Evidence that stratospheric circulation changes drive ocean changes, and thus climate changes

From the University of Utah and the “science is not settled” department comes this interesting bit of research.

Stratosphere targets deep sea to shape climate

North Atlantic ‘Achilles heel’ lets upper atmosphere affect the abyss

The simplified artist’s conception shows how changes in polar vortex winds high in the stratosphere can influence the North Atlantic to cause changes in the global conveyor belt of ocean circulation. Credit: Thomas Reichler, University of Utah.

SALT LAKE CITY, Sept. 23, 2012 – A University of Utah study suggests something amazing: Periodic changes in winds 15 to 30 miles high in the stratosphere influence the seas by striking a vulnerable “Achilles heel” in the North Atlantic and changing mile-deep ocean circulation patterns, which in turn affect Earth’s climate.

“We found evidence that what happens in the stratosphere matters for the ocean circulation and therefore for climate,” says Thomas Reichler, senior author of the study published online Sunday, Sept. 23 in the journal Nature Geoscience.

Scientists already knew that events in the stratosphere, 6 miles to 30 miles above Earth, affect what happens below in the troposphere, the part of the atmosphere from Earth’s surface up to 6 miles or about 32,800 feet. Weather occurs in the troposphere.

Researchers also knew that global circulation patterns in the oceans – patterns caused mostly by variations in water temperature and saltiness – affect global climate.

“It is not new that the stratosphere impacts the troposphere,” says Reichler, an associate professor of atmospheric sciences at the University of Utah. “It also is not new that the troposphere impacts the ocean. But now we actually demonstrated an entire link between the stratosphere, the troposphere and the ocean.”

Funded by the University of Utah, Reichler conducted the study with University of Utah atmospheric sciences doctoral student Junsu Kim, and with atmospheric scientist Elisa Manzini and oceanographer Jürgen Kröger, both with the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg, Germany.

Stratospheric Winds and Sea Circulation Show Similar Rhythms

Reichler and colleagues used weather observations and 4,000 years worth of supercomputer simulations of weather to show a surprising association between decade-scale, periodic changes in stratospheric wind patterns known as the polar vortex, and similar rhythmic changes in deep-sea circulation patterns. The changes are:

— “Stratospheric sudden warming” events occur when temperatures rise and 80-mph “polar vortex” winds encircling the Artic suddenly weaken or even change direction. These winds extend from 15 miles elevation in the stratosphere up beyond the top of the stratosphere at 30 miles. The changes last for up to 60 days, allowing time for their effects to propagate down through the atmosphere to the ocean.

— Changes in the speed of the Atlantic circulation pattern – known as Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation – that influences the world’s oceans because it acts like a conveyor belt moving water around the planet.

Sometimes, both events happen several years in a row in one decade, and then none occur in the next decade. So incorporating this decade-scale effect of the stratosphere on the sea into supercomputer climate simulations or “models” is important in forecasting decade-to-decade climate changes that are distinct from global warming, Reichler says.

“If we as humans modify the stratosphere, it may – through the chain of events we demonstrate in this study – also impact the ocean circulation,” he says. “Good examples of how we modify the stratosphere are the ozone hole and also fossil-fuel burning that adds carbon dioxide to the stratosphere. These changes to the stratosphere can alter the ocean, and any change to the ocean is extremely important to global climate.”

A Vulnerable Soft Spot in the North Atlantic

“The North Atlantic is particularly important for global ocean circulation, and therefore for climate worldwide,” Reichler says. “In a region south of Greenland, which is called the downwelling region, water can get cold and salty enough – and thus dense enough – so the water starts sinking.”

It is Earth’s most important region of seawater downwelling, he adds. That sinking of cold, salty water “drives the three-dimensional oceanic conveyor belt circulation. What happens in the Atlantic also affects the other oceans.”

