Record Rainfall? No, A Damp Squib!

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

After three months of apocalyptic media stories, flood warnings and amber alerts, you would be excused for thinking we have just had the wettest winter in the UK since Noah slipped anchor! Even now the Met Office are describing it as “among the wettest on record”.

But the Met Office numbers tell a different story. In reality, it turns out to have been no different to many other winters in the past.

Over the country as a whole, it was only the 20th wettest on record since 1836. As always, some parts have been wetter than others.

Weeks on end of bitter, polar air over much of the US pushed the jetstream far south of its usual track, while at the same time firing it up. As a result, storms have homed in on the southern half of Britain rather than further north. But even then, no region broke any rainfall records, nor even came close.

Desperate to keep up the alarm however, the Met Office have decided that the West Midlands, Cornwall and Leicestershire all experienced their wettest winter since records began in 1837. There’s only one problem here – there are no current stations in any of these regions which have data as far back as 1837, or even the 19th century for that matter. In Leicestershire, for example, they have just one official weather station – Market Bosworth, which has only been open since 2002! There is no data at all to support their assertions, which only originate from their dodgy computer models.

We do however have a long-term record at Radcliffe College, Oxford, which has been keeping meticulous records every day since 1767. The Met Office database, which begins in 1853, confirms that there was nothing at all unusual about this winter’s rainfall there.

This totally contradicts their claim that this particular area of the country had one of its wettest winters on record.

https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/pub/data/weather/uk/climate/stationdata/oxforddata.txt

There are in fact very few long running weather stations in the UK. Four others have data going back to the 1800s, and none back up the Met Office claims that the winter was one of the wettest on record – Armagh, Durham, Sheffield and Cambridge ranked 14th, 35th, 19th and 24th wettest respectively.

The Met Office continue to claim that climate change is making rainfall more extreme:

While this winter’s weather has been heavily influenced by natural variability and atmospheric patterns, climate change provides important context.

A warmer atmosphere can hold more moisture, approximately 7% more for every degree Celsius of warming. This means that when it does rain, downpours can be heavier and more intense.

https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/about-us/news-and-media/media-centre/weather-and-climate-news/2026/dull-and-mild-february-brings-a-wet-winter-to-a-close

But their own data fails to bear this out. For instance, if we look at the wettest months in England & Wales, those with more than 170mm of rain, they are not occurring more often than they used. Nor are they becoming wetter.

The wettest month this winter was January, with 144.3mm, not an unusually high monthly total at all. In fact, it is more than two years since we had a month with more than 170mm.

https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadukp/data/download.html

Last year, we had a dry, sunny start to the year. This year, it has been dank and miserable.

But neither have anything to do with climate change. It is just weather.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 7 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
18 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
March 7, 2026 10:13 pm

Too dry — Climate Change®
Too wet — Climate Change®
Too cold — Climate Change®
Too warm — Climate Change®
Too truthful — Climate Denier!

Robertvd
Reply to  Shoki
March 8, 2026 3:31 am

Too average – Climate Change®

Scarecrow Repair
March 7, 2026 10:13 pm

Why do they and so many other agencies lie like this? I doubt Paul Homewood is the only one calling them out. They must know the truth will out. I understand the media lies; they probably don’t even know there’s any controversy over the accuracy.

And I don’t buy them lying because they are intentionally trying to deceive the public. There are some higher-ups who want to push the catastrophe narrative, but down at the grunt level of some drone typing up the press releases, I doubt they know it’s all lies.

So who is pushing this? Is it those higher-ups passing down memos about expanding the crisis coverage, and it gets translated by layers of bureaucracy until the drone gets a memo about record rainfall?

Bryan A
Reply to  Scarecrow Repair
March 8, 2026 12:44 am

Likely it’s the lower down drones (Liberal Socialist Media Reporters) that are writing what their editors tell them to…if they want to remain employed!

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Bryan A
March 9, 2026 7:21 am

Just like climate researchers produce the results stipulated in the grant paperwork.

Bryan A
March 8, 2026 12:41 am

A warmer atmosphere can hold more moisture, approximately 7% more for every degree Celsius of warming. This means that when it does rain, downpours can be heavier and more intense.

But if warmer atmosphere can “Hold” more moisture, wouldn’t it stand to reason that the same “Warmer Atmosphere” would also still retain more of that same moisture…even while raining?

March 8, 2026 4:07 am

Last year the UK was the driest spring for ages and I lost of lot of plants. This year its the wettest winter for ages.

In Britain climate change is an annual – if not a daily – occurrence.

Reply to  Leo Smith
March 8, 2026 5:25 am

Just like New England only the weather here is more extreme and always has been.

