More climate idiocy from California

Source: US Department of Energy

If the looming spectre of rising electricity prices due to CARB’s upcoming “cap and trade” isn’t enough, now the Department of Water resources has opted to be less efficient by giving low cost electricity the boot. Somebody else will buy it, so there’s no net savings other than banking “feel good” capital.

From the green section of the Chico News and Review:

Coal-fired plant gets the boot

Department of Water Resources will not renew lease with Nevada plant

This article was published on 06.21.12.

California’s Department of Water Resources will not renew a lease with the coal-burning Reid Gardner Power Station in Moapa Valley, Nev., as part of a recently released climate action plan.

The department aims to cut carbon emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050, and the Reid Gardner plant, which has served the State Water Project (the water system that diverts water from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta), accounts for one-fourth of DWR’s total emissions, according to The Sacramento Bee. Water Resources will purchase more energy from renewable energy sources, the California Independent System Operator and Lodi Energy Center, a natural gas plant beginning operations this summer.

Reid Gardner had accounted for about 10 to 15 percent of DWR’s energy for the past 30 years. The contract with the company expires in 2013.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
120 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
kakatoa
June 21, 2012 2:09 pm

Anthony,
The DWP’s plan to meet the Cap and Trade goals is noted in their Climate Action Plan-
http://www.water.ca.gov/climatechange/docs/Final-DWR-ClimateActionPlan.pdf
So who will actually be paying for the power to move the water to the folks down south?

GlynnMhor
June 21, 2012 2:14 pm

Panic stricken carbon strangulation policies will be the ruin of the economy unless the politicians wake up (soon) to the reality that CO2 never was the Great Boogeyman it has been made out to be.
There’s been trivial (if any) global temperature increase for over a decade now…
http://tinyurl.com/7zwa2ne

Mike McMillan
June 21, 2012 2:14 pm

A valid hockey stick

Mark.R
June 21, 2012 2:14 pm

We pay 26c per KW now here in ChCh N.Z.

Lance
June 21, 2012 2:17 pm

shaking head….

Nerd
June 21, 2012 2:19 pm

Mr. Watt, Will this force you to leave California if they keep it up? I can’t imagine being able to afford electric bill..

rabbit
June 21, 2012 2:28 pm

Do Californians have some sort of death wish? Or are they sensible people who are being held hostage by a cadre of environmental radicals?

June 21, 2012 2:36 pm

This is what I pay in England
first 219 kWh units used at 26.63p each = 41 $US cent
next XYZ kWh units used at 11.22p each =17.4 $US cent

John
June 21, 2012 2:50 pm

Do you have a link to the source of the price of electricity graph please.

David
June 21, 2012 2:52 pm

I think it’s a little premature to assume this will increase their cost for electricity and I can actually see some benefit to California from this.
Water Resources will purchase more energy from renewable energy sources, the California Independent System Operator and Lodi Energy Center, a natural gas plant beginning operations this summer.
I’m betting that most of that “more energy” will be coming from Lodi. I believe the natural gas is going to remain cheap for a good long time (thank you fracking). In addition, you’ve now got a large energy consumer in California, switching their power source from a plant in Nevada to a plant inside California. Keeps the money in state.

scarletmacaw
June 21, 2012 2:53 pm

Anthony, why are you still living in Kalifornia?

Hoser
June 21, 2012 2:56 pm

kakatoa says:
June 21, 2012 at 2:09 pm

The answer is desal. But, the reality is, the coastal communities will have to force Sacto to build the power generation required. The CA Energy Commission and Coastal Commission will have to be put on a leash (better to abolish them).
rabbit says:
June 21, 2012 at 2:28 pm

The elites want a private playground. They think they can keep people away from their exclusive areas. They created the CA Coastal Commission to allow special people to live near the beach without the annoying masses (like us) nearby.

Robert j. Sandor
June 21, 2012 2:59 pm

As residential users, in Northern California we are paying $.34 per kWh at the margin. Essentially they sell you the first package of kWh hours at $.13 (called the baseline), but it is usually just enough power to make a couple of pieces of toast. The PUC/PGE cabal then gets to claim an average rate of $.19.
However, most households use way beyond the baseline. I can’t even begin to imagine a family of four who can live within the “baseline”.
In our house (no air conditioning, mostly CFL lighting, gas appliances) essentially our monthly bill is $400 just for electricity.
Given the national average of $.11, it’s just a scam to enrich PG&E, and help make the bogus case for residential solar installs. California is going to fail, it is doing everything to drive residents and businesses out of the state.

