The “World’s Dumbest Energy Policy” Just Got Dumber…The Frightening Race To Reset By World War

From the NoTricksZone

By P Gosselin

Just when we thought leaders couldn’t possibly screw things up more…now Europe faces a massively crippling energy shock and the German Chancellor closes pipeline…NATO’s frightening race to war with Russia. 

The inflation rate in Germany stood at +4.9% in January, 2022. In December 2021, it had been +5.3% when it reached its highest level in almost 30 years.

Chart: Destatis.

Soaring energy costs

The main inflation driver for Germany is energy, which in January saw an increase of 20.5% year on year.

According the the the Federal Statistical Office, motor fuel prices jumped 24.8% and household energy prices 18.3%, year on year. The price of home heating oil rose a whopping 51.9%, natural gas up 32.2% and electricity +11.1%.

The steep price rise for energy products was affected by several factors: 1) the CO2 charge that increased from 25 euros to 30 euros per metric ton of CO2 at the beginning of the year and 2) higher electricity prices.

Escalating to war

Now worries are growing that the situation Europe is about to get a lot worse.

Earlier today Chancellor Olaf Scholz announced that Germany was suspending the approval process for the Russian-German Nord Stream 2 natural gas pipeline – which means it cannot go online. The pipeline was built to be a major supply line to meet Germany’s energy needs as the country takes nuclear and coal power plants offline.

“55% of Germany’s natural gas demand is met by Russia’s Gazprom. Gas storage facilities in the country are currently only 31% full,” reports Disclose.tv.

2000 euros for 1000 cubic meters of gas

Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chair of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, reacted with a forceful tweet to the German move:

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz has issued an order to halt the process of certifying the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline. Well. Welcome to the brave new world where Europeans are very soon going to pay €2.000 for 1.000 cubic meters of natural gas!

— Dmitry Medvedev (@MedvedevRussiaE) February 22, 2022

Nuclear superpowers’ mad race to world war

All signs point to an escalating Ukraine conflict that threatens to fly out of control, possibly unleashing a World War between nuclear super-powers Russia and NATO.It’s reported: “NATO has put more than 100 fighter jets on high alert, and 120 allied ships are underway in what Stoltenberg called ‘the most dangerous moment for European security in a generation.’”Stock up everyone. it’s not looking good. We’re being run by dangerous, reckless madmen.

4.3 40 votes
Article Rating
423 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
W Smith
February 23, 2022 6:03 am

Next: Russia turns off the tap on the existing pipeline.

Reply to  W Smith
February 23, 2022 7:13 am

Exactly. I think this was on Putin’s agenda from the beginning.

Christopher Hagan
Reply to  W Smith
February 23, 2022 7:14 am

No. There will be a local war and “someone” will shell the pipeline. The Russians will blame the Ukrainians and the Ukrainians will blame the Russians but then the Europeans will force Ukraine to the peace table with Russia or their citizens will freeze to death.

Reply to  Christopher Hagan
February 24, 2022 11:22 am

not likely to freeze to death any time soon you numpty!!
It’s spring in Europe now and the flowers are already here.

Putin was forced by his own crass stupidity to act now or within weeks comes the “season of unending mud”.

Derg
Reply to  pigs_in_space
March 1, 2022 4:53 am

Or was Putin lured in by the CIA 🤔

Duane
Reply to  W Smith
February 23, 2022 7:16 am

Thereby guaranteeing that Germany will find sources of gas elsewhere. Putin is proving the point the US has been making for years that depending upon Russian oil and gas is a fool’s bet. Totally proven.

Reply to  Duane
February 23, 2022 7:41 am

Funny how loudly the media have declared that Trump only told lies and got nothing right. I am no Trump fan but try and be honest enough to give credit where it is due. He was certainly right about the need and importance of the US being energy independent. Strangely he was also right about a number of other matters that were not insignificant like the need to clamp down on drugs pouring in across the southern border and China’s role as one of the major suppliers.

Reply to  Michael in Dublin
February 23, 2022 8:07 am

I think Trump was smart enough to let sane advisers in the GOP tell him what was what on foreign policy.
No doubt that whoever advises Biden isn’t out of nappies (diapers) yet…

ex-KaliforniaKook
Reply to  Leo Smith
February 23, 2022 4:37 pm

Scary thing is that when Biden is meeting with his Cabinet and advisers, he may be the smartest man in the room.

And Biden exhibits signs of advanced dementia.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  ex-KaliforniaKook
February 23, 2022 5:54 pm

That’s right. The entire Democrat leadership are a bunch of morons who don’t have a clue about the real world or how to handle dictators.

They are good at corruption and criminality, though. Putin is just lucky he’s not running for president of the U.S. Then, the Democrats would pursue him relentlessly.

As it is, the Democrats will only place inconsequential sanctions on Putin. This may be because the Biden family got a big, $3.5 million payoff from the Russians in the past and Biden wants to keep that quiet, so he kowtows to Putin, acting tough and doing nothing substantial.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 23, 2022 7:23 pm

Dem/Progs are good at thinking up overly expensive social programs that are partially paid for by increasing taxes on Republicans, the rest is charged to the national debt.

That has been going on for at least 50 years, and we have a $30 TRILLION debt to prove it.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 24, 2022 7:17 am

The extent of dysfunction cannot be explained by the incompetence and corruption of just one man.

lee
Reply to  Leo Smith
February 23, 2022 9:30 pm

I think you mean back in diapers. Depends. 😉

Reply to  Michael in Dublin
February 23, 2022 10:01 am

Don’t forget, Trump was a business executive who builds resort complexes all around the world. Trump dealt with the Russians and was not able to close any agreements with them. Trump has gone to Russia and successively run beauty pageants and other shows. This tells me that Trump knows how to deal with the Russians and not come out worse for the wear.

Trump had the balls to go to North Korea and offer Kim a business plan to turn NK around. Granted it didn’t come to fruition within one term. Which other world leaders have these kinds of balls, and business acumen to go to NK, to offer Kim a path other than global welfare?

Trump Inc operates somewhere north of 500 different business entities, and employs over 20k people. Yes some have gone south, but more than 90% of all businesses fail. If nothing else, Trump is a great executive.

Adrian Mann
Reply to  Lil-Mike
February 25, 2022 6:26 pm

Trump – owns three casinos (Casino = literally license to print money) – all go bankrupt. Trump magazine? Trump vodka? Trump steaks? Trump airline? Trump anything? All bankrupt. Trump is not, and never was, a great executive. Who has been filling your head with this demonstrable nonsense? Oh yeah… Trump. Trump is a con man, a liar, cheat, misogynist rapist, hypocrite bag ‘o shite. And this is the the person that you look up to and tout as being a ‘great executive’. More fool you.

Reply to  Adrian Mann
February 27, 2022 6:53 am

Are you knowledgeable about how many businesses fail every year? Are you an accountant who knows how “failures” can affect the taxes you pay on profitable businesses? Running a large conglomeration of different entities is not an easy task. Think twice before you criticize.

Derg
Reply to  Adrian Mann
March 1, 2022 4:56 am

Russia colluuuusion Adrian 😉

Peter Fraser
Reply to  Michael in Dublin
February 23, 2022 10:28 am

Not least being that he gave NATO a wake up call and to start funding more of their own defence and stop leaving it all to good old Uncle Sam.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Peter Fraser
February 23, 2022 5:56 pm

Yes, NATO is now spending billions more dollars on defense than they were before Trump chastised them.

That may come in handy in the future.

Reply to  Peter Fraser
February 24, 2022 3:33 am

NATO Expansions Starting in 1997
https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/the-plot-is-thickening-with-germany-and-france-no-longer-in

PART 1

Germany’s Spiegel Asks “Is Vladimir Putin Right?” Over NATO Expansion
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/germanys-spiegel-asks-vladimir-putin-right-over-nato-expansion

The West promised no to expand NATO, beyond East Germany (the Oder River), according to a recently made-public document from the UK National Archives.

A newly discovered document from March 1991 shows US, UK, French, and German officials discussing a pledge made to Moscow that NATO would not expand to Poland and beyond. Its publication by the German magazine Der Spiegel on Friday comes as expansion of the US-led bloc has led to a military standoff in Eastern Europe. 

The minutes of a March 6, 1991 meeting in Bonn between political directors of the foreign ministries of the US, UK, France, and Germany contain multiple references to “2+4” talks on German unification in which the Western officials made it “clear” to the Soviet Union that NATO would not push into territory east of Germany. 

“We made it clear to the Soviet Union – in the 2+4 talks, as well as in other negotiations – that we do not intend to benefit from the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Eastern Europe”,the document quotes US Assistant Secretary of State for Europe and Canada Raymond Seitz.

“NATO should not expand to the east, either officially or unofficially,” Seitz added. 
A British representative also mentions the existence of a “general agreement” that membership of NATO for eastern European countries is “unacceptable.”

“We had made it clear during the 2+4 negotiations that we would not extend NATO beyond the Elbe [sic],” said West German diplomat Juergen Hrobog. “We could not therefore offer Poland and others membership in NATO.”

SEE URL
https://www.rt.com/news/549921-nato-expansion-russia-document/

PART 2

During a 1990 meeting, US Secretary of State James Baker assured Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev of the following:

Baker said“If the United States keeps its presence in Germany within the framework of NATO, not an inch of NATO’s present military jurisdiction will spread in an eastern direction.”

Several years later, NATO and President Clinton began considering just such a spreading—but not without controversy. 

1) American diplomat George Kennan, a towering figure in Cold War strategy, who authored the policy of Soviet “containment,” was unequivocal in his opposition.

In a 1997 essay published by The New York TimesKennan said, “Expanding NATO would be the most fateful error of American policy in the entire post-cold-war era…Such a decision may be expected…to restore the atmosphere of the cold war to East-West relations, and to impel Russian foreign policy in directions decidedly not to our liking.”

2) A bipartisan group of 50 foreign policy luminaries—including Cold War hawks like Paul Nitze and Robert McNamara—signed an open letter to President Clinton opposing NATO expansion.

“Russia does not now pose a threat to its western neighbors and the nations of Central and Eastern Europe are not in danger…we believe that NATO expansion is neither necessary, nor desirable, and that this ill-conceived policy can, and should be put on hold,” the group declared.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/how-nato-empire-building-set-stage-crisis-over-ukraine
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/tangled-tale-nato-expansion-heart-ukraine-crisis

PART 3

NATO did promise Moscow it wouldn’t expand, former German defense official tells RT
https://www.rt.com/russia/549961-west-nato-expand-willy-wimmer/

Here is more evidence, the 1990-promise not to expand NATO beyond the Oder (border of East Germany and Poland), was deliberately broken by the US, using NATO as its battering ram since 1994

Hungary and Poland became the first major NATO expansion countries in 1997.

The present US/EU/NATO call for unison, is basically a call for “same-message-thinking”

It is a sign to the Media airing “at variance” thoughts is not welcome, even if such suppression would instigate a real war., which would give the US/EU the excuse to severely sanction Russia

They likely knew “stirring the bear” eventually would lead to trouble. 

The US has instigated lots of wars/military actions/color-revolution since 1945

Eisenhower warned against the power of the military-industrial complex in 1960

The image shows, NATO expansions 

Reply to  Willem post
February 24, 2022 4:50 am

The Baltic States are in NATO and not invaded.
Ukraine is not in NATO and is invaded.

It’s clear that NATO membership is a pre-requisite for independence in Central Europe. Moldova will fall next.

This is not about NATO aggression.

Reply to  M Courtney
February 24, 2022 11:28 am

The Baltic states were sold down the river by the US and UK at Yalta.

No suprise they’re some of the most militant against a re-emergence of the same nasty crooks and thieves as ran the USSR back then.

They actually ASKED to join Nato so they could enjoy what little security can be bought sandwiched between such monumental A – holes as running nearby Bielorussia and Kaliningrad.

Adrian Mann
Reply to  M Courtney
February 25, 2022 6:49 pm

Damn right. NATO does not have any plans to invade and occupy Russia. Putin, however, operates under no constraints and can enact whatever his lizard brain decides is best for Mother Russia.

Derg
Reply to  M Courtney
March 1, 2022 4:58 am

Did Russia invade? What lands have they taken?

ironargonaut
Reply to  Willem post
February 24, 2022 8:20 am

You intentionally say Moscow to make a false equivalence between Russia and Soviet Union. Let’s use your logic for a second. Ukraine was part of Soviet Union during these talks thus they represent the Soviet Union. Therefore, it is “Moscow” itself that decided expanding Nato was OK. Now my logic, by making your claims you are saying that only the dictator on the throne in Kremlin can make decisions for any territory that used to be part of Soviet Union. PS current Russia promised not to invade Ukraine, look up Chamberlain for example of what appeasement gets you

Adrian Mann
Reply to  Willem post
February 25, 2022 6:45 pm

Note the dates – they are are important. 1990 – 91. Before the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Obviously, to anyone with an intellect more advanced than an earthworm, policy regarding NATO expansion is going to change with the collapse of the Soviet Union. What else would you expect? You expect NATO to adhere to an agreement with a body (the Soviet Union) that no longer exists?
It wasn’t just the Soviet Union that ceased to exist, but the Warsaw Pact. Hungary and Poland, no longer Soviet vassal states, rightly concluded that their best bet for security lay with the West, and NATO. The landscape changed. Policy was changed. It’s what happens when you are a realist and change to accommodate new conditions.
NATO expansion is a good thing. I now live in Hungary, member the EU and NATO, and it’s been a very good thing for Hungary. Much, much better than the 50 years of Soviet occupation that they endured. I live with Hungarians who lived during the occupation, and they hated them. Disgusting, uneducated, primitive bastards, every one of them, and they cheered as they left.
NATO and the EU are a force for good, a counter to Putins corrupt, arrogant, genocidal kleptocracy. Go talk to people in Ukraine. They’ll tell you. “Russia does not now pose a threat’. You think that statement is still valid?
No idea who you are, Willem, but I can tell what you are. Perhaps you’d be happier living in the Motherland. Maybe Putin would give you flat to live in, and all the bottled beetroot you can eat, as thanks for your support. Oh, and (Deleted gratuitous personal attack) SUNMOD

Derg
Reply to  Adrian Mann
March 1, 2022 4:59 am

What was Obama and the CIA doing in Ukraine 🤔

Dave Fair
Reply to  Michael in Dublin
February 23, 2022 12:18 pm

“… you don’t know what you’ve lost ’till its gone …”

RevJay4
Reply to  Dave Fair
February 23, 2022 3:35 pm

Not “lost”, stolen.

ex-KaliforniaKook
Reply to  RevJay4
February 23, 2022 4:38 pm

Given away?

Diogenese
Reply to  Duane
February 23, 2022 12:17 pm

And where is the alternative supply ? Sorry there is none the mid East is maxed out the USA stoped fracking and pipelines , the far East has stated it will out bid Europe for what LNG there is , Russia is the world’s largest energy producer .

Steve Reddish
Reply to  Diogenese
February 23, 2022 2:36 pm

The alternative supply is the Israeli pipeline to Greece that Biden just promised to block, to make Turkey/Russia happy.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Diogenese
February 23, 2022 5:57 pm

The U.S. was the world’s largest energy producer right before Biden took office.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Duane
February 24, 2022 2:47 am

the eu/russia gas supplies were just fine UNTIL ussa decided to push into the market with your frakked gas from finance sites it looks like that supply isnt going to be viable long term either
oops germany foot shot itself

Robert Hardy
Reply to  ozspeaksup
February 25, 2022 2:30 am

Would you mind rewriting that in English?

Reply to  W Smith
February 23, 2022 8:00 am

The oligarchs who support him and how get paid billions by the EU for gas will not be happy.
He may end up eating the ‘polonium meal’

Adrian Mann
Reply to  Leo Smith
February 25, 2022 6:51 pm

We can only hope so. This ill-advised adventure may yet signal the end for Uncle Vlad. Can’t come a moment too soon.

Derg
Reply to  Leo Smith
March 1, 2022 5:01 am

I keep hearing the term Oligarchs…do you mind naming a few?

ResourceGuy
Reply to  W Smith
February 23, 2022 9:00 am

Somehow, I don’t think it took as long to get agreements and permits to build alternative, large-diameter gas pipelines to China from Russian fields.

