Revealing Chinese-virus excess-death graphs #coronavirus

By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley

In the United Kingdom, total excess deaths are now causing real alarm among statisticians. The 18,516 deaths recorded in England and Wales in the week to April 10 are the highest weekly total since winter 2000 – and we are not in winter now. There 7996 (or 76%) more deaths than the mean weekly death toll for the time of year.

clip_image002

Fig. 1. UK weekly excess deaths by the thousand, compared to the five-year mean, attributed to the Chinese virus (grey) and not currently attributed to it (green), weeks 8 to 15 of 2020.

It can no longer be argued that the Chinese virus is “no worse than the annual flu”. If these are the excess deaths even after a lockdown, one can imagine how much worse the position might have been without a lockdown.

Of the 7996 excess deaths, 6213 had the Chinese virus registered on the death certificate, leaving 1783 unexplained excess deaths. A handful of these are attributable to suicide and other adverse consequences of the lockdown: inferentially, nearly all the rest are uncounted Chinese-virus deaths.

Sir David Spiegelhalter, Professor of the Public Understanding of Statistics in the University of Cambridge, described the excess-deaths spike as “incredibly vivid”. He told the Daily Telegraph:

“I don’t think I’ve ever been as shocked when I’ve looked at something, particularly as just over half of that spike were death certificates with COVID written on them. We knew there was going to be a jump in COVID-registered deaths. I hadn’t expected such a huge number of deaths which didn’t mention it on the death certificate.”

Sir David would not have been so surprised if he had been tracking our daily graphs showing the compound daily growth rates in confirmed (i.e., usually more serious) cases and in deaths. These growth rates, though a lot less bad than before the world began to take the Chinese virus seriously, are still dangerously high, baking in substantial numbers of future deaths.

The unallocated deaths reveal yet another weakness in HM Government’s recording and publication of the figures. It was already known that the death statistics announced in Downing Street’s daily press conferences were underestimated by at least 52% nationally (41% in England and Wales, 70% in Scotland, 91% in Northern Ireland: Fig. 2) because the figures were for hospital deaths only, excluding all deaths in care homes and in people’s houses.

Now it seems that even after adding 52% the figure is a 76% underestimate (Fig. 1), because the Government has not taken the elementary step of issuing instructions that all fatalities where the virus is suspected to have caused suffocation should be tested for the virus and the results reported to it within 24 hours where possible.

clip_image004

Fig. 2. Daily death counts reported by hospitals and the total corrected by the Office for National Statistics to allow for deaths registered later.

The absence of credible death statistics compounds the difficulties caused by HM Government’s failure to give instructions to hospitals and doctors to report all cases where the patient was infected but has recovered. In the absence of these basic numbers, HM Government is visibly stumbling about in the dark.

Daily growth rates in new cases and in deaths are no longer falling much, but they need to be lower before it becomes safe to end the lockdowns in those nations that have them. Sweden, with no lockdown, continues to track a little above the global daily growth rate in cumulative cases, and appreciably above it in cumulative deaths. Sweden has 175 deaths per million population, compared with 64 per million in Denmark, 34 in Norway and 25 in Finland.

clip_image006

Fig. 1. Mean compound daily growth rates in cumulative confirmed cases of COVID-19 for the world excluding China (red) and for several individual nations averaged over the successive seven-day periods ending on all dates from March 28 to April 20, 2020.

clip_image008

Fig. 2. Mean compound daily growth rates in cumulative COVID-19 deaths for the world excluding China (red) and for several individual nations averaged over the successive seven-day periods ending on all dates from April 4 to April 20, 2020.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

317 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
richard
April 22, 2020 1:37 pm

A friend’s daughter working at a fairly large hospital is not allowed to talk about numbers or what is going on.

Hmm now how do I read that?

Reply to  richard
April 22, 2020 3:36 pm

If you are talking about the numbers regarding ongoing trials, it is considered unethical to do so.
In the case of researchers involved with clinical trials of unapproved drugs, it is sometimes illegal to do so, depending on who is doing the talking.
The idea is to keep the studies as unbiased as possible.

If it is regarding numbers not having to do with clinical trials, there may be concerns regarding HIPAA.
Doctors and others have a legal obligation to maintain the privacy of individuals.
Besides for those concerns, I do not think there is any reason why what is going on cannot be spoken about or reported.
Some statistical information on deaths and survival is discussed in press conferences, for example by the governor of New York, when he reported that 20% of intubated patients have been surviving in New York hospitals.
There is other specific info on cases in New York compared here:
https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/doh/downloads/pdf/imm/covid-19-daily-data-summary-deaths-04152020-1.pdf

And here:
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-age-sex-demographics/

richard
Reply to  Nicholas McGinley
April 22, 2020 3:46 pm

cases and deaths.

Reply to  richard
April 22, 2020 3:55 pm

I think that in general, in many public and private organizations and businesses, there is a general prohibition on disclosing things except by people who are specifically authorized and given permission to do so.

richard
Reply to  Nicholas McGinley
April 23, 2020 12:29 am

maybe the numbers are not significant. Wouldn’t want that getting out.

Krishna Gans
April 22, 2020 3:20 pm

What I heard today from a relative working in an nursing home for elderly where a complete floor all elderly, about 20 people, have been tested positive, no one, even one woman at 99, had symptoms, not even fever.

Germany has passed the frontier of 150.00 confirmed cases while 99.400 recovered.

Elimar
April 22, 2020 7:30 pm

Because they do not know how dangerous it is, yet. That’s what the stats are suppose to show/hint. 🙁
If the stats conclude that Covid-19 is no more dangerous than flu, they will stop using additional protection.

richard
April 23, 2020 8:24 am

“The US Navy ran an experiment. An aircraft carrier was infected with C19. In this environment, people literally live on top of each other. No “such precautions” were taken.

Now, they’ve collected data on this experiment.

Here it is:

4,800 people on the ship
4,582/4,800 were tested for the virus
3,872/4,582 people tested were NOT infected
710/4,582 people tested were infected
355+/710 infected with NO symptoms
9/710 hospitalized
2/710 hospitalized in ICU
1/710 death with/by the virus

The Navy reported that “…of the 600 or so that have been infected…a majority of those, 350 plus, are asymptomatic…”

Summary: In this experiement, with people in an infected environment, on top of each other, we can assume that everyone on the ship was “exposed” to the virus.

The vast majority of those exposed were NOT infected.
The majority of those who were infected did NOT have symptoms.
98% of those infected did NOT require hospitalization.
Of those infected, 0.3% required Intensive Care in the hospital.
Of those infected, 0.14% died.
Of the total population exposed to the virus, 0.02% died.

We now have excellent data. Can this virus really be regarded as a deadly scourge equivalent to the Black Plague? So deadly that the entire economic output of our country must be exterminated to deal with the virus?”

https://www.businessinsider.com/testing-reveals-most-aircraft0-carrier-sailors-coronavirus-had-no-symptoms-2020-4?op=1

niceguy
Reply to  richard
April 23, 2020 6:01 pm

What is the vaccine schedule in the Navy?

Julius
April 23, 2020 7:25 pm

[I wanted to let this through because we don’t censor based on point of view but…invalid email address-mod]