Guest slam-dunk by David Middleton
Climate change threatens nearly 40% of the world’s primates, study says
By Scottie Andrew and Saeed Ahmed, CNN
Updated 12:58 PM ET, Mon June 17, 2019(CNN) As cyclones and droughts are expected to grow in frequency and intensity while global temperatures rise, humankind’s closest relatives will become increasingly vulnerable to extinction, scientists say.
At climate change’s current pace, nearly 40% of the Earth’s primates will be threatened by the extreme weather events that accompany rising temperatures, a new study says. And with 60% of primate species already vulnerable to habitat loss and human activity, researchers are pleading that conservationists consider both human and climatic impacts in their efforts.
In the study, published in the journal Nature Climate Change …
[…]
Catastrophic News Network
While “habitat loss and human activity” may very well imperil many primate species, they evolved and thrived through a helluva lot more climate change than humans will ever cause.
References
Data from Hadley Centre / UEA CRU
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/
For terms and conditions of use, please see
http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcrut3/terms_and_conditions.html
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadsst3gl/mean:12/compress:12
Jouzel, J., et al. 2007. EPICA Dome C Ice Core 800KYr Deuterium Data and Temperature Estimates. IGBP PAGES/World Data Center for Paleoclimatology Data Contribution Series # 2007-091. NOAA/NCDC Paleoclimatology Program, Boulder CO, USA.
Jouzel, J., V. Masson-Delmotte, O. Cattani, G. Dreyfus, S. Falourd, G. Hoffmann, B. Minster, J. Nouet, J.M. Barnola, J. Chappellaz, H. Fischer, J.C. Gallet, S. Johnsen, M. Leuenberger, L. Loulergue, D. Luethi, H. Oerter, F. Parrenin, G. Raisbeck, D. Raynaud, A. Schilt, J. Schwander, E. Selmo, R. Souchez, R. Spahni, B. Stauffer, J.P. Steffensen, B. Stenni, T.F. Stocker, J.L. Tison, M. Werner, and E.W. Wolff. 2007. “Orbital and Millennial Antarctic Climate Variability over the Past 800,000 Years”. Science, Vol. 317, No. 5839, pp.793-797, 10 August 2007.
“Periods of Primate Evolution and Their Fossils.” Primate Timeline, analogicalplanet.com/Pages/ContentPages/Sidebars/PrimateTimeChart.html.
“The Primate Family Tree Or Primate Evolutionary Tree.” The Primate Family Tree – Primate Evolutionary Tree, www.age-of-the-sage.org/evolution/primate_family_tree.html.
Zachos, J., et al. 2008. “Cenozoic Global Deep-Sea Stable Isotope Data”.
IGBP PAGES/World Data Center for Paleoclimatology Data Contribution Series # 2008-098. NOAA/NCDC Paleoclimatology Program, Boulder CO, USA.
Zachos, J. C., Pagani, M., Sloan, L. C., Thomas, E. & Billups, K. “Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present”. Science 292, 686–-693 (2001).
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Much of the ‘habitat loss’ is due to ‘green’ renewable schemes like the palm oil plantations that are destroying so much tropical rain forest. But like windfarms killing rare birds and bats – it is alright to destroy the environment if it is a green money making scheme.
AND THE TRUTH…SHALL SET YOU FREE!
If they’re worried about our planet’s non-human primates (not to mention raptors, bats, etc.), then they should end all of the ecologically destructive “green energy” schemes, since none of them are actually “green” and they won’t produce the energy needed anyway.
And it’ll be this 40%: “Birthstrikers: The Selfless Activist Effort to Cede the Future to Climate Skeptics”
Well, we can hope that stupidity, arrogance and hubris are either self-correcting, via birthrates, or we could actually force a dialogue that shows them how the only 97% that has any meaning in climate change, is that 97% of everything ever said about climate change was nothing more than propaganda, using every dirty trick in the propaganda playbook.
Bonobos (My choice) or Chimps? I am deliberately excluding humans because most seem to have forgotten where we are in the grand scheme of things.
That depends on whose version of the grand scheme of things you believe in.
Where humans fit in (African great apes) is less of an issue than tarsiers. Once considered prosimians, like lemurs and lorises, genetic analysis has shown them to be more closely related to us simians or anthropoids, ie “monkeys” and apes. For instance, tarsiers’ vitamin C-making gene is broken in the same way as is ours, while prosimians retain the ability produce the essential nutrient.
