From NCDC’s spring report here
More record warmth as scientists warn of global tipping point – CNN.com
— It’s hot out there. But this time, it’s more than idle watercooler talk, according to weather scientists.
At the same time the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Climatic Data Center has released a report noting that this spring in the United States has been the warmest since record-keeping began in 1895, a group of scientists has published a paper in the journal Nature warning that the planet is approaching a critical tipping point because of climate and other factors.
Rampant population growth and changes to the environment caused by humans, including the burning of fossil fuels and the conversion of nearly 43% of the planet’s land to farms or cities, threaten to cause an abrupt and unpredictable shift in the global ecosystem, 22 scientists from five countries said in their paper.
In its report issued Thursday, the climate data center said the average U.S. temperature between March and May was 57.1 degrees, 5.2 degrees above the long-term average from 1901 to 2000.
While May was only the second-warmest on record, it was still in the top third for monthly average temperatures, marking 12 consecutive months with temperatures in that range, said Jake Crouch, a NOAA climate scientist.
“For that to happen 12 times in a row in a random circumstance is one in 540,000,” he said.
Globally, NOAA reported in May that the average temperature in April was 1.17 degrees warmer than the average from the past century, making it the fifth-warmest April since at least 1880.
It was the 326th consecutive month that global temperatures exceeded the 20th-century average, NOAA said.
The warm spring weather in the United States was partially the result of the waning La Niña, a pattern of below-average sea surface temperatures in the central Pacific that tends to help direct the high-level jet stream and influence weather patterns nationwide.
But it was also partially the result of long-term climate change, Crouch said.
“The pattern we’ve been in for the last 12 months is exactly what we would expect in climate change,” he said.
…
A shift in the biosphere is possible by 2100 if nothing is done to better predict changes and act upon them, said Anthony D. Barnosky, professor of integrative biology at the University of California, Berkeley and lead author on the Nature article.
“If we do nothing, I personally think we hit this tipping point,” Barnosky said Friday. “It means the world will be very different, losing biodiversity and (affecting where) species live in particular places.”
Full story here
================================================================
It is also interesting and a bit humorous to note this table at NCDC, where the word “coolest” is verboten.
For example:
| Nome, AK | 9.3 °F | 16.1 °F | -6.8 °F | -1.5σ | 99th warmest of 104 yrs |
5th coolest would be the way I would describe that.
Yes it was a warm spring. But not warm everywhere. But was it really driven by AGW, and was it “The pattern we’ve been in for the last 12 months is exactly what we would expect in climate change,” ?
This is the same sort of logic that is employed as we saw during the Russian Heat Wave of 2010.
![]()
One spot on the globe becomes the focal point and “proof” that AGW is happening. This gets touted in the media. Then later, a study comes out saying AGW wasn’t the main driver.
NOAA on the Russian heat wave: blocking high, not global warming
But that doesn’t get much attention because it doesn’t have a gloom and doom quality for MSM News.
But this was found to be based on a synoptic pattern, basically weather noise. This spring in the USA is no different. Even the father of global warming, Jim Hansen says the same thing: (hat tip to Chris Horner and the CEI FOIA efforts for us being able to see this email)
And here in the article excepted above, Jake Crouch, CNN, and other MSM outlets aren’t even talking about a full year, just three months.
“If it bleeds it leads”, was never more true.
Some graphs: (thanks to Joe D’Aleo, all data NCDC data)
The state monthly records through the end of the 2009.. This depicts the 12 monthly records for the 50 states (600 data points). There were likely March heat records set in some states and perhaps some other months so the 2010s will show and take away from some prior years.
The 1930s stands out as the hottest decade, the 1910s and 1950s were second, 1990s third and 1980s fourth. This decade doesn’t rank although it is early.
All time cold records look like this.
It seems the climate was much more variable, with more extremes in the 1930’s.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



![STATE_RECORDS[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/state_records1.jpg?resize=640%2C480&quality=83)
![ALL_TIME_STATE_RECORDS[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/all_time_state_records1.jpg?resize=483%2C371&quality=83)
![ALL_TIME_LOWS[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/all_time_lows1.jpg?resize=483%2C373&quality=83)
The weather here in low country South Carolina has been very cool for a typical June; my wife and I have both commented on how it “feels like the fall”.
Would it be a suprise if the twelve hottest days at any station in any year were consecutive. It would certainly be a suprise if they were evenly spread throughout the year. Why then should twelve consecutive years be anything unusual?
