Guest essay by Philip Mulholland
In my previous essay We Must Get Rid of the Carboniferous Warm Period I discussed the role of the polar seas around Antarctica in generating the cold dense oxygenated marine water that dominates the abyssal ocean depths of our modern world. I now want to discuss the role of shallow tropical seas in generating warm dense oxygen-poor marine water and how this fundamental and often overlooked process explains the presence of abyssal ocean warm water and high atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration during previous geological times, in particular the Cretaceous period.
It is a mid-June day in 1991, West Caicos, a small uninhabited tropical island in the Turks and Caicos archipelago, bakes in the hot summer sun. I am on a field trip to the British West Indies organised by Dr Hal Wanless of the University of Miami, to study the modern geology and natural depositional environments of a marine carbonate platform. A visit that, even now, I consider to have been the best field study trip of my entire geoscience career. Located in the trade wind belt, the Turks and Caicos Islands lie at the south-eastern end of the Bahamian chain of Atlantic Ocean carbonate-platform islands. With the Tropic of Cancer passing to the north of the group, at midday the June sun is directly overhead and your shadow falls exactly beneath you. By evening, the summer thunderstorms arrive tracking west across the ocean, passing by on their way to the Caribbean.
For most of the year, the climate of West Caicos is dominated by dry trade winds. These are derived from the downwelling of the Hadley Cell, centred over the Atlantic Ocean to the north-east.
The low rainfall and high evaporation rate make the climate too dry for sugar cane production, an economic enterprise tried by past entrepreneurs at this remote island location. Salt production, the original economic activity of the Turks and Caicos, was also attempted at West Caicos, but that enterprise failed too. At West Caicos the salt pans were located on the site of a major wash-over fan in the northwest of the island. The bedrock here consists of permeable limestone rubble and not impermeable mudflats, the place of choice for salt production on the other islands in the group. This site, with its poor hydrogeology, probably accounts for the failure of the West Caicos salt pan enterprise.
Now West Caicos is a nature reserve and the native bromeliad flora are left to grow undisturbed. We are here to undertake a west to east traverse across the island to see how the individual elements of its geology have been created by the natural marine processes of active carbonate deposition occurring over the past few thousand years, since the sea level rise at the end of the last ice age flooded the Caicos platform.
We begin our journey in the sea, swimming with mask and flippers off the island’s west coast; here we observe the corals thriving in the shallow warm waters of the reef flat, everyone’s ideal coral island setting. Swimming is easy in the warm water with its slight swell, as we make our way out to the drop-off, and spot the barracuda fish below, patrolling the reef edge, marking its location. Then everything suddenly changes, the seabed disappears from sight as the water depth precipitously increases, the water colour becomes a deep blue and its temperature abruptly falls. With the sudden temperature drop I experience cramps in both legs and am grateful for the life jacket I’m wearing and the presence of my safety buddy, as swimming becomes difficult in the now cold water. So where has the warm water gone? Leaving this question unanswered, we swim to the support boat and head back to the island’s shore.
Our next stop is just off the beach, here the corals are no longer thriving, they are being buried by carbonate beach sand and the burrows of innumerable marine creatures pockmark the seabed. This change to carbonate sand is not evidence of environmental degradation, this sand zone is also a thriving pristine environment, it is simply no longer the coral’s home and a new force of nature, sediment derived from the inorganic carbonate beach factory, dominates the scene. Carbonate geologists estimate that approximately 50% of all the carbonate rock on Earth is generated by inorganic means and our next stop is the factory floor, the sand generating swash zone of the carbonate beach environment.
We arrive on the western beach of West Caicos, standing in the shallows where the seawater reaches its warmest temperature. We observe the continuous back and forth motion of the water as each wave arrives, rolling the grains of carbonate sand and creating a smooth beach profile with a distinctive sedimentary pattern or facies. Hal draws our attention to the beach rock in a small cliff adjacent to our landing point. Here we can see, preserved in the vertical rock face and deposited at a time of previously higher sea level, the sedimentary facies of the same near shore environments we have just observed offshore.
