Somebody Please Tell Kathy Hochul That The Climate Jig Is Up

From the MANHATTAN CONTRARIAN

It’s Climate Week here in New York, and you can feel the excitement. The UN General Assembly is in town, and simultaneously something called the “Climate Group” (“Our mission is to drive climate action. Fast.”) is holding some 600 (!) events to promote policies that they somehow believe will “save the planet.”

At one of these events yesterday, New York Governor Kathy Hochul showed up to deliver what she probably thought was a significant policy speech. The Governor’s web page describes the speech this way:

Earlier today, Governor Kathy Hochul announced New York’s participation in the U.S. Climate Alliance’s Governors’ Climate-Ready Workforce Initiative to grow career pathways in climate and clean energy fields, strengthen workforce diversity, and jointly train 1 million new registered apprentices across the Alliance’s states and territories by 2035. Governor Hochul made the announcement today at a Climate Week NYC event, which also featured her Alliance Co-Chair New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham, founding Alliance member Washington Governor Jay Inslee, and White House National Climate Advisor Ali Zaidi.

In the speech the Gov went on and on about how in New York the energy transition is really happening and is going to create zillions of “green jobs”:

We’re not talking about some transition happening in the future, we’re talking about it unfolding right now, and that’s what we’re so excited about. And we’re opening the doors to underrepresented communities. And I go to these job sites all the time and I want to see more women and people of color and the unions recognize this. That’s where they’re doing their recruiting, because these industries had been previously closed off to them.

She may be “so excited,” but while our airhead governor isn’t looking the world is passing her by. A few data points from the past few days:

  • The Wall Street Journal has a front-page article today, with headline and sub-headline “America’s Ambitious Climate Plan Is Faltering. Global emissions are at records, while shift away from fossil fuels slows amid high costs, surging power demand.” There are obligatory nods to the supposed climate crisis (this is the Journal’s news pages, not the opinion section), but there is no avoiding the reality. Examples from the article: “Climate optimism is fading. Higher costs, pushback from businesses and consumers, and the slow rollout of technology are delaying the transition from fossil fuels. . . . Investment in improving the efficiency of buildings—a major driver of emissions—fell last year, the International Energy Agency says. Spending decisions happening now can lock in emissions for decades. Multibillion-dollar liquefied-natural-gas terminals being built in Texas and Louisiana could serve a projected demand boom in places such as Southeast Asia.” 
  • How’s that EV roll-out going? From Reuters, September 19: “[A]uto industry . . . data [released] on Thursday . . . showed the fourth consecutive monthly drop in EV sales, prompting the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA) to demand “urgent action” to prevent further decline. . . . Sales of fully electric cars slumped 43.9% in August, as the bloc’s biggest EV markets Germany and France recorded drops of 68.8% and 33.1% respectively, ACEA said.” Those are rather dramatic drops. In the usual European way, the manufacturers’ trade association took consumer resistance to buying EVs as an opportunity to demand more government subsidies and mandates: “[The ACEA said that] EU institutions [need] to come forward with urgent relief measures before new CO2 targets for cars and vans come into effect in 2025.”
  • This one is from a few weeks ago, but another so-called “green hydrogen” project has failed. It was only two months ago that I had a post on the failure of a big green hydrogen project in Australia. The latest such failure, last month, comes from Germany. From Hydrogen Insight, August 14: “The refusal of potential green hydrogen customers to sign binding sales agreements, as well as uncertainty over the price of the product, contributed to the collapse of a plan to build a renewable H2 project in the German city of Hannover. . . . [Officials originally] estimat[ed] that it would cost around €25m. However, by the time the project was cancelled in March this year, costs had ballooned five-fold to around €136m.” This was for just a 17 MW facility.

Maybe some day those “underreprestented communities” that Governor Hochul talks about will figure out that what’s holding them back is reliance on government planning and handouts as the route to economic betterment.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
4.8 23 votes
Article Rating
49 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
starzmom
September 26, 2024 6:17 am

This morning, New York state is generating 64% of its in-state electricity from fossil fuels, and about 5% from wind and solar. This ratio if typical.

Reply to  starzmom
September 26, 2024 6:25 am

In my travels to visit relatives in western NY, I saw some new additions to the landscape between Middletown and Binghamton along NY 17/ I-86 – some huge new windmills visible from the highway.

In the five times I could see them (daylight trips only) all were stationary four out of the five times I saw them.

The fifth time was a very windy day, the type that pushes your car around on the highway and hardly “typical and everyday” weather for the area.

So in my random sample, non-functional 80% of the time. “Transition,” my ass.