Reichler continues: “This area where downwelling occurs is quite susceptible to cooling or warming from the troposphere. If the water is close to becoming heavy enough to sink, then even small additional amounts of heating or cooling from the atmosphere may be imported to the ocean and either trigger downwelling events or delay them.”

Because of that sensitivity, Reichler calls the sea south of Greenland “the Achilles heel of the North Atlantic.”

From Stratosphere to the Sea

In winter, the stratospheric Arctic polar vortex whirls counterclockwise around the North Pole, with the strongest, 80-mph winds at about 60 degrees north latitude. They are stronger than jet stream winds, which are less than 70 mph in the troposphere below. But every two years on average, the stratospheric air suddenly is disrupted and the vortex gets warmer and weaker, and sometimes even shifts direction to clockwise.

“These are catastrophic rearrangements of circulation in the stratosphere,” and the weaker or reversed polar vortex persists up to two months, Reichler says. “Breakdown of the polar vortex can affect circulation in the troposphere all the way down to the surface.”

Reichler’s study ventured into new territory by asking if changes in stratospheric polar vortex winds impart heat or cold to the sea, and how that affects the sea.

It already was known that that these stratospheric wind changes affect the North Atlantic Oscillation – a pattern of low atmospheric pressure centered over Greenland and high pressure over the Azores to the south. The pattern can reverse or oscillate.

Because the oscillating pressure patterns are located above the ocean downwelling area near Greenland, the question is whether that pattern affects the downwelling and, in turn, the global oceanic circulation conveyor belt.

The study’s computer simulations show a decadal on-off pattern of correlated changes in the polar vortex, atmospheric pressure oscillations over the North Atlantic and changes in sea circulation more than one mile beneath the waves. Observations are consistent with the pattern revealed in computer simulations.

Observations and Simulations of the Stratosphere-to-Sea Link

In the 1980s and 2000s, a series of stratospheric sudden warming events weakened polar vortex winds. During the 1990s, the polar vortex remained strong.

Reichler and colleagues used published worldwide ocean observations from a dozen research groups to reconstruct behavior of the conveyor belt ocean circulation during the same 30-year period.

“The weakening and strengthening of the stratospheric circulation seems to correspond with changes in ocean circulation in the North Atlantic,” Reichler says.

To reduce uncertainties about the observations, the researchers used computers to simulate 4,000 years worth of atmosphere and ocean circulation.

“The computer model showed that when we have a series of these polar vortex changes, the ocean circulation is susceptible to those stratospheric events,” Reichler says.

To further verify the findings, the researchers combined 18 atmosphere and ocean models into one big simulation, and “we see very similar outcomes.”

The study suggests there is “a significant stratospheric impact on the ocean,” the researchers write. “Recurring stratospheric vortex events create long-lived perturbations at the ocean surface, which penetrate into the deeper ocean and trigger multidecadal variability in its circulation. This leads to the remarkable fact that signals that emanate from the stratosphere cross the entire atmosphere-ocean system.”

###

UPDATE: Although not listed in the official press release from the University of Utah here, I’ve located the title of the paper and abstract, reproduced below from Nature Geoscience

A stratospheric connection to Atlantic climate variability

Nature Geoscience (2012) doi:10.1038/ngeo1586

The stratosphere is connected to tropospheric weather and climate. In particular, extreme stratospheric circulation events are known to exert a dynamical feedback on the troposphere1. However, it is unclear whether the state of the stratosphere also affects the ocean and its circulation. A co-variability of decadal stratospheric flow variations and conditions in the North Atlantic Ocean has been suggested, but such findings are based on short simulations with only one climate model2. Here we assess ocean reanalysis data and find that, over the previous 30 years, the stratosphere and the Atlantic thermohaline circulation experienced low-frequency variations that were similar to each other. Using climate models, we demonstrate that this similarity is consistent with the hypothesis that variations in the sequence of stratospheric circulation anomalies, combined with the persistence of individual anomalies, significantly affect the North Atlantic Ocean. Our analyses identify a previously unknown source for decadal climate variability and suggest that simulations of deep layers of the atmosphere and the ocean are needed for realistic predictions of climate.

