Panic-Stricken Climate Alarmists Resort to Bolder Lies

By Vijay Jayaraj

The panic is real among climate alarmists as their scaremongering of the past three decades loses its power over a public awakening from a spell induced by a corrupt political class and sustained by a compliant business community and media.

So, what is the response of those holding onto the fantasy that humankind is driving the planet to an overheated apocalypse and that politicians who struggle to manage public services could control something as complex as the climate? They attempt to spice up warmed-over lies with more outrageous ones.

This theater of pathetic prevarication was encapsulated perfectly in humid, overcrowded halls of the recent COP30, the 30th version of the United Nations’ annual climate conference. Year after year, celebrities of politics, business and entertainment fly to exotic locations, burning thousands of gallons of jet fuel, to admonish working people who insist on driving to their jobs and to pressure the Third World to accept energy poverty for the sake of a world that theoretically might be cooler by a degree or two. The hypocrisy is matched only by the thirst for power and other people’s money.

Held this year in Belém, Brazil, with the Amazon providing a lush backdrop, the smell of desperation was in the air. And speaking of public services, so was the occasional stench of cranky indoor plumbing.

Al Gore, the United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stood before cameras warning of imminent catastrophe, never acknowledging that previous predictions had failed to materialize.

Here is a sampling of falsehoods:

  • The Lie: “The transition away from fossil fuels is inevitable and accelerating.” The Truth: Global demand for oil, gas, and coal is at an all-time high. The “transition” lives only in press releases of Western governments. The rest of the world is drilling and mining.
  • The Lie: “Climate action creates jobs and wealth.” The Truth: “Green mandates destroy industry.” Look at Germany’s deindustrialization and the wreckage of the automotive sector in the U.S. and Europe. “Green jobs” are subsidized mirages that vanish the moment government subsidies disappear.
  • The Lie: “We are running out of time.” The Truth: “We have heard this for 50 years and counting.” In the 1970s, it was a coming ice age. In the 2000s, it was Arctic ice that would be gone by 2013. The timeline of doom makes the promise of a used car salesman look like a Boy Scout’s pledge.

Gore attacked President Donald Trump’s move away from the cultic climate movement, knowing that without the checkbook of the U.S. taxpayer the U.N.’s redistribution schemes are dead.

Gore even turned his fire on one of his own, Bill Gates. Why? Because Gates dared to suggest that perhaps, just perhaps, more immediate threats like hunger and disease should be prioritized over the climate crusade’s nebulous, ever-shifting goalposts. Members of the climate elite have become so intoxicated by their own dogma that any deviation – even from a fellow traveler like Gates – is considered treason.

Something as ambitious as COP30’s “Global Ethical Stocktake” – an initiative to create a governance structure superseding national sovereignty – can ill afford dissent among the faithful. Their vision is to direct countries away from coal plants, oil drilling, meat consumption and so on to “save the planet” from a made-up crisis.

To manage dissent, COP30 advanced a “Global Initiative for Information Integrity on Climate Change.” While framed as a defense of truth, it would be Orwellian worldwide censorship.

The real misinformation has been repeated predictions of apocalypse, fabricated links between bad weather and a harmless gas necessary for life on Earth and attacks on the reputations of those who question climate orthodoxy.

Gore ended his main COP30 speech urging data-driven action. Following that advice would include examinations of crop harvests, changes in standards of living and deaths from natural disasters. All have been trending in a positive direction for decades – good news that only adds to the panic.

This commentary was first published by Townhall on December 6, 2025.

Vijay Jayaraj is a Science and Research Associate at the CO2 Coalition, Fairfax, Virginia. He holds an M.S. in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia and a postgraduate degree in energy management from Robert Gordon University, both in the U.K., and a bachelor’s in engineering from Anna University, India.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
5 21 votes
Article Rating
54 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
December 14, 2025 6:15 am

The Lie: “The transition away from fossil fuels is inevitable and accelerating.” The Truth: Global demand for oil, gas, and coal is at an all-time high. The “transition” lives only in press releases of Western governments. The rest of the world is drilling and mining.

I wouldn’t be so sure about that, but time will tell. Demand would be far higher without renewables.

Mr.
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 14, 2025 6:22 am

and that would b a good thing.

Reply to  Mr.
December 14, 2025 6:29 am

Not for countries that have to import them. Which is the majority. More independence never hurts.

Mr.
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 14, 2025 6:45 am

Every grid that has had weather dependent generation has resulted in higher electricity pricing for consumers.

They’re better off financially to keep using the imported, reliable proper fuels.

Reply to  Mr.
December 14, 2025 6:53 am

Europe got a very expensive lesson in what “reliable imports” mean.