Reply to  W Smith
February 23, 2022 9:08 am

won’t happen. Russia needs the foreign currency to fund it military aggression and still feed its people.

Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
February 23, 2022 10:41 pm

Russia has over $600 Billion in foreign currency reserves according to a recent article in The Atlantic by David Frum. That massive state account cash balance is in excess of all the paid for production costs of the armaments on public display captured by the media, not the least of which is the successful development and launching of an intercontinental suborbital hypersonic missile that leaves current ABM defenses obsolete/inoperative.

IMHO Putin’s future career as a Russian tyrant fulfilling of the fever dreams of Mother Russia rising to the prior glory years under Stalin “the Man of Steel”, recreating the “near abroad of the USSR”, depends upon a military invasion and definitive victory in eastern Ukraine taking more than just the small pieces he already controls in Donbas region. Otherwise he loses face and looks like a saber rattler. Moreover, I don’t think he gets the concessions he wants from NATO by threats alone.

Derg
Reply to  Gerard O'Dowd
March 1, 2022 5:02 am

How much of that is propaganda?

Reply to  W Smith
February 23, 2022 9:43 am

And China stops supplying everything the ‘developed’ decided it didn’t need to make.

Reply to  Stephen Skinner
February 23, 2022 10:15 am

won’t happen. China needs the foreign currency inflows to feed its people (like buying cattle and sheep from New Zealand, or hogs from Iowa), and to import LNG and coal.

The Trump-led US Energy Dominance of 2018-2019 scared the bejeezers out of Russia, China, and Global Elitists. That was because it meant the US could give the middle finger to Middle East oil (so no more US wars for oil security there and the Abraham Accords bringing new peace to the region) and to assist Europe with energy independence from Russia via LNG from the US Gulf coast terminals and (yes) coal exports from the East Coast.

Richard Page
Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
February 23, 2022 12:36 pm

Speaking of China – is it significant that Putin moved into Ukraine during the Chinese Winter Olympics, exactly 8 years to the day that the Maidan revolution occurred, during the Sochi Olympics?

Derg
Reply to  Richard Page
March 1, 2022 5:03 am

He didn’t move in during the Olympics

Reply to  W Smith
February 23, 2022 12:40 pm

Russia will sell oil, gas, coal, weapons, nuclear reactors to China, India , etc.

Reply to  W Smith
February 23, 2022 12:47 pm

That means we should be producing more sources of energy to ship to Europe. A don’t mean windmills and solar panels.

ex-KaliforniaKook
Reply to  Fred Haynie
February 23, 2022 4:53 pm

Duh. That’s obvious to all but politicians and socialist/communists.

But maybe I repeat myself.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  W Smith
February 24, 2022 2:45 am

cant say Id be blaming him

Reply to  W Smith
February 24, 2022 3:31 am

IT WOULD BE VERY DIFFICULT TO REPLACE RUSSIAN GAS
https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/the-plot-is-thickening-with-germany-and-france-no-longer-in

Russia Pipeline Gas Supply to Europe
 
Fossil fuel provides about 70% of Europe’s primary energy
Natural gas provides about 20%; of that about 20% for electric power generation, the rest for heating and industrial processes.

Russia provided Europe and Turkey with 200.8 and 198.97 billion cubic meters of gas (bcm), in 2018 and 2019, respectively; 
Russia provided 174.9 bcm in 2020, because COVID reduced economic activity. 
Russia provides about 40% of annual EU gas requirements. See Note
Other gas suppliers are: Norway 22%, Algeria 18%, Azerbaijan 9%
Germany, Italy and Turkey received 45.84, 20.80, 16.40 bcm, respectively, in 2020. See URL
http://www.gazpromexport.ru/en/statistics/

LNG from Elsewhere Replacing Russian Gas

In case of no gas flow from Russia, 200 bcm/y, Europe would have a 40% shortfall, of which about 10% to 15%, or 20 bcm/y to 30 bcm/y, could be offset by diverting LNG from other sources; gas and other spot prices would be at new highs.

NOTE: In 2020, Russia provided the following percentage of gas to Europe, by country: 
* Members of the EU.

Bosnia + Herzegovina 100%, N. Macedonia 100%, Moldova 100%, *Finland 94%, *Latvia 93%, Serbia 89%, *Estonia 79%, *Bulgaria 77%, *Slovakia 70%, Croatia 68%, *Czechia (Czech Republic) 66%, *Austria 64%, *Greece 51%, *Germany 49%, *Italy 46%, *Lithuania 41%, *Poland 40%, *Slovenia 40%, *France 24%, *Netherlands 11%, *Romania 10%, Georgia 6%.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/russian-gas-dependence-in-europe-by-country

Calculation of Additional LNG Carrier Loads

Assume an average LNG carrier capacity at 170,000 m3, equivalent to 76,500 metric ton of LNG
In 2020, world LNG demand was 360 million metric ton, equivalent to 4,706 LNG carrier loads/y. See URL
The 200 bcm/y of pipeline gas supply from Russia is equivalent to 1903 LNG carrier loads/y 

There would need to be an enormous, worldwide increase in LNG carrier loads of about (4706 + 1903)/4706 = 40.4%, if Russian gas to the EU were stopped. See table

There would be a gigantic, additional strain on the world’s LNG system, which would send spot prices to unprecedented levels for many years. 
At present, Europe lacks the capacity to receive and gasify that many carrier loads. 
At present, there is a significant shortage of large-capacity LNG carriers

NOTE
https://www.rivieramm.com/opinion/opinion/lng-shipping-by-numbers-36027
https://www.shell.com/energy-and-innovation/natural-gas/liquefied-natural-gas-lng/lng-outlook-2021.html#iframe=L3dlYmFwcHMvTE5HX091dGxvb2svMjAyMS8

Walter Harrell
February 23, 2022 6:14 am

I hardly consider stopping the pipeline and telling Russia that it can’t force Germany into silence because of it, is a reckless action by madmen or women. I wouldn’t go to war over Ukraine but I don’t believe filling the Russian banks up with money and pretending they have done nothing wrong is a smart move either.

John Tillman
Reply to  Walter Harrell
February 23, 2022 6:30 am

Putin’s recognition of and move into the “republics” is probably a prelude to general invasion. He hopes to draw even more Ukrainian forces into the Donbas before invading from the north, east and south. Plus airborne landings along the Dnepr in the center of Ukraine.

Gregory Woods
Reply to  John Tillman
February 23, 2022 6:45 am

Why would he do that?

MarkW
Reply to  Gregory Woods
February 23, 2022 6:52 am

Putin has stated that the collapse of the Soviet Union was one of the worst disasters Russia has ever seen. He seeks to reconstruct the Soviet Union.

Chaswarnertoo
Reply to  MarkW
February 23, 2022 7:06 am

Wants a rebellious Ukraine? I doubt it. Just protecting his people (Russians).

Kenji
Reply to  MarkW
February 23, 2022 7:07 am

If that were true, then our leftist leaders would be cheering Putin … just as they cozy-up with Dear Leader Xi

Reply to  Kenji
February 23, 2022 8:08 am

They are. Europe is largely in a ‘well let him have it’ mood.

Thomas
Reply to  Leo Smith
February 23, 2022 10:18 am

My guess is he’ll take the Russian speaking part of Ukraine. Other than sanctions there is no reasonable action the west can take to prevent it, and Putin doesn’t seem to care about sanctions. It seems like the best we can do now is to try to make the transition as peaceful as possible.

Dave Fair
Reply to  Thomas
February 23, 2022 12:24 pm

Ah, yes … give the bully Vaseline so it doesn’t hurt too much. The Neville Chamberlain school of international relations.

MZufferey
Reply to  Dave Fair
February 23, 2022 2:03 pm

of course, Putin = Hitler

Richard Page
Reply to  Dave Fair
February 24, 2022 12:58 pm

‘Vaseline Putin’ – y’know, it could catch on!

Derg
Reply to  Dave Fair
March 1, 2022 5:06 am

There are many skirmishes in the world and you want to fight over this one?

What was Obama and the CIA doing in Ukraine?

Lots of CIA propaganda lately

Dave Fair
Reply to  Derg
March 1, 2022 10:07 am

What gives you the impression I want to “fight over this one,” Derg?

Reply to  Leo Smith
February 23, 2022 3:17 pm

So are a lot of Ukrainians, it appears.

Reply to  MarkW
February 23, 2022 7:51 am

I believe in the likelihood of the collapse of the EU in the next generation but do not think this is about unscrambling the broken USSR egg. I suspect that Putin has other motives and is laughing all the way to the bank with the huge increase in oil/gas prices because of the Western warmongers. Putin is probably a much better student of history than Biden and certainly a better chess player.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Michael in Dublin
February 24, 2022 2:54 am

sooner the eu/brussels falls over the better

Derg
Reply to  MarkW
February 23, 2022 8:38 am

I am not buying that.

Reply to  MarkW
February 23, 2022 9:16 am

Hit nail on head. Vlad is definitely a “Back in the USSR” sorta guy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nS5_EQgbuLc

Thomas
Reply to  MarkW
February 23, 2022 9:44 am

Much of Ukraine was part of Russia for hundreds of years before it was part of the Soviet Union.

Reply to  Thomas
February 23, 2022 10:11 am

Russia is Russia, Ukraine is Ukraine. They speak different languages, have different culture. Ukraine was only part of The USSR. Once that fell apart, Ukraine returned to independence. Russia is relatively young, a product of the Swedish Rurik dynasty.

Thomas
Reply to  Lil-Mike
February 23, 2022 10:57 am

The eastern part of Ukraine is Russian speaking. Catherine the Great took that and Crimea back around 1750. I guess one could say that Russia became a nation state in 1547, when Ivan the Terrible (the Formidable) because the first Tsar. From then until the revolution, the Tsar’s added a huge amount of land. At its greatest extent 8.8 million square miles, Today Russia is about 6.6 million square miles. I’ve been to Ukraine several times. It’s was strange to see white folks living in conditions that are worse than in Mexico. Today the per capita GDP of Mexico is twice as high as it is in Ukraine.

MarkW
Reply to  Thomas
February 23, 2022 11:38 am

The eastern part of the Ukraine is Russian because the Soviets imported lots of Russian speaking people in order to replace all the Ukrainians that Stalin killed.

Steve Taylor
Reply to  MarkW
February 23, 2022 1:55 pm

THIS. People who don’t understand what the Ukrainians suffered under Stalin are as ignorant as Holocaust deniers.

Reply to  Thomas
February 23, 2022 11:47 pm

Add to the cultural and language differences between Ukraine and Russia the fact that after the Communist Revolution and Civil War, after Stalin achieved power on Lenin’s death, the grain supplies and harvests of Ukrainian farming communities and rich farmers called kulaks were seized by Communist activists from the cities referred to as the 25thousanders; and the Ukrainian people starved, forced into exile, or forced to submit all they owned and the food they had to support the state, with millions of Ukrainians dying of famine during Stalin’s agricultural collectivization program in 1931-33; Robert Conquest estimated 4 million Ukrainians died in the famine of 1931-33;

Reply to  Gerard O'Dowd
February 24, 2022 1:42 pm

Khrushchev’s father was a well-off kulak living In Russia, east of Ukraine.
Khrushchev moved to Ukraine, worked in a coal mine, became a union boss, was noted by the Kremlin, brought to Moscow, became President, gave Crimea to Ukraine, banged his shoe, etc., was ousted

MZufferey
Reply to  Lil-Mike
February 23, 2022 2:04 pm

Except that 18mio ppl speak russian in Ukraine. That’s the whole point, + NATO presence

Editor
Reply to  Thomas
February 23, 2022 10:48 am

Many countries, such as England and Egypt, were part of the Roman Empire for hundreds of years. So?

BTW, Ukraine wasn’t part of Russia. Kievan Rus’ as it is now called, was a loose association of states run by the Rurik dynasty which came from what is now Sweden. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rurik

MZufferey
Reply to  Mike Jonas
February 23, 2022 2:06 pm

of course it was part of russian empire. Many cities were founded by russian tsars. Russians suffered as well under Stalin, who was not even russian btw.

Reply to  MZufferey
February 24, 2022 1:38 pm

Stalin was from Georgia

MarkW
Reply to  Thomas
February 23, 2022 11:37 am

So what? Every line on every map has changed at least once in the last 100 years.

MZufferey
Reply to  MarkW
February 23, 2022 2:03 pm

He did say that, but not in the sense of wanting to recreate it. It was an economic, human desaster.

Christopher Hagan
Reply to  Gregory Woods
February 23, 2022 7:08 am

To get a land bridge to Crimea and take the eastern industrial portion of Ukraine that is majority Russian speaking. During soviet times many ethnic Russian speaking people moved there for work and stayed. The Ukrainian government decided in the last few years to not recognize the Russian language as an official language in Ukraine. Which caused this whole problem.

Reply to  Christopher Hagan
February 23, 2022 7:20 am

THE UKRAINE PLOT IS THICKENING WITH GERMANY AND FRANCE BARELY IN LOCKSTEP WITH US/UK-LED NATO
https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/the-plot-is-thickening-with-germany-and-france-no-longer-in
 
I wrote this article, because Russia-hating, extreme rightists in the US State Department and US Senate are leading the US into a shooting war with Russia, on European soil

I was living in the Netherlands during NAZI occupation.
Millions of European people, including my family, have vivid memories of war and the Holocaust.

EU Goals

European countries have had trade relations with Russia for more than 1000 years

France, Germany, and Russia are trying to find common ground and avoid the outbreak of hostilities. 

France and Germany are aiming to deescalate the crisis atmosphere the US/UK is creating and hyping

France and Germany understand ignoring Moscow’s security interests and concerns is not realistic, if order, stability and peace is to be maintained in Europe

France and Germany are dependent on Russian energy supplies. They do not want to enforce the harsh restrictions the US/UK-combo demands.
 
Germany is unwilling to sacrifice its energy and industrial needs, and ENERGIEWENDE to facilitate Washington’s hostile anti-Russia policies.

France not acceding to the US/UK demands for extreme sanctions would further weaken their unwanted hold over European affairs.

France and Germany are ignoring the incessant complaints from Poland and the Baltic states, and now also Ukraine; all of them are acting as US/UK lapdogs to: 1) facilitate NATO expansions and 2) receive free weapons

Although the EU vows to respond to any Russian invasion of Ukraine to show “unity” with the US, they fully understand Moscow has no plans for any invasion. 

US/UK Goals

A US/UK expeditionary army of about 20,000 was fighting with the Tsarist White Army against the Communist Red Army in 1918. That fight is still going by the extreme rightists in the US State Department and by some Members in the US Congress

In 2022, the US/UK are continuing to pursue their uncompromising, warmongering, hate-Russia agenda; they would have no bloodshed and damage within their own territories.

The US/UK-combo goals are to pressure, contain, threaten, intimidate, and diminish the viability of Russia  

The US energy sector has a further aim to make Europe dependent on US LNG, instead of 25 to 30 percent less-costly Russian pipeline gas, as part of wiping out a competitor. Much to its frustration, Russia has allied with China and India, who are eager buyers of low-cost Russian oil and gas.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/there-will-be-no-winners-latest-efforts-preserve-peace-europe

NATO, a US/UK Handmaiden to Pressure, Contain, Diminish Russia

The US/UK combo has used NATO to advance US/UK policy goals to pressure, contain, diminish, demonize first the USSR, then Russia, which is unlike the USSR, but has been demonized just the same.

The US/UK policies do not fully serve the policy interests of the EU, which aim to gain power/influence by means of profitable international trade, instead of military muscle-flexing.
As a result, only a few NATO members fulfil their pledge to spend at least 2% of GDP on their military defense.

The US/UK has almost no trade relations with Russia
France, Germany, Italy, etc., have major trade relations with Russia that are very profitable
Sanctions on Russia, eagerly imposed by the US/UK, and reluctantly imposed by the EU, have had little adverse impact on the US/UK, but major adverse impacts on the EU.

Russia’s response to sanctions has been countersanctions, and adaptations to minimize adverse effects of sanctions, including closer military and commercial alliances with China and India.
The adaptations have improved the diversity, independence and efficiency of the Russian economy.

