Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach
‘Tis the voice of the Lobster: I heard him declare
“You have baked me too brown, I must sugar my hair.”
As a duck with its eyelids, so he with his nose
Trims his belt & his buttons, & turns out his toes.
When the sands are all dry, he is gay as a lark,
And will talk in contemptuous tones of the Shark:
But, when the tide rises and Sharks are around,
His voice has a timid & tremulous sound.
Over in the Tweetiverse, someone was all boo-hoo about the eeevil effects of “climate change” that he claimed had “already occurred”. He referenced a publication from a once-noble organization that sadly has drunk the “CLIMATE EMERGENCY” koolaid, National Geographic.
So I read it, and the only thing in that, other than what “might” and “probably” and “could” occur at some uncertain time in the future, was a mention of “oceanic heatwaves” in Maine and surroundings, viz:
“The U.S. is already grappling with climate change’s heavy costs, like when a powerful ocean heatwave struck the Northeast and devastated the region’s lobster fishery.”
As a long-time commercial fisherman, that piqued my interest. So I looked to see what I could find out. Of course, over at Forbes, Priya Shukla can be counted on to repeat the latest alarmism. In this case, her article is entitled How Ocean Heatwaves Are Threatening The Gulf Of Maine.
Here’s the area that she’s discussing, on the Northeast coast up where the US meets Canada:

Figure 1. The Gulf of Maine. The state of Maine extends from between Portland and Portsmouth at the south end to Passamaquoddy Bay near the north end. You can see the deeps of the Jordan Basin off the coast of Maine.
Regarding 2018 ocean temperatures, her article said :
“The Gulf of Maine is currently experiencing its third-warmest year in 37 years, with satellite data showing that water temperatures are nearly 3 °F warmer than average – even in the depths of the Jordan Basin (which is over 600 feet deep). This anomalous warming has only been exceeded during ocean heatwaves in 2012 and 2016. Although waters within the Gulf were only warming by one degree every two years for nearly two decades, research by Dr. Andrew Pershing, Chief Scientific Officer of the Gulf of Maine Research Institute, shows that warming in the Gulf of Maine suddenly accelerated in 2004 to nearly ten times that rate so that the Gulf is now warming 99% faster than the rest of the world’s oceans.”
OMG, everyone stand back, it’s the horrible “ocean heatwave”!
(I can’t help but note that if it was warming at one degree every two years, and it “suddenly accelerated in 2004 to nearly ten times that rate“, that would mean it was warming at five degrees F (~2.8°C) per year. That made my bad number detector go off, so I did some more research. If you go here, you can investigate that claim. The buoy out in the Jordan Deep shows that far from changing at 5°F per year, from 2004 to 2005, the peak temperature in August dropped by three degrees F. In 2006 it warmed to where it was in 2004, and after that, peak temperatures remained unchanged for the next five years until the warm year of 2012 … but I digress …)
Okay, so we’re looking for aquatic devastation in the warm-water years of 2012, 2016, and the third-warmest year, 2018. Plus we’re looking to see what happened as the Gulf of Maine waters warmed at an accelerated rate since 2004.
Next, I went to find some data bearing on the question, and you’re gonna either laugh or cry about what I found.
First, I got the total commercial landings for all ocean species in Maine. Maine is the state that has the largest border on the Gulf of Maine, so total landings in Maine are the best indicator of the health of the Gulf. Here’s that graph:

Figure 2. Total weight of all commercial fishery landings in Maine from 1964 to 2018.
Here, you can see the horrible effects of the “ocean heatwaves” in the Gulf of Maine in 2012, 2016, and 2018. In all three cases, catches were higher than in the cooler years before and after.
Next, I looked at the lobster fishery, since the National Geographic article had claimed that “ocean heatwaves” had “devastated the region’s lobster fishery”.
In this case, I was fortunate in that I found enough data to calculate a most important statistic, what in the study of fisheries management is called “CPUE”—Catch Per Unit Effort.