Tarsiers and simians are now both assigned to Suborder Haplorhini, and the prosimians to Strepsirrhini (the terms are based upon nose traits). Simians include catarrhines (Old World monkeys and apes), and the platyrrhines (New World monkeys). The English word “monkey” is thus paraphyletic, while “ape” is monophyletic, since it includes lesser and great apes but excludes Old World monkeys. It’s scientifically correct to say that apes evolved from catarrhines, not monkeys. Old World monkeys and apes share a more recent common ancestor than we do with New World monkeys.
The last common ancestor of all extant catarrhines would have looked more like a monkey than an ape, however, at least those monkeys with tails. Many OWMs share with us apes the trait of lacking a tail.
In some other languages, the words for both monkeys and apes are monophyletic. In Spanish, both monkeys and apes are monos (!). In German both monkeys and apes are Affen, however the ape superfamily Hominoidea, containing the lesser and great ape families, can be distinguished by the term Menschenaffen, ie Men-apes/monkeys. Or maybe that refers just to great apes, the Hominidae, but that would still be monophyletic, as long as it includes humans and our extinct ancestors.
Climate change porn … change the channel, please.
I may not be a scientist, but in the words of the SCOTUS Potter Stewart … I know Climate porn when I see it.
Nobody actually has any faith in evolution.
Not even from conception till death do us part. Well, not nobody, but certainly a large minority.
No faith required. Evolution is repeatedly observed, ie a scientific fact.
The share of Americans who recognize this fact depends upon how opinion poll questions are asked. Pew recently tried different survey questions. One approach produced 31% pro-creationist responses, versus 18% for the other.
https://www.pewforum.org/2019/02/06/the-evolution-of-pew-research-centers-survey-questions-about-the-origins-and-development-of-life-on-earth/
But in any case, far from nobody accepts the reality of evolution. It’s a majority.
On faith – the daughter of a colleague once said that she would have liked to study Marine Biology, but she couldn’t – because she’d have to believe in evolution!
If that were really her reason, it’s sad.
But she wouldn’t have had to believe in evolution, just understand how biologists have discovered it works. There actually is at least one Harvard-PhD paleontologist who is a creationist and “baraminology” theorist. IIRC, his thesis advisor was Gould.
When teaching at a traditionally Baptist college, I told creationist students that they could inject God into the history of life on earth at any or all points. They just had to learn what science has discovered. They don’t have to believe it.
However it’s a lot easier to reconcile the Bible with biology than with astronomy. Except for the cud-chewing rabbits, which actually eat their excrement, not a cud. And except for the orders of creation in the two contradictory creation myths in Genesis 1 and 2.
Funny to see how the alarmist message gets ever more shrill and twisted. they just can not let go of this one (CC), they see it as their last hope to force a socialist utopia on others. Of course they will not be subject to the ramifications of their own policies.
“they see it as their last hope to force a socialist distopia on others.”
There that’s more like it! 😉
Alan the B
I’m in Johor watching the endangered primates through the open patio door right now. They are Lazy Leaf Monkeys and Greys (no doubt from another planet). They are discussing whether or not to try to get into the house to grab the fruit off the counter. They evolved this skill (consultation) over a short time – presumably the comma in a punctuated equilibrium – in order to adapt to the rapidly changing climate of Southern Malaysia where the temperature has remained unchanged for eons, literally.
This capacity for rapid evolution, possibly to include the formation of committees, dooms these two species extinction, apparently, because within a few generations they will learn how to make steam from coal. We will be gone and they will be monkeying around with the atmosphere.
In the meantime I think they will settle for peanuts. I wonder if I can get them to co-sponsor some CDM project papers before we move to the Paris Accord Article 6.4 in 2020. Hopefully that one that looks like a lawyer isn’t too bright. The spectacles don’t fool me.
Now, just what in the world would convince any Bible believing Creationists to forsake the covenant that exists between their God and themselves, ……. and again take up the belief and worship in/of “false idols” that are directly associated with the pseudo-religion of CAGW climate change?
Those whom are easily fooled have a history of being easily fooled. Why should you expect any different this time?
Oh dear, some of my best friends are primates, as am I.
So long, been nice to know ya.
I have only met the previous Archbishop of York.
“Primates in the Anglican Communion are the most senior bishop or archbishop of one of the 39 churches of the Anglican Communion” [Per the inimitable, and illimitably editable, Wiki-thingy].