NATO’s military infrastructure expansions into east Europe and the Caucasus since 1990 may have increased European security, but certainly diminished Russian security, in violation of the Helsinki Agreements and the Russia-NATO Founding Act

NATO has a convenient policy, which states each sovereign country has a right to make its own security arrangements.
Russia is surrounded by sovereign countries, such as Belarus, Kazakhstan, etc.
Does that mean all these countries are fair game for NATO-color-revolution-style regime change?

Russia Recognized Luhansk and Donetsk as Independent Republics (not just the areas held by separatists)
https://nypost.com/2022/02/21/putin-mulls-recognizing-breakaway-ukrainian-regions-as-independent-states/

Putin addressed the security guarantees that he demanded of the US and NATO in December, arguing if Ukraine is allowed to join NATO, “then the threats to our country will increase many times.”

He raised the issue again in his speech Monday, Feb 21, 2022, arguing to his fellow Russians that “if Ukraine was to join NATO, it would serve as a direct threat to the security of Russia.”

“In NATO documents, our country is officially and directly declared the main threat to North Atlantic security,” Putin added. “And Ukraine will serve as a forward springboard for the strike. If our ancestors had heard about it, they probably would simply not have believed it. And today we don’t want to believe it, but it’s true.”

mal
Reply to  Willem post
February 23, 2022 8:17 am

“I wrote this article, because Russia-hating, extreme rightists in the US State Department and US Senate are leading the US into a shooting war with Russia, on European soil” Excuse me it not the right say Russia is bad in the US it the left, they concocted a story the Putin help Trump it a lie and has been for the last six years. You also failed to observer that it was Oblama that set up a coup against the pro Russian Ukrainians who won and election in 2013 or 2014 and installed a right wing government. If you think Oblama was a right wing you are a fool. Now the neocons here in the US are on both side of the right and left, the one thing they had in common was a deep hatred of Trump since Trump was not an one to start useless wars.

Nicholas Harding
Reply to  mal
February 23, 2022 8:49 am

How about offering Russia a full membership in NATO with a path to membership in the EU? No NATO country has invaded another NATO country. No EU country has attacked another EU country. An offer of membership should have been made back in 1994. Kenya’s Ambassador to the UN made a great speech on the embers of dead empires: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofijY6M-OA8

Reply to  Nicholas Harding
February 23, 2022 12:46 pm

If post-Cold War Russia had any interest in joining NATO, the door was wide open. They were diplomatic about it at the time, but Russia made it quite clear that they felt they were a world power on their own and had their own alliances.

MZufferey
Reply to  Joe Gordon
February 23, 2022 2:10 pm

this is wrong. they asked in early 2000, Putin mentioned this during his speech the other day. In general, they called for a european security scheme many times during 2000-2010. It seems that the US was not interested.

Reply to  Nicholas Harding
February 23, 2022 12:50 pm

I used to live in Norway
The reason Norway is not a member of the EU is to protect/control its natural resources.
Russia is not a member of the EU, to protect/control its vast resources

meiggs
Reply to  Willem Post
February 23, 2022 3:58 pm

whoodah wanna be EU or Na2?

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Willem post
February 23, 2022 8:52 am

“France and Germany are dependent on Russian energy supplies. They do not want to enforce the harsh restrictions the US/UK-combo demands.”

That’s the problem. Germany and France are not free to act. They are prisoners of Putin’s gas. Now they are forced to allow a dictator to work his will. Realy stupid people running these nations.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 24, 2022 2:59 am

no theyve got usa pushing their gas into markets upsetting the usually calm markets etc
thanks bidet and scummy son hunter

Citizen Smith
Reply to  Willem post
February 23, 2022 9:35 am

Willem,

Correction! There are no “Rightist” of any substantial influence in the US state department. If there ever was a deep state leftist establishment within the federal government, it started in the state department. And it was a long time ago. It blows a big hole in your theory.

Be honest, Germany, France and other NATO members are soft on defending Ukraine because they want cheap gas and to maintain business. No skin off their noses if some Ukrainian or other former Soviet satellite countries loose autonomy. It won’t be felt in Holland.

Business first, ethics later.

Gregg Eshelman
Reply to  Citizen Smith
February 23, 2022 10:02 am

IMHO Germany and France couldn’t conquer (and hold!) Europe through force of arms despite repeated attempts over centuries. So they concocted the EU to rule by economic means, and convinced the people in the other countries to join, though they couldn’t get the British to give up the Pound for the Euro.

Reply to  Willem post
February 23, 2022 10:20 am

You bought into Putin propaganda to his own people. Putin has to get Russian on-board and he is justifying Russia aggression into Ukraine that will inevitably send large number of Russian soldiers back in body bags.

Putin wants Ukraine for its grain harvests. Ukraine has long been called “The Breadbasket of Europe” for good reason. The Kremlin wants a Moscow puppet in Kyiv to control where that grain goes in the coming years as the War on Fossil Fuels is already silently initiating a global food shortage of affordable grains.

Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
February 23, 2022 12:56 pm

Russia is the largest exporter of grains in the world

Ukraine was a major factor in the USSR nuclear sector.

It would have no problem to build a bomb, with missiles from its NATO friends, then threaten Russia.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
February 24, 2022 3:00 am

russian midland provide massive grain and other resources eu depends on
well theyre stuffing that up rather well

Curious George
Reply to  Willem post
February 23, 2022 10:22 am

Have you ever stood in front of Russian tanks, as I did in Prague in 1968? It was touted as a brotherly help.

MarkW
Reply to  Curious George
February 23, 2022 11:41 am

During the cold war Russia bought the loyalty of many European leftists. They stayed bought.

Reply to  Willem post
February 23, 2022 1:21 pm

When has NATO been a threat to Russia? It was formed to counter Russia’s aggression and expansion.

MZufferey
Reply to  Fred Haynie
February 23, 2022 2:12 pm

How would you feel if there was a military alliance next to your country, that does not accept to include you? I guess you’re right to feel threatened.

Reply to  Fred Haynie
February 23, 2022 7:30 pm

And to support the military-industrial complex, which was wheezing after WW2

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Willem Post
February 24, 2022 3:02 am

and thats down now so they need another lovely war to use and claim more gov money

Chris H
Reply to  Willem post
February 23, 2022 11:16 pm

The fact remains that Russia has now launched an unprovoked all-out assault on Ukraine

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Willem post
February 24, 2022 2:57 am

well stated

Gregg Eshelman
Reply to  Gregory Woods
February 23, 2022 9:56 am

It’s very like what a certain German did with Poland in the late 1930’s. Create agitation within another country (Poland) then come to the “rescue” of the “oppressed people”. The Ukrainians know that history and how life was under Russian rule before. They’ll fight.

Will the rest of the world turn their backs on Russian aggression again?

Juan Slayton
Reply to  Gregg Eshelman
February 23, 2022 6:01 pm

Not just the German guy. Ref: Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. Putin is a true son of Stalin.

Scissor
Reply to  John Tillman
February 23, 2022 6:49 am

Those Russian soldiers crossing the border are simply undocumented.

Kenji
Reply to  Scissor
February 23, 2022 7:09 am

The Democrat Party has lectured me for years now, that borders are immoral, and that no human is illegal. This doesn’t apply to Ukraine? And Russia?

Reply to  Scissor
February 23, 2022 4:14 pm

… and in search of a better life.

Reply to  John Tillman
February 23, 2022 7:19 am

and attack from the east and the west

Reply to  John Tillman
February 23, 2022 9:09 am

Russia HAS invaded the Ukraine in the last few days if you read between the lines. Media sources are just keeping it on the down-low. There are those who believe that Putin will stop when he controls the Russian speaking areas.

Historically, Hitler’s success in the German-speaking Sudentenland of Czechoslovakia gave him confidence to expand further, and declarations of war to stop him caused a German need to drive for the oil fields of the Caucasus….But it will probably be different this time, especially if nobody fights back.

It’s important that voters in the western democracies don’t know what is really going on, lest they become incensed, and some of their poll-incentivised politicians react…..

Richard Page
Reply to  DMacKenzie
February 23, 2022 12:10 pm

Biden being the weak, confused and toothless puppet was probably all of the encouragement Putin needed – you can bet that Beijing will be watching what happens with a great deal of interest. I’m pretty appalled by the high-handed ‘might makes right’ of Putin’s regime but equally the attitude of the US dems has been equally reprehensible – they had the power to force Ukraine to the negotiating table and sort this mess out, instead they backed Ukraine’s stalling and game playing whilst they tried to retake the Donbas by force. Putin’s wrong to do this but Ukraine has poked the bear once too often and now they are paying the hefty price.

Reply to  John Tillman
February 23, 2022 10:07 am

No, he’s only going to take a small bite, then retreat with a small success.

This is his ploy, take small bites in one location, back off let things cool down, step up, take another small bite, step back.

Everyone gets all worked up talking about WWIII, then things cool off and we all feel a bit foolish … but Putin has made incremental gains.

In a year or two, he’ll be plowing—through Latvia—a road to Kaliningrad … to reunite Russian speaking peoples.

Richard Page
Reply to  Lil-Mike
February 23, 2022 12:17 pm

I think you might be wrong – it’ll be Byelorussia that does it, I reckon. But it all depends on how toothless NATO and Europe are over Ukraine – so far all we’ve heard is ‘sanctions, sanctions.’ Hello – they’ve been trying the sanctions game for about 10 years so far and it has done absolutely nothing. Zero. Nada. Time for NATO and EU to show some teeth or they might as well do nothing at all.

meiggs
Reply to  Richard Page
February 23, 2022 4:09 pm

They’ll send the D&I crowd in to bite the Ruskies?

Reply to  Walter Harrell
February 23, 2022 6:54 am

I agree- the Russian economy is trivial compared to the EU. It’ll suffer from this far more. They can sell energy to China of course but nobody negotiates better than the Chinese who’ll get the Russian energy for peanuts- while they eye all that land Russia stole from them, going all the way to Vladivostok. Russia should be careful getting bogged down is disputes with Europe while China is eyeing its butt side. Of course Russia considers Ukraine as part of Russia but this isn’t going to be the smart way to win them over. Watch “Why Is it Not in Russia’s Interest to Invade Ukraine? – VisualPolitik EN”. The presenter says it’s possible that America wants to bog Russia down in Ukraine. The young British dude who has this channel is very good in explaining or at least interpreting world affairs.

Dan M
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 23, 2022 7:08 am

That’s the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard. Putin is not walking into a trap. Because of the weakness of Biden and the West, Putin will succeed in annexing at least a third of Ukraine, if not taking over the whole country and installing a pro-Russian puppet regime. And I wouldn’t be surprised to see China move on Taiwan once Putin’s invasion starts. Putin is in a win-win situation – his aggression on Ukraine is another step to reconstituting the Soviet Union, while oil traders fearful of the war push the price of the oil he sells to $90 – $100 a barrel. Meanwhile, the west is dependent on his oil and gas because they’ve shut down their coal and nuclear in favor of unreliable renewables.
This is not surprising. Dictators with global ambitions will do what dictators do: take advantage of the weakness of their enemies.

Reply to  Dan M
February 23, 2022 7:27 am

He has to

occupy and annex ALL OF Ukraine,

rename it NOVORUS,

have Russian as the only language,

restore the Russian orthodox church,

have all Media in Russian,

expel any people who do not agree,

throw out all NGOs, and all diplomats,

have no foreign Media,

build a fence similar to that of Poland to eliminate Special Forces from infiltrating.

Reply to  Willem post
February 23, 2022 7:29 am

Up to 40% Additional LNG Carrier Loads, if Russian Pipeline Gas Supply to Europe were Stopped  
 
Brussels wind/solar bureaucrats make the same mistakes as Washington wind/solar bureaucrats

The only beneficiaries are multi-billion companies that supply the wind and solar systems, and Utilities, that sell much more high-priced electricity due to implementing the “electrify everything” mantra 

Everyone else gets screwed with higher taxes, fees and surcharges, and higher household electric rates, as happened in Denmark and Germany. 

Those people are told to grin-and-bear-it/sacrifice, because they are “fighting” climate change, a la Don-Quixote tilting at wind mills, while the RE subsidy-collecting elites cruise around in private jets and yachts. 

Historically, the EU has imported very minor quantities of LNG, because LNG prices are about 25 – 30% higher than pipeline gas bought from Russia, under long-term contracts. 
That will always be the case, due to cost differences of applicable technologies.

Brussels RE bureaucrats, likely with little hands-on experience in the energy sector, have urged EU countries not to sign long-term gas supply contracts with Russia, because that would send the wrong “virtue signal” regarding “weaning the EU off fossil fuels”. Just google, if you find this incredible. 

As a result of Brussels RE bureaucrat myopic decisions, EU spot prices for gas have become “volatile”, i.e., about 5 to 10 times long-term prices
 
Russia made sure to reliably provide pipeline gas, to clients with signed long-term contracts, as confirmed by Brussels, Germany, Turkey, etc.
Russia has no contractual obligation to supply gas to the EU spot market.
Russia has no contractual obligations to fill the EU above- and belowground gas storage reservoirs
This was known by Brussels RE bureaucrats, prior to their myopic decisions.

Calculation of Additional LNG Carrier Loads

Assume an average LNG carrier capacity at 170,000 m3, equivalent to 76,500 metric ton of LNG
In 2020, world LNG demand was 360 million metric ton, equivalent to 4,706 LNG carrier loads/y. See URL
The 200 bcm/y of pipeline gas supply from Russia is equivalent to 1903 LNG carrier loads/y 

There would need to be an enormous, worldwide increase in LNG carrier loads of about (4706 + 1903)/4706 = 40.4%, if Russian gas to the EU were stopped. See table

There would be a gigantic, additional strain on the world’s LNG system, which would send spot prices to unprecedented levels for many years. 
At present, Europe lacks the capacity to receive and gasify that many carrier loads. 
At present, there is a significant shortage of large-capacity LNG carriers

NOTE
https://www.rivieramm.com/opinion/opinion/lng-shipping-by-numbers-36027
https://www.shell.com/energy-and-innovation/natural-gas/liquefied-natural-gas-lng/lng-outlook-2021.html#iframe=L3dlYmFwcHMvTE5HX091dGxvb2svMjAyMS8

jeffery p
Reply to  Willem post
February 23, 2022 8:57 am

Russian is the dominant language in eastern Europe. It’s a legacy of the USSR and the Iron Curtain.

MarkW
Reply to  jeffery p
February 23, 2022 11:44 am

And an excellent excuse for a reconquest.

Robert Hardy
Reply to  jeffery p
February 25, 2022 2:58 am

Actually, it’s English.

meiggs
Reply to  Willem post
February 23, 2022 4:13 pm

Special Mexicans?

mal
Reply to  Dan M
February 23, 2022 8:22 am

installing a pro-Russian puppet regime.” Oblama installed a pro extreme right wing puppet regime, that lead to this mess. Not only that that right wing government stifled all opposition. What in the hell was Oblama thinking, oh I forgot thinking was not Oblama forte.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  mal
February 23, 2022 9:00 am

I wonder, did Obama get any of that Hunter Biden cash? I would think the president would at least get as much of a cut of the profits as the “Big Guy”.

MarkW
Reply to  mal
February 23, 2022 11:45 am

Fascinating how communists call anyone to the right of socialists, extreme right wing.

Richard Page
Reply to  MarkW
February 23, 2022 12:30 pm

Normally, I’d agree. However, in the case of Ukraine, there may be some justification – at least for large parts of Western Ukraine. I’d normally refer to Ukraines government as an extremely corrupt oligarchy in the main though. Obama and Biden both did sod all to sort out the problems in Ukraine – all they were interested in was toning down the government corruption so it played well to a western audience. The problems for the majority of the people of Ukraine have got worse and worse – food, medicine and basic utilities need hefty bribes and sweeteners to obtain if they are actually available at all. I don’t know what the answers are but nothing has worked so far and I can’t see Putin going in will help matters either. It’ll still be a godawful mess in 10 years time at this rate.

meiggs
Reply to  Richard Page
February 23, 2022 4:18 pm

Change you can believe in.