Why is catch per unit effort important? Suppose a given year, a certain fishery catches twice as many fish as the year before. Does this reflect an increase in the numbers of fish in the ocean? Or does it just reflect twice as many boats fishing the same numbers of fish in the ocean? It’s a crucial distinction with many consequences for the management of the fishery.
Now, in different fisheries, the “unit effort” has different meanings. If it is a longline fishery, for example, they catch fish on mile-long lines with hooks dropping from them at intervals. So the “unit effort” would likely be “hook-days”, the number of hooks times the number of days that the hooks are in the water. And the CPUE would then be pounds (or kilos) caught per hook per day.
For lobsters, it’s much simpler. Each fisherman is allotted a certain number of traps that he can fish, no more than 800 traps per boat. So the unit effort is the number of traps fished, and the CPUE is pounds per trap.
With that as prologue, here is the CPUE for the Maine lobster fishery.

Figure 3. Lobster catch per unit effort, Maine, from 1964 to 2018.
Look at the awful outcome of the “marine heatwaves” of 2012, 2016, and 2018 on the Maine lobster fishery … they actually increased the lobster CPUE. And check out the result of the “accelerated” ocean warming since 2004 … steadily increasing lobster catch rates. I told you you’d either laugh or cry.
I swear, they’re getting so desperate that they are simply making things up out of the whole cloth. They hear a rumor, multiply it by “EMERGENCY”, add a soupçon of “IT’S WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT” and a heaping teaspoon of “EVERYONE PANIC!!”, and write it up as if it were fact, with bonus points for using a new alarmist term like “ocean heatwave”.
They say “The truth will out”, but man, it’s taking longer than I thought …
w.
My Perennial Request: When you comment, please quote the exact words you are discussing. I began asking this after years of people saying “Willis, you claimed X” when I’d said nothing of the sort. Quoting the exact words avoids endless misunderstandings.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Willis, thanks for quoting from”‘Tis the Voice of the Lobster” by Lewis Carroll in Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. This is worth re-reading and makes much more sense to me about lobsters than the ravings of the Warmistas.
Thank, Nicholas. I work to make my pieces interesting, educational, and fun.
w.
And that you have done, Willis.
The post was “interesting, educational, and fun”.
Regards,
Bob
Do check into Lewis Carroll and his math work everyone. He was very good at more than writing fictional stories.
Just a pity that graphs are seen as so boring that they have to be tarted up with background pictures.
Hey, if you like boring graphs, that’s your business. I figure, why should science be boring?
Me, I look on my graphs as works of art. I want them to pop, to stand out. Plus which, it makes them instantly recognizable as my work and not that of someone else.
w.
Thanks Willis,
I like the lobster peering over the bars in the chart. Lots of symbolism there. Perhaps Mr. Aris doesn’t like the message, subliminal or otherwise?
-Cube
I especially loved your last paragraph Willis.
You need to write a book which parodies the insanity of the 21st Century cultural leftists. May I suggest you call it “The Hitchhikers Guide to the Planet” with the bywords: “EVERYONE PANIC!!”
Great job Willis !
Forwarded a copy of this to Ms. Shukla.
Is she any relation to the climate change thieving Jagadish Shukla?
NOTE: The argument isn’t about “We’re all going to die” anymore.
It’s an economic argument about damage to an industry. (A fallacious argument too).
Most people recognise that the costs of Green policies are the reason to not do them, so the economics is the argument that must be won. (Honestly or not).
This retreat should be welcomed.
They are on the run.
well at least it’s not the ski industry any more…..we were all getting sick and tired of that one
The enemy of climate alarmism is data.
And to think they claim the mantle of “science” and that we skeptics are nothing but addle-minded, bought off knuckle dragging “science deniers”.
It never changes.