24 states warmest 12 months are pre-1950.
http://sunshinehours.wordpress.com/2012/06/07/noaa-12-warmest-consecutive-months-continental-48-as-of-may-2012/
TA. says:
June 9, 2012 at 11:18 am
Well, yes, sort of. Land temperatures are related to sea surface temperatures, given that Earth is mostly covered with water, there should be a coupling.
The PDO, being upwind of the US and larger than the Atlantic is also coupled. See these:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/09/30/amopdo-temperature-variation-one-graph-says-it-all/
And an admonition about computing correlations after smoothing data and water/air coupling is at
http://wmbriggs.com/blog/?p=2952
The AMO has a major impact on Atlantic hurricanes and things like the North Atlantic Oscillation sometimes has a major impact on northeast winters.
Sometimes when I read something like this I just feel like giving up.
Invariably, 10-20 people will pop up to the lab or catch me at the proverbial water cooler/coffee maker concerned for the future of the planet having just read some such nonsense as this. Do I take the time to explain the Zohnerism, again? Do I go through how not only is it “consistent with” anthropogenic climate change but also natural climate change, and weather for that matter, not to mention alien invasion protocol 7B-2.4J (lol), again? Do I express my deep disappointment that those being called scientists that present only part of the data, (like a prosecuting attorney might) but real scientists (unlike these authors) do not, again?
I ask myself, is it worth it? Then I think of my children and grandchildren.
[Self- Snip] Skippy It’s Worth It!
We will fight them in individual conversations. [i.e.: The Scientifically Literate Populace]
We will fight them in small to large group discussions. [i.e.: Monckton; Heartland]
We will fight them in the press. [i.e.: Heartland, Tisdale, Morano]
We will fight them in the blog sphere. [i.e.: WUWT, JoNova, CA]
We will fight them in the peer-reviewed literature. [ i.e.: Christy, Spenser, Lindzen]
We would fight them in open debate but they’re too cowardly.
We will still fight them anywhere we can.
And NEVER, EVER, give up.
Not to be nitpicking or anything, I take that back – I am nitpicking.
For something to be in the top third 12 times in a row, the odds are 1 in 3^12, and 3^12 is 531,441. He can’t help it – NOAA climate scientists always round up. 🙂
Curiously enough, to have 12 months all in the middle third is odds of 1 in 531,441, and gosh, for them to be in the lowest is also 1 in 531,441.
Of course, on this planet months are short enough so usually one month is not random compared to another month, but when there’s hype to be made, I guess it’s gotta be made, if you’re a NOAA climate scientist. And when you’re comparing to all of the 20th century, well, I think we’re still recovering from the Little Ice Age on top of various human related warming processes and it’s a lot more likely to have twelve months in a row in the warmest third than the coolest third.
I still haven’t quite figured out what point tips when we reach a tipping point. From the full article, it doesn’t seem to be that we turn into another Venus. I think that’s what the early tipping point was. We seem to have one tipping point per NOAA climate scientist now.
Spring is not so warm when I still have my heat on in June. We were supposed to come back from the Bahamas at the end of April. I changed our return to the end of May as Southern Ontario was having “winter snow storms” at the end of April. We came home on May 25th which was a nice warm afternoon but i could feel the cold air coming in the windows that night. Woke up the next morning, screaming, as it was 14 C and I hadn’t turned the heat on. The heat is still on. I have lived through June’s where the heat was not on and it was warm. That is not happening this year. Last year was cold also. Yes, I know, temperature is regional. The fact that some of the US is enjoying a warm spring while the rest of the globe shivers is not a tipping point.
Another example of gruesome statistics misuse:
Jake Crouch, a NOAA climate scientist…“For that to happen 12 times in a row in a random circumstance is one in 540,000,” he said.
The statement implies a normal and random distribution, neither of which apply.That has been discussed above by other WUWT readers. A scientist who does not apply the correct statistical procedures is not a scientist.
So do I believe that the result claimed was “just random natural temperature swings?” Not in a million years. After studying WUWT (and other sources) for over a year, I attribute this this warming trend, not to any real improvement in temperature (and it would be good news if true), nor to any part of CAGW, but to cherry picking the data, cherry picking the comparison points (top third of months), elimination of the coldest 2/3 of the weather stations, urban heat island and other machinations to fight the cognitive dissonance that would occur should Jake ever take a genuinely scientific look at the data.
Bloody cold and wet here in England maybe some folk could remind Hansen, NOAA et al that the USA is not the World?