Do Renewables Really Raise Electricity Prices? What the Data Shows
https://ace-usa.org/blog/research/research-environmental-policy/do-renewables-really-raise-electricity-prices-what-the-data-shows/

Available evidence does not support a direct link between renewable energy adoption and rising electricity prices. Analysis of data from 2000-2024 reveals no statistically significant correlation between wind and solar generation growth and inflation-adjusted electricity prices, despite a 97-fold increase in renewable generation.

Mr.
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 14, 2025 7:06 am

🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
This claim is lifted straight from Obi-Wan Kanobe’s “these aren’t the drones you’re looking for”

Mr.
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 14, 2025 7:32 am

From your linked article –

” . . electricity appears to have increased 91 percent from 2000 to 2024 . . . “

Then waffles on about how cheap renewable power is to generate, and if only it didn’t need to be backed up and transmitted, it would be fantastically cheap.

(and fantasy is what it is)

SxyxS
Reply to  Mr.
December 14, 2025 9:34 am

Well, Angela Merkel openly stated that electricity in Germany is way to cheap, and then she started tearing the infrastructure down.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 14, 2025 7:37 am

Then what’s the cause of extremely high electricity costs in CA, the UK and Germany?

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
December 14, 2025 10:09 am

Add CA, NY and Oz. They are on a path to collapse and ruin.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 14, 2025 12:15 pm

Your own report shows that only sites with less than 20% renewables were sampled. Talk about cherry picking. The ruinous effects of renewables are well known to expand exponentially after 20%.

Ontario has peaks of as much as 40% wind power induced by feed in guarantees and subsidies. This drove the price of electricity so high that the government had to subsidize the customers to prevent a ratepayers revolt. Sometimes, in low demand, wind produces more than Ontario can use, so they sell it into the US at negative prices. So Ontario is subsidizing the production of wind power, subsidizing the US to take some of it, and subsidizing their residents to be able to use it.

Or how about Germany where a similar trick has been played by moving renewable surcharges from the cost calculation and absorbed into federal budget and grid charges to disguise the crippling cost of renewables.

Your study is a lie within a lie wrapped up in a lie.

Michael Flynn
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 14, 2025 10:51 pm

Do Renewables Really Raise Electricity Prices? What the Data Shows.

It doesn’t matter how cheap electricity is if there isn’t any when you want it. A bit like “free beer tomorrow”.

Reply to  Mr.
December 14, 2025 7:35 am

And those imported fossil fuels can be stored a lot easier and cheaper than storing electricity in a battery.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 14, 2025 7:34 am

Not if you pay more for the ruinables than imported fossil fuels. (considering all real costs)

erlrodd
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 14, 2025 9:17 am

Countries that have to import gas/oil likely also have to import all components of solar arrays, windmills, backup systems, and transmission connections. The basic economics are the same anywhere: Fossil Fuel generated electricity has capital cost (at work market price) and fuel cost (at world market price) and solar/windmills have capital cost (at world market price) and operating costs. Yest those market prices differ in different places, but usually don’t change the fact that gas generated electricity costs less than solar/windmills. Where the opposite is true, nations should build other than fossil fuel generation. This has often been true with developing hydro, even on a fairly small scale.

William Howard
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 14, 2025 6:35 am

and without massive subsidies the intermittent aka renewable energy industry falls apart – we’re watching it live

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 14, 2025 6:54 am

Not really, since you have to maintain dispatchable power no matter how many “renewables” you have.

MarkW
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 14, 2025 8:24 am

The truth is that renewables don’t reduce the demand for fossil fuels.
Fossil fuel plants have to be kept running so that they can step in and take over when the wind drops, or a cloud passes over a solar field.

Reply to  MarkW
December 14, 2025 8:32 am

Really?

Then why did their imports decline?

IEA: Renewables have cut fossil-fuel imports for more than 100 countries
https://www.carbonbrief.org/iea-renewables-have-cut-fossil-fuel-imports-for-more-than-100-countries/

Ex-KaliforniaKook
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 14, 2025 9:43 am

You are pitifully gullible. Do you get taken by email scams a lot?

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 14, 2025 11:37 am

Fossil fuel plants have to be kept running so that they can step in and take over when the wind drops, or a cloud passes over a solar field.”

So, you have no explanation how electricity is provided when there is no wind, or no sun. OK !

Michael Flynn
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 14, 2025 10:54 pm

Then why did their imports decline?

They didn’t. They just imported more things which needed “fossil fuels” to produce them.

strativarius
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 14, 2025 8:47 am

YourUsernameRefloated

Reply to  strativarius
December 14, 2025 11:44 am

And still deluded.

Reply to  bnice2000
December 14, 2025 12:04 pm

You also haven’t changed.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 14, 2025 12:47 pm

Thank you, Unlike you, I avoid delusion causing substances.

Michael Flynn
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 14, 2025 10:57 pm

You also haven’t changed.

That sounds like the sort of comment an ignorant and gullible idiot (who believes that adding CO2 to air makes it hotter) would make.