I don’t know, Willis, but for figure 3 if you connect the dots in 2016 and 2018 and extend the line down to the x axis, it appears somewhere around 2030 the total lobster catch goes to 0. It’s pretty obvious. And I really like lobster.
rbabcock February 14, 2020 at 2:27 pm
I don’t know, Willis, but for figure 3 if you connect the dots in 2016 and 2018 and extend the line down to the x axis, it appears somewhere around 2030 the total lobster catch goes to 0. It’s pretty obvious. And I really like lobster.
____________________________________
OK. From 2016 to 2018 that’s a peak. And what goes up often comes down.
OTOH: good hint. Correct me were I’m wrong – there’s, arguable, a half sine-curve between 1960 – 2020.
– with = 2 x 11.3 / ( 6 + 1 )
https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-huawei&sxsrf=ALeKk03kEeJyNqjrGLRp3DD0ydcCAq_33w%3A1582721443806&ei=o2lWXtrYMO7KrgSlx76YCQ&q=%3D+2++x+11.3+%2F+%28+6+%2B+1%29&oq=%3D+2++x+11.3+%2F+%28+6+%2B+1%29&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-serp.
– again the quasi biennial oscillation.
– with = 2 x sunspot cycle / ( 6 El Niño’s + 1 La Niña )
Looks like the Maine Fisheries have a Peak Season once every 14 – 16 years
1968
+13
1981
+15
1996
+16
2012
While Loobster just keeps going up, up, up
Best thing about the seas raising in temperatures 5F per year, in 35 years you will be able to harvest your Loobster already cooked
LOL, Bryan – I thought of the same thing too with their silly 5 deg F heating every year … in but a few years we won’t have to worry about sea level rise, as the entire oceans would boil away!
I agree with your statement that “they’re getting so desperate that they are simply making things up out of the whole cloth.”
Unfortunately even when confronted with numbers that eviscerate their claims they don’t change their minds so I am not sure how to put the brakes on this.
“…I am not sure how to put the brakes on this.”
Like drunks and addicts, they have to hit bottom. Unfortunately, they can take us with them.
for some possible insight, look at this
https://getpocket.com/explore/item/150-years-ago-a-philosopher-showed-why-it-s-pointless-to-start-arguments-on-the-internet?
Also, consider this evaluation by Thomas Jefferson as to why “facts” don’t matter
“Man, once surrendering his reason, has no remaining guard against absurdities the most monstrous, and like a ship without rudder, is the spot of every wind. With such persons, gullability, which they call faith, takes the helm from the hand of reason and the mind becomes a wreck.” —Thomas Jefferson (1822)
It might go away with sufficient distraction but it isn’t likely to get better.
Head-on collision with the facts will do it in time, with sufficient exposure. As Burns said: “Facts are chiels that winna ding.” They are kinda hard to come by admittedly, especially in relation to the future.
I used to live in Bermuda where they had strict rules on the use of traps. You could get a license to dive and catch them but with no scuba equipment. Commercial fisherman could use traps in some areas. Every now and then someone would get caught for illegal trapping. The lobsters tasted fantastic.
Who know how the lobster got
Into the lobster pot
When he went in he didn’t doubt
That there would be
A way out
There was not.
One of Spike Milligan’s finest, I think.
Another entry into the archive of “silly pronouncements”.
NatGeo should have its own volume by now.
OK. One degree every two years for two decades is ten degrees. The rate is 0.5 degree per year.
Ten times that rate is 5 degrees per year. It is 16 years since 2004. The temperature would have increased 80 degrees since then for a total of 90 degrees. That’s gotta be Fahrenheit because the ocean isn’t boiling.
Ms. Shukla, you are innumerate. Somehow people are ashamed of being illiterate. On the other hand, some folks wear their innumeracy as a badge of honor. It is not. /rant
Lewis Carroll beat them to it. He also wrote: “And why the sea is boiling hot, and whether pigs have wings.”
Ronald G
…and ships and shoes and sealing wax and cabbages and kings…
Cheers
Mike
The death of Nat Geo due to climate change is tragic
That’s another one for the list of what glopbal warming can do!