Derg
Reply to  Dan M
February 23, 2022 8:44 am

Exactly and Obama / Biden are about as feckless as they come.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Dan M
February 23, 2022 8:58 am

“This is not surprising. Dictators with global ambitions will do what dictators do: take advantage of the weakness of their enemies.”

Yes, and the leaders of the West have plenty of weaknesses. It’s amazing that there is not one real leader among them. This is not a good moment in time to be led by stupid people.

meiggs
Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 23, 2022 4:19 pm

Who installed the stupid people?

Tom Abbott
Reply to  meiggs
February 23, 2022 6:16 pm

Not me.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Dan M
February 23, 2022 6:13 pm

“This is not surprising. Dictators with global ambitions will do what dictators do: take advantage of the weakness of their enemies.”

That’s right. Dictators always push their envelope, until they get sufficient pushback.

Not only is Biden a weak leader, he is a blackmail subject for Putin since Biden’s son took $3.5 million from the Russians for an unknown reason, which Biden probably doesn’t want to make public. Putin will keep it quiet for certain concessions.

jeffery p
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 23, 2022 8:55 am

Putin is not walking into a trap. He is creating a crisis to force concessions from the US and Nato. Putin will walk away with more than when he started. He doesn’t need to conquer Ukraine or start a full-scale invasion to get what he wants.

Reply to  jeffery p
February 23, 2022 9:09 am

Don’t underestimate the West. I suggest Putin is making a huge mistake. This will ruin his economy. I saw recently that Russia’s economy is smaller than S. Koreas and it’ll get a lot smaller in a hurry.

MarkW
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 23, 2022 11:46 am

As long as Putin can portray himself in the puppet media as restoring the glory of the Russian Empire, there are a lot of Russians who will put up with a lot of privation to support him.

Reply to  MarkW
February 23, 2022 2:57 pm

sure, but that doesn’t mean he’s going to win in the long term- Russia would be better off advancing its economy the way China has and stay out of such problems- and “build back better” when stronger- the West isn’t going to make it easy for him

meiggs
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 23, 2022 4:21 pm

They gotta a lot o land and not many people…why dey need a big ****?

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 24, 2022 3:08 am

small but stable and theyre debt free and have a safety net
unlike usa trillions in debt

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 23, 2022 9:24 am

Russian economy is trivial compared to the EU”
It’s possible that those in control don’t measure their economy in Euros, but in tonnes of tanks and artillery production….

Dave Fair
Reply to  DMacKenzie
February 23, 2022 12:39 pm

Stalin: And how many divisions does the Pope have?

MZufferey
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 23, 2022 2:13 pm

They need a buffer against Nato. So trap or not trap is not the real question.

Reply to  Walter Harrell
February 23, 2022 7:17 am

It is the US/UK-led NATO using Ukraine as an attack dog to Pressure, Contain, Diminish, Eventually ruin Russia.

Before that happens, China will swoop in, en masse, to save Russia and get some type of reward.

THE UKRAINE PLOT IS THICKENING WITH GERMANY AND FRANCE BARELY IN LOCKSTEP WITH US/UK-LED NATO
https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/the-plot-is-thickening-with-germany-and-france-no-longer-in

Dan M
Reply to  Willem post
February 23, 2022 7:59 am

It’s absurd to think that Ukraine is an attack dog pressuring Russia, or that Biden and the weak western leaders have some plot to ruin Russia when they are shooting themselves in the foot by dismantling their coal and nuclear industries and becoming dependent on Russian natural gas.

mal
Reply to  Dan M
February 23, 2022 8:25 am

When it comes to the world elites who believe in one world government. As Ron White puts it “you can’t fix stupid”

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Dan M
February 23, 2022 9:03 am

“It’s absurd to think that Ukraine is an attack dog pressuring Russia”

Yes, it is absurd. Ukraine is no military threat to Russia.

This “crisis” is all ginned up by Putin.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 23, 2022 7:35 pm

How many times did Biden say imminent attack during the past 30 days? That is not ginning/riling up the US public?
Even Zelensky told him to lay off

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Willem Post
February 24, 2022 3:06 am

The U.S. public is not the one attacking Ukraine.

MarkW
Reply to  Willem Post
February 24, 2022 9:08 am

And the attack happened in less than 30 days. That sounds a lot like an imminent attack. Why do you object to accurate labeling?

Reply to  Willem post
February 23, 2022 9:11 am

Before that happens, China will swoop in, en masse, to save Russia and get some type of reward.”

Yuh, like all that land Russia stole from China. Maybe China will be happy with just Vladivostok and those islands Russia stole from Japan at the end of WWII.

Neo
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 23, 2022 9:47 am

China has come down on the side of the Russians, hoping for help when they go after Taiwan

Reply to  Neo
February 23, 2022 11:33 am

China still needs trade with the West and wants to not get into a trade tariff war with the US. Trumps’ trade tariff “riff” in 2017-2018 with China caught China by surprise and un-nerved. And the World is still mightly PO’d at China for unleashing COVID. China can’t fall into the Russian sphere without endangering itself even more. China cannot feed it’s 1.3 billion population without large amounts of fossil fuel and agriculture inflows to the country, a demand so large that Russia alone cannot satisfy.

Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
February 23, 2022 2:53 pm

China’s economy is in deep trouble.

meiggs
Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
February 23, 2022 4:27 pm

Da Chens got plenty o peeps to take back a lettle land in NA, turnabout fair play after all, they don’t need the west but the converse is not true…it’s now wind and solar vs coal. Out come of that is foregone.

Reply to  Neo
February 23, 2022 7:39 pm

Taiwan is an electronics power house like Japan, South Korea.

China will soon take over Taiwan, because computer chips, etc., are needed by China and Russia

jeffery p
Reply to  Willem post
February 23, 2022 1:12 pm

And Covid came from Ft Detrick, Maryland.

meiggs
Reply to  jeffery p
February 23, 2022 4:29 pm

Ft D area votes 94% Dem, no?

Duane
Reply to  Walter Harrell
February 23, 2022 7:17 am

Lots of people said they wouldn’t go to war over Sudetenland … then it was Czechoslovakia, then it was Austria … then it was Poland .. then it was the rest of Europe .. and then it was the USA that was attacked and forced to fight our bloodiest foreign war ever.

Derg
Reply to  Duane
February 23, 2022 8:47 am

Well Obama / Biden might need a war given the runaway inflation in the US.

whiten
Reply to  Derg
February 23, 2022 1:08 pm

The “Putin-Hitler” scaremongering might work far better than the Covid scaremongering, for the benefit of the libtards, woke to broke, Great Reset, new wanabe fascist global cabal.

cheers

meiggs
Reply to  Derg
February 23, 2022 4:31 pm

From the New Deal to the Green New Deal FDR, O’biden, same play book and mo’ war

jeffery p
Reply to  Duane
February 23, 2022 9:02 am

Western Europe was in no position to go to war over the Sudetenland or Czechoslovakia or Austria. These countries disarmed after WWI and foolishly believed treaties and international law would save them from another war.

They had no deterrence — they lacked the ability and the will to stand up to aggression.

Jit
Reply to  jeffery p
February 23, 2022 9:41 am

The Czechs had an army. The problem was everyone who wasn’t being attacked standing by while each small country was taken. If France & Britain had fought when the panzers were rolling into Czechoslovakia things might have turned out differently.

jeffery p
Reply to  Jit
February 23, 2022 1:00 pm

Yes, if… But neither France nor Britain were prepared to go to war. They lacked the will and the ability because they had downsized too much and had very limited offensive capabilities.

Drake
Reply to  jeffery p
February 23, 2022 9:53 am

And today??

NATO countries and leftists in the US screamed when TRUMP! forced them to pay their agreed upon 2 measly % of their GDP on their militaries.

TRUMP! started to do some good in Europe when he moved troops around, moving many from Germany to Poland, but the Military fought this move. No news outlet has even mentioned that relocation of troops while discussing OBiden sending more troops to Poland and the Baltic countries. Another thing TRUMP was in the process of doing.

So the US, in the next TRUMP! presidency will, with no next election to stop him, remove all troops from the useless EU states like Germany, Italy, etc. and only place troops in training/support roles in countries who actually live up to their military commitments to NATO.

Bring our troops HOME from Europe, S. Korea, Japan ,etc. etc.

Take TOTAL control of the Moon, the ultimate HIGH GROUND. Build the linear accelerator and a pile of dirt clods to throw at anyone who threatens the US homeland.

With no atmosphere to cause loss of velocity, simple moon based particle weapons would provide protection of the moon base from attack.

Game, set and match.

Reply to  Drake
February 23, 2022 11:28 am

Most Americans are unaware of those Realities. That’s because the Fake News mainstream press refuses to report on them.

MarkW
Reply to  Drake
February 23, 2022 11:50 am

Yet there are still some who insist that Trump was nothing more than a Russian lackey.

jeffery p
Reply to  Drake
February 23, 2022 1:14 pm

Imagine we to that. The next Biden, Obama or Clinton that comes along will decide to share with our enemies so they won’t be so mad.

We can build all the weapons we want but without the will to use them, they are big expensive paperweights.

Richard Page
Reply to  Drake
February 24, 2022 1:17 am

Trump didn’t force NATO countries to do anything. To this date, only 4 countries in NATO spend 2% or over on military spending – USA, Canada, UK and Poland – everyone else is still far lower, some by a huge margin.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Drake
February 24, 2022 3:14 am

ya had me till the moon bit
takes little more boost to get there than to do skylab
but you never did
because? you prob didnt get there the first time either
until i see a new lander checking out that flag up close I still dont reckon you got there

MZufferey
Reply to  Duane
February 23, 2022 2:14 pm

yes write it then, Putin=Hitler, and at the same time Putin=Stalin

meiggs
Reply to  MZufferey
February 23, 2022 4:35 pm

Biden = Stalin

meiggs
Reply to  Duane
February 23, 2022 4:30 pm

Stoopid is as stoopid does

mal
Reply to  Walter Harrell
February 23, 2022 8:07 am

It really stupid when the UK has enough gas to go around, that is if they would tap it, the same for coal. Their problems are all over an no existence problem called climate change. Note to world the climate is always changing, the question always is how much and what direction and neither of those question are being answered honestly. God help us.

Admin
Reply to  Walter Harrell
February 23, 2022 1:20 pm

Hitler started off this way, started by taking a few countries nobody wanted to protect. There is no reason to believe Putin’s ambitions are limited to the Ukraine.

MZufferey
Reply to  Eric Worrall
February 23, 2022 2:15 pm

No, of course because hel’s Hitler as everybody knows. Maybe you should stick to climate research.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Eric Worrall
February 23, 2022 6:22 pm

“There is no reason to believe Putin’s ambitions are limited to the Ukraine.”

Nukes might deter him.

Rob_Dawg
February 23, 2022 6:15 am

“Daddy, I’m cold” might get people to rethink our civilization collapsing energy policies.

Scissor
Reply to  Rob_Dawg
February 23, 2022 6:54 am

With regard to civilization collapsing and WWIII, it seems the elites want you and us dead.

By “you and us” I mean those that aren’t them.

Chaswarnertoo
Reply to  Scissor
February 23, 2022 7:07 am

I prefer the term scum, to ‘elite’.

Derg
Reply to  Scissor
February 23, 2022 8:48 am

Rules for thee but not for me…sums up mask rules perfectly.

meiggs
Reply to  Scissor
February 23, 2022 4:40 pm

Yep, Mo-rons git what Mo-rons d-serve along with the rest of us who aren’t them

Kenji
Reply to  Rob_Dawg
February 23, 2022 7:13 am

Just put on another layer of coats, sweetie … soon, it will Spring and you can peel a couple layers off. You may suffer from pneumonia … but you’ve “saved the planet”. Freezing for Gaia is … well … a “Saintly” act.

Tom Halla
February 23, 2022 6:16 am

Shutting down nukes and then relying on wind and solar is the meatheaded policy, which is being relieved by lignite and Russian gas.

John Tillman
Reply to  Tom Halla
February 23, 2022 6:24 am

Yes, the madness is Europe’s buying into climate craziness.

Putin isn’t mad. He is clever, cold, cunning and calculating, correctly judging the West’s weakness and Wokeness.

Derg
Reply to  John Tillman
February 23, 2022 8:49 am

Along with Xi times 10

Reply to  John Tillman
February 23, 2022 11:26 am

Putin’s aggression in Geeorgia (2008), Crimea and the Donbass (2014) and now Ukraine correlates with high world fossil fuel prices. Conclusion: Putin needs the large excess of cash generated by high oil and gas prices to fund his military aggression. The West’s suicide War on Fossil Fuels is what allows Putin to have the ability to wage Russia’s aggression on its neighbors.

Richard Page
Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
February 24, 2022 1:26 am

OK. The rest of it I’ll buy, but it was South Ossettia, not Georgia – Sakashvilli, President of Georgia rolled his tanks and troops into South Ossettia and Putin aggressively kicked them out again. That’s why the Georgian people convicted Sakashvilli of war crimes and have now imprisoned him. Aggression by Georgia and against them – strange how the MSM downplays that Georgia was the first to resort to aggression and violence.

Dr Ken Pollock
Reply to  Tom Halla
February 23, 2022 6:27 am

The EU seemed to have a moment of inspiration when it designated natural gas and nuclear energy as green. Pity Germany did not follow suit and stop closing its nuclear power stations. Its gas comes from Russia, but it is now digging up lignite from beneath villages – imagine that happening in the UK???
So how will the famed German economy get over this, with electricity prices already among the highest in Europe? Perhaps, the Greens will see sense and stop cutting down ancient forests to build wind farms!!!

Kenji
Reply to  Dr Ken Pollock
February 23, 2022 7:17 am

My leftist neighbors who have to re-order their Porsche because their car is burning in a cargo ship off the Azores … are worried they will have to pay +20% for their replacement Porsche … not to worry, they all have government jobs

Reply to  Kenji
February 23, 2022 12:03 pm

They’ll be lucky if it is just 20%. I would probably put it at more like 50%-80% more by 2023. Replacing that lost cargo only backs up demand even further into the 2023 and 2024 production runs. Production Runs that already are struggling with higher material costs, and now energy costs to the European factories that assembled them.

meiggs
Reply to  Tom Halla
February 23, 2022 4:42 pm

The west wins the Darwin award, soon!

Ron Long
February 23, 2022 6:21 am

Stupid energy policies aside, you cannot appease Russia with small stuff. The Bush Doctrine was to fight wars on foreign soil and not wait for the war to come to you. Eastern Europe would be wise to think about this. As an aside, when Russia gets more money for their carbon products so do the other producers. Inflation, anyone?

Reply to  Ron Long
February 23, 2022 11:21 am

Ron, You are conflating gross revenue with profits.
Russia and OPEC profits from high oil and natural gas prices. Everyone else down the line has higher revenue but potentially less (or the same) profits. Energy price increases pass down to the consumers in higher prices for foods, finished goods, electricity, and transportation fuels. The only ones profiting are the energy producers, but even their costs for labor and machinery to keep producing oil and gas will ultimately increase as well.

Sandy
Reply to  Ron Long
February 24, 2022 5:45 am

Yeah, that Bush Doctrine was a real winner. Oh wait, it’s 2022 and we know it was a disaster.

February 23, 2022 6:31 am

Nah, it wont go to war, Putin knows he cant win, all he is doing is protecting Russian speaking Ukrainians from being victimised. There is a lot of bad blood between them, when the armed mob took power in 20154 they declared the Russian language illegal, despite millions of Ukrainians speaking it.

This shows the mentality of Ukrainians. Yeah, *******, and now, we dont want them in NATO either. And really, we shouldnt even help them, they asked for it.

DonK31
Reply to  Matthew Sykes
February 23, 2022 6:41 am

Yeah right! And Hitler only wanted to protect the German speakers of Bohemia and Moravia from the their fellow countrymen the Czechs. Matthew Sykes gives us Peace in our time.

whiten
Reply to  DonK31
February 23, 2022 7:35 am

One ‘small” problem there though.
Russia has a permanent seat in the UN Security Chancel, because it fought fascism and Nazy Germany.

And also Ukraine is not a NATO member.