In the base of the cliff we find the fossil corals, above them surrounding and smothering them we see the lithified carbonate sand grains and the distinctive cone shaped burrows of long dead marine animals. Above this zone are the smooth layers of sand from the old swash zone forming a structured Z shaped pattern in the cliff face marking the exact tidal limit of the ancient beach. This is a classic geological example of the “Principle of Superposition and Original Horizontality”, where the younger sediments of the proximal shallow-water beach environment extend over the older distal deeper-water coral reef, as the sea bed shallows and the island grows seaward. The effects of this principle are regularly observed in marine carbonate deposits, with each upward episodic sea level change defining the next level in a repeated pattern of sedimentary growth.
We climb off the beach, up onto the rock outcrop and on its upper level we find gigantic boulders of beach rock with the same three facies as before, but tumbled out of their original setting. Hal observes that these boulders have been ripped out from the cliff and deposited up here by a storm surge from a former hurricane. My personal opinion is that this could be a tsunami deposit, given that we are due north of Hispaniola and at the western end of the active Puerto Rico submarine trench, this explanation of a powerful wave, generated by a submarine earthquake, also seems plausible. It is my view that in geoscience it is always good to consider more than one possible explanation for any set of field observations.
We are now standing at the top of the cliff on the highest and oldest part of the island. Turning to face east, the land falls away in a gentle slope and in the distance, on the horizon, a line of sand dunes rises behind a blue saline lake, Lake Catherine. Following a straight track, laid out by the former sugar plantation enterprise, we are soon back down at sea level, walking out on a causeway across the brine lake. Half way across there is a break in the track, the site of a former culvert, where the lake water flows though the causeway gap from north to south. Hal explains that on every visit to West Caicos he has always observed the same continuous direction of flow, so a tidal explanation for the movement of the water can be discounted.
Lake Catherine occupies the site of an old bay on the island’s former east coast, now separated from the lagoon by lines of barrier dunes, but its waters are still connected to the sea by an underground limestone aquifer. The wind driven marine current flowing west towards West Caicos island across the shallow Caicos lagoon creates a hydraulic gradient on the islands east coast that forces seawater underground, through the island’s limestone core to emerge in and flow through this central blue lake, before the water again makes its way back underground to regain the open sea on the island’s west coast.
Beyond Lake Catherine the track rises to a cut through heavily vegetated small hills, the maturity of the bromeliad flora demonstrates the significant age of these now inactive sand dunes. At the crest line, a new vista appears, in the distance a second line of modern sand dunes lies beyond a sabkha mudflat. We descend and cross the sabkha, its fragile algal crust breaking under the pressure of our footsteps, to reveal soft gypsum mud below. The presence of natural gypsum (hydrated calcium sulfate) in this ocean island setting is a surprise and is a testimony to the effectiveness of the high evaporation rate of the Caicos climate in concentrating the seawater brine.
Leaving the sabkha we climb the line of modern dunes, the loose carbonate sand and the sparse vegetation of grasses demonstrate the young age of this second barrier to be crossed before we reach the modern east coast of West Caicos. Beyond the crest, a rapid descent brings us down to a wide wind swept beach. A continuous drying wind, blowing in our face, moves the loose sand off the shore, adding to the dunes behind us and raising the island’s surface above sea level by means of aeolian sedimentation.
Here on the wide eastern beach, sitting below a small Casuarina tree and facing the shallow lagoon, we see the true extent of the carbonate sediment factory, a prolific producer of inorganic carbonate sand. Oolitic (egg shaped) grains roll in the beach swash zone growing layer on layer to produce an onion ringed sand grain wrapped around an original seed crystal of aragonite. Out beyond the beach the shallow warm sea, with water depths of less than 10 metres, extends eastward for 100 km, it is dotted with small patch reefs of coral rising clear of the sandy bottom. Parrot fish, with their strong beaks, bio-erode the coral and excrete crystals of indigestible aragonite, mineral seeds that form an endless supply of crystals around which new oolitic sand grains grow, in a symbiotic union of organic and inorganic sedimentation.
It is now 22 years since that summer day, yet the memories of my short visit to West Caicos remain vivid. Looking back, it is time to place all the elements of that day into an environmental synthesis and answer the question of what happened to the warm surface water when I swam beyond the reef edge into the cold water of the Atlantic Ocean.
