bob
April 19, 2026 4:37 pm

What a joke. Renewables can’t sustain a modern economy even with the help of fossil fuels and nuclear. If we only had renewables our economy would grind down to near zero. Everybody knows that.

Phillip Chalmers
April 19, 2026 4:58 pm

Has the grid synchronisation issue been solved? I cannot find any report to confirm it.
Has affordable, stable and reliable battery technology been invented and mass-produced? Missed that headline too.
How long before someone suggest we just use dilithium crystals, problem solved!

ferdberple
April 19, 2026 6:08 pm

Moonbat confuses oil and electricity as though they are interchangeable. They are not because you need energy to produce electricity. Oil already comes with the energy built in. Electricity is a pipeline to carry energy.

ferdberple
April 19, 2026 6:14 pm

What the war has shown is that leaving the oil in the ground for future generations means you will have no future generations.

KevinM
Reply to  ferdberple
April 20, 2026 1:56 pm

I scanned the GDP by country chart and found #15 South Korea was the only one on the first page that has had a shooting war with a similar-sized opponent in the last 70 years. #1 USA has participated in a lot of wars during that time, but the highest rated opponent was #34 Vietnam. I go to nuclear war as a default civilization ender. What inspires a “no future generations” viewpoint relative to unpumped oil?

Petey Bird
April 20, 2026 7:31 am

Yes, the UK can supply the world with energy from its solar panels and batteries at virtually no cost. Germany is also an energy super power. /s

April 20, 2026 9:51 am

Slightly related, its to do with EVs and a solution for when they catch fire. You should be able to guess the comments before seeing them.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/vca10WYTmPs

KevinM
Reply to  sskinner
April 20, 2026 2:01 pm

Sooooo. The maker of the system is saying EVs catch fire – but not their batteries.

Yeah, the comments are obvious.

What is the penalty for launching a 4-foot long flaming battery at passersby on the highway? into a roadside forest?