Oh well, just saying.

cheers

DonK31
Reply to  whiten
February 23, 2022 8:14 am

Ukraine did have a separate vote in the UN General Assembly from the USSR. Remember that one of the carrots given to the USSR to join the UN is that Soviet Socialist Republics would have 3 members in the UN as opposed to 1. Ukraine was one of those separate members, not part of the USSR. That was the choice of the USSR, not the Americans.

DonK31
Reply to  DonK31
February 23, 2022 8:28 am

Sorry I couldn’t edit my previous post. Belarus also was one of the Soviet Socialist Republics that had a vote in the UN General Assembly separate from from the USSR even though it was part of the USSR. So by the logic of the USSR, Ukraine and Belarus were countries separate from the Russian dominated USSR.

whiten
Reply to  DonK31
February 23, 2022 8:28 am

I just stated two simple facts, telling you that is not easy at all for any country or even NATO to declare war to Russia under the circumstances… rather quite impossible.

Also pointing out, that being judgemental and implying or claiming that Russia is the same or similar to Hitler’s Germany, just like that, because it is following a similar tactic, does not really help, I think.

cheers

Gregg Eshelman
Reply to  whiten
February 23, 2022 10:10 am

It’s a similar tactic that a lot of people are falling for just like a lot of people did in the 1930’s.

whiten
Reply to  Gregg Eshelman
February 23, 2022 10:41 am

But still, that does not make Russia a Hitler’s Germany at this point in time.

And under the circumstances, politically, trying to project Putin as Hitler, it only works for Putin.

cheers

mcswell
Reply to  Matthew Sykes
February 23, 2022 6:42 am

They (the Ukrainians, I assume) asked for a Russian invasion? What are you, a Russian troll?

Derg
Reply to  mcswell
February 23, 2022 8:52 am

Well you might be 🤔

Richard Page
Reply to  mcswell
February 24, 2022 1:30 am

Yes they did. The people in Donetsk and Luhansk did, anyway. Kyiv not so much, I’ll grant you!

Reply to  Matthew Sykes
February 23, 2022 6:58 am

yuh, but if you were a Pole or Hungarian or Bulgarian you might not like the sound of marching Russian troops- those nations are begging America to send them more troops

Kenji
Reply to  Matthew Sykes
February 23, 2022 7:20 am

The Biden crime family has laundered US taxpayer dollars through a corrupt Ukraine for years now … let me say that I draw the line when their crime syndicate starts costing the lives of young Americans to keep Hunter in piles of crack cocaine.

jeffery p
Reply to  Matthew Sykes
February 23, 2022 9:06 am

About 100% of Ukrainians speak Russian, give or take. Russian-speaking Ukrainians are not a minority. If Ukraine is anything like its neighbors Poland or Belarus, Ukrainian is a second language.

Reply to  Matthew Sykes
February 23, 2022 10:19 am

That was an openly Nazi coup d’etat paid for by Obama, $5 billion, and Biden was point man in 2014.
Check the Azov Batallion, Bandera, the ONU, the Galicia SS – all Nazi. As Putin precisely put it, Kiev is preparing a Blitzkrieg on Donbass. Now there are 2 new Republics, Donetsk, Lugansk , recognized by Russia, to cheers and dancing in Donbass.

Thomas Gasloli
February 23, 2022 6:50 am

Correct me if I am wrong, but, aren’t they currently purchasing Russian gas? Nord Stream 2 would be a new pipeline to deliver the gas they are already getting. Postponing the certification of Nord Stream 2 seems like an empty gesture unless they stop purchasing gas through the existing delivery system.

Reply to  Thomas Gasloli
February 23, 2022 8:52 am

But Russia paid to build NS2, right? They’d love to sell a lot more energy to the EU but they won’t now. They’ll be selling a lot less- they can sell it on heavy discount to China- but that means piping it across Siberia.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 23, 2022 10:12 am

The new Siberia China pipeline almost ready to go. If the EU wants to do a harikiri, who cares, except of course voters being gauged by utter incompetent policies.

Richard Page
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 24, 2022 1:39 am

Gazprom was one of several companies that built Nordstream 2, although it paid 50% – I think one was French and the others German, Austrian and Dutch. As soon as the dust settles and people look at the next worrying thing, NS2 will quietly start pumping gas – Europe needs the gas desperately, far more than it needs Ukraine.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Thomas Gasloli
February 23, 2022 9:11 am

“Postponing the certification of Nord Stream 2 seems like an empty gesture”

I think that’s what it is. Even so, it still made the Russians angry. Or maybe that’s just part of the act, too.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 23, 2022 10:15 am

What makes Russia angry is not some silly Brussels’ pomposity, rather NATOstan putting missiles on its borders. When Macron tried to deal, he was told bluntly get the US to the table to deal. Germany and France are now clearly seen as US vassals.

Vuk
Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 23, 2022 10:24 am

I read somewhere that Nord Stream 2 may have been pressurised and ready to use. It can be restarted at any time. When Germans run out of gas (if Ukrainian pipe is damaged and closed) they can put a Bundeswehr unit to operate their end, no one else would be wiser of what is going on.

Reply to  Vuk
February 23, 2022 3:23 pm

Biden has made it personal – he wants to kill NS2.

Reply to  Thomas Gasloli
February 23, 2022 10:10 am

Check gas volumes – NordStream2 is urgently required – no way Qatar of US LNG can possibly substitute. Voters are being forced to pay 4 TIMES that Russia offers – plain as daylight Heist. How long do you think voters will go along?

kenji
Reply to  Thomas Gasloli
February 23, 2022 10:21 am

Germany is still hooked up to Nord Stream 1 … and paying Russia a boatload of Euros … every second of the day … cha-ching!! goes Putin’s cash register. Thanks Greenies !!

Reply to  kenji
February 23, 2022 3:24 pm

Gazprom and Exxon/Mobil are laughing all the way to the un-sanctioned banks. Poor voters meanwhile are brutally gauged.

Richard Page
Reply to  bonbon
February 24, 2022 1:42 am

Gouged, dear. I trust I gauged my response correctly?

James McTear
February 23, 2022 6:51 am

This situation has been forty years in the making, enabled by the nativity of the Western powers, Western peoples and now the juvenile wokeness of ‘those who know nothing about everything’, apart from making themselves ‘thoroughly disruptive’, especially to the productive working classes, and themselves delusionally self-important.

Climate Change is but another fake delusion, as was Paris Accord, followed by COP 26.
The global climate has its own way of recognising change, in one area of activity, and taking care of that change in a manner suited to maintain a balanced global environment. These changes take time, as they have in the past. Setting false deadlines, to achieve the imaginary target (temperature, heat content, rainfall control, food consumption etc) are all beginning to see artificial goals (consumption, pollution control, energy availability etc) which will have major impacts on global societies, most of which are dependent on “being provided for” by ‘responsible’ governments, generally made up of self-interested parties, with long term personal aims. Others, which fail to be able to provide for the masses, are made up of those who can only see short term advantages, associated with power and, as always, money.

The drive to ‘diversify everything, regardless of the costs, has eroded the real identity of almost everything and everybody, and those alone enable massive changes, in attitudes and activities, that permit newfound ‘rights and revolutions’ to be prioritized, and increased political and religious uncertainties.
The result is that “nobody actually knows who they are, nor what they can say, or think, without being attacked, from many sides.

We need some level of control to be re-established, to keep people in line, doing what they are told to do, and when they can do it.

Xi and Vladimir Putin think they know how this can be achieved.
The West has given them room to believe they are right.
Sit back and watch.
Attack is the only form of Defence.

Reply to  James McTear
February 23, 2022 10:43 am

Climate Change is nothing but the West’s destruction of its own fossil fuel resource production. This obviously leaves the West dependent on the Middle East (OPEC) and Russia for energy. The climate scam thus directly benefits Russia, OPEC, and China in dimiishing the West’s economic and thus geopolitcal power. Russia needs the large inflows of western currency that high oil and gas prices bring to the Russian treasury. Thuis is what feuls Putin’s military aggression.

Putin wants Ukraine under Moscow’s control so it can direct where Ukrainian grain exports go in the coming years. Food scarcity has long been Russia main problem for the control, and thus political stability, of the Russian population.

Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
February 23, 2022 3:30 pm

Russia is the largest grain exporter right now. Poor Ukraine has been totally impoverished. It used to be the grain silo of the USSR, sadly now a shadow, Thanks to Obama’s ‘promises’ .

Richard Page
Reply to  bonbon
February 24, 2022 1:44 am

Also thanks to the sheer greed and corruption of Ukraine’s oligarchs, who would rather see their own people starve than miss out on a profit.

Kenji
February 23, 2022 7:05 am

6uild 6ack 6etter … enjoy the decline. Hell, enjoy the decimation

Bruce Cobb
February 23, 2022 7:07 am

Putin is essentially behaving like Hitler, so I’m not sure how else NATO or indeed the rest of the world is supposed to respond. Appeasement was a mistake then, and it would be today as well.

Kenji
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
February 23, 2022 7:24 am

Calm down … wake me when Putin invades Poland … or Hungary. Oh! Wait! Those are politically conservative outcasts of the EU … NATO wouldn’t give a shit, would they?

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  Kenji
February 23, 2022 7:30 am

Wakey wakey. The invasion has already started. Sure, it isn’t a full-scale one, yet, and it’s “only” in the separatist controlled region so far, but so what? It is still part of Ukraine, and it is a strategic move.

mal
Reply to  Kenji
February 23, 2022 8:30 am

conservative outcasts of the EU” The left will always let the leftist barbarians through the gate, they never have figured the left in the end eats it own.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
February 23, 2022 9:21 am

Well, if NATO troops are not going into Ukraine to fight the Russians, then that leaves it up to the Ukrainians to do the fighting.

The Ukranians can’t last for long going toe to toe with the Russian military, but they can certainly mount a vigorous guerrilla war campaign, and that’s what they should threaten to do, and the West should say they are going to supply the Ukrainians with all the weapons and assistance they need.

Putin got bogged down in Ukraine the last time he attacked, and he will get bogged down again this time if he decides to take on the whole of the Ukraine.

The weak-kneed leaders in the West might allow Putin to keep the areas he is currently occupying in Ukraine without too much of a fight, other than ineffective sanctions, but if Putin moves into the rest of Ukraine then it will be a whole different ballgame.

The Ukranians are going to bleed you, Vladimir. Think about what you are doing.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 23, 2022 10:07 am

Peacekeeping troops might move to the 2 new republics of Donetsk and Lugansk. See post above from someone who actually knows what he is talking about.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/02/23/the-worlds-dumbest-energy-policy-just-got-dumberthe-frightening-race-to-reset-by-world-war/#comment-3461028

Reply to  Bruce Cobb
February 23, 2022 10:49 am

Hitler wanted the Lebensraum of Ukrainian grain production and petroleum from the oil field of Ploiești Romania. Putin doesn’t need Ukrainian natural resources, but he does want Ukraine’s wheat and grains harvests.

Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
February 23, 2022 3:22 pm

Russia is the largest grain exporter right now. Poor Ukraine has been totally impoverished. It used to be the grain silo of the USSR, sadly now a shadow, Thanks to Obama’s ‘promises’ .

Duane
February 23, 2022 7:14 am

This is a ridiculously stupid post – probably sponsored by Vlad Putin. The only power that is racing to war is Vlad Putin – Trump’s hero and BFF who slobbered all over Putin’s warmaking yesterday in a media interview – par for the course for Trump.

In any case, the Nord Stream pipeline has never operated, so it cannot shut down and was not in any case going to be certified to open any time soon. Stupid Putin was warned, and he continued with his mindless warmaking.

All that the rest of the world can do is attempt to dissuade the Warmonger Putin from his warmongering. If he he persists, then the rest of the world, except for Putin’s other BFF Xi, will have to take whatever actions are necessary.

Kenji
Reply to  Duane
February 23, 2022 7:30 am

Everything NATO and Jao Bidinh are doing is resulting in massive increases in oil and gas prices. Have you checked the price of oil and Nat. gas recently? Putin is reaping a massive windfall €€€€ $$$$ thanks to the “tough guy” policies of our feckless leaders. Smiling all the way to the bank. Our leftist leaders are real geniuses

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  Kenji
February 23, 2022 8:00 am

Yeah, because appeasement is the way to treat a Hitler wannabe. Moron.

Derg
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
February 23, 2022 8:56 am

Hitler wannabe…are we talking about Trudeau?

kenji
Reply to  Derg
February 23, 2022 10:22 am

Hitler be … Trudeau

whiten
Reply to  kenji
February 23, 2022 12:54 pm

Thanks to Russia… or dare I say Putin.
Impeccable timing, of the Ruskis.

🙂

whiten
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
February 23, 2022 12:49 pm

Yeah, of course, like when Putin and Russia completely failed to bend in appeasement to either Berry or Merky, and with not the smallest whim of warning or notification or cry out,went and took Crimea over night.
And that was it.

Reply to  Kenji
February 23, 2022 8:07 am

Don’t discount the benefit to Putin’s power from Biden’s green wet dream. If we had remained energy independent, Putin’s leverage would be mostly gone.

I wouldn’t be surprised if Biden’s dysfunctional administration wants war to both deflect from his continuous failings and to achieve his anti-science net zero goal that nuclear Armageddon would surely accomplish. Rational thinking isn’t something the Biden administration has embraced and destroying the planet to save it from CO2 emissions is consistent with his other policies that are destroying America to save us from conservative ideas.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  co2isnotevil
February 23, 2022 9:29 am

I would be more inclined to believe Putin is blackmailing Biden into inaction.

The Russians did give Hunter Biden millions of dollars for some unknown reason. Perhaps Putin threatened to tell the world about those reasons. So Biden talks tough and does nothing,

MarkW
Reply to  Kenji
February 23, 2022 8:12 am

Oil prices are going up because of the invasion. So it’s the fault of the west?

Kenji
Reply to  MarkW
February 23, 2022 3:34 pm

The stock market is crashing DAILY because of the THREAT of invasion … so it’s the fault of Bidinh’s constant harping about it?

Reply to  Kenji
February 23, 2022 8:55 am

me thinks Putin will be losing all his customers real soon

Kenji
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 23, 2022 3:35 pm

Oil and gas are a world marketplace … make a note of it. Putin has.

MarkW
Reply to  Duane
February 23, 2022 8:11 am

Your hatred of Trump has rotted your brain.
Nord Stream 2 has never operated.
Nord Stream has been operating for years.

Neo
Reply to  MarkW
February 23, 2022 9:52 am

Nord Stream 2 is completed, but waiting for the proper payoffs before being allowed to start operations.

kenji
Reply to  MarkW
February 23, 2022 10:38 am

Nordstream Numero Uno … cha-ching !! goes Putin’s cash register. The gas keeps flowing into Europe from Russia. And the oil and gas markets keep spiraling UP UP UP !! Way to go, tough-talking Kamallalalalalaa Harris !! Every stilted word you speak, then cackle … is spooking the markets and making Vlad richer. Corn Pop may have been vanquished by Bidinh’s tough guy act … but Putin is a much cooler customer. Bidinh’s puppeteers need to try something different, eh?

mal
Reply to  Duane
February 23, 2022 8:34 am

Funny if Trump was President do you really think this would be happing. Putin did not take Crimea when Bush was in power. the USSR muscled Carter and played him like a puppet also. Somehow walk quietly and carry a big stick evades the Dimms. Instead they stomp around with a straw.

Derg
Reply to  mal
February 23, 2022 8:57 am

Exactly, I remember Obama’s line in the sand.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  mal
February 23, 2022 9:30 am

The Dimms walk around wringing their hands.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Duane
February 23, 2022 9:25 am

“The only power that is racing to war is Vlad Putin – Trump’s hero and BFF who slobbered all over Putin’s warmaking yesterday in a media interview – par for the course for Trump.”

Do you have a transcript of that conversation? I’ll bet it isn’t anything like the way you describe it.

Gregg Eshelman
Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 23, 2022 10:16 am

It was Trump being his usual sarcastic self, followed by stating that he wouldn’t have allowed this to happen.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 23, 2022 10:41 am

Interview here – the word invasion was not used by Trump, rather independence.
Trump praises Putin’s invasion of Ukraine as ‘genius’ and ‘very savvy’

Reply to  bonbon
February 23, 2022 12:14 pm

I would call the 1939-1940 German Wehrmacht’s Blitzkrieg invasion into Belgium, Netherlands, and France as “genius” and “savvy”.
That would not mean I don’t also recognize it as evil or condone it.