There are two major types of marine carbonate environment: carbonate platforms and carbonate ramps. Carbonate platforms are found throughout the tropical oceans of the modern world and consist of isolated flat topped carbonate banks that are very sensitive to global seawater drawdown. During the ice ages, when the sea level lowers as ice builds up on land, carbonate platforms are easily exposed and then become incapable of further sedimentary growth; warm water production ceases, inorganic calcium carbonate formation stops and the associated process of carbon dioxide gas liberation fails.
Marine inorganic carbonate sedimentation is a geological process that occurs in shallow warm-water, tropical seas. The crystalline chemical solid calcium carbonate is unusual in that it becomes more insoluble as water warms. Carbon dioxide gas dissolved in cold water creates the weakly acidic carbonic acid which can dissolve solid calcium carbonate crystals creating water soluble calcium bicarbonate, by this mechanism the carbon dioxide becomes chemically associated with the calcium, and not just simply dissolved in the water. Calcium bicarbonate however, unlike calcium carbonate, does not exist in a solid chemical form, it occurs only in solution. In the warm surface waters and beach zones of shallow tropical seas calcium bicarbonate solution becomes thermally unstable, calcite precipitates naturally from the seawater as the water soluble calcium bicarbonate reverts to insoluble calcium carbonate crystals, liberating carbon dioxide molecules.
The geological record shows that half of all marine limestones were formed from seawater by the mechanism of direct chemical precipitation in a purely temperature and evaporation driven process. These non-biological limestone rocks include oolitic carbonate sandstones; even now egg-shaped grains of these carbonate sands form abundantly in the shallowest and warmest waters of the modern Bahamian platform lagoons.
The Caicos Islands are an example of a modern active carbonate platform that, during our current interglacial high sea level, forms an area of shallow lagoon surrounded by the deep waters of the Atlantic Ocean. The dimensions of the platform are large, in the south it extends from West Caicos to Seal Cays, a distance of about 100 km, while in the north it extends from Providenciales to East Caicos a distance of about 80 km. The platform covers an area of approximately 5,400 sq. km, of which only 430 sq. km is land and about 5,000 sq. km is covered by shallow sea. This shallow lagoon is a gigantic solar energy collector, each day the tropical sun warms the seawater and all day and night the dry north-east trade wind enhances the surface evaporation, increasing the seawater salinity and driving the water westward across the lagoon towards West Caicos and the open ocean beyond.
As the temperature and salinity of the seawater increases in the lagoon a process of evaporitic precipitation of salts from marine waters becomes possible. The deposition of these salts occurs in a distinct sequence. Calcium carbonate, the least soluble salt, precipitates first. The water soluble calcium bicarbonate is converted to calcium carbonate precipitate with the release of gaseous carbon dioxide. This process takes place in the warmth of the beach swash zone and accounts for the prolific carbonate sand sedimentation found here and throughout the Bahamas.
The next salt that precipitates from the seawater concentrate is gypsum (hydrated calcium sulfate). This process takes place on the West Caicos sabkha, behind the dunes, where the ponded seawater, driven onto the island by the wind, concentrates by further evaporation. The third salt to precipitate is halite (sodium chloride) this is the most soluble mineral of the three and therefore the least likely to precipitate. The waters of the brine lake demonstrate that there is the potential for this process to occur on West Caicos, and would do so if a suitable natural salt pan existed here, as happens on other islands within the group.
As a consequence of the process of evaporation the sun warmed seawaters leaving the Caicos lagoon, on its western margin, are more saline and therefore denser than the colder open ocean waters that have flowed around the archipelago. At the reef edge this density difference allows the warmer lagoon water to sink down below the colder less saline ocean water and accounts for the sudden thermal contrast I experienced while swimming in the sea off West Caicos. It is interesting to note that the world freediving record was set at Providenciales, where the warm dense water exits from the Caicos lagoon and descends into the Atlantic Ocean depths.
Carbonate ramps are found on continental shelves in shallow tropical seas and form extensive coastal fringes. Unlike flat topped carbonate platforms, carbonate ramps are tilted and therefore robust to global sea level drawdown. They can maintain warm water production, calcite precipitation and carbon dioxide emission to the atmosphere throughout the sea level fall of a glacial cycle. Carbonate ramps are rare in the modern world. The best example is the Emirates coast on the southern margin of the relatively small (in geological terms) Persian Gulf. Because it is not the continental shelf margin of an open ocean, this shallow gulf, with its maximum water depth of 80m and restricted size, is vulnerable to global sea level fall, during ice ages the ramp ceased to function as the seabed turned into exposed land.