Feel free to correct me.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 14, 2025 11:40 am

(graph didn’t attach) trying again

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 14, 2025 11:42 am

Wind and solar have had basically zero effect on energy from real sources.

World-Energy-Wind-Solar-2024-Article
Reply to  bnice2000
December 14, 2025 12:12 pm

From the Energy Institute (I guess the site your graph is from):

Since 2010 renewables and nuclear have avoided the use of 1,371 exajoules of fossil fuels, nearly two and a half times the entire energy supplied globally in 2024.

Investment in renewables in particular is increasingly being seen as a cornerstone of energy security, enabling countries to disconnect their energy systems from global fuel markets and geopolitical tensions. Technologies such as wind, solar, hydro, and geothermal that draw on homegrown resources reduce the need to import energy from abroad.

https://www.energyinst.org/statistical-review

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 14, 2025 12:44 pm

LOL, anyone can see from the graph that energy use is growing faster than combine wind and solar.

Wind and solar aren’t even keeping up with the demand increase.

And they probably took about twice as energy much to produce than the fossil fuel use the activists say the saved….

.. not to mention all the toxic chemicals used in their manufacturing, the toxic waste that get pumped into sludge lakes, environmental degradation during installation, and during use, and toxic landfill at end of their short erratic unproductive life.

Michael Flynn
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 14, 2025 11:05 pm

Technologies such as wind, solar, hydro, and geothermal . . .

Try connecting a light to a “technology”. You need “stuff” to provide electricity or heat – and “stuff” costs. You’ll find the devil is in the details.

OK for niche requirements, and has been used as such for hundreds (or thousands) of years. Otherwise, just fodder for the ignorant and gullible.

Colin Belshaw
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 14, 2025 12:52 pm

Which is fine . . . and the thinking is more than utterly and pathetically delusional.
You see . . . you have NOT take into account the requirement on metals and minerals that are demanded by anything to do with net zero by 2050. And these are materials that don’t, somehow, just appear out of nowhere.
So may I suggest – only a suggestion – you now do a scoping-level feasibility study on whether it is geologically, let alone mining industry possible, to achieve the production of these metals and minerals at the rates required to build the wind turbines, solar panels, increase grid sizes by 3-fold, produce EV batteries for the replacement of 1.4 billion ICEVs, and provide massive batteries to provide for when there’s no wind and no sun . . . which will allow for the elimination of fossil fuels by 2050.
That question asked, now you’re a bit unsure of yourself . . . I absolutely guarantee. But you’re not alone – not a single western country has actually embarked upon such a feasibility exercise . . . except Finland.

strativarius
December 14, 2025 6:15 am

Their day is drawing to a close, and they know it. The hanged man thrashes around violently before expiring. Why would the malicious, bigoted and contemptuous alarmists be any different.

For bolder read more absurd.

2hotel9
December 14, 2025 6:44 am

When all you have are lies all you can do is scream them louder.

I'm not a robot
December 14, 2025 7:13 am

Others have commented on the nature of the advertisements we see now on WUWT.

I must express my displeasure with the pornographic images.

I could not look away from that dribbling egg yolk.

Reply to  I'm not a robot
December 14, 2025 8:34 am

Then subscribe, Doofus. Give yourself a Xmas present. Stop being a cheap screw.

Others have commented that if you don’t pay the toll, you shouldn’t be allowed to comment, and I endorse those sentiments.

Also, while we’re on that topic, buy a copy or two of Climate At A Glance to gift your friends and/or read yourself.

Merry Christmas to all. Here’s hoping for a warmer future with plenty of CO2.

I'm not a robot
Reply to  OR For
December 14, 2025 8:50 am

I wasn’t complaining, but the shaming works anyway. I’ll pay up.

Ex-KaliforniaKook
Reply to  OR For
December 14, 2025 10:10 am

I have subscribed. I still see the ads. I didn’t think you could avoid them. I subscribed because of all the features you get for subscribing.

I only see the ads when I go back one page. If I go back two, I avoid them.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Ex-KaliforniaKook
December 14, 2025 12:20 pm

I don’t see any ads. I’m subscribed, but not at the premier level.

Reply to  Ex-KaliforniaKook
December 14, 2025 3:38 pm

Ad Free annual subscription is $66 (US). It’s a tiny, itty bitty amount to pay for THE website that has fought the good fight for 20 years and saved you $billions. WUWT kicked ass. This site lit the climate realism fire that has spread across the world. A gratuity is most appropriate.

strativarius
Reply to  I'm not a robot
December 14, 2025 8:55 am

“I could not look away from that dribbling egg yolk.”

If you cannot tune that stuff out, or at least ignore it…

The Complete Self-Discipline Course – Control Your Own Life

Reply to  I'm not a robot
December 14, 2025 10:28 am

You should obtain an ad blocker. Firstly, try searching for “uBlock Origin” from your browser extension store if it has one. Do this search: Where can I obtain an ad blocker? There are free ad blockers available.