Willis, thank you for another interesting post. It’s always fascinating to see the discrepancies between the alarmist “news” and reality. It must be fun working in the fiction writing industry as the MSM and just make stuff up!
I am interested in doing some experiments on the effects of global warming on Maine lobster so I would request a couple of dozen packed in dry ice. I’d be happy to let you participate; just be sure to bring a few bottles of a nice oaky Chardonnay! Hope to hear from you soon!
Great post. Simple and devastating. Great bookmarked graphics.
There is an interesting sidebar (that I have read about—seems plausible, but dunno how true). The Maine lobster catch (80% of US total) was falling in the 70s and 80s from ‘overfishing’. Maine fishermen turned to cod. Then the big cod (a bottom feeding young lobster top predator) got overfished allowing the lobster stock to more than recover to record catches and falling prices. Alas, the cod stock has still not recovered, yet.
Man, not climate change, at work in the Gulf of Maine.
Sad but true, Rud … from the same site I got the other data from:
w.
the story of the zebra mussel has it all in the great lakes
The dams they built just about wiped out the cod fishery….
Thanks, Latitude. The cod were hit hard by a combination of overfishing, dams affecting their prey species (herring and alewives) and the ban on killing marine mammals.
w.
https://globalnews.ca/news/5797225/grey-seals-atlantic-cod-extinction/
To WE and Latitude:
WUWT is like a never ending adult education course. I posted a vaguely recalled memory about Lobster abundance causation. Next thing we have not only a cod ‘proof’ but a cod ‘causation’ more complex than just overfishing.
I consider myself a now gratefully newly educated about Gulf of Maine WUWTer.
Rud: Me, too. You folks are amazing…
WUWT is a many-faceted diamond of education. Thanks to one and all.
More on marine heat waves
https://tambonthongchai.com/2020/01/30/ohw/
I wish this piece could banner the front page of the Portland Press-Herald, but alas…
Hope in one hand and ‘you know what’ in the other. See which one fills up first. I used to purchase that paper to get a chuckle from the ‘letters to the editor’ section. It is too depressing at this point and I haven’t bought it in years.
Willis, I was lucky enough to take up rock fishing during my college years. A friend who worked his way through law school in San Diego crewing on party boats taught me the tricks and let me use his tackle and custom-made rods until I could afford to invest in my own. That picture you posted in the previous post of the CG boat off Eureka reminded me off hopping through the “potato patch” outside the Golden Gate, on the way to the Farallons and a bagful of various rock cod and sea bass. Thanks again for the articles and the reminder of good times. When is it okay to crack a beer at 6:00AM? When the boat leaves the dock and the you’ll be at sea and fishing for the next 10-12 hours!
Ah, yes, the potato patch … it’s what passes for the bar in front of the Golden Gate. Been across it in all weathers, it can get ugly.
w
I live in Maine and do enjoy our lobster. The Gulf of Maine is a bit of a stand alone ocean climate. It is sheltered from the Gulf Stream by Cape Cod and Georges Bank. It is also quite deep and remains relatively cold most of the time. Sometimes Gulf Stream waters swirl into the Gulf of Maine and cause ocean temps to fluctuate up quite a bit. The point being is that ocean temps off the coast of Maine are not a particularly good indicator of whats going on in the rest of the ocean.
So basically, you’re saying it is the oceanic equivalent of “weather”.
This is my shocked face that the alarmists would try to turn a “weather” event into a definitive statement on climate!
I am from Maine. I can confirm this observation on the Gulf Stream Eddies impacting the Gulf of Maine. I think the cycle is 4 or 5 years understanding that the Stream wiggle is entitled to a mind of it’s own. Another factor you should use is the ground fishery was squeezed out of Maine into Mass. Because Maine law says by catch of lobsters subjects the whole catch to siezure. Not so in Mass. This rule diminished landings in Maine.
Isn’t volcanic activity a factor in the warmer water near Maine?