There are, apparently, 41 of them [per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primates_in_the_Anglican_Communion%5D.
So, it seems that some 16 or 17 will have less than 11.5 years to live.
Or am I getting confused with the Seer of the Bronx, Representative AOC?
Auto
It’s CNN.
I believe it.
/sarc
How did primates make it through the Holocene Climate Optimum, I wonder…
Obviously they didn’t.
What you are seeing now is an illusion cast by climate deniers to fool the faithful.
They did – and they did just fine.
But there were 40% less of them at that time, anyways.
/sarc
They all went extinct, just like the Polar Bears.
Hope it’s chimps. Those buggers like to rip peoples’ faces off!
Nonsense destroyed by one comprehensive chart.
But the trick is to get the true believers to review independent data.
A better chart would be to show no increase in the purported disasters.
Well climate change activism as indeed wiped out 40% of the human primate sanity.
So there’s that.
“As cyclones and droughts are expected to grow in frequency and intensity while global temperatures rise,…”
Who expects that since we’ve seen the exact opposite over the last 30 years of global temperature rise?
Clearly Godzilla went extinct because of Global Warming and Climate Change. He couldn’t take the heat.
The Alarmist messaging has jumped the sharknadoes.
I am trying to figure out how cyclones and droughts could grow in frequency and intensity as global temperatures rise. Historically cyclones and droughts grow in frequency as the temperature at the poles decreases.
well good…and too bad….something made a bad evolutionary choice and can’t take the weather changing
…and that’s the way evolution is supposed to work
😀
You mean the 40% who are CAGWarmist nutters? Who would miss them. Now that’s natural selection!!
The arrogance of these warmists truly amazes me: to think that they believe they can beat the many massive forces of nature which dictate the climate. Their Bible and its disciples, the IPCC, have even less credibility than the Flat Earth Society and their followers.
In addition the £billions already spent, and planned to be spent, on this crusade has clearly been ineffective: the dreaded “pollutant” of atmospheric CO2 unreasonably keeps rising! The conclusion is warmists must be masochists! The tragedy is that its our money that they are wasting and are spending from our funding of their perks and wages! They are so indoctrinated into this false religion that they deny any consideration of others’ lack of faith and contrary facts and evidence!
Put the problem in its true proportions! They say we must limit temperature rises by 2100 to 1.5 degrees C. Let’s consider what that means to the Earth System which acts and reacts in line with scientifically determined and confirmed processes, and not to any pleadings and theories of religious zealots, however penitent!
Such a temperature rise equates to roughly a 0.5% increase in temperatures when, scientifically, we use the Kelvin scale zero at -273 degrees C and do not cherry pick the artificial zero centigrade scale. That temperature rise equates to an average temperature rise per decade of roughly only 0.065% – far, far less than the error band widths on the warmists’ computer generated projected future average global temperature curve. The error band is so massively wide simply because of the very many adjustments that have to be made for the very many variables that need be taken into consideration which affect the accuracy and reliability of the weather stations’ recorded temperature around the world.
The 0.065% target rate of temperature rise per decade is far, far lower than the accuracy and reliability of the temperature data being used! How then do we adequately monitor the progress of any warmists’ policies, including spending of even more of our money, to see if we are on track to meet the set targets and to periodically making the right judgements and identify what revised or new measures are needed.
But I forget, they will just further adjust the computer inputs to provide the computer output answers their religion tells them are necessary.
CNN…is now Climate Nutters Nattering …
When they’re not hunting witches and dunking warlocks.
The 40% we don’t know, but assume to exist.
And everyone knows that habitat loss and human activity are both caused by CO₂ levels…
These alleged researchers likely assessed the trend of people promising to not have children because of “climate change”; extrapolated that trend out 100 years and concluding that mankind is going extinct.
Fluff and nutter mumblings from global warming religion zealots.
Hum …
And I foolishly thought that the supposition underpinning the cAGW idea was that the poles would warm more than the tropics.
Or are they only BSing about primates in the temperate and polar regions?
“As cyclones and droughts are expected…”
Bullshit.
to grow in frequency…”
Bullshit.
“and intensity…”
Bullshit.
“while global temperatures rise…”
Exactly the opposite of what any basic book on meteorology will tell you! I need not read another word of this nonsense.
, humankind’s closest relatives will become increasingly vulnerable to extinction, scientists say.
“Humankind’s closest relatives” are more intelligent than the so-called “scientists” who author this kind of blather.