
[At least there will be less radiation spread around. -Anthony]
Going Bananas: Another Climate Change Hustle
Guest essay by Paul C. “Chip” Knappenberger and Patrick J. Michaels
We hear that there is looming banana crisis in Costa Rica—the world’s 2nd leading exporter of the fruit—as this year’s crop is being threatened by an infestation of mealybugs, scale insects, and fungal infection.
Petulance, plagues, disease? It must be climate change, of course!
The Director of the Costa Rican Agriculture and Livestock Ministry’s State Phytosanitary Services, Magda González, told the San José Tico Times, “Climate change, by affecting temperature, favors the conditions under which [the insects] reproduce.” González estimated that the rising temperature and concomitant changes in precipitation patterns could shorten the reproduction cycle of the insect pests by a third. “I can tell you with near certainty that climate change is behind these pests.”
This is bananas.
But there’s a method to Gonzalez’ madness. In it’s recent Warsaw confab on climate change, the UN has made it abundantly clear that one of its endgames is compelling “reparations” for climate damages cost by dreaded emissions of carbon dioxide. The more that poorer nations make these claims—however fatuously—the more momentum builds to extract capital from me and thee.
May we humbly suggest that calling Ms. Gonzalez’ claim “fatuous” is really being too nice. She should actually propose compensating the United States for all the excess bananas that are associated with warmer temperatures.
Figure 1 shows banana production in Costa Rica from 1961-2011. Figure 2 shows the temperatures there over the same period. We hate to burst anyone’s climate-change-is bad-bubble, but the correlation between these two variables is positive. That is, higher temperatures are associated with greater banana production (and yield).

Figure 1. Annual production (tonnes) and yield (Hg/Ha) of bananas in Costa Rica (data from FAOSTAT)

Figure 2. Annual temperature anomalies in Costa Rica, 1961-2011 (data from Berkeley Earth).
And as far as precipitation goes, the trends down there are all over the place—some stations show trends towards increasing rainfall amounts, while others nearby, towards decreasing amounts. The geography of the country, along with all sorts of external influences including tropical cyclone activity, sea surface temperature patterns, and larger-scale circulation systems in both the Pacific and Atlantic makes for a very complex pattern precipitation variability, both temporally and spatially, across Costa Rica. It is virtually impossible to assess the influence of recent human-caused climate change in such a complicated and highly variable natural system.
So you have a situation where annual precipitation variability is high and where warmer conditions seem to be associated with greater banana yields.
While it is probably not out completely out of the question that some sort of weather influence may, in part, play some role in the current affliction of the Costa Rica banana crop, to implicate human-caused global warming, you’d have to have gone completely…, well, you know.
But climate policy has always functioned best in a data-free environment, about the only way a cheap hustle like that of the Costa Rican National Phytosanitariest merits any attention at all.
Related articles
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Banana photosynthesis is by the C3 pathway, which is relatively sensitive to the CO2 fertilization effect. Another graph, with positive correlation, would plot banana productivity per acre against CO2 concentration.
If they want it 0.4 degC cooler and back to the 70s temperature, they’ll soon have it.
cwon14 says:
December 18, 2013 at 9:24 am
“Orwellian media is one thing but we have developed an Orwellian audience that thinks this is all very normal. None of these writers are going to lose work or position being just flat out wrong on statements of fact. This is the world we live in.”
Benjamin Franklin says:
Eighteenth Century at 9:25 am
“Believe none of what you hear and only half of what you see”
Abraham Lincoln says:
Nineteenth Century at 9:23 am
“You can fool some of the people all of the time and all of the people some of the time, but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time.”
Firesign Theater says:
June 18th, 1974 at 9:25 am
“Everything you know is wrong!”
If all of these people are expressing the same basic thought over 250 years (almost to the minute), than it is likely it has always been this way. The quest for truth is a constant battle. You can believe me on that!
Interesting that lobster has only relatively become a “high class” food. Previously, it was eaten by the lower classes, to the extent that servants would demand that it only be served a certain number of times.
As for bananas, as the UN is the EU on steroids, no doubt there will soon be a full and fearsome bureaucracy related to how straight one’s banana should officially be…
Yes, We Have No Banana’s — Pied Pipers
Didn’t have ’em in 1948, either, apparently…
I have NO IDEA why I put a ‘ after the a in bananas — didn’t eat enough bananas, I guess.