One must always correctly understand your enemy’s thoughts and motivations to counter them.

If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War

Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
February 23, 2022 3:18 pm

You are quoting the von Schlieffen Plan from WWI, applied in WWII :

It is very important not to underestimate your enemy. Never think that the enemy is stupid: If you think your enemy is stupid, you’ve lost. Secondly, never repeat a flank! Don’t think that the enemy can’t read books; they’ve studied the same battles that you have, they’ve studied the same flanks, and they’re very intelligent. So, if you try to copy what has been done in the past, you will lose

Except today NATOstan is actually stupid, as Hitler stupefied the army as Generals realized.
Better Savvy than roadkill?

Dave Fair
Reply to  bonbon
February 23, 2022 12:59 pm

In what practical way is Putin’s invasion of the Ukraine at this time not “very savvy?” It appears he is getting what he wants: Control.

And in no way did Donald Trump praise Putin’s “invasion.” He said it would not have happened under his Presidency; I believe him.

Reply to  Dave Fair
February 23, 2022 3:19 pm

Trump praised Putin’s savvy handling of a crisis – look at the EU and US, is savvy evident?

Reply to  bonbon
February 23, 2022 3:08 pm

Listen – clear the Cold War Wax in the ears.
There was no ‘invasion’ , even on Wednesday. Everyone knows you do not hit on Wednesday :
The Adventures of Baron Munchausen (3/8) Movie CLIP – The Cannonball Ride (1988) HD

Gregg Eshelman
Reply to  Duane
February 23, 2022 10:14 am

I see you have trouble recognizing sarcasm. Did you miss the part where Trump said he wouldn’t have allowed this to happen? Or have you only paid attention to left wing media that neglects to repeat that part of what Trump said?

Reply to  Gregg Eshelman
February 23, 2022 10:47 am

Remember anything of Trump – Russiagate for example?
I’m afraid both Putin and Trump are far savvier than you!

MarkW
Reply to  bonbon
February 23, 2022 11:57 am

Russiagate, that would be the dossier created by the Hillary campaign that all the clueless leftists still believe in?

Reply to  MarkW
February 23, 2022 3:20 pm

Have a chat with Durham.

MarkW
Reply to  Duane
February 23, 2022 7:14 pm

By Duane’s logic, if I were to say that during WWII the German’s made good tanks, this would make me a Nazi supporter.

czechlist
February 23, 2022 7:18 am

No one can possibly be this stupid. Almost every “leader” involved in this debacle is a WEF alum. Therefore I have to believe this is all some pre-planned NWO activity brainstormed by Klaus and his minions

Neo
Reply to  czechlist
February 23, 2022 9:53 am

These WEF minions think everything can be ‘paid for’ but that isn’t the only thing Putin wants.

Dan M
February 23, 2022 7:19 am

It’s not dumb if Germany were to decided not to be reliant on Russian gas, given the ambition of Putin to reconstitute the Soviet Union,

But unfortunately, Germany has already dug themselves into a huge energy hole by shutting down all of their coal and nuclear plants. Whoever said suicide is painless was clearly wrong, for Germany, it is becoming very, very painful, and it’s made them so weak that they won’t be able to stop Putin’s aggression. Look for them to continue to join Biden in trying the “diplomatic” approach, which is essentially appeasement a la Neville Chamberlin.

Burgher King
Reply to  Dan M
February 23, 2022 8:35 am

Dan M, your previous analysis is spot on. Putin is very smart and he is also very patient. There will be no massive invasion. Biden’s talk of such is 100% wag the dog. Putin will take Ukraine one bite at a time until eventually he has it all.

What Putin needs most in Ukraine is its people and their combined talents as a productive industrial resource. With the fall of the Soviet Union, Russia lost half of its population. If Putin is to Make Russia Great Again, and keep pace with China as a rising world power, he needs most of those people put back inside Russia’s close economic and political orbit.

Putin won’t get the Baltic states back. On the other hand, he doesn’t need those states nearly as much as he needs Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan.

Reply to  Burgher King
February 23, 2022 8:58 am

I wish Putin luck trying to win back Moslem nations!

Burgher King
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 23, 2022 9:07 am

Kazakhstan and its leaders will do what they see as being in their best interests. If that means throwing in their lot with Russia and Putin, as opposed to China, that’s what they will do.

Derg
Reply to  Burgher King
February 23, 2022 8:59 am

Bingo

Neo
Reply to  Burgher King
February 23, 2022 9:54 am

That post didn’t age well

Derg
Reply to  Neo
February 23, 2022 9:58 am

Why not?

Burgher King
Reply to  Neo
February 24, 2022 6:07 am

It’s February 24th, and Putin has now launched a serious attack against Ukraine. The next question is, will he limit his ground incursion to the eastern provinces, or will he go all out and take the entire country?

Richard Page
Reply to  Burgher King
February 24, 2022 1:17 pm

So far – air strikes and cruise missile strikes on military targets across all Ukraine – airborne drop on the airport outside Kyiv and ground forces moving in on 4 other cities in Eastern Ukraine. So they’ve pretty much punched out the entire Ukraine air force on day one and are pushing ground forces into the whole of the Donbas. I don’t see the Ukraine military doing a huge amount at this point – the re-arming and up-gunning that the US government has done over the past 8 years notwithstanding.

Burgher King
Reply to  Richard Page
February 24, 2022 1:38 pm

Putin is now doing something I hadn’t thought he would do, and that is to take the whole country in one massive invasion, rather than to bite off a piece at a time, digest it, and then move on to the next piece from there.

Putin is one smart cookie. He wouldn’t have made this bold move if he hadn’t carefully weighed the benefits versus the costs. He has clearly concluded that the gains from his Ukraine adventure will, over time, greatly exceed the costs.

The gains include the reacquisition of former Russian territory, the recovery of former Russian citizens and their productive talents; and last but not least, demonstrating to the world that Russia is on the ascendancy while America is on the decline by every measure of economic and military power.

Barry Anthony
February 23, 2022 7:20 am

The fact that this site and many others across the fossil fuel shill misinformation network are actively campaigning for Putin’s own interests is a terrifying testament as to where their funding money is really coming from.

MarkW
Reply to  Barry Anthony
February 23, 2022 8:13 am

Saying that the rest of the world should produce as much oil as possible is campaigning for Putin’s interests?

Are you really as stupid as your posts make you sound? Or have you just put your brains in a trust fund until graduation?

Meab
Reply to  MarkW
February 23, 2022 8:55 am

Bare rant just spews ignorant crap, most often gets refuted by facts, but when he gets schooled he doesn’t admit that he was wrong. He’s either collosally stupid or a dishonest person with an agenda. Most likely both.

Reply to  Barry Anthony
February 23, 2022 8:15 am

The fact that other sites (but not WUWT) across the fossil fuel shill misinformation network are actively campaigning for Putin’s own interests is a terrifying testament as to where their funding money is really coming from.

WUWT is largely pro gas and pro nuclear. You need to look at who opposes frackingm, coal and nuclear power to see where Putin’s money is being spent.

Yup. Its the Greens and their leftist chums the Liberals.

mal
Reply to  Barry Anthony
February 23, 2022 8:36 am

As if Putin is not supporting the “green movement” across the world? The useful idiots of the world never wise up, do they.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  mal
February 23, 2022 9:33 am

“The useful idiots of the world never wise up, do they.”

No, they don’t. I guess that’s why they are useful idiots.

Derg
Reply to  Barry Anthony
February 23, 2022 9:00 am

Russia colluuuusion…who are you?Simon?

kenji
Reply to  Derg
February 23, 2022 10:43 am

SHE came, SHE saw … SHE misinformed.
When will SHE be censored by the BIG TECH monopolies?

kenji
Reply to  Barry Anthony
February 23, 2022 10:41 am

Why don’t you just be honest with yourself? The REAL reason you HATE Putin is because he doesn’t kowtow to the LGBTQq+/- mafia. You simply loathe his cisgender masculinity.

Kazinski
February 23, 2022 7:26 am

So its just about energy policy? Oil is king?

Germany will be in worse shape if they make themselves more beholden to Putin. I’m not saying its worth a war to save Ukraine, but certainly sanctions shouldn’t be off the table.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Kazinski
February 23, 2022 9:36 am

Putin has taken sanctions into consideration already. He has ways of getting around any sanctions with the help of the Chicoms.

I wonder if it makes Putin nervous that he has the majority of his military sitting outside Ukraine leaving his eastern regions practically unprotected.

Richard Page
Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 24, 2022 1:56 am

So, you can’t count then? Putin has about 15-20% of his military on the border with Ukraine, not counting reservists of course. I think his ‘eastern regions’ are fairly well covered.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Richard Page
February 24, 2022 3:11 am

I’m just going by news accounts claiming Putin has half his military sitting outside Ukraine.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 24, 2022 3:19 am

Two minutes ago, I just heard Vice President Pence’s former national security advisor, General Kellogg, say Putin had 70 percent of his military surrounding Ukraine.

Richard Page
Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 24, 2022 1:33 pm

That would indicate a sudden troop build up, in just one day, from around 200,000 to over 700,000 – can’t be done. I think General Kellogg is not being truthful, or he’s already preparing excuses for Ukraine’s military. Either way, even allowing for the Byelorussian contingent in the troops invading Ukraine, I don’t think Putin’s using more than 20% of his active service military.
Ukraine has about 250,000 active service troops, about 50% of which had already been moved into the areas surrounding Luhansk and Donetsk. Unfortunately they are mostly equipped with tanks and apc’s from the 1960’s – the oligarchs have been busy making money by selling newer tanks and apc’s off to Pakistan and Iraq. The fact is that Putin doesn’t need huge overwhelming forces to defeat Ukraine’s military – it’s a bit of a paper tiger.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Richard Page
February 25, 2022 3:20 am

“I think General Kellogg is not being truthful,”

Ridiculous.

Perhaps General Kellogg is only counting combat forces, not support forces. Calling him a liar is pathetic.

And, he’s not the only one quoting those numbers. Are all of them lying? Why would they lie about that? How would lying help their case? Ridiculous.

February 23, 2022 7:34 am

Some of us are old enough to have had close relatives that fought and died in World War II. Those leaders and politicians that want war can have it if they are prepared to go and fight on the front lines and take their children and grandchildren with them. The rest of us want nothing to do with these warmongers and bellicose people or with their wars.

MarkW
Reply to  Michael in Dublin
February 23, 2022 8:14 am

So Churchill should have surrendered to Hitler instead of fighting?

Reply to  MarkW
February 23, 2022 9:00 am

I’ve just starting reading a biography of Churchill- interesting guy!

Derg
Reply to  MarkW
February 23, 2022 9:04 am

Do you think this is the same situation?

If that is the case why not go into North Korea? Why not China itself?

Wars are a dangerous game and it’s easy for politicians to choose since they won’t be fighting.

Gregg Eshelman
Reply to  Derg
February 23, 2022 10:21 am

We had pushed all the way to the Korea/China border, then for some reason fell back to the middle while China unofficially supported the North Korean military.

What deals were cut to abandon half of Korea to decades of misery?

MarkW
Reply to  Derg
February 23, 2022 12:08 pm

Are you actually going to claim that unless one is willing to fight in every potential conflict, one should never fight?

Derg
Reply to  MarkW
February 23, 2022 3:25 pm

Not quite sure but it is far easier for politicians to go to war than the people doing the actual fighting.

US Blood and treasure should be used very diligently…very diligently. Vietnam left my uncle a scarred man.

kenji
Reply to  MarkW
February 23, 2022 10:46 am

Equating Putin with Hitler is a tad … uh … premature. PS … where were you when the Soviet Union tanks were rolling across Eastern Europe? Cheering them on ?

MarkW
Reply to  kenji
February 23, 2022 12:03 pm

Comparing Hitler of 1935 with Hitler of 1940 would have been premature as well.
As to your comment about Eastern Europe, do you enjoy making an ass of yourself?

Elle Webber
Reply to  MarkW
February 23, 2022 12:23 pm

Ireland was “neutral” in WW2. This helps illuminate Michael from Dublin’s mentality: Ireland wouldn’t fight Hitler, but was ok with killing off Irish civilians due to border issues a few years later. *shakes head*

Reply to  Michael in Dublin
February 23, 2022 8:18 am

The price of your quiet life is hard men prepared to die in your behalf to maintain your lifestyle.
Your not wanting war will not prevent war. It will simply ensure you lose it.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Leo Smith
February 23, 2022 9:38 am

I couldn’t have said it better, Leo.

Reply to  Leo Smith
February 23, 2022 10:43 am

Thanks for that insight Leo. Pacifism and disarmament was the flavour of the decade in 1930s UK, and peaceful isolationism was the flavour of the decade in the USA. I didn’t realise that they lost world war 2. History’s a funny thing when you can rewrite it at will.

Reply to  Leo Smith
February 23, 2022 12:11 pm

The price of your quiet life is hard men prepared to die in your behalf to maintain your lifestyle.

Then we’re screwed. Not many of them left.

Dave Fair
Reply to  TonyG
February 23, 2022 1:11 pm

Bullshit! There are plenty of hard men and women ready to fight. All you hear from the government, NGOs, Deep State, MSM and Leftists in general is the drumbeat of woke ideology.

Richard Page
Reply to  Leo Smith
February 24, 2022 2:00 am

Ireland may have been neutral but large numbers of the ‘hard men’ who fought in WW2 crossed the borders to enlist.

Reply to  Michael in Dublin
February 23, 2022 9:58 am

Dublin is not in NATOstan, that fossil relic from the Cold War, looking for yet another war after Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yugoslavia.
Someone ought to remind the Politico’s there, that the EU is merely NATOstans outhouse.

Some halfwits do not realize that Churchill and Beaverbrook actually created Hitler, and Churchill went screaming for help from FDR only when his Golem started bombing London.

MarkW
Reply to  bonbon
February 23, 2022 12:09 pm

God forbid anyone should stand up to your precious Putin and his communists.

Reply to  MarkW
February 23, 2022 3:03 pm

Cold War fossil – not that I am against ‘fossil fuels’ . Get with the program!

alastair gray
February 23, 2022 7:47 am

But Gazprom funded all the green useful idiots and XR traitors. Our political elite is on track to achieve what it set out to achieve. The total destruction of Western industrial economies. Rejoice for ye shall own nothing and who gives a damn if you are happy or not

jono1066
February 23, 2022 7:50 am

just let them have land access to sevastapol and then we can carry on saving the planet . . . as there is nothing more important than that, is there not

February 23, 2022 7:58 am

For once Biden’s scriptwriter has it correct ‘Putin has gone full Tonto’

Reply to  Leo Smith
February 23, 2022 10:56 am

Tonto is a fictional Apache – just shows that D.C. today, unlike during the Cold War, thinks Eurasia is the Prairie!!
What a bunch of utter idiots are running foreign policy!

Richard Page
Reply to  Leo Smith
February 24, 2022 1:35 pm

I thought that was said by a British MP? Or was he just quoting Biden?

Vuk
February 23, 2022 8:03 am

Hi all,
I come from a place were we loved Russian tzars, loved Joe Stalin, soon after if you mention Stalin or Russia you would get thrown into conc-camp on a rocky Adriatic island, from place where Hrushchov was a friend and enemy and so on and so on.
I intentionally left out Adolf and Benito .
From feudalism we became communists then socialists and now neo-capitalists of the worst kind.
It is same with very little difference in Ukraine, Poland, Roumania, Bulgaria etc, etc. Leaders of these countries have been jumping into bed and out of bed with whom ever would keep them in power or threaten their privileges regardless whether they came from the East or West..

Reply to  Vuk
February 23, 2022 9:04 am

It’s tough to live between other powerful nations so can you blame them for such behavior. And recall they also spent centuries battling the Turks.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Vuk
February 23, 2022 9:40 am

And now the U.S. has a president that is just as corrupt as they are.

kenji
Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 23, 2022 10:55 am

He’s doing all this for the memory of Beau. Right?