Spatial pattern of surface impact from the stratosphere.

Shown are composite anomalies averaged from day 0 to 60 following the strong vortex events of Fig. 2. Sea-level pressure anomalies are contoured at ±0.5, ±1, ±2, ±3, ±4 hPa; red and blue lines indicate positive and negative values, respectively.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
98 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
September 24, 2012 11:22 am

rgbatduke says:
September 24, 2012 at 9:06 am
……………….
I am another engineer, usually avoid reading long posts, yours are exception, always red with interest, always a new aspect to a topic.
You say : We have yet to see a change in phase of the NAO, which appears to be chaotic, not periodic, and is weakly coupled to the Arctic Oscillation (AO).
I have looked into data for two components that make the NAO and came to the opposite conclusion, i.e the NAO may be predictable:
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/NAOn.htm
North Atlantic is the main area of my interest, and may have grasped some basics of its behavior. I would suggest that observing Icelandic atmospheric pressure would be more appropriate for understanding what is going up there:
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/NAO-SST-ea.htm
Trying to explain it eloquently is not my forte, but I may get to it some ‘rainy day’, when all the AGW storm blows over and scientists really get interested in the natural variability. Your colleague Scafetta had a go, unfortunately he totally misunderstood where 60sh (more like 64-65) year cycle comes from, and ended in bit of a muddle. Have no intention of following his path, not at least as yet.

Editor
September 24, 2012 11:59 am

They should be saying that they discovered an Achilles heel in their model of the North Atlantic, but these lunatics make no distinction between their model and the real world at all:

This leads to the remarkable fact that signals that emanate from the stratosphere cross the entire atmosphere-ocean system. [[emphasis added.]

They are apparently claiming that they are able to trace causality in their model from the stratosphere to the troposphere to ocean circulation, but causality in their model is not causality in the real world. Do they really not know what a fact is?
If they can really get a model based on physical principles to generate the causality they claim then that is interesting in itself. Why fake it up by claiming that their model result is a fact about the real world?

Tenuk
September 24, 2012 12:21 pm

higley7 says:
September 24, 2012 at 11:01 am
“…What I love is the apparent lack of understanding of the oceanic conveyor belt. The Gulf Stream flows faster during warm periods and slows during cold times. This makes sense as the viscosity of water varies with temperature…
Oh, if only it were that simple! The ocean ‘conveyor’ is a heat transport system and its speed and the temperature of the volume of water moving which dictate where and how much energy gets distributed around. Simplistically, a warm fast current tends to produce turbulent eddies at its boundary with cooler ocean water and this mixing reduces the temperature of the current and slows it down. On the other hand a cooler, slower current tends to have a smoother laminar flow and retain the energy for longer.
The following images show sea surface temperatures for summer and winter showing the extent of the turbulence and dissipation in the middle of the Atlantic ocean…
Summer…
http://www.appinsys.com/globalwarming/GW_4CE_NATCGulfStream_files/image008.jpg
Winter…
http://www.appinsys.com/globalwarming/GW_4CE_NATCGulfStream_files/image009.jpg
(Thanks go to psc,edu and Apin Sys for the images.)
Varying levels of turbulence tend to have a balancing effect on how much energy is transported. Add in variations to wind speed, salinity, tides e.t.c. and you have a highly non-linear system to deal with. We do not yet have either the data or mathematical methodology to be able to quantify the energy moved by this messy this spatio-temporal system. Computer models are therefore useless in helping us to understand how ocean currents effect weather/climate. No wonder they always get it wrong.

george e smith
September 24, 2012 12:21 pm

Finally we have a demonstration of a previously mythical phenomenon; best described as the Monster Truck Tractor Push.
All red necks are familiar with the Monster Truck tractor pull, were a heavily loaded tractor is pulled by a monster truck, until it stalls out as the tractor slowly digs its blade into the earth.
So in this newly observed phenomenon, the tractor is pushed through a rope, instead of pulled. A high degree of driving skill is required to keep the rope straight so it doesn’t bend and fold up.
Long conjectured, it would appear that someone has finally succeeded in doing it.
By the way, what is the torsional stiffness of the lower Troposphere, through which the stratospheric twists must be stransferred to the deep ocean waters to spin them ??

