Jerry Brown Climate Rant: “We need a total, I might say, brainwashing”

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

Jerry Brown thinks we all need a total brainwashing to avoid the extinction of all mammalian life due to climate change.

Jerry Brown, President of the Independent Republic of California

As he crusades across Europe, the governor is acting like the leader of a sovereign country—an alternative to the United States in the Trump era.

By DAVID SIDERS November 11, 2017

Bonn, Germany, this week, Jerry Brown stopped over at the Vatican, where a doleful group of climate scientists, politicians and public health officials had convened to discuss calamities that might befall a warming world. The prospects were so dire—floods and fires, but also forced migration, famine and war—that some of the participants acknowledged difficulty staving off despair.

California’s doomsayer governor did not express much optimism either. Seated between an economist and an Argentine bishop at the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Brown leaned into his microphone and said, “It is despairing. Ending the world, ending all mammalian life. This is bad stuff.”

“There’s nothing that I see out there that gives me any ground for optimism,” he went on. Still, he promised action: “I’m extremely excited about doing something about it.”

In one sense, Brown’s fixation on climate change would seem unremarkable, the predictable conclusion of a career steeped in the ecological and environmental movements of the 1960s and 1970s. The 1969 Santa Barbara oil spill, early Earth Day rallies and the Stockholm conference on the environment weighed heavily on the public consciousness when Brown was starting out in politics, and observers of a certain age will still recall him mystifying audiences with pronouncements about “planetary realism” and the “spaceship Earth.” He was still talking about the need for a fundamental shift in lifestyle when he said at the Vatican that confronting climate change will require “a transformation of the relationship of human beings to all the mysterious network of things.”

“It’s not just a light rinse,” Brown said. “We need a total, I might say, brainwashing. We need to wash our brains out and see a very different kind of world.”

But in his climate diplomacy today, Brown is performing a more urgent, final act. For nearly all his public life—from secretary of state to governor, to mayor of Oakland and state attorney general before becoming governor once again, at age 72—Brown’s near-constant state was to run for public office. Now, for the first time, he is not. Term limits will chase Brown from the state Capitol in January 2019, and today he calls climate change his “campaign,” dismissing the idea that after running unsuccessfully for president three times, he might try again in 2020. “I’ve thought because people like you ask me,” he said in an interview before leaving for Europe. “But no, I’m not running.”

Now, Brown’s future rests on a family ranch in Northern California, where he is nearly finished building a remote, off-the-grid home. These days, he talks more about rattlesnakes and wild boar than the presidential election, and he has turned his focus from electoral politics to more existential concerns.

Read more: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/11/jerry-brown-california-profile-215812

Perhaps retirement is what Brown had in mind, when Jerry Brown instructed state regulators to survey his Northern California ranch for oil in 2015. Despite the disappointing results of the survey, income from Brown’s land holdings, his governor’s pension and whatever other investments he has accumulated should make for a comfortable retirement.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
177 Comments
Olen
November 12, 2017 7:36 am

ARTICLE: .” He was still talking about the need for a fundamental shift in lifestyle when he said at the Vatican that confronting climate change will require “a transformation of the relationship of human beings to all the mysterious network of things.”

mysterious definition: 1.difficult or impossible to understand, explain, or identify:
Translation they don’t understand climate change.

Reply to  Olen
November 12, 2017 8:36 am

HA you got it before I did…I saw that too, “relationship of human beings to all the mysterious network of things”.

Mysterious network?
Things?

Conspiracy nuts got Christmas early this year. Brown just confirmed human beings relationship to:
Aliens
Alien Abduction
MIB
Ancient Advanced Civilizations
Government Conspiracy:
JFK assassination
Hoffa’s hidden body
And all “false flags’

Does the CIA know he just outed them? I don’t think he’ll make it to retirement….

LOL

Zeke
Reply to  Jenn Runion
November 12, 2017 2:33 pm

The fb i and ci a have discredited themselves so thoroughly and completely, that the Deep State nuts are out in force calling rational people “conspiracy nuts.”

So now there are those two categories.

I think as a test for which you fall into, every one should watch the trailer for the new LBJ movie. If you snort, laugh, or roll your eyes, face it: you are a “conspiracy nut.” 😀 🙂

Reply to  Olen
November 12, 2017 11:58 am

Appealing to Vatican cred? Think of the strife inflicted upon Galileo Galilei during his lifetime.

Goldrider
Reply to  Olen
November 12, 2017 5:14 pm

You DO realize this is BABBLE, right?

techgm
November 12, 2017 8:15 am

“We need a total, I might say, brainwashing.”

Too late.

Christopher D Hoff
November 12, 2017 8:59 am

Basically, somebody attached a high pressure hose to a high pressure septic tank on one end, and Governor Browns ear on the other. His brains have been flushed out leaving his skull densely packed with cr@p, so badly when he opens his mouth a raging torrent of $hit comes roaring out

November 12, 2017 9:26 am

We need (click, buzz, zing), I might say (boing, zoom, bang), brainwashing (ZZZZzzzzz).