Funny … I don’t walk around telling everyone I meet about how much I miss my ONLY brother who died of a rare cancer at age 27. I’ve missed him now for 42 years. But I’ve never sought to personally PROFIT by invoking his death over and over and over.

Neo
Reply to  Vuk
February 23, 2022 9:57 am

So, you’re saying Ukraine, Poland, Roumania, Bulgaria are just like Afghanistan but without the 6th century religion.

Reply to  Neo
February 23, 2022 10:53 am

They are all along the Arc of Crisis, including Caucasus, Georgia, of British Bernard Lewis. He happened also to be an Islamic specialist, sold his plan to Carter….

Reply to  Vuk
February 23, 2022 10:50 am

Did you see Putin’s reference to NATO’s illegal bombing and destruction of Yugoslavia? So much for NATOstan being a ‘defense’ force…

Vuk
Reply to  bonbon
February 23, 2022 11:12 am

I heard his reference, and I did see actual thing from a hillside about 5 miles away when my local airport was hit few times, nearly 23 years ago.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/balkans/stories/montenegro050399.htm

Vuk
Reply to  bonbon
February 23, 2022 11:53 am

One event caused a bit of amusement among locals.
A cruise missile was launched from a warship (?) in the Adriatic and hit rock about 2-3 feet above entrance to a road 15 foot long mini-tunnel leading to the capital of Montenegro.
Part of the rock was chipped off, but for some reason missile did not explode, and as you can see on google street view, the mini-tunnel is still there.
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.3057032,18.8835338,3a,46.4y,139.71h,100.91t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sFGm4li3Vin9qYsugqjFBjQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

Some armchair ‘generals’ thought it was meant to wreck the tunnel and disable the road connection to the coast, while the others thought the missile was programmed to follow the road to the capital and the programmers overlooked existence of the obstacle.

Reply to  Vuk
February 23, 2022 3:02 pm

That makes NATOstan a terrorist outfit with establishment smiles of course…

Richard Page
Reply to  bonbon
February 24, 2022 1:39 pm

Don’t be silly sweety – everybody knows that if you’re backed by a legitimate government, you’re not a terrorist, can’t be by definition.

jeffery p
February 23, 2022 8:10 am

We’re being run by dangerous, reckless madmen.”

Madmen? No.

jeffery p
Reply to  jeffery p
February 23, 2022 8:38 am

They are quite sane. Dangerous? Reckless? Absolutely.

Putin is taking a calculated risk that NATO and the US will blink. He doesn’t want war, he wants to win something from the West. He wants concessions to shore up his domestic political situation. Putin believes he will succeed because all indications are Nato and the US are led by weak and indecisive men.

If anybody remembers the Obama administration, every international agreement was made with the US giving away virtually everything and getting nothing but empty promises in return. Western Europe lacks both the will and ability to resist militarily and have foolishly allowed themselves to become energy dependent upon a hostile nation.

The US will blink. Biden will bluster and gnash his teeth, but Putin will get what he wants in the end.

Reply to  jeffery p
February 23, 2022 9:06 am

“Putin believes he will succeed because all indications are Nato and the US are led by weak and indecisive men.”
Some men may seem weak and indecisive until you piss them off enough. Just because they don’t ride horses with their shirt off doesn’t mean their weak. As for the idea the West lacks the ability to resist militarily, I think you need to do more homework on that.

jeffery p
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 23, 2022 1:17 pm

Do your homework. Nato is a paper force. The US military does the heavy lifting.

Sorry, did the heavy lifting. Now the US armed forces are busy rooting out white supremacy, fighting against the patriarchy, etc.

My apologies to the troops. They deserve better leadership than what we have.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  jeffery p
February 23, 2022 6:45 pm

“My apologies to the troops. They deserve better leadership than what we have.”

Isn’t that the truth!

Dave Fair
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 23, 2022 1:25 pm

That’s the problem, Joseph: One can “piss off” weak men into lashing out irrationally. Strong men plan ahead and take actions (some unpopular) designed to head off real military, economic or political problems. Weak men follow fads and take advice from fawning sycophants such that there is no coherence to their actions such that any preparedness for adversity falls by the wayside.

Additionally, you mistake military ability with the will to use it effectively. If your opponent believes you don’t have the will, he will ignore it. Before WWII, the Japanese knew the U.S. had the industrial might to win a war with them, but they believed they could negotiate a peace. Bad mistake.

Reply to  Dave Fair
February 23, 2022 3:02 pm

except the West does have the will- so Putin will need to wake up and back down- which he will – and in a way to not look that way- and he’ll still be a hero to Russians

“Petraeus: Russian threat ‘has unified NATO’ | DW News”

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  jeffery p
February 23, 2022 9:10 am

No, he will not. Heavy sanctions and supplying war materiel to Ukraine constitutes “blinking”? M’kay.

jeffery p
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
February 23, 2022 1:07 pm

A little too late, don’t you think? Putin will walk away from this with more than he started with, Ukraine, western Europe and the US with less.

jeffery p
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
February 23, 2022 1:24 pm

Biden is weak and a fool. His bumbling withdrawal from Afghanistan and the inept handling of the fallout precipitated this crisis. Add in his brain addled presser where he gave Putin permission to walk on in and it’s easy to see how we got here.

Joe has always been weak and stupid. His ego is a mile wide and his abilities are an inch deep. He’s in over his head and in his lucid moments, he knows it.

Dave Fair
Reply to  jeffery p
February 23, 2022 9:12 pm

Wasn’t it Obama that once said: “Never underestimate Joe’s ability to f**k things up?”

Reply to  jeffery p
February 23, 2022 10:32 am

Surely you mean Blinken?

kenji
Reply to  jeffery p
February 23, 2022 10:56 am

You forgot the airlifting of pallets of cash … in small unmarked bills … flown in to the Mullahs of Iran. Thanks Barry !!

Neo
February 23, 2022 8:12 am

Regional nuclear war could trigger global cooling and famine
Even a limited nuclear conflict could spark “unprecedented climate change,” U.S. government scientists warn.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/110223-nuclear-war-winter-global-warming-environment-science-climate-change

Reply to  Neo
February 23, 2022 9:12 am

(deleted my comment, meant for Rhee, below)

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Neo
February 23, 2022 9:46 am

I doubt there will be a regional nuclear war that stops at that.

I think a regional nuclear war would quickly expand to a larger nuclear war.

Putin should be careful. He and his country won’t fare too well in a general nuclear war.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 23, 2022 9:50 am

Russia isn’t stupid enough to use nuclear weapons. I doubt even Dementia Joe is that stupid. So who is gonna fire the first nuke? Mr. Macaroni of France? Hardly. BlowJo? Quite unlikely.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
February 23, 2022 6:48 pm

“So who is gonna fire the first nuke?”

That’s the $64,000.00 question.

Richard Page
Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 24, 2022 1:45 pm

There is no such thing as a ‘regional’ nuclear war – you either cross the nuclear threshold, or you don’t. As to the rest – are you an imbecile? In a general nuclear war, nobody will fare particularly well – USA, Europe, Russia really won’t matter a damn, it’ll be widespread destruction and devastation.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Richard Page
February 25, 2022 3:25 am

“are you an imbecile? In a general nuclear war, nobody will fare particularly well”

You are putting words in my mouth. I didn’t say some would fare well in a general nuclear war. I ought to insult your intelligence, but i’ll refrain for now.

Reply to  Neo
February 23, 2022 9:52 am

“Regional” nuclear war exists only in the vacuum of liberals brains.

Rhee
February 23, 2022 8:43 am

why can’t Germany spool up their nuclear power stations again? they’ve not been dismantled have they?

Reply to  Rhee
February 23, 2022 9:13 am

A nuclear power plant is not something that can be shut-down and the skilled work force dismissed and then spun up again like a coal or gas plant. Very stringent licensing and operating permits processes have to be followed along with considerations of lead times to get fresh nuclear fuel into the core.

Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
February 23, 2022 9:51 am

And someone would stop that certification just as easily as NordStream2.

Derg
Reply to  bonbon
February 23, 2022 3:30 pm

Bonbon you are on fire here today. I had no idea there were so many NeoCons. People sure want war 🙁

kenji
Reply to  Rhee
February 23, 2022 11:01 am

But, but, but … Chernobyl !! Fukishima !! Three Mile Island oh my !! We’re all gonna dieeeeeeeeeee if we restart a NUKE plant.

Thank Gaia that we are shutting down Diablo Canyon!! My PG&E bill was only $750 last month. I should really be paying MORE of a “fair share” to save Gaia … Right?

Tom Abbott
Reply to  kenji
February 23, 2022 6:50 pm

“My PG&E bill was only $750 last month.”

Tell me you are joking!

ResourceGuy
February 23, 2022 8:57 am

But hey, the Doomsday Clock stopped ticking right after Biden was elected. The BBB passage and carbon taxes might even get it to tick backwards….for a fee of course.

Mac
February 23, 2022 9:10 am

I have been to Russia and Ukraine a number of times and my ex wife is in Tula, Russia. I speak to her almost daily (she decided she needed to be in Russia to take care of her elderly mother). The propaganda Putin is broadcasting has the Russian people very much against Ukraine and its people (including my ex).
The western part of Ukraine is very anti Russian; they have long memories of Stalin killing so many and of Chernobyl etc. They have started teaching English rather than the Russian language. Russians have been in the eastern part of Ukraine for a long time and of course the Crimea which Russian has had as a port for many years. The sympathies of those are of course for Russia.
Personally I think Putin has overstepped and will regret what he has done; angering Europe and the US and actually diminishing his power.
He might get Russia into a shooting war and find himself in a situation similar to Afganistan.
It might wake up the western world to the green energy scam??

Reply to  Mac
February 23, 2022 9:46 am

Putin really doesn’t need Ukrainian natural resources of coal or hard minerals. Russia has plenty of that. The people of the Donbass Oblasts that Russia is taking in are now desperately poor and require Russian welfare to get by. Russia is now handing on out food and stipends to those fleeing, displaced Donbass civilians who have fled to Russia. There really is zero threat of NATO to Russia’s sovereignty. Many analysts claim Putin wants to rebuild the glory of the USSR empire. I think Putin’s needs from Ukraine are more practical than that.

Putin I think wants a Moscow Puppet running Kyiv so that Russia can control where Ukrainian grain harvests go. Food scarcity and famine have always haunted Russia. Putin need secure food in the coming years, because it is quite obvious what the War on Fossil Fuels is now doing to the price and availability food commodities on the world markets.

Mac
Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
February 23, 2022 3:19 pm

Ukrainians are generally poor as compared to western societies. I had a female interpreter who was ambitious and had a shed in an open market area selling woolen winter goods. Her yearly income was approx $25 thousand per year which was much better than the majority of the population. (With the exception of the Ukraine mafia who do much better I believe).
I do agree Putin is after the grain growing areas of Ukraine.
I still think he will have a guerilla war on his hands if he is very aggressive.

Reply to  Mac
February 23, 2022 9:50 am

Have a look at this, from an American who lives in Russia :
Ukrainian Crisis 1st Quarter of 2022: From Inaction to the Verge of Proxy War

https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2022/02/22/ukrainian-crisis-1st-quarter-of-2022-from-inaction-to-the-verge-of-proxy-war/
And this from a well known American weapons inspector : Scott Ritter :
Why a war may be the only solution Americans can bring to this conflictWhat passes for expertise on Russia in the US today is corrupted by partisan politics, which distorts fact-based analysis

https://www.rt.com/news/550337-american-ignorance-russia-policy-putin/

ResourceGuy
February 23, 2022 9:11 am

The Emergency Windmill Construction Act has been posted. All able-bodied adults are to report to your local windmill hauling and construction sites for further instructions. Those not in compliance will have their heat turned off–well have it turned off longer anyway. Your local Green Party commander Griff will supervise you and report AWOL comrades. Achtung!!

February 23, 2022 9:13 am

Since when did P. Gosselin (or What’s Up With That) become an authority on Western foreign and national security policy?

Reply to  Richard Schulman
February 23, 2022 12:23 pm

This entire Russian aggression fiasco is part and parcel caused by the Progressive West’s pursuit of the Climate Scam. Putin’s history of aggression to its neighbors correlates exactly with periods of hard currency largess to the Russian treasury from sales of its oil and natural gas. So yes, the Climate Scam very much at the underlying cause of this national and European security issue.

Reply to  Richard Schulman
February 23, 2022 2:57 pm

Exactly – NTZ and WUWT incredibly echo MSM gleichschaltung on Russia while countering MSM on Climate. The EXACT SAME MSM.

Anyone smell a RAT?

February 23, 2022 9:16 am

Discussing war is always a bummer. Now, back to discussing idiotic ruinable energy.

After a Shaky Start, Airborne Wind Energy Is Slowly Taking Off

Numerous companies are developing technologies, such as large kites, that can harvest wind energy up to a half-mile above ground. While still in its nascent stages, airborne wind power could potentially be used in remote locations or flying from barges far offshore.

https://e360.yale.edu/features/after-a-shaky-start-airborne-wind-energy-is-slowly-taking-off

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 23, 2022 9:39 am

While ground based wind mills produce unreliable electricity, just imagine how much more unreliable kite powered electricity would be.

Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
February 23, 2022 2:58 pm

Hey, kites can’t fly unless there is wind, so when they are in the sky, they will always be generating wind power.

See, kite wind energy is not in any way unreliable. Its the wind that is unreliable. QED.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 23, 2022 10:29 am

Well it didn’t work on the ground, so let’s try it in the sky! How can you possibly refute that impeccable logic?

February 23, 2022 9:23 am

(my reposted comment from another thread for more visibility)

Executive summary:
The Climate Scam is what enables Putin military imperialism.
The Climate Scam is a War on Fossil Fuels by another name.
The War on Fossil Fuels by President Biden and by the EU has allowed much of Europe to become dependent on Russian natural gas.
The War of Fossil Fuels is directly responsible for the soaring price of Natural Gas that Europe and the UK have had to pay to get thru this current winter season.
The War on Fossil Fuels has resulted in a destruction of affordable energy for Europe, and thus left the EU nations unable to adequately counter Putin.
Putin is now flush again with hard currency to fund his military adventurism and seizing of Ukrainian territory while the EU and US can do little to stop him.

Discussion:
What stops Putin is low gas and oil prices. When the Russian treasury is low on income, Putin’s tanks stay in their garrisons, the Sukhoi and Mig jets don’t fly, and the Russian missiles and arty remain silent. First and foremost Putin has to keep Russians fed and his military paid to stay in power. He needs hard currency to do that.

When the Russian treasury is flush with cash during high oil and natural gas periods, Putin’s goes on the offensive. His military is on the move burning oil because they can afford it domestically. Putin can afford to run his tanks and jets and keep everyone fed.

Correlation of Russian military imperialism with oil prices is causation in this case.
The evidence:
2008: Russia invaded Georgia and seized South Ossetia in August 2008, a period when Brent crude was hitting north of $120/bbl. Russia was flush with cash in 2008 to fund aggression into Georgia.
2014: Russia seized the Ukrainian territory of Crimea in February and March 2014. It also took parts of eastern Ukraine via a proxy war of little green men. For all of 2013 and the first 3 months of 2014, Brent crude was north of $100/bbl,
2022: Russia is now effectively annexing parts of the Ukrainian Donbass, the break-away Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts and placing them under the control of Moscow selected leadership. Brent oil is now nearing $100/bbl.

Russia does not need Ukraine for its natural resources of coal and hard minerals. Ultimately keeping Ukraine under Russian control means Moscow can direct Ukrainian grain harvests to Russia as needed in the coming years as potential famines await the world as the War on Fossil Fuels accelerates, driving up the price of all agricultural commodiities. In 2019 Ukraine was the world’s 5th largest exporter of wheat, behind US, Canada, Argentina and Australia. Food scarcity and famine have long haunted the Russian people, and Putin understands this, and to keep his people fed to stay in power.

The Climate Scam and the ensuing Western Left’s War on Fossil Fuels is enabling Vladimir Putin to carry out this aggression. Until the Strategic appeasement of the West’s Climate Scam crumbles, this Russian aggression will continue.

Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
February 23, 2022 9:44 am

NATOstan is on its last legs. The Unipolar world order is finished. Welcome to the Multipolar World. Drop obsolete fossilized cliche’s .