September 24, 2012 12:56 pm

A seemingly almost afterthought claim “its the CO2 and Ozone stupid” unsupported by any data or science it would appear.
Exactly HOW does Ozone or CO2 have an effect on the polar vortex?
And how do they prove what direction their correlation goes? Correlation does not equal causation..
Last if I remember correctly a warmer stratosphere means a cooler troposphere.

Lars P.
September 24, 2012 1:46 pm

aladin02 says:
September 24, 2012 at 3:17 am
is known what happpend to Jo Nova’s account ?
She’s back aladin – at least a temporary site already on.

Stephen Wilde
September 24, 2012 2:31 pm

Clearly the stratosphere cannot drive the oceans directly for the reasons eloquently stated by many here.
But if changes in the stratosphere alter cloudiness and the amount of energy entering the oceans then it can drive the oceans indirectly.
However, the stratospheric temperatures can only be changed significantly by the sun from above. The oceans make little difference to stratospheric temperatures but they can make a difference to the tropopause height when the rate of energy release changes during the course of internal ocean cycles.
It is the sun that produces changes in both stratosphere and oceans. Since there is common causation it is not surprising that there are correlations.
In theory CO2 is supposed to have caused the cooling stratosphere of the late 20th century by holding more energy for longer in the troposphere That idea has been falsified by a cessation of stratospheric cooling whilst CO2 continues to rise.

Power Grab
September 24, 2012 2:37 pm

Could it work like one of these?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_stirrer

Stephen Wilde
September 24, 2012 2:43 pm

“Exactly HOW does Ozone or CO2 have an effect on the polar vortex? ”
Ozone amounts dictate temperatures in the vertical column of the atmosphere above the tropopause because ozone molecules react strongly to incoming solar energy. That is why there is a temperature inversion in the stratosphere.
If ozone amounts fall above the poles when the sun is more active then the stratosphere cools and the tropopause rises so that the polar vortex becomes more intense vertically but less extensive horizontally giving a more ‘positive’ AO and AAO with more poleward / zonal jets.
CO2 was supposed to have been the cause of more poleward / zonal jets in the late 20th century but now we can see that it was not.
CFCs were supposed to have been a contributory factor cooling the stratosphere by reducing ozone amounts but recent findings are casting doubt on that proposition because the ozone response to changes in solar activity levels are the reverse of what was expected above 45km.
So most likely solar activity levels control ozone amounts and stratospheric temperatures. Maybe neither CO2 nor CFCs were ever responsible.
“Last if I remember correctly a warmer stratosphere means a cooler troposphere.”
Quite so. I have previously contended that the troposphere and thermosphere warm when the stratosphere and mesosphere cool (at a time of active sun) and vice versa.
Solar variations being the cause in both scenarios.

September 24, 2012 3:37 pm

RE:Tenuk says:
September 24, 2012 at 12:21 pm
Neat pictures of summer and winter Gulf Stream. The problem is that it could be quite different the following summer and following winter.
Meandering is a process involving Chaos and Strange Attractors, and defies prediction once you get a ways downstream.
Watch a trickle of water running down the side of an old porcelain sink, (that beads the water up, so the trickle meanders over the surface,) and you’ll see quite a variety of movements. Occationally the trickle is nearly straight, while at other times it can move surprisingly far to the left or right. The same sort of factors determine where the Gulf Stream’s warmth will wind up, and whether it will head straight north or wind all over the place and only get north in a very blended state. It is very interesting (as the Gulf Stream has no banks) but cannot be predicted.