One other thing I noticed the article said, “The Gulf of Maine is currently experiencing its third-warmest year in 37 years, with satellite data…” That puts the date start date about 1981, right in the range that I use a demarcation and call “BS” before satellite. It was in the period 1978-1982 that the first truly operation weather satellites were launched.
What I after see in reporting is that the starting data is from this period or later and data from BS is ignored or discounted.
Along with “EMERGENCY”, “IT’S WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT’, and “EVERYONE PANIC’ you need to add “WHIPPED TO A LIGHT FROTH AND SERVED IN A BOWL OF STUPID’
after that, it is perfect.
Weeks ago I was showing a few people the band of warm water at the Maine Latitude that circles the globe, same lat. at the Mediterranean etc. and appears to be caused by the magnetic shield as it is a common phenomenon and wanders about the place at all latitudes, on and off, but if you watch for it it is real, I’ve been watching it for a decade or more and quite often you have cool and hot bands alternating at all latitudes in a way that strongly suggests the mag. shield …I jokingly bet friends that they would soon be blaming global warming for the temporary band of hot water at NY… as they always do with any hot anomaly. Even though it is clearly a SST anomaly.
It is already fading and was way hotter before. You can already see cool SST waters moving into that area…I wonder if that will qualify as global cooling?
Here is a SST anomalies chart on Elders Weather which I watch and seems accurate. Note that band of hot water circling the planet…not as obvious now as it has begun to break up but still pretty damn obvious…unless you are a fucking idiot greeny. The bands are usually more obvious, its a bit jumbled right now, which is also normal, keep an eye on it. Does anyone know more about this?
https://www.eldersweather.com.au/climimage.jsp?i=sstag
And speaking of Nat Geo, check out their wall map of the world that has no ice at all showing at the North Pole.
My grandies were perplexed that Santa’s home base was just all open ocean. What’s up with that?, they wanted to know.
Grandad here had to explain to them that Nat Geo had just made a mistake – there was still miles & miles of ice at the North Pole, and Santa would always have his presents warehouse there, and his stables for Donna, Blitzen, etc etc etc. (I had no clue where those elves bunk down – I just moved the tricky discussion to other topics)
And looking at Nat Geo’s depiction of an ice-free Arctic, maybe it’s no wonder that there’s a “Ship Of Fools” stuck in the (non-existent) ice up there every.single.year.
Surely the elves bunk down in “egloos”.
It would be very unusual (and cartographicaly wrong) for a map to display very variable sea ice. It is correct for a map to show the ocean at the north pole, because that’s what it is.
What it is, is – misleading.
They have no problem showing the extensive ice shelves in the Antarctic, and the sea ice extent in the Ross Sea.
IMO, NatGeo treats cartography as Al Gore predicts it to be.
I used to have a Nat Geo map of the Arctic from the 1960s or ’70s. As I recall, it showed the average extent of the ice cap, either in summer or winter, or both.
As to Santa’s reindeer, it was originally Dunder, then Donner, but if it is now Donna, so be it. Has anyone examined these reindeer to ensure they have broken the glass, or maybe ice, ceiling?
The alarm-ism is non stop….
A quick web look came up with this first—->https://lobsteranywhere.com/seafood-savvy/best-lobster-prices/
which has this narrative –data/photos –>Willis you will appreciate the data charts
“2015 was a different story. Frozen over waters prevented many lobstermen from setting traps or even getting their boats out of the harbor. The temperature of water at Beal’s Lobster Pier in Southwest Harbor, Maine was a frigid 36 degrees and it was nearly May! At the same time the year before the water temperature was around 43 degrees.”
My passion for flyfishing has taken me to New England for the Martha’s Vineyard derby a time or two.
One of my favorite memories there were watching the lobstermen heading out of Menemsha Harbor
at daybreak into the fog with only a dog (chesapeake type) for company. Very dangerous
work in my view..hope to go back again in the future..where 10 wts go to die….