Reply to  bonbon
February 23, 2022 9:57 am

Did I mention NATO? No.
Did I claim a unipolar world? No.
Do I understand the multipolar world we are in? yes.

Putin’s aggression against Ukraine is being directly fueled by the large inflows of Western currency to Russian treasury. Just as it was in 2008 into Georgia, and 2014 into Crimea.

Your criticism is stupid bonbon, even for you. The West’s calamitous War on Fossil Fuels, driven under the guicse of the climate change Trojan Horse, is what has led Europe to this 1938 moment.

Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
February 23, 2022 2:55 pm

Your stupid ommission of NATOstan and Unipolar Rules-based-Order is simply dementia.
CO2, CPO26, Great Reset, Ukraine, are window dressing.

That is what is actually going on in the real world outside of the NATOstan rubber room.

February 23, 2022 9:28 am

The <expletive> BBC should be closed down following their ‘coverage’ of this carry on.

They have ran a constant barrage of articles like this one:
Headline:”Russia-Ukraine crisis: How likely is it to escalate into broader war?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-60485766

They have constantly fed it into people’s heads that there is going to be a full blown World War kicking off sooner than later.

why why why – wtf is really going on here?

Reply to  Peta of Newark
February 23, 2022 9:42 am

The End of an Era – the Multipolar world was born with twins…

February 23, 2022 9:41 am

As Pepe Escobar wrote, the New Multipolar World was born with the twins of Donetsk and Lugansk.
The Unipolar Rules-based Order is over.
As China and Russia said recently, replaced with a Multipolar Law-based Order.

Interview here – the word invasion was not used by Trump, rather independence.
Trump praises Putin’s invasion of Ukraine as ‘genius’ and ‘very savvy’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sAlXuRIuH4

Meanwhile NordStream2 was put on hold, again. There is no way Qatar and US LNG can possibly replace this supply.
The EU did not get the Multipolar Memo yet, and no doubt are scurrying – every response looks dumber than the last.

PS : beat this for incompetence :
“There is no gas in the NordStream 2 pipeline. What has been stopped is the approval it needs in order to get into operation, which means stopping the approval process can have no effect on gas prices,” European Commission Executive Vice-President Margrethe Vestager.

Reply to  bonbon
February 23, 2022 10:01 am

Russia will still sell its natural gas to someone else, like China. Russia needs the foreign currency to feed its people and keep its military and industrial base running. This just shifts the global flows of gas.

Dave Fair
Reply to  bonbon
February 23, 2022 1:38 pm

Why lie, bonbon? Trump in no way praised Putin’s invasion of the Ukraine: He said, given the incompetence of Let’s Go Brandon, that Putin was very savvy in how he went about it. He also said that it would never have happened during his Presidency.

Reply to  Dave Fair
February 23, 2022 2:51 pm

Why not listen – Trump said Putn is savvy – the entire tragedy would not happen except for relentless Russiagate.
Trump DID NOT say invasion – he said independence. Brilliant move.
Cut out Rachel Maddow”s lies.

Charles
Reply to  bonbon
February 23, 2022 5:05 pm

You said-“Meanwhile NordStream2 was put on hold, again. There is no way Qatar and US LNG can possibly replace this supply.

Who put it on hold the 1st time ?

Compared to Biden, I would say that Putin has the mental edge on savvy also. BBB Joe said in a debate that Hunter was one of the smartest people he knew.

Compared to BBB Joe, Putin probably ranks as a genius. Trump is comparing their two mental capacities.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Charles
February 23, 2022 6:59 pm

Trump’s just telling the truth, like he always does. The radical Left can’t stand the truth.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 23, 2022 7:11 pm

Btw, Simon, I heard today that the New York Prosecutor dealing with Trump is thinking about dropping the case against Trump.

griff
February 23, 2022 9:48 am

There is enough gas to see out the winter even if imports from Russia stop…

Europe could see out winter on gas reserves if Russian imports stop, says German analysis | Russia | The Guardian

Reply to  griff
February 23, 2022 10:32 am

Nothing focuses one’s attention more than the prospect of being left in the cold and dark for months. Maybe this is the wake-up call for Europe to End the Climate Scam and its War on Fossil Fuels.
The collapse of the Climate Scam, like all collapses in history of schemes built on lies, will come fast, furious, and be unstoppable by the Global Elitists. They (and you Griff) live in a Climate Scam House of Cards built on lies.

Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
February 23, 2022 2:47 pm

Trouble is we live in this Scam House :
Samson :

180px-SamsonDestroyTemple.jpg
Gregg Eshelman
February 23, 2022 9:51 am

Meanwhile, the media propagandists are spreading the lie that Trump praised Putin. It’s sarcasm! Most of them conveniently omit the part where he said he wouldn’t have allowed this to happen. But leftists have always had problems understanding sarcasm because they’re always on the lookout for things people say to be offended by.

Reply to  Gregg Eshelman
February 23, 2022 10:44 am

Interview here – the word invasion was not used by Trump, rather independence.
Trump praises Putin’s invasion of Ukraine as ‘genius’ and ‘very savvy’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sAlXuRIuH4

Listen carefully. The whole Ukraine gambit is Obama and Biden. Not sarcasm at all. As Trump often said getting along with Russia is a good thing. Durham has not finished with Russiagate yet!

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  Gregg Eshelman
February 23, 2022 11:43 am

Trump is in love with Putin. If he could, he’d probably marry him.

Reply to  Bruce Cobb
February 23, 2022 2:27 pm

Trump’s First Lady is the most catching I have seen in decades!

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
February 23, 2022 7:02 pm

Bruce, you are very good on climate change subjects. Politics, not so much.

David S
February 23, 2022 9:58 am

We’re being run by dangerous, reckless madmen.”

You forgot to mention crooks.

Davis
February 23, 2022 10:26 am

Does Germany or France really care who is in charge of the Ukraine?

Reply to  Davis
February 23, 2022 10:39 am

Both refused to address NATOstan’s constant expansion east to Russia. Both would veto Ukraine NATO membership – there is a civil war there after all. Now we will see how NATOstan crumbles – it will take a while… Meantime we might freeze in winter….

February 23, 2022 10:31 am

In an effort to improve the expert jingoism here, by those that, like Greta, do no homework :
Ukraine’s nuclear fantasy is dangerousUkraine seeks to retain the status of a nuclear weapons state it never possessed
Scott Ritter, US weapons inspector :

https://www.rt.com/russia/550057-zelensky-dangerous-nuclear-ukraine/

And :
Sergey Karaganov: Russia’s new foreign policy, the Putin DoctrineMoscow’s confrontation with NATO is just the start
By Professor Sergey Karaganov, honorary chairman of Russia’s Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, and academic supervisor at the School of International Economics and Foreign Affairs Higher School of Economics (HSE) in Moscow

https://www.rt.com/russia/550271-putin-doctrine-foreign-policy/

Some of the comments here make Greta look like a Professor of Climatology.

Reply to  bonbon
February 23, 2022 2:25 pm

I know, kids, homework is heavy.
Imagine if kids could dislike their teachers?
Oh, wait, that is Woke!

griff
Reply to  bonbon
February 24, 2022 4:01 am

This is just nonsense.

Is Moscow paying you?

Jade Goat
February 23, 2022 12:23 pm

Nah – won’t happen!
Nato knows that war with Russia is suicide.
Putin knows that war with Nato is suicide.
I agree with Anne Applebaum here who says that Putin’s grumbles about Nato are “a distraction” – watch and you’ll be convinced –
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRTakARMODE

If Putin didn’t want Nato on his borders, why would he invade Ukraine, thereby encouraging Sweden and Finland to look at joining Nato?
Putin MUST have known that would happen!
He’s not THAT stupid!

No. Putin grumbles about the Nato countries on his border because he can’t invade THEM.
He is a piss-ant looking for another anthill to piss from. Ukraine is “up for grabs” (not being in Nato) so he snaps it up.
The logic seems rock-solid to me.

As for the fighters heading east – they’ll reinforce what’s already in the Nato countries.
Panic over!

Reply to  Jade Goat
February 23, 2022 2:19 pm

See what Scott Ritter, US weapons inspector, says about Applebaum, McFaul ‘Russian experts’ :

https://www.rt.com/russia/550057-zelensky-dangerous-nuclear-ukraine/

and laugh.
NATOstan is finished. Not that it understands it openly, yet.

February 23, 2022 12:43 pm

I don’t think either Biden or Putin are “mad” enough to start a nuclear war, even with tactical weapons. That’s a no-win situation. There is a lot more we can do to curtail Russia’s aggression without officially declaring war. Putin knows that. Let’s see how far he tries to go and risk those responses.

February 23, 2022 12:45 pm

So now the warmunista alarmoclones are h3ll bent on starting WWIII. Can’t say they didn’t warn us. Can’t say we didn’t see it coming. It’s going to get a lot worse before it gets better, if ever.

griff
Reply to  Mike Dubrasich
February 24, 2022 4:01 am

I think you’ll find this was Putin’s idea and nobody else’s

Reply to  griff
February 24, 2022 12:48 pm

No, AOC and her radical Left warmunista comrades gleefully welcomed World War to “combat climate change”. It’s in the record. You yourself celebrated the idea of World War, as well as world domination by climate tyrants. You yourself praised the Net Zero build up to World War. You have been jonesing for armed conflict to advance your agenda. You can’t erase your bellicose desire to remake the world by the most brutal and violent means. It all comes home to roost on your head and those of your fearmongering vermin.

Michael S. Kelly
Reply to  griff
February 25, 2022 8:44 pm

I think you’re right about that. And I think it might be the end of Putin, politically.

February 23, 2022 1:10 pm

Until this year, and even after Crimea was taken, Ukrainians were against joining NATO. Did Obama make a mistake not pushing economic isolation after Crimea was taken? Trump couldn’t do anything – there was no immediate provocation.

So here we are again, Putin taking another chunk out of Ukraine and now the Ukrainians are worried this might not stop at the Russian-leaning areas in the east. Finally, they would actually vote to join NATO if offered.

It’s a complicated situation. On one hand, an independent country that’s somewhat of a Democracy is being invaded. It’s quite clear that if Kyiv responds militarily, it will be shelled and perhaps even taken.

Add to that the idiotic decisions by the EU/UK and the USA/Canada to abandon any thoughts of energy independence, which has handed a lifeline to a Russian state that otherwise would have collapsed by now.

What to do? A real leader who can see the energy situation clearly and isn’t part of the Church of AGW would immediately start ramping up oil and coal production and maybe even look into a modern nuclear program for the future.

But when you look at these major new Chinese manufacturing cities and see all the multinationals there, you know who’s really running the show. The price of all that corruption is ceding energy security.

Therefore, China will use this Russia situation to its advantage and we really can’t do a damned thing about Ukraine – nor for Taiwan when it falls later this year. And we hope Putin understands that if he still has his eyes on Finland and/or Estonia, that might actually force the EU to look for some collective manhood… maybe.

For now, as Finland/Sweden in particular are strongly against joining NATO, it’s Putin’s game and these weak sanctions are all we’ve got.

Reply to  Joe Gordon
February 23, 2022 2:23 pm

Finlandisation is one possibility for Ukraine.
Key is, NATOstan out, Europe in, and Russia with China on the ball.

griff
Reply to  Joe Gordon
February 24, 2022 4:00 am

‘In 2017, Ukraine adopted a constitutional amendment that committed itself to NATO membershipUkraine then adopted a National Security Strategy aimed at developing its NATO partnership in 2021. ‘

Ukrainians backed that.

Reply to  griff
February 24, 2022 11:37 am

It’s a little more complicated than that. The amendment made a commitment to supporting the process, but as recently as a couple of week ago, diplomats implied that the bid could be negotiated away in return for a treaty of sorts with Russia.

Keep in mind that Russia has been engaged in a war of sorts with Ukraine since 2014, when it took Crimea.

Popular opinion in western Ukraine is pro-NATO, and has been since 2014, but the eastern half of the country was against it. Obviously polls would turn out a little differently today, but the consensus was that proceeding with membership was far from a given.

I had no idea you actually read responses on this forum. I thought you were a bot from John Kerry’s office or something. Go figure.

Martin
February 23, 2022 3:13 pm

I remember a debate between Obama and Romney where they were asked where the greatest danger was going to come from. Romney said Russia and Obama laughed at him and mockingly said “the 80s rang, they want their cold war back”. The war just became hot…probably due to climate change.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Martin
February 23, 2022 7:07 pm

Obama was, and is clueless about foreign policy and dealing with dictators. Just like most other Democrats.

Emory
Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 24, 2022 12:08 pm

China…….

ResourceGuy
February 23, 2022 5:08 pm

The U.S. is barely functioning now if Putin wanted to continue past Ukraine.

USPS gets final signoff to order new delivery vehicles – ABC News (go.com)

AntonyIndia
February 23, 2022 5:48 pm

Thought experiment for Americans:

substitute US for Russia and Canada for Ukraine: mostly same language/ culture close neighbors with long land borders.
Imagine the Russian FSS having organized a coup in Ottawa and wanting it to join a military alliance with it (wasn’t Alaska once Russian anyway?): would the Pentagon take that lying down?

Zero chance.

(Also because Canada has the woke Trudeau WEF mannequin “in charge” who is even dumb enough to cancel his own countries fossil fuel wealth, so no need for any foreign enemy,)

Reply to  AntonyIndia
February 23, 2022 7:17 pm

Until about a month ago, the Ukrainians would not have supported joining NATO. And do you have any information that the US (or anyone else) has been involved in any Ukrainian unrest? Perhaps it’s part of the Steele Dossier and Trump’s still out there?

Anyway, now what? Putin is apparently going to take down the Ukrainian government. China is apparently fine with that. Our energy grid hasn’t been this weak since before WWII, thanks to Obama and Biden.

Tom Abbott
February 23, 2022 7:20 pm

It looks like Putin is starting to murder innocent people in Ukraine. The attack has begun.

A ruthless dictator murdering innocent people. What will the West do about this?

Putin is an existential threat to world peace.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 23, 2022 8:02 pm

How can Germany justify buying fossil fuels from a ruthless, murderer-of-innocent-people, like Vladamir Putin?

Anders Valland
February 24, 2022 4:24 am

Paying more for energy is not much of a sacrifice when the only madman in the room, Putin, is throwing a temper tantrum.

Russia has not got the financial stamina to enter Ukraine and stay. Putin is already on his knees financially as Russia is severely lagging behind in economic development. Yes, he can make a move now and hope that everyone backs down but he cannot sustain the effort. I think he knows it.

The bigger problem is he is the small fish jumping out of the water. The usually do that because of the bigger fish below….

February 24, 2022 7:00 am

The reason I voted for Johnson instead of Clinton was because she would’ve been the greatest gift to Russia and OPEC ever imagined. Well, before Biden anyway.

The president and his son are emblematic of how our government works. He essentially took bribes in support for his crackhead son and, according to him, took kickbacks from that.

If we were properly focused on energy security, greenhouse gas emissions would be a moot point.

The Northern Hemisphere climate was much more extreme in previous centuries. The past 150 years have been unusually kind. We are not prepared for reversion to the mean.

#AntiFragileEnergy #GreenNUCLEARDeal #HighlyFlexibleNaturalGas #IncineratePlasticPollution #WasteToEnergy

Reply to  aaron
February 24, 2022 7:21 am

AntiFragileEnergy #GreenNUCLEARDeal #HighlyFlexibleNaturalGas 

9AED7BE9-E9E1-4BA4-9ACC-52FA638A50EF.jpeg
Reply to  aaron
February 24, 2022 7:23 am

AntiFragileEnergy #GreenNUCLEARDeal

55D1178C-3EEF-464C-9297-105828FDDEA0.jpeg
Reply to  aaron
February 24, 2022 7:24 am

The reason I voted for Johnson instead of Clinton was because she would’ve been the greatest gift to Russia and OPEC ever imagined. Well, before Biden anyway.

E22C4D72-97BF-47DF-8E85-BFCA6ADA4C08.png
Reply to  aaron
February 24, 2022 7:26 am

OPEC

F769C791-08A9-4412-8810-C2BD216E90A7.png