Editor
September 24, 2012 3:45 pm

Geoff Sharp says: “Can’t help yourself it seems. I re posted your links so you’ll get a little more exposure.”
Thanks.

Dennis Dunton
September 24, 2012 8:31 pm

E M Smith…I really enjoy your posts. They are usually on topic and insightful.
Having said that…you obviously have no clue how the Sled at a Truck/Tractor Pull works. LOL

September 24, 2012 9:14 pm

“Observations are consistent with the pattern revealed in computer simulations.”
Isn’t that backwards? Theories, model runs and even wild speculation that are “consistent with” with the real world are not proved true but at least they’re not proved false. The above statement implies that the real world might really be real because it is “consistent with” the model. LOL. Have we no shame gentlemen?

RoHa
September 24, 2012 9:41 pm

“It is not new that the stratosphere impacts the troposphere,” says Reichler, an associate professor of atmospheric sciences at the University of Utah. ”
It’s news to me! I’ve never heard of the stratosphere whacking down hard on the troposphere.
Or is Reichler just another who has forgotten the verb “affect”?

Leo G
September 24, 2012 9:48 pm

Power Engineer says: “You can’t say enough about the influence of ocean currents on climate…. and how the warm currents melt the polar ice which increases absorption of sunlight 12 times which increases melting of ice …”
The melting of polar sea ice only increases the absorption of sunlight by a factor of two. The albedo of sea ice is in the range 0.5 to 0.7, whereas in regions with a solar zenith angle of 80° ice-free ocean albedo ranges from 0.2 to 0.35.

donald penman
September 24, 2012 10:17 pm

I do not know very much about atmospherics but my idea of why we had stratopheric warming warming a few years ago in the arctic was this ,the jet stream was blocked from flowing across the Atlantic towards Europe so that it had to flow through the arctic to reach Europe and therefore was colder when it reached Europe.My reason why the air fow would be cooler is that warmer air has to rise above colder air and could lead to stratospheric warming because of the stratification of temperatures .

September 24, 2012 10:58 pm

The water upwelling off California as a result of the PDO phase change is about 1500 years old. The proximate cause of the increased anticyclonicTrade Winds that cause this upwelling seems to be a persistent red positive anomaly in stratospheric pressure. http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/intraseasonal/z200anim.gif12000.
Now if the North Atlantic were so important, I’d have to wait about 1500 years for the THC to bring that water over here anyway…

