Lets Hope Global Temperature Stays Elevated Until the Paris Agreement Collapses

Essay by Eric Worrall

“Such temporary breaches do not mean the Paris Agreement’s long-term climate goals are unattainable” – the desperate UN push to save the Paris Agreement.

Global temperatures set to stay near record levels: UN weather agency

By Vibhu Mishra28 May 2026 Climate and Environment

The world is heading into another period of dangerous heat, a new UN report warns on Thursday, and it’s nearly certain global temperatures over the next five years will stay “at or near record levels” as climate change accelerates across land and sea.

A report produced by the UK Met Office and released on Thursday by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) said there is an 86 per cent chance that at least one year between 2026 and 2030 will surpass 2024 as the hottest year ever recorded.

It also found there is a 91 per cent likelihood that average global temperatures will temporarily exceed 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels during at least one of the next five years.

…

Such temporary breaches do not mean the Paris Agreement’s long-term climate goals are unattainable since the accord refers to warming sustained over decades rather than individual years.

Still, the forecasts underscore the accelerating pace of global warming and the increasing frequency of extreme heat events.

…
Read more: https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/05/1167596

How many years above 1.5C are required to liberate us from this nonsense?

I mean it was fun watching the thermometer creep slowly upwards, watching the propaganda build to a crescendo. Then global temperature suddenly spiked and upset their carefully orchestrated buildup to the world ending 1.5C climax. For a while it was funny – scientists scrambling to redefine 2.0C as the new 1.5C, before they mostly coalesced around the claim that a brief excursion doesn’t really count.

Now it’s just getting boring – it really is time to put the Paris Agreement 1.5C narrative out of its misery. So let’s hope nature obliges, and delivers a sufficient succession of warm years so we don’t have to hear or read this brief excursion nonsense ever again.

5 2 votes

Article Rating

3 Comments

gyan1

May 31, 2026 2:10 pm

The fiction that exceeding 1.5C from the coldest period in the last 10,000 years is a tipping point was one of the most preposterous claims of climate zealots. The Holocene Thermal Optimum was an average of 2C warmer than today for 4,000 years and gave rise to human civilizations world wide. All I get is crickets or name calling from alarmists when I point this out.

Charles Armand

Reply to gyan1

May 31, 2026 2:26 pm

They will tell you that what matters is not the temperature reached in the end, but the (obviously unprecedented) rate at which we are reaching that temperature. I am still waiting for someone to provide me with the exact thermometric record for the last several hundred thousand years. I’m not asking for much. The Phanerozoic goes back more than five hundred million years.

As for the 1.5 degrees Celsius limit, one must know where one is going, even if the path resembles a trip to the madhouse more than anything else.

Edward Katz

May 31, 2026 2:29 pm

So even if it does continue increasing, how has it affected the human population? Has it been dropping along with life expectancy and agricultural output? Or maybe we’d be better off to have a repeat of the Little Ice Age? According to Ellsworth Huntington’s historical/scientific study Mainstreams of Civilization written in 1945, in the 14th Century Britain and Europe showed greater weather extremes than any other period in history. A number of major rivers like the Thames, Rhine and Danube stayed frozen for months because in no other century were so many cold winters recorded. In 1323 horses and sleighs were able to cross the Baltic Sea between Germany and Sweden regularly. Violent spring floods were common almost every second year; yet summer droughts were also frequent so that some rivers like the Danube could actually be forded. In addition, these extremes didn’t stop in Europe since they were recorded as far east as China. Naturally global food supplies were adversely impacted which had the guaranteed negative effect on the human population. How did all this happen without the supposed impact of too much fossil fuel use? Or maybe all this is precisely what the mainstream media and all the NGOs like the UN make certain to keep suppressed because it refutes most of their climate alarmism.