Hochul would look well suited in an SS uniform. What an idiot.

starzmom
Reply to  AGW is Not Science
September 26, 2024 7:16 am

Based on my experience traveling, I think what you are seeing is typical. I travel a lot, and always look at wind farms carefully, so long as I am not driving. In the midwest, 100 turbine wind farms or wind farm clusters are pretty common. Usually, by my count anywhere from 10-20% are not turning at all, and others are moving. This says to me it is not a wind problem but a maintenance problem. I will qualify this statement by saying that I have no idea whether or not turbines are turning at their rated capacity or something less. We have also watched an entire wind farm die down at dusk–going from most turning to none turning in about 10 minutes.

atticman
Reply to  starzmom
September 26, 2024 7:26 am

At dusk? You mean just when they’re supposed to be taking over from solar?

starzmom
Reply to  atticman
September 26, 2024 7:56 am

Uh, yup. Hope they had spinning reserve somewhere.

Reply to  starzmom
September 26, 2024 2:01 pm

here’s the spinning reserve

Untitled
J Boles
Reply to  starzmom
September 26, 2024 9:14 am

I have noticed it usually grows calm at dusk.

Reply to  J Boles
September 26, 2024 10:28 am

Yes, but not above 200 feet which is where the turbines are… Its caused by the air and the land becoming the same temperature at dusk so vertical convection ceases for a while…and so the boundary layer sticks to the ground.

Reply to  Leo Smith
September 26, 2024 2:02 pm

yet, we often see them doing nothing at dusk

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  starzmom
September 26, 2024 10:32 am

A lot of people do not understand that local winds die when the sun sets? Why? The thermal updrafts caused by warm soil pulls air in. It’s a circulation phenomenon. No sun, no warm dirt, no updrafts, no wind influx.

Reply to  starzmom
September 26, 2024 1:58 pm

“none turning in about 10 minutes”

Well, I guess it’s time to turn off your heater or AC, your TV, your computer, your oven and of course stop charging that EV! And feel proud you’re helping to save the planet and helping China to thrive and rule the world.

Reply to  AGW is Not Science
September 26, 2024 1:56 pm

Her and governor Healey of Wokeachusetts! Yes, in SS uniforms.

Reply to  starzmom
September 26, 2024 7:14 am

Just checked (10 am) the New England – ISO page, they’re at about 4% W&S. In my state, all energy providers are required to purchase renewable energy credits (RECs) for 37% of their supply, which seems way out of line with the reality of generation. My assumption is that this is some form of meaningless, but expensive, Green cronyism, but if anyone knows better, please advise.

StephenP
Reply to  Frank from NoVA
September 26, 2024 7:56 am

Shouldn’t the electricity generators have to supply 37%, even if they have to buy on the open market when the wind doesn’t blow.
Yesterday UK wind was providing 0.6GW for 5 hours in the middle of the day. Why don’t the MSM ask Mr Milliband how we get by without FF generation?

Reply to  StephenP
September 26, 2024 8:13 am

My understanding is that the requirement to purchase RECs is used to subsidize non-economic energy sources that wouldn’t exist in an unhampered market, hence the volume of RECs doesn’t directly map to the volume of energy actually generated. They are analogous to Medieval indulgences, which clearly had little impact on the commitment of sins. Other than that, I don’t know a lot about them, probably because the more opaque they are, the easier it is to hide their cost in customers’ bills.

Reply to  StephenP
September 26, 2024 10:17 am

Yes, but then the boondoggle doesn’t work. If the worse-than-useless wind and solar “providers” had to pay for the “backup” for all the times when their crap isn’t working, or isn’t producing the amount promised, not a single “wind farm” or “solar farm” would ever have been built.

Because there is no economic case for these things when they have to compete on a level playing field.

starzmom
Reply to  Frank from NoVA
September 26, 2024 7:58 am

Sounds about right for New England. No matter how much lipstick they put on it, fossil generation is 60-65% across the board.

Reply to  Frank from NoVA
September 26, 2024 2:03 pm

“Green cronyism”

I prefer the term, Mafia rackets.

Scarecrow Repair
September 26, 2024 6:18 am

Government: what can’t it screw up? It’s how we screw with other people before they screw with us.

observa
September 26, 2024 6:50 am

When they’re losing hearts and minds there’s only one solution-
Labor’s misinformation bill is ‘bonkers’ (msn.com)
Their final solution as usual.

starzmom
September 26, 2024 7:18 am

The Southwest Power Pool just dropped their accredited wind capacity to 14.5% of their actual installed generating capacity. And we are the windy Great Plains!

Tony Sullivan
September 26, 2024 8:04 am

And we’re opening the doors to underrepresented communities. And I go to these job sites all the time and I want to see more women and people of color and the unions recognize this. That’s where they’re doing their recruiting, because these industries had been previously closed off to them.