Berényi Péter
September 25, 2012 1:37 am

Well, they have demonstrated conclusively that changes in the “stratosphere” and in the “ocean”, that is, a bunch of numbers in a computer simulation and another bunch of them, are related. Unfortunately it never establishes a causal relationship between the two vectors, because these changes are in fact driven by electricity running in the computer’s circuits on one hand and the software uploaded to it on the other one. It may certainly tell us something about that piece of computer code (all several million lines of it), but why would these results be of interest to anyone but designers, coders and users of that software?
So, before this study could be taken seriously, researchers are facing a rather formidable task: to demonstrate beyond reasonable doubt that their “stratosphere” and “ocean” behaves the same way as the actual Stratosphere and Ocean do, that is, the vectors constructed from measured data correspond (in a well defined way) to those produced by gaming software. However, playing the game 4000 times over can never add even a bit of information to this correspondence, therefore there is no way uncertainties about the observations could be reduced by this trick.
It does not bode well either, that their understanding of MOC (Meridional Overturning Circulation) seems to be lacking.
“Researchers also knew that global circulation patterns in the oceans – patterns caused mostly by variations in water temperature and saltiness – affect global climate.”
No, that’s not exactly what “researchers knew”. The first thing to consider is that ocean circulation is not a heat engine. That is, it is not driven by differences in water density, but the entire system is kept in motion by (low entropy) mechanical energy input, supplied by tidal breaking and winds (mostly over the southern ocean). The only way heat from the surface can penetrate into the deep ocean is by turbulent mixing, which works against density gradients. This is the process that makes room for more dense, cold, salty water in the abyss, making any downwelling whatsoever possible. Otherwise the deep reservoir of this stuff would simply fill up completely and the overturning would stop altogether. Or, rather, it would slow down to a crawl, as some heat would still be supplied by geothermal processes at the bottom, but that flux is an order of magnitude or two smaller than the one required to run it properly.
Now, density of seawater, unlike that of fresh water, is highest just before freezing. On freezing it gets even higher by a process called brine exclusion, that is, ice crystals do not like salt, therefore water left over on freezing becomes even more salty. Such water masses will always be available somewhere at the edge of sea ice, as long as there remains sea ice at all. But there is no way for it to disappear completely with the current configuration of continents, not even under the wildest “scenarios”. And temperature of these water masses are not determined by “climate”, but by the very physics of water, that is, by its freezing point.
So. There always will be water ready to “downwell”. But it can only do so if another process, deep turbulent mixing (driven by mechanical energy input) makes room for it down below. Therefore the global flux of downwelling is quite independent of “global temperature” or such.
The next question is, of course, where this downwelling should occur? The answer is, obviously, at those points where salinity is the highest right around the ice edge. And that can indeed vary, with huge consequences to regional (not “global”) climate around such points.
In other words, if more water sinks around Antarctica, less can do so in the Northern Atlantic (seesaw, anyone?). Except if deep turbulent mixing is increased by either higher tidal breaking (which depends on the relative positions of sun and moon, that is, on the Metonic cycle) or if the Roaring Forties, Furious Fifties and Shrieking Sixties happen to increase in strength down south, inducing stronger internal waves in the water body that break at rugged bottom features. But there are hard limits to wind speed, so it can’t possibly increase forever.

george e smith
September 25, 2012 10:52 am

“””””…..Dennis Dunton says:
September 24, 2012 at 8:31 pm
E M Smith…I really enjoy your posts. They are usually on topic and insightful.
Having said that…you obviously have no clue how the Sled at a Truck/Tractor Pull works. LOL…..”””””
And Dennis, you obviously have no clue how to spell George E. Smith. But as a matter of fact I do indeed know exactly how the sled works in the truck/tractor pull; it’s just in the heat of the moment, my short term memory couldn’t recall the word sled, so I punted with the blade instead.
But I have to say that a monster truck/tractor pull, is my kind of entertainment; on a par with WWF wrestling, as a totally decadent fun recreation.

Matt in Houston
September 25, 2012 5:23 pm

4000 years of computer simulations…ROFLMAO
I am pretty sure JC would’ve mentioned this in the Bible or perhaps Nero could’ve used themthere compooters to save Rome from burning. /sarc
Seriously- this looked interesting right up until the 4000 years of computer simulation gibberish and it got worse from there. There may well be a real phenomena worth studying, but the testable hypothesis has to be established before creating a clusterf1*k of a model to claim they’ve proved anything. Test and measure, test and measure…where do these people learn how to do science.
Sorry, another engineer that is tired of this non-sense .

September 25, 2012 6:07 pm

“Reichler’s study ventured into new territory by asking if changes in stratospheric polar vortex winds impart heat or cold to the sea, and how that affects the sea.”
More relevant is the effects of winds on sea currents and surface water movements, depending on the condition of the AO and NAO, which when negative result in higher sea surface temperatures in the North Atlantic, with the region just below Greenland showing particular sensitivity. A negative NAO in summer correlates well with increased Arctic summer ice loss.
Sudden Stratospheric Warmings are generally more dependent upon a negative AO than they are an easterly QBO, but when they occur on an east QBO with +AO and +NAO as in early 2008, there is no discernible warming of the sea surface around Greenland:
http://weather.unisys.com/archive/sst/
http://www.geo.fu-berlin.de/en/met/ag/strat/produkte/northpole/index.html