Although the modern world lacks major continental shelf tropical seas capable of hosting carbonate ramps, they occurred extensively in the geological past. For example, during the Cretaceous period a region of shallow tropical seas associated with the margins of the Tethys Ocean existed in the Horse latitudes of the northern hemisphere. In these shallow seas major carbonate ramps developed and abundant carbonate sedimentation occurred. The shallow waters of the carbonate ramp, warmed by the tropical sun, generated dense saline marine brines that filled the abyssal depths of the Cretaceous world ocean with warm anoxia prone bottom water, while at the surface inorganic carbonate sedimentation released carbon dioxide gas into the Cretaceous atmosphere.
The climatic difference between our modern cold ocean world and the ancient warm ocean world of the Cretaceous is simply due to the presence in the Horse latitudes of shallow tropical seas containing the carbonate ramps that form the planet’s “oceanic central heating system”. The physical location, areal size, and water depth of the world’s shallow tropical seas throughout geological time dictates the quantity of solar energy that these seas can collect from the tropics. Our modern world, with its carbonate platforms and restricted ramps (such as the Persian Gulf) that are sensitive to global sea level fall, has a much less efficient and less robust planetary “oceanic central heating system”.
In the argument of which comes first: atmospheric carbon dioxide levels or warm ocean water, the geological evidence is unequivocal: The “oceanic central heating effect” dog wags the “atmospheric greenhouse gas” tail.
###
Personal Statement:
I am a professional geoscientist with a BA in Environmental Sciences from The University of Lancaster in 1974 and an MSc in Conservation from University College London in 1981, where I studied the natural regeneration of woodland in Epping Forest using a Markovian Matrix technique to determine the temporal balance between Birch, Oak and Beech trees in a successional replacement cycle.
I started my career in the Institute of Geological Sciences (now the British Geological Survey) where I worked for 10 years learning about geology from experts, before moving on to continue my career in industry. Geology is a field science and the best geologist is the person who has seen the most rocks. I am a generalist by aptitude and therefore rely on the field work of experts when attempting to understand the interlocking complexities of geoscience.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
![wind-patterns[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/wind-patterns1.jpg?resize=461%2C390&quality=83)
“Keith DeHavelle says:
October 20, 2013 at 10:41 pm”
That was great! I would say brilliant, but I don’t want it to go to your head.
Enlightening article, written like a real scientist./both a sentence and not a sentence
Mkey Moon . . . We feel you pain.
A cure is available.
http://tbh.adam.com/content.aspx?productId=114&pid=1&gid=002939
Michael Moon says:
October 20, 2013 at 9:48 pm
“A vist that, even now, I consider to have been the best field study trip of my entire geoscience career.”
Am I one of only four people on this site who attended and completed high school? Could we please have a verb in this sentence?
____________________________
Hey Moon, apparently you didn’t consider that “consider” was used as the verb? Do you need a ladder to get down from that high horse?
Philip Mulholland
The graphic of the Hadley cells was greatly appreciated by this non-geologist who has boxes of rocks under his desk. Thanks for the great article.
What a beautifully written post. I felt a strong need to empty the sand from my boots as the end. Thank you so much for this view of a piece of the world through a geologist’s eyes. I will explore my beloved Okanogan Highlands with greater care and awareness of the processes at work there.
Mr. Moon – every time a grammar Nazi posts something inane as you have done a drop bear kills a joey. Please stop.
DP,
Grammar is fun-damental! I like the site but I wish people would write better. Mulholland is far from the worst, others are even more unreadable, with Tisdale being tied with McIntyre in this regard. People bury the lead, use unrecognizable jargon, and just slay the English language. Most posts could be summarized in two or three paragraphs, and bullet points with terse, informative phrases would be even better.
Some important things happen here, but teasing out the useful bits from the endless turgid prose, what a struggle.