When I got my new Lenovo laptop, my tech savy son installed an ad blocker but he did not tell me that he installed it.

Awhile back I went to website and there appeared on the first screen
in big letters “Turn off ad blocker”. No thank you. I quickly returned to
WUWT.

Reply to  I'm not a robot
December 14, 2025 11:49 am

I think they are funny.. Absolutely irrelevant and total nonsense ads.

Obviously they sort of know you location, but nothing about your location.

They are sort of BOGUS ads.. and I can’t see how they cold possibly generate any income for WUWT..

surely WUWT can get better ads.! The quality of the ads demeans the site

Michael Flynn
Reply to  bnice2000
December 14, 2025 11:13 pm

surely WUWT can get better ads.! 

I suspect the ads (I just skip them, I guess) are aimed at the ignorant and gullible.

If Anthony gets paid to host them, well done Anthony!

I'm not a robot
Reply to  bnice2000
December 16, 2025 4:45 pm

My comment was meant to be humorous…

Explaining never makes it better.

NotChickenLittle
Reply to  I'm not a robot
December 14, 2025 2:23 pm

I probably shouldn’t tell you, but on my phone using Opera and on my laptop using Brave, I see no ads whatsoever…

Bob
December 14, 2025 12:49 pm

I can’t imagine looking to Gore for anything unless I intended to scam someone.

Edward Katz
December 14, 2025 2:11 pm

In addition, a combination of government and environmental organization funding pressures the mainstream media in a number of countries to pounce on any slightly extraordinary weather event and equate it to climate change driven of course by human activities. A typical example in
Canada just this last week was the consistently alarmist CBC, which after heavy rains and flooding in southern British Columbia and parts of adjacent Washington state, promptly dusted off a mini-documentary to be shown on the national news that claimed such floods are likely to be more frequent because of a warming climate. Whether such events had ever occurred before, it never mentioned, but this is the type of propaganda that can be expected as the doom & gloom crowd desperately searches to regain what little credibility it ever had.

Reply to  Edward Katz
December 15, 2025 2:53 am

I heard a meteorologist this morning refer to the cause of the large amount of rain in the American northwest as an AR.

Atmospheric Rivers used to be called the Pineapple Express back before CO2 became a political issue.

How about calling them PE’s? I guess that would be too tame for today’s world.

December 14, 2025 3:00 pm

Lazard, an investment firm, created the fictional LCOE, a bogus measure which ignores both engineering and economic realities.

Empirical reality:

601008503_10166421309826124_1462702966149913114_n
December 15, 2025 2:02 pm

“The transition away from fossil fuels is inevitable and accelerating.” The Truth: Global demand for oil, gas, and coal is at an all-time high.

The Lie: “We are running out of time.” 

We are running out of time, but for a different reason than their apocalyptic evidence-free doomsaying about global warming, sea level rise, and all the other imagined disasters they’ve tossed in to scare everyone.

How soon we need to transition from petrol and coal as primary energy sources is unknown, but it’s not indefinite. And that transition will happen naturally as the price of fossil fuels increases due to diminishing resources. In their tyrannical efforts to force a transition long before it needs to happen naturally, the leftist ruling class and their deranged supporters are destructively distorting market forces and generating all kinds of problems that are far worse than the imagined disaster they think they’re averting.

The collective ingenuity of millions of motivated, smart humans chasing their own profit motives that yield greater efficiency and lower costs will eventually move us to energy and propulsion technologies that will supplant the fossil fuel economy, just like fossil fuels replaced the biomass-based energy and propulsion technologies of the early 19th century that were unsustainable.

Based on where we are now, I’d bet on nuclear fission as the dominant grid-scale power source in the next century, but who knows? Thanks to fracking technology there are some interesting developments in geothermal that may make it more economical and widely available. Propulsion for planes and automobiles? We may have to transition to a way to store energy instead of extracting already-stored energy from fossil fuels, but again, who knows? Maybe the miniature Mr. Fusion of Back to the Future will become a thing, or rather, a Mr. Fission. There a lot of bright minds working on all this. The future’s so bright I’ve gotta wear shades.

December 15, 2025 3:26 pm

WHISTLEBLOWER and former investment banker DESIREE FIXLER expose what she says is one of the biggest scams of the modern era. UN, WEF, and the big Corporations are all in on the scam, well knowing that all is based on lies. Working inside of Deutsche Bank and WEF, she came to realize it was all based on lies and a plot by the big players to scam all the world. They invented the CLIMATE CRISIS out of thin air with no evidence. This scam is A TRILLION DOLLAR business for those who are in on it. And they will not give up this easily. This is not about climate science at all!



December 17, 2025 12:42 am

hallo