E.M.Smith
Editor
September 26, 2012 5:36 pm

Dennis Dunton says:
E M Smith…I really enjoy your posts. They are usually on topic and insightful.
Having said that…you obviously have no clue how the Sled at a Truck/Tractor Pull works. LOL

Um, that was my distant cousin George E. Smith, not me…
I know how tractor pulls work, having watched many (some of which I remember as the beer ran out early 😉 and grown up in farm country. First motorized vehicle I drove on my own was a blue and grey Ford Tractor (about 9? years old)… at about 3 years I had a ‘tricycle’ that was a green John Deere tractor and a Little Red Wagon I’d tie onto the back…. Really hated it when I grew too big for it…
The mechanism that moves the weight on the sled progressively over the blade / skid is ‘interesting’… (While most have a sled, I’ve seen some with a blade used for the Monster Tractors that have 4 or more engines and too much HP for a sled to stop them…)
Oh, and it’s worth a mention that these events were being done with horses prior to the use of Diesel and Gas tractors… (Family used to farm with Very Large Horses… Amish and all…)
Berényi Péter and ROM:
So true. IMHO, it’s Drake Passage that makes all the difference. Southern circumpolar current whacks into it and sends a cold shiver up the spine of South America, then out into the central Pacific. That’s the driver of the rest. Wilson showed that Length Of Day changes in correlation with solar cycle. That means “things slop then”, so what gets shoved at the Strait changes… it can only take so much.
Also, IMHO, the “driver” of that process is the lunar orbital mechanics. (i.e. tidal changes). That it is driven by the same planetary motions that change solar output gives the ‘correlation’ between solar cycles and weather (climate) cycles.
http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2010/12/22/drakes-passage/
http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2011/11/03/lunar-resonance-and-taurid-storms/
links to this paper that details the lunar cycle:
http://www.pnas.org/content/97/8/3814.full

The 1,800-year oceanic tidal cycle: A possible cause of rapid climate change
Charles D. Keeling* and
Timothy P. Whorf
We propose that such abrupt millennial changes, seen in ice and sedimentary core records, were produced in part by well characterized, almost periodic variations in the strength of the global oceanic tide-raising forces caused by resonances in the periodic motions of the earth and moon. A well defined 1,800-year tidal cycle is associated with gradually shifting lunar declination from one episode of maximum tidal forcing on the centennial time-scale to the next. An amplitude modulation of this cycle occurs with an average period of about 5,000 years, associated with gradually shifting separation-intervals between perihelion and syzygy at maxima of the 1,800-year cycle. We propose that strong tidal forcing causes cooling at the sea surface by increasing vertical mixing in the oceans. On the millennial time-scale, this tidal hypothesis is supported by findings, from sedimentary records of ice-rafting debris, that ocean waters cooled close to the times predicted for strong tidal forcing.

And a whole lot more. WELL worth time reading it and looking at the graphs…
So we’ve got a bunch of things that “all change together when they change” from solar output to UV levels to rotation rate (LOD) to tides to… and all driven by the planetary positions and orbital resonance locking it all together.
Wiggle matching can not sort out which does how much nor ascribe proportional causality.
Good luck sorting it all out in the context of stochastic resonance and chaotic processes…

george e smith
September 27, 2012 12:56 am

“””””…..E.M.Smith says:
September 26, 2012 at 5:36 pm
Dennis Dunton says:
E M Smith…I really enjoy your posts. They are usually on topic and insightful.
Having said that…you obviously have no clue how the Sled at a Truck/Tractor Pull works. LOL
Um, that was my distant cousin George E. Smith, not me……..”””””
We can share it Cuzz, specially since we both know how Monster Truck/Tractor pulls work, besides, we Smiths have to stick together.