Nazi? No, not so much…
[thanks for the critique. The first one I have seen here as most folk seem to “get it”.Perhaps you could put up a rewrite of , say Bob’s recent article, that would be a good example of the kind of prose you would like to see and everybody could give you the same kind of encouragement. Could be a win-win. . . mod]
Nick Stokes says:
October 21, 2013 at 3:26 am
You must not have read the whole article. It does contain an argument explaining the observation that doesn’t comply with your religious doctrine. In fact, it’s presented in the paragraph preceding the one you quoted, so you wouldn’t even have to have read the whole paper:
“Although the modern world lacks major continental shelf tropical seas capable of hosting carbonate ramps, they occurred extensively in the geological past. For example, during the Cretaceous period a region of shallow tropical seas associated with the margins of the Tethys Ocean existed in the Horse latitudes of the northern hemisphere. In these shallow seas major carbonate ramps developed and abundant carbonate sedimentation occurred. The shallow waters of the carbonate ramp, warmed by the tropical sun, generated dense saline marine brines that filled the abyssal depths of the Cretaceous world ocean with warm anoxia prone bottom water, while at the surface inorganic carbonate sedimentation released carbon dioxide gas into the Cretaceous atmosphere.”
Your heater & blanket analogy isn’t one. In the shallow Cretaceous seas, the water carries its heat content & salt away with it, unlike warmth from a heater.
So, did you not read the preceding paragraph, or simply fail to grasp it?
Nick – you’ve given no evidence to substantiate your claim at October 21, 2013 at 3:26 am. Bad form, chap.
“…in geoscience it is always good to consider more than one possible explanation for any set of field observations.”
Good sense on several fronts: a) it keeps the door open to add new observations, even from other places, to help decide what the best explanation for a geological phenomenon is. b) examine your outcrops as if it is the last time you will ever get to see them is an old geological dictum. At your first outcrop in a field season, you don’t know much about where evidence is going to lead you. It is a process of discovery. Also it is expensive and for this reason, you probably are going to see “this” outcrop only once. In geology, theory is never this or thus because “what else could it be?” There has to be evidence for what you espouse. It is hard (rewarding, pleasant) work. This is why climate science is a magnet for skeptical minds to probe. “What else could it be?” might certainly be the explanation of an inexperienced scientist visiting his first outcrop, unaware of the variety of things that it might be. He gets a beginning sense of the variety when he visits his second and subsequent outcrops.
Nick Stokes says:
October 21, 2013 at 3:26 am
“”The climatic difference between our modern cold ocean world and the ancient warm ocean world of the Cretaceous is simply due to the presence in the Horse latitudes of shallow tropical seas containing the carbonate ramps that form the planet’s “oceanic central heating system”. “
“No argument to substantiate this is given. Yes, the shallow water is warmer. But that doesn’t mean it is collecting more heat than a corresponding area of open ocean”.
Nick, as with the first essay by PM, he has chosen a small system to show how a big system works and what he is trying to show is how the deep seas can be warmed by the mechanism in an era (Cretaceous) when shallows (ramps) were much more prevalent. The warm water doesn’t just pool. It is a conveyor system. BTW, it is an answer that we will see Trenberth and the IPCC jumping all over to explain warmth in the deep seas (ignoring, of course, that the mechanism is not operating today on any effective scale).
Nick, I see there is no way you would be able to see what a beautiful and coherent piece Mulholland’s essay is. Laymen with an open mind even do. Note he is also an environmental geologist. Note also the very unclimate science methodology. He walked the ground, dove into the seas, collected real data. You as a physicist (?) looking at an outcrop would see, perhaps, what colour it is, is it soft, is it light or heavy – conclusion? what has this to do with climate science? Nearly all the evidence that a geologist sees would be lost to your eyes and, with a closed mind, you would get nothing. This is not a thread that can benefit from your thoughts, it would seem.
Doug Proctor says:
October 20, 2013 at 9:17 pm
“Excellent summary of the process in the Caicos, a complex and interrelated situation beyond the appreciation of those focused on solitary, unique or, at most, limited parameters.”
Doug’s mini essay is similarly an example of the richness of the science (and the excellent observational and writing skills of the author). Had such as these fellows been attracted into the “nondebate” among physicists, astronomers and environmental activists in 1988, all would be better informed and climate science would have arrived much more quickly to the potential that it will in the coming decade or so.