Remember ‘food’? We eat is sometimes.
I am not sure if you all heard that the extraordinary cold during fruit tree flowering in the NE US and Southern Ontario has killed about 80% of the fruit crop in the bud, literally. Our apple tree has only two apples this year, both nestled inside the densest leaf cover. Cold killed the rest of the flowers. What survives will be marked or stunted or both.
I am not sure if the cold was ‘record’ but the losses will be. Over $100m it is said. It is warm now – already better than the whole of 2010 – but the birds are nesting late. Bad sign. The long term records show no change in decades. But we still need to eat.
The recent heat wave visualized for Canada:
http://sunshinehours.wordpress.com/2012/06/09/the-recent-heat-wave-in-canada/
“… the recent heat wave that is making headlines is like a red wave that engulfs most of Canada and then retreats back to the north and eastern Canada”
Perhaps the tipping point that they keep referring to is the point where they tip all their garbage pseudo science papers into the bin and go and do some real work like cleaning gum off the pavements.
“For that to happen 12 times in a row in a random circumstance is one in 540,000,”
Well, yeah, maybe so. But if you actually look at climatic “circumstances”, you notice that they’re not “random circumstances” but parts of a curve made up of a lot of cycles and other influences, mostly related to our little planet’s being part of a big solar system trundling around our local galaxy. But of course 12 high readings on a curve which has been trending gently upwards for over a century is … (yawn) … really no more than you’d expect.
Next? (says he, knowing full well there’ll be one …) (okay, lots …)
A shift in the biosphere is possible by 2100 if nothing is done to better predict changes and act upon them,
=====
A hundred years ago…..people were complaining about the cold…..I don’t remember anyone complaining about the increase in biodiversity
Warmists have told me time and again that the USA is only a small part of the globe. Now it’s significant. That’s the ticket.
Here, May was a bit above average on temp, but June has been very pleasant. That’s the weather for ya. Systems come and systems go but unless you have observed a complete synchronous cycle of all the natural patterns (probably in the 60 to 25000 year range {slight sarc on the width of the range}) can you really attribute today’s temperature to any particular parameter at all? You can guess, and you can probably eliminate many variables, but to say “these two things right here cause all of this” is preposterous!
Am I wrong or didn’t a whole swag of some of the coldest weather reporting stations just disappear following the collapse of the Soviet Union ?
That in itself would cause a warm bias in modern records if the old Soviet Bloc (presumably some of the coldest) records are still in the historical dataset.
Not to worry. I have it on good authority that Quetzalcoatl will be stopping by this Dec, to straighten all this out 😉
43% my sweet patootie. I believe, though, that they’ve just demonstrated that 38% of statistics are made up on the spot.
“If we do nothing…”
What do you suggest we do? Cull?
@DiskoTroop
The 43% figure for “disrupted” land surface comes from the following paper which I’ll admit that I have not read.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v486/n7401/full/nature11018.html
Still, from the abstract there is a lot of discussion of something called “state shift”. I would hope their paper gives us a complete run down of how they might determine “state shift” as well as how much “state shift” nature is applying and how much humans are applying. My quick analysis of the abstract indicates to me that none of this has been done and we most likely have a case of some sort of back room conjuring of which in the Journal Nature 50 years ago would have been immediately tossed out as junk science.
Bernie
Oh and the Berkeley Newscenter reports that this paper is written by 22 internationally known scienctist and that it validates all the scary tipping point predictions. It hasta be good! Right?
http://newscenter.berkeley.edu/2012/06/06/scientists-uncover-evidence-of-impending-tipping-point-for-earth/
Lots of stuff to feed the media with here.
Bernie
Once again we find that weather is climate but only if it helps ‘the cause ‘
They can’t even stick to their own dam ideas on what is and what is not climate .
Steven Kopits says:
June 9, 2012 at 10:41 am
For those interested in the topic: An article on the economics of self-driving electric vehicles I wrote for Foreign Policy:
“How the Electric, Self-Driving Miracle Car Will Change Your Life”
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/06/08/self_driving_car?page=0,0
_____________________________________
I had a “Self driving” vehicle for about twenty years. A pair of Saddlebred mares trained to voice commands. Top speed 15 MPH and would do 40 miles on a bale of hay easy.
Caleb says:
June 9, 2012 at 11:06 am
I thought Hansens email was more recent. It’s from 2007. Lord knows how many readjusted adjusted adjustments have occurred since then.
_______________________________________
Hansen is really good at doing adjustments GRAPHS