Reply to  Leo Smith
March 8, 2026 9:20 am

Yes, at my hometown on the Welsh border the river dried up this summer, this winter there have been multiple floods with travel to nearby towns impossible.

Anthony Banton
March 8, 2026 4:18 am

The Met Office continue to claim that climate change is making rainfall more extreme:
While this winter’s weather has been heavily influenced by natural variability and atmospheric patterns, climate change provides important context.
A warmer atmosphere can hold more moisture, approximately 7% more for every degree Celsius of warming. This means that when it does rain, downpours can be heavier and more intense.

But their own data fails to bear this out. For instance, if we look at the wettest months in England & Wales, those with more than 170mm of rain, they are not occurring more often than they used. Nor are they becoming wetter.

Nice pick of criteria Mr Homewood, but of course obscures the full facts. Winter precip comes from dynamical rain brought by the Atlantic PJS and the “wetness” of winter would be correlated with the persistence of SW’ly winds bringing moist air within Tm and Rpm air masses. And so correlated with those air mass frequencies (itself correlated with a -ve NAO which pushes the PJS futher south), but also with SST’s in the N Atlantic.

comment image

comment image

comment image

“Using the 1×1 km gridded climate data from the UKMO here are four bar charts of precipitation for each of the meteorological seasons in the UK from 1836 to 2025. I’ve also added a simple linear trend for the last 30 years to help identify any recent changes in each of the seasons.
Winters[DJF] are getting wetter by 19.1 mm each decade since 1996.”

“Record Rainfall? No, A Damp Squib!”

Not a “damp squib” in the south ….

comment image

Mr.
Reply to  Anthony Banton
March 8, 2026 5:46 am

The PJS?

Splitters!!

Reply to  Anthony Banton
March 8, 2026 6:22 am

Nice pick of criteria Mr Homewood, but of course obscures the full facts.

Obscuring facts, right!

Let’s talk about your random use of modeling to generate graphs. Your first shows anomalies. Generally, an increase from 0.2 to 0.8. That is 6 tenths of a degree calculated by using several averages. Perhaps you don’t realize that averaging is a smoothing function when only the means are shown.

Averaging hides all the variance in the data that was used in the average. Using averaged data as input to a second model be it another average or a regression destroys the uncertainty contained in the actual data. I will guarantee that the total uncertainty that should be propagated will far exceed the values you are graphing.

I have harped on this incessantly. I am sure folks are tired of hearing me. Here is a recent portion of text from a “class” that a real statistician, W. M. Briggs has online and in YouTube. You would do well to listen to it and read the blog summary when it is available online. I receive blog transcripts early by subscribing.

(194) Uncertainty & Probability Theory The Logic Of Science – YouTube

The second is smoothing, which we can call Models of Models of Models. The idea is simple. If you model data and then use that model as input to a second model, or then a third and so on in a great Daisy Chain Of Science, and do not carry forward the uncertainty, then your end result, the Final Boss Model, will be wrong.

For the life of me, I cannot see how this is not obvious. Okay, that’s a double negative. Stated positively, I think it is plain as sunshine. Yet I used to have such fights over this. You will not be surprised (I hope) to learn that forgetting uncertainty led to mini-panics in what we used to call global warming (a phrase in common use before people realized a slight increase in temperature was a welcome thing).

Every time you average without including and propagating the uncertainty, you are only fooling yourself and misleading others as to what you really know about the data. Every time you rely on a regression to show accurate information as if it was real data you are fooling yourself also.

Reply to  Anthony Banton
March 8, 2026 8:33 am

I’m curious, what was the temperature of the UK yesterday?

Bryan A
Reply to  Anthony Banton
March 8, 2026 9:22 am

Perhaps no a “Damp Squib” in the south but not “Record Rainfall” either.
Probably brought about some of the best “Air” London has seen in a while.

March 8, 2026 5:22 am

Many historically dry areas on the planet would be happy to have somewhat more rain than average.

March 8, 2026 4:11 pm

Over the country as a whole, it was only the 20th wettest on record since 1836.

20th out of 189. Surely that would put it into the the bracket of “among the wettest on record”.

They didn’t say it was ‘the wettest‘.

And then the old ‘let’s highlight one station that wasn’t particularly wet and pretend that therefore nowhere was particularly wet‘ non sequitur.

Honestly’ how do people still fall for this stuff?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  TheFinalNail
March 9, 2026 7:26 am

As usual, you spin. You are conflating the analysis of the MET report with what the MET report actually said.

Honestly, how do you still fail on these topics?

Sparta Nova 4
March 9, 2026 7:19 am

Can hold more moisture. Of course, but that does not mean it results in precipitation. That process is much more complex that relative humidity.