Don K says:
October 21, 2013 at 4:57 am
“Excellent. I enjoyed the article very much. A couple of questions if I may:
1. Mud flats under the salt flats on other islands? I’m at best mediocre at geology and self-taught to boot. But doesn’t “mud” imply a source of silicate material? Where is it coming from on a carbonate platform? Windborne dust from Africa?”
Don, in geology, mud (clay) is a grain size. These are carbonate and gypsum muds from the sea water.
ferd berple says: October 21, 2013 at 6:04 am
“The article isn’t about radiation. It explains the release of CO2 from warm oceans. It shows that it isn’t just a matter of CO2 dissolved in water. The CO2 is bound up with calcium, and enhanced by calcite precipitation…”
Well, that part of what it says is simply wrong chemistry. The CO2 is not bound up with calcium in solution – these are ionic solutions. The CO2 forms bicarb ions. The Ca++ ions exist independently. It’s no more calcium bicarb than it is sodium bicarb. The association only comes when CaCO3 precipitation occurs.
milodonharlani says: October 21, 2013 at 9:13 am
“Your heater & blanket analogy isn’t one. In the shallow Cretaceous seas, the water carries its heat content & salt away with it, unlike warmth from a heater.
So, did you not read the preceding paragraph, or simply fail to grasp it?”
The para you quote postulates a mechanism whereby the shallow sea transfers some heat to the deep sea. But there’s no argument presented that it uses sunlight to heat the Earth more effectively than simple direct absorption of sunlight in open sea.
That’s the point of the blanket analogy. Heat absorbed in the open ocean is easily redistributed, so it doesn’t raise temperatures locally as much. A lagoon channels the outflow into a relatively small region, so the temperature rises and there is a noticeable gradient. But it is less effective heating of the whole Earth.
Mr. ‘Moon’,
Well played Sir! What a clever send up of the classic Grammar Nazi trope. The first clue, of course, was the very name Michael Moon, which rhymes with Buffoon. For you played one quite skillfully. Bravo!
As others have already noted, the requisite quotation you held up for ridicule did indeed contain the invisible verb ‘consider’. But that word could only be invisible to a true Grammar Nazi as ‘considering’ something before posting is something of which they are incapable. Too cute.
I also loved the touch where, in a follow up post you wrote “People bury the lead, use unrecognizable jargon,…” This time you played the Buffoon who over-relies on spell-check (Bueller!), trying to turn your own sentence into unrecognizable jargon. The homophone replacement of lede was easy to spot, but it nicely mocked the troll who doesn’t understand the very words he uses to insult others,
You must practice that obnoxious shtick a lot. You’re scary good at it.
philip mulholland and doug proctor,thank you for your excellent essay/post. whenever a topic crops up that mentions model ,i refuse to read it.current modelling techniques have no place in climate science due to the many unknowns,and inability to accurately input the knowns.
the very best work on this blog results from obervations and real science carried out in the field,as the hosts work on temperature recording shows.please continue to contribute.
mr moon,it used to tickle me how the “smart” people always deemed us of lesser intellectual capacity unfit to contribute to any debate,any opinion or input not worthy of the really “smart people. but funnily enough,when it comes to paying taxes ,particularly green taxes,we have are deemed fit to contribute,in some cases more fit than the “smarter”,usually more financially secure
people.
like i say ,it used to tickle me,now it just boils my piss, maybe i was born a few centuries late,because back in the day when might was right,we would not be in the current position where people that would not say boo to a goose,are screwing the majority of the western worlds peoples into the ground financially, and stripping them of their rights as individuals on a daily basis.
Few have the hutzpah to say what you have. Go you!
MikeW says:
October 21, 2013 at 12:57 pm
Re lead v. lede (US reporters employ that latter spelling to avoid confusion with the metal used in printing): Maybe the punctured yet still pompous pedant Mr. Moon is not an American. How does he spell vapor, color, honor, etc? Or has he never studied or practiced reportage, yet presumed to use a journalistic phrase anyway?
I really enjoyed this essay; thank you.
Keith DeHavelle @ur momisugly 10:41 pm (20th):..Hilarious.
Doug Proctor @ur momisugly 9:17 pm (20th): I enjoyed reading this too.