Not only bananas but we will have nothing to eat if things of environment sector keeps going in same fashion. We must wake up from deep sombre otherwise our coming generations will be cursing us on our lethargy to control pollution and save this world from climate change.
The increasing self restriction on the usage of agricultural chemicals has and is leading to uncontrollable damage. Maybe this is yet another example.
Can I have some money. I’ve had an infestation of scaly bugs this year on my lemon tree which sits on my terrasse all summer. I’ve tried evrything to get rid of them and they are still there. It must be climate change. I want some money from the rich countries, like china, for france in anything but rich.
The EU commies have announced the fight against air pollution. It kills millions of europeans every year so we have to stop driving in cities, bikes only from now on. A tax will be introduced on beans, cabbage and all methane generating plants.
“higher temperatures are associated with greater banana production (and yield).”
That explains the poor annual production rate of the Wyoming banana industry.
NEW Costa Rican national song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OuB4Jfw5n_8
Or, from the same page, the climate scientist with no clothes?
‘“I can tell you with near certainty that climate change is behind these pests.” – Magda Gonzales
…………from the mouths of babes………………..
Just ask NOAA/GISS to readjust the temperature back to where it was once, then there will be no liability. Can not be so hard to invent a new procedure that makes that, even if it takes some time to find the arguments for the changes.
So, what does this do to radiation exposure from incidental banana contact?
talldave2 says:
December 18, 2013 at 9:11 am
I think you meant “pestilence,” though “petulance” is funnier.
No, no, I’m pretty sure he meant pustulence, which is a combination of pestilence and pustulation.
So where is the evidence of all this claimed petulance and scale? And why should we think that two tenths of a degree spells disaster? Oh yeah, we’re stupid, that’s right!
It is a well known fact banana favors cool climate. This is why Canada, Norway &. Russia are the largest producers. Oh, wait…
Everything is “threatened by climate change”, even the lowly haggis.
mubami says:
December 18, 2013 at 11:01 am
I think you forgot to include /sarc after your message.
I wonder if, perhaps, there are different dangers at work here and it may be the EU and not climate change that’s threatening the Costa Rican banana crop. I read recently that according to the EU a cucumber is not a cucumber unless, per its measured length in millimeters, it has no greater deviancy (sorry, but I couldn’t resist using that description for cucumbers – and, ultimately, bananas) than just a few paltry millimeters in curvature from being ruler straight. A shorter cucumber, however, is granted greater leniency, in relationship to its permitted curve. (Perhaps this is because, the shorter the length, the less size matters.) Now, since I don’t grow cucumbers I’m not privy to the actual dimensions, but I’m really not making any of this up; it’s right there in the EU regulations. And the same kind of tremendously important style of standards are actually ordained by the EU regulators in Brussels to apply to bananas: the general attractiveness of the appearance of a banana. Seriously, I wonder if that’s the reason for any loss in the Costa Rican crop. They just simply aren’t good enough looking to have an affair with.
Tom J,
Maybe if the cucumbers have too great a curvature, they are classified as bananas ?
Come Mr. Climate Man Talley Banana —- I kept looking for the obvious retort and it never materialized — must be Gorbal Warming
Tom J says:
December 18, 2013 at 1:50 pm
“And the same kind of tremendously important style of standards are actually ordained by the EU regulators in Brussels to apply to bananas: the general attractiveness of the appearance of a banana.”
These are only criteria that need to be fulfilled so that you can call your banana a “class A” banana. You can sell all the crooked fruits you want; you just might not achieve the class A price.
When I criticize the EU for something my socialist German colleagues usually come up with calling me a nutter because those fruit regulations are not that bad aren’t they. It takes me endless patience to make it clear to them that fruit classification systems are the least of my concerns.
The synchronized EU media does a great job bringing up these strawmen as if they meant anything; a well coordinated maneuvre to make criticism of the EU seem petty. Interestingly they never talk about the real issues.
QUICK!!!!!
Sell your shares in this company before the world cools!!!!
2 Pack Hutzler 571 Banana Slicer 571b
________________________________________
• Faster, safer than using a knife
• Great for cereal
• Plastic, dishwasher safe
• Slice your banana with one quick motion
• Kids love slicing their own bananas