(Backstage) OK, boys, get up there quick and wind his key back up……

JLabute
November 12, 2017 10:36 am

That’s a lot of acres for two people with no kids (no little taxpayers to help us out). No wonder he likes illegal immigration. Doesn’t Agenda 21 try to get us away from property ownership? Or is he not in to this sustainability thing?

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/29/us/jerry-brown-california-ranch.html

AndyG55
Reply to  JLabute
November 12, 2017 11:34 am

When is Jerry getting an electric car to travel around his ranch ?

Rather than the fossil fuel guzzling , CO2 spewing , high pollution vehicle he appears to be driving

HYPOCRITE !!!!

M.W. Plia.
November 12, 2017 11:20 am

It’s not just Jerry who’s deluded….

“Climate change is a global problem that requires global solutions. Now more than ever, we need to work together with our partners at home and around the world to show how our collaboration can lead to results in this international fight. Today’s carbon market linking agreement will add to the success we have already seen in reducing greenhouse gas emissions in Ontario, Québec and California. We are stronger together, and by linking our three carbon markets we will achieve even greater reductions at the lowest cost. I look forward to continuing to work with Premier Couillard and Governor Brown on our common goals, including advancing carbon markets and emissions cap programs across North America and around the world.”
Kathleen Wynne
Premier of Ontario

Here in Ontario it’s our total educated and political class who worship the climate priests.

Madness, just insane madness.

Reply to  M.W. Plia.
November 12, 2017 12:01 pm

Does this mean that Canadians are not carbon-based life forms?

Barbara
Reply to  M.W. Plia.
November 12, 2017 7:32 pm

Premier Wynne got the urban vote and not the rural vote. Urban voters in Ontario out-number the rural voters.

TA
Reply to  M.W. Plia.
November 12, 2017 8:19 pm

“Madness, just insane madness.”

It’s mass delusion. They believe what they want to believe and reject anything that doesn’t fit their worldview.

Sara
November 12, 2017 8:39 pm

Build walls around the cities and make them pay a massive, punitive tax for having the gall to travel outside those walls. And (since they have no real understanding of infrastructure) once in a while, shut off the power to the cities completely.

See how long they last with that.

“Soylent green is people!”

Amber
November 12, 2017 10:52 pm

Lets not talk about Mr. Wynn . The Liberals in Ontario excel at deleting E mails and screwing tax payers out of hundred’s of millions in torn up power contracts . Ontario will likely vote them in again just to be ripped off another term . Like Moonbeam in California and Mimi- Beam in BC global warming is the best deflection strategy they could come up with . Kids in their own cities can’t afford a dog house while the planet savers run around the world on kerosene fueled jets to preach the earth has a fever and now they have even come out of the closet encouraging brain washing .

November 13, 2017 4:34 am

And that “off the grid” ranch in California can only ever survive with massive amounts of diesel powered generators and water pumps.
He will need solar panels built in China using resources extracted using diesel powered equipment and manufactured in factories run on electricity from coal powered power plants.
He’s going to have to get lumber trucked in from Oregon or further afield in diesel powered trucks.
The products his ranch produces (if any, he’s a socialist after all and more likely to subsist on the labour of others) will have to be trucked out on diesel powered trucks as well.

Very CO2 neutral, Jerry.

Claritas
November 13, 2017 8:16 am

Shark jumped. Next asshat?

Joel Snider
November 13, 2017 12:31 pm

I would call the policies pushed by Jerry Brown and his entire cadre of Progressive/Eco-fascists exactly what is meant by ‘behavior-based extinction’.

Ian Macdonald
November 14, 2017 1:45 pm

Rather than brainwashing, i reckon it’s about time we saw some legal action over blatantly untrue claims by climate alarmists. Now, anyone is free to publish conjecture or opinion which might or might not become true, but if someone publishes untruths then that is a different matter. If it is done in the name of promoting business interests -and it usually is – then it is fraud, and fraud is a crime.

‘Climate change might cause sea level rise’ – Opinion, therefore not illegal.
‘Ending the world, ending all mammalian life’ is an opinion, and although a ridiculous one, not illegal.

‘Sea levels are rising at an accelerating rate’ – Factual claim, and Untrue, therefore fraudulent.
‘Oceans are becoming more acidic’ Factual claim, and Untrue. Oceans are alkaline.
‘Storms are becoming more frequent’ – Depends on region, but fraudulent if not supported by met data.
‘Grid-scale energy storage tech is just around the corner’ – If there is no product nearing the marketing stage to support the claim, then it is fraudulent.
Diesel cars are causing massive pollution – If official pollution levels have not increased, then that would also seem to be fraudulent.

We could really do with getting some legal eagles onto this. At the very least it would send a warning message to those engaging in deliberate disinformation. It might also incline journals to refuse such articles.