Milodonharlani @ur momisugly 2:52 pm:
Perhaps I should have an attack of the vapours and turn puce in colour while defending the honour of ancient English men and women who wish to spell their language as they were taught to many moons ago! Perhaps our American friends prefer to save labour in leaving out the ‘u’ but for me old habits die hard. Another ancient habit of mine is to refer to Maths. This has been the abbreviation for mathematics ever since I was old enough to become aware of the term!
Annie says:
October 21, 2013 at 3:02 pm
Nothing could make me happier than your continued use of British English spelling. Long may it wave. If this blog be any indication, “maths” is successfully invading the US, as have a number of other fine Britishisms in recent years & decades, like “cheeky” & “bits” to mean parts or pieces (eg Douglas Adams’ “squiggly bits”). We already had “blown to bits”, itty-bitty, Baco-Bits & a “bit”, meaning 1/8 of a dollar (from Spanish coins cut into “pieces of eight”), which might have eased the way for its more general use in this meaning. Now there’s Bitcoin.
Mr. Moon however, if an American, spells “lead” (pronounced “leed”, meaning the top of a periodical article) in the British fashion, which is a sign of ignorance on his part, yet he presumes to teach others, mistakenly of course. In the US, it’s spelled “lede” (as in Middle English) to distinguish this word from “lead” (“led”), the metal used in printing. The paleo-retro-neologism is no longer confined to journalists as jargon, but has entered common usage.
StephenP says October 21, 2013 at 2:32 am :
Global CO2 mass balance sinks and sources are poorly known and their annual estimates extremely imprecise. Coal and Oil deposits are dwarfed by calcium/magnesium carbonate-containing mineral sedimentary deposits. One thing is certain: human global production of CO2 is so small that it is clearly within measurement error. I have yet to see accurate order of magnitude estimates of demineralization of carbonate deposits, subduction effects, etc.
In other words, we don’t have a clue !! Termites probably produce an order or magnitude more CO2 than we do.
BioBob says:
October 21, 2013 at 3:34 pm
If you include both GHGs CH4 & CO2, that could well be right.
Philip .. did you ever work with Dr. Paul Lowman ?
Philip Mulholland,
I am a SCUBA diver who has dove many places, including T & C. You give a really good explanation of various phenomena that I have noted and puzzled over, without the requisite training to explain.
Thank you.
My first thanks go to Anthony for his inspired choice of diagram to illustrate my essay.
Thanks also to all who posted such kind comments. I do not have much time during the working week to respond, so my particular thanks to those who are responding on my behalf.
Berényi Péter at October 21, 2013 at 12:50 am asks
Berényi Péter, I do not know of any such study for the Caicos, but the following information about the Emirates Ramp in The Persian Gulf may help illustrate the process of warm dense saline bottom water formation.
Bloke down the pub at October 21, 2013 at 2:27 am
I haven’t told you the half of it, this was a five day field trip.
Don K at October 21, 2013 at 4:57 am
The muds are micrites that eventually form Micrite Limestone. Almost all of the rock that makes up a carbonate platform arrives in solution (apart from minor amounts of airborne dust). In some ways you can view the Bahama Banks as a precipitation delta with the invisible solute carried there by the ocean current.
Patricia at October 21, 2013 at 7:51 am
Thanks for the link. Carbonate Geology is a great career choice, if only because the modern environment analogues you will need to study are mostly in the tropics.
milodonharlani says:
October 21, 2013 at 3:45 pm
heh, actually, if you include the methane production, it would be likely more like 2 orders of magnitude of carbon vs humans, if we had decent estimates.
But we don’t and I for one won’t do what all the idiot climate scientists and carbon cycle guesstimators do and pull numbers out of my ass.
Bacteria & plants together currently dominate the control of CO2 and O2 portions of the global atmosphere and have for more than two billion years – that’s B I L L I O N. Geochemical processes, (if they are not even more important) take over from where the bacteria & plants leave off. Animals, including humans, take care of the rounding errors, so sorry.
That is something elementary which all delusional so-called CO2 climate scientist types have yet to comprehend. “They’re so vain, they think this song is about them”.
———– 8>0 —————
Definitely a great post and read.
More: http://www.climal.com/measuring-earths-temperature.php