Hoser
June 21, 2012 3:02 pm

Oh, yes, I nearly forgot. Texas domestic power prices went up 50% after becoming the state with the most wind generation capacity. Thanks to Enron Wind (now GE), T Boone Pickens, and Rick Perry.
http://www.masterresource.org/2009/03/governor-rick-perry-r-tx-t-boone-pickens-and-the-enron-legacy-of-windpower/

ursus augustus
June 21, 2012 3:04 pm

About as logical as stuffing toothpaste back into its tube with a toothpick because they share the word ‘tooth’. Meanwhile Californians with drive hither and thither in their tens of millions in their cars between ariconditioned/heated homes and airconditioned/heated workplaces and generally gobble up the brainless bling of modern consumer society as they upsize their lives to obese pointlessness. Shhh, dont mention the banality of it all. Its the economy stupid, i.e. its a stupid, uneconomic economy. Just because AGW is largely bulldust and this sort of moronic policy probably counterproductive rather than just pointless does not mean there are no good reasons to reconsider bad habits.

crosspatch
June 21, 2012 3:21 pm

What is absolutely the most idiotic thing about these measures is that they are extremely expensive and will have no impact whatsoever on the environment. The amount of CO2 emissions removed from the atmosphere is such an absolutely miniscule amount that it is not only negligible, it is completely immeasurable. They will make absolutely no difference whatsoever. In fact, the Moapa decision will likely have NO impact at all, not even theoretically because it will still be there producing power, it will just mean cheaper power for people in Nevada.
What this IS going to do is move the tech industry out of California. Silicon Valley is going to end up looking like portions of the central valley after the irrigation water was shut off. They are killing their own golden goose. These people are so absolutely dumb yet believe they are the smart ones. Just insane.

garymount
June 21, 2012 3:30 pm

@ursus augustus
It’s a bad habit to heat / cool your home / workplace ?

June 21, 2012 3:32 pm

California was recently voted worst state to do business in by a survey of executives. The state is stupid all over, not just when it comes to energy production. They are determined to become environmental heroes, even if that means further bankrupting an already bankrupt state. Problem is, they don’t know how to go about reducing carbon emissions, assuming there is some benefit from doing so. Two easy ways : build nuclear plants, or natural gas plants. Natural gas plants produce about half the carbon emissions of a coal plant and nowadays are relatively cheap.
Nuclear plants are the cheapest – their operating costs dropped below coal in 1999 and are now about 33% cheaper than coal. uranium fuel costs run around half a cent per kilowatthour, total operating costs around 3 cents. Natural gas is somewhere around 5 cents I believe. There are currently 465 nuclear plants either currently being built, in the planning/siting stages or being planned for the future. China, India, Russia, and Britain have the largest number. With all those plants at Gen3+ or Gen 4 technology, fears of accidents can be laid to rest. California has rather stupidly believed their own propaganda concerning the cost of solar and wind – they produce simple minded analyses that disregard the high costs that must be borne by introducing an uncontrollable power source into the grid – regardless of how much wind and solar they generate, not one single controllable power plant can be shuttered. One may save on fuel costs, but often the larger cost of operating a plant (mortgage, maintenance, staffing, etc.) will be the same as it was when it was producing at full power, rather than simply being on line (and idling, consuming fuel) waiting for the uncontrollable power to sudddenly disappear – the wind dies down or goes away, clouds or storms shut off solar power (or darkness) . Britain recently determined that the
overall cost of wind was double what the wind proponents originally claimed it would be. It’s good to see California steering its population into a collision with reality. Gov Brown is just the dope to do just that, as he has proved in the past.

u.k.(us)
June 21, 2012 3:36 pm

If idocy drives everyone out of the state, who will pay the salaries of the rulers.
Sorry to be the wet blanket.

Owen
June 21, 2012 3:54 pm

For those expecting a continuation of cheap natural gas I believe you are going to be disappointed. From reading quite a bit about the largest player in the industry, Chesapeake, I’ve learned that natural gas in the U.S. is currently the only commodity in the world that sells below its cost of production. That cost is above $6.00 mcf for the lowest cost producers and $7-8 is not uncommon. There is currently a large over-supply for several reasons, but one of the biggest is that producers signed contracts back when natural gas was $12 mcf that required drilling to maintain the lease rights. Drilling activity has switched to liquids (oil). In Europe and Asia prices are at $10 mcf and the possibility of LNG exports is becoming more realistic. Expect substantially higher natural gas prices 3-5 years out, perhaps sooner. Oh, I need to add that with fracking you get 60-70% of the well’s production in the first year, much higher than conventional wells and another reason for the current over-supply.

Merovign
June 21, 2012 4:10 pm

There’s nothing wrong with California that can’t be fixed by moving the State government 1200 miles West.

D. J. Hawkins
June 21, 2012 4:12 pm

vukcevic says:
June 21, 2012 at 2:36 pm
This is what I pay in England
first 219 kWh units used at 26.63p each = 41 $US cent
next XYZ kWh units used at 11.22p each =17.4 $US cent

$0.41 per KWh equivalent?!? Ye gods and little fishes!!! I’d be looking to throw someone a blanket party for that!!

June 21, 2012 4:19 pm

Reblogged this on Public Secrets and commented:
We are ruled by such idiots. And it’s our fault for electing them.

Wally
June 21, 2012 4:27 pm

Here Australia, (A$ = US$ at the moment), our rates have just gone up 18.8% as of 1 July. New rates are approx 35 c / kW-hr at the Winter rate, and go to over 40 c / kW-hr at the peak summer rate.
Our rates also increase as you use more.

Tsk Tsk
June 21, 2012 4:31 pm

The beauty of that curve is that it gives businesses plenty of time to migrate out of the state. The net impact to national GDP will be small but to the state it will be devastating. I have to admit to some schadenfreude at seeing the greatest of all blue states slitting its own throat. Now if we could just fix the financial industry propping up New York that would do wonders for knocking out the other side of the coalition.

1 2 3 5