h/t Jo Nova; In the wake of Britain’s recent catastrophic wind drought, the Boris Johnson administration appears set to embrace nuclear power as their main strategy for achieving net zero.
U.K. Net Zero Emission Plan to Focus on Nuclear Power, FT Says
By Sherry Su 16 October 2021, 20:35 GMT+10
…
Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng is to unveil an overarching “Net Zero Strategy” paper as soon as Monday, along with a “Heat and Building Strategy” and a Treasury assessment of the cost of reaching the 2050 goal, the report said.
The main strategy will have a heavy focus on Britain’s nuclear power program. Prime Minister Boris Johnson was expected to give the go-ahead to the documents on Friday, according to the report.
The creation of a “regulated asset base” model will be key to delivering future large atomic-power stations. Under the plan, households will be charged for the cost of a plant via an energy levy long before it begins generating electricity, the report said.
…
Read more: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-10-16/u-k-net-zero-emission-plan-to-focus-on-nuclear-power-ft-says
A pivot to nuclear power is marginally less insane than a 50 degree north nation trying to stay warm in winter using solar power, but the new proposal still sounds very expensive.
The “regulated asset base” prepayment for new nuclear plants will drive up the cost of energy for Britons who are already reeling from having to pay for the British Government’s energy market tinkering.
In addition, a commitment to future nuclear power does nothing to solve Britain’s current energy woes. A new generator which is planned to come online in 15 years or whatever does not help keep the lights and heating on today.
When France transitioned to affordable nuclear power in the 1970s, there was bipartisan support for the move. Continued reliance on oil and fossil fuel was seen as a major national security risk. The mass produced nuclear plants were deployed with minimal red tape, and have continued supplying France with affordable, reliable nuclear power ever since.
But a similar will to act decisively does not yet appear to exist in Britain.
It is the rush, the government attempts to impose energy policy, which I believe is making everything so expensive. Nobody will invest in nuclear in Britain without government financial support, because the political risk is too great. Building nuclear plants is affordable, until you add the red tape and the risk the next administration might shut you down.
The best thing the Boris Johnson administration could do, in my opinion, is to lay off the power sector, stop funnelling ordinary people’s utility bill cash to special interest groups through sweetheart deals and guaranteed purchase contracts, and allow the free market to restore reliability and affordability to Britain’s energy network.
Right now Britain’s energy market is a mess, everyone has their hand out. All of these demands for special consideration to achieve non-commercial government energy policy objectives are being subsidised by ordinary people, who are suffering unprecedented energy bills and fuel poverty.
BoJo’s administration has got to stop tinkering, they have to stop trying to kid themselves that they can somehow outsmart the smooth operators who run Britain’s energy industry, the smart boys who are doing very well out of this shambles, at the expense of the British People.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I’m afraid this is just misleading nonsense…
17GW of new nuclear power has been part of the present govt’s energy strategy since October 2010. No pivot here…
This is just another attempt to find some way of funding the intended nuclear plant… companies have pulled out of Wlfa and Moorside because no way could be found to produce a return on investment without burdening consumers (as Hinkley will)
There is also now no chance the Chinese will be allowed a stake in Sizewell or to build Bradwell. so there’s an element of revised foreign policy in there. So the UK has no regulation against building nuclear, however US foreign policy has scuppered this…
And BTW – Rolls Royce has not yet got or even designed an SMR – their head was explaining their plans last week on UK R4 and said they were currently trying to fund the development.
They only waited till all the engineers that built the UK reactors retired to start demanding that we MUST have (French) reactors and far far greater cost than our own ones would have costed.
“the Boris Johnson administration appears set to embrace nuclear power as their main strategy for achieving net zero.” Good for you Mr. Johnson. I wish America would comment to more nuclear energy. Stop shutting down the ones we already have that are still functioning just fine. Nuclear is the best answer.
I am curious as to where the nukes would be built. Given the relative small size of the Isles I would guess it would take 10 years alone to site a plant!
As for the funding plan, it at least addresses the financial risk of bankruptcy facing any corporation or bank should they (try to) build it.