Complete word salad blathering by Hochul. These industries aren’t closed off to anyone. You either have the qualifications to perform a job, regardless of industry, or you don’t. Period.

starzmom
Reply to  Tony Sullivan
September 26, 2024 8:08 am

Bingo. I completely fail to see what the race or gender of the workers has to do with anything. These types of jobs require competent people. It is a safety matter.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  starzmom
September 26, 2024 10:34 am

You obviously are not on the DEI band wagon or fell off at the first speed hump.

Reply to  starzmom
September 26, 2024 11:20 am

Yeah the squeegee guys who keep the solar panels clean need to be top dogs! 😆😅🤣

That’s the only lasting “green jobs” they’ll be “creating.”

Reply to  starzmom
September 26, 2024 11:27 am

Yes, these vile people have to inject racism into places where there is none. It gives them something to do and, more importantly, gets them paid.

Fortunately, more people are catching on to the fact that it’s them who are the racists.

…… and that they are surplus to requirements.

Curious George
Reply to  Tony Sullivan
September 26, 2024 10:35 am

Is a madhouse an underrepresented community?

Reply to  Curious George
September 26, 2024 3:49 pm

There are lots of underrepresented communities.
In fact, as much as 49% of all people living in democracies are underrepresented.

Reply to  Tony Sullivan
September 26, 2024 11:22 am

Well the democrats have to keep up the “POC” boot-licking. Election day is comin’.

Reply to  Tony Sullivan
September 26, 2024 2:08 pm

“people of color”

Once upon a time, such folks were called “colored people”- but then that term became a negative- so now it’s OK to call them “people of color”. Big difference, right? 🙂

Of course the NAACP still exists.

John Hultquist
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
September 26, 2024 8:40 pm

Then there are the “historically black colleges and universities” [HBCU]
You can look it up!

Reply to  John Hultquist
September 27, 2024 3:08 am

They must be racist! And, I think all male too! /s

oeman50
Reply to  Tony Sullivan
September 27, 2024 5:20 am

And what happens to these “women and people of color,” when those jobs go down the toilet?

strativarius
September 26, 2024 9:00 am

It’s Climate Week here in New York

Could you hang on to Sadiq Khan for us?

Reply to  strativarius
September 26, 2024 10:32 am

s /on to // g…

Reply to  strativarius
September 26, 2024 2:13 pm

Climate week here in Wokeachusetts too. The new climate religion will probably make Climate Week into a new annual celebration/holiday- maybe kinda like Lent. Instead of giving up ice cream or whiskey or whatever, you promise to give up all CO2.

davidinredmond
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
September 26, 2024 4:17 pm

waiting to exhale

J Boles
September 26, 2024 9:25 am

Remember those BIG climate marches? Wait until energy prices go thru the roof, they will be marching instead for lower energy prices and more fossil fuels. Popcorn please!

Sparta Nova 4
September 26, 2024 10:30 am

Most people do not comprehend in the slightest how governments get money to spend.

September 26, 2024 11:17 am

It blows my mind that with example after example of major job losses after installing significant amounts of unreliable energy (see Spain, Germany, England) lying fools still spout this obvious nonsense.

Reply to  ringworldrefugee
September 26, 2024 12:30 pm

Big Tech is starting to back nuclear. It won’t be long until they quit funding wind and solar.

Reply to  ringworldrefugee
September 26, 2024 4:22 pm

The lying fools are losing THEIR jobs- the more they lie, the bigger promotions they get.

September 26, 2024 12:28 pm

The climate jig isn’t up until the big-money men funding the Democrats give up. As long as they fund the candidates this sham will continue.

Bob
September 26, 2024 12:48 pm

There is no risk greater than bad government, the proof is all around us. If we don’t do anything other than outlaw government mandates we would be on our way to prosperity. Remove all mandates now.

September 26, 2024 1:51 pm

wow, ZILLIONS of green jobs! Probably everyone on the planet should be able to get one. /s

September 26, 2024 1:54 pm

You think the NY governor is a nut job? The governor of Wokeachusetts has declared this CLIMATE WEEK! WTF?

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
September 26, 2024 3:56 pm

Climate week is like shark week. At some point there will be a big bite taken.

John Hultquist
September 26, 2024 8:32 pm

“Somebody Please Tell Kathy Hochul …
As my Irish grandmother said: You can always tell an Irishman, but you can’t tell him much. I wonder if she ever said that of the Irish women? 😇

John Hultquist
September 26, 2024 8:53 pm

Washington Governor Jay Inslee
He will need a new job in less than 4 